|
|
PUBLIC HEARING: SB 511, SB 493, SB 847 |
|
|
PUBLIC HEARING AND WORK SESSION: SJR 13 |
|
|
TAPES 89-91,
A-B |
April 10,
2003 1:00 PM STATE CAPITOL BUILDING
Members Present: Senator Ryan Deckert, Chair
Senator Ted
Ferrioli, Vice Chair
Senator
Tony Corcoran
Senator
Lenn Hannon
Senator
Charlie Ringo
Senator
Bruce Starr
Witnesses Present: Senator Peter Courtney, District 11
Bruce
Warner, Department of Transportation
Jim
Botwinis, Oregon State Police Officers’ Association
Ron
Ruecker, Superintendent, Oregon State Police
Chuck
Hayes, Oregon State Police
John
Ledger, Associated Oregon Industry
Andrea
Fogue, League of Oregon Cities
Bill
Pinhollow, Association of Oregon Counties
Senator
Schrader, District 20
Representative
Prozanski, District 8
Randy
Tucker, 1000 Friends of Oregon
Barbara
McAusland, Deschutes County
Jan
Auxier, Deschutes County
Robb
Reavill, Deschutes County
Bill
Boyer, Friends of Deschutes County
Jim
Long, Friends of North Plains
Don
Ganer, Beaverton Citizens for School Support
Laurie
Wimmer Whelan, Oregon Education Association
Ed
Dennis, Chief of Staff, Superintendent of Public Instruction
Gary
Conkling, Beaverton and Hillsboro School Districts
David
Dodds, Mayor, West Linn
Chuck
Adams, Resident of West Linn
Richard
Reid, Alternatives to Growth Oregon
Jeff
Winston, Washington County
Laura
Weiss, Oregon Environmental Council
Dexter
Johnson, Legislative Counsel
Will
Newman, Oregon Sustainable Agriculture Land Trust
Bradley
Witt, Oregon AFL-CIO
Paulette
Pyle, Oregonian for Food and Shelter
Jean
Wilkinson, Oregon Farm Bureau Association
Julie
Brandis, Association of Oregon Industries
Staff Present: Paul
Warner, Legislative Revenue Office
Mazen
Malik, Legislative Revenue Office
Richard
Yates, Legislative Revenue Office
Steve
Meyer, Legislative Revenue Office
Tara
Lantz, Committee Assistant
TAPE
89, SIDE A
|
004 |
Chair Deckert |
Calls meeting to order at 1:16pm. |
OPENS PUBLIC HEARING ON SB
863
|
016 |
Richard Yates |
Explains SB 863 which authorizes
common and Union high school districts, upon district elector approval, to
impose real estate transfer tax on transfers of real property within the
district. Exhibit 1. |
CLOSES PUBLIC HEARING ON SB
863
OPENS PUBLIC HEARING ON SJR
13
|
030 |
Sen. Hannon |
Discusses past legislation that has
reduced funding for state police enforcement of highways and freeways. States
that if this legislation passes a bill to raise speed limits, there needs to
be a bill to adequately fund highway policing. Discusses a change in language
he would like to see before passage of the bill. |
|
|
|
|
|
096 |
Sen. Courtney |
Discusses editorial which showed
that Oregon has the lowest number of police per capita in the nation and
states that the general fund will not be able support essential programs
unless they find another source of revenue. Discusses differences in highway
patrol and the state police force. Testifies in support of SJR 13 because it
would take pressure off the general fund which needs to support K-12
education and other essential programs. |
|
|
|
|
|
170 |
Sen. Hannon |
States that it would be his desire
to come back in the 2005 session if SJR 13 passes and find a specific funding
source that would increase over its current level the money dedicated for
this public service. |
|
|
|
|
|
194 |
Sen. Ringo |
Asks where they should get money for
parks. |
|
|
|
|
|
200 |
Sen. Hannon |
Responds that lottery funds are
dedicated to parks. |
|
|
|
|
|
210 |
Sen. Ringo |
Expresses support for SJR 13 but
wanted to address parks. |
|
|
|
|
|
214 |
Sen. Courtney |
Responds that our parks are
inadequate and that if this passes it could free up money from the general
fund to support the parks. |
|
|
|
|
|
229 |
Sen. Starr |
States that registration fees from
recreation vehicles goes to fund parks. |
|
|
|
|
|
257 |
Bruce Warner |
Testifies in support of SJR 13
because safety is one of the most important issues for the Department of
Transportation including adequate policing of the state highway system.
Discusses statistics of accidents. Refer to written testimony. Exhibit 4. |
|
|
|
|
|
298 |
Jim Botwinis |
Testifies in favor of SJR 13 with
amendments to dedicate the funds to State policing because they have lost so
many troopers since being pulled from ODOT funding. Refer to written
testimony. Exhibit 5. |
|
|
|
|
|
353 |
Sen. Starr |
Asks how other states fund highway
patrols. |
|
|
|
|
|
355 |
Botwinis |
Responds that most are funded
through some sort of gas tax or some source other than the general fund. |
|
|
|
|
|
390 |
Ron Ruecker |
Testifies in support of SJR 13
because the Oregon State Police Department is in a desperate situation due to
lack of funding. |
TAPE 90, SIDE A
|
007 |
Chuck Hayes |
Testifies in support of SJR 13 with
amendments because there has been a significant increase in drivers and a
significant decrease in troopers in Oregon. Refer to written testimony. Exhibit
6. |
|
|
|
|
|
040 |
Sen. Deckert |
Asks if Hayes is concerned that they
have not had much success with putting measures on the ballot. |
|
|
|
|
|
047 |
Ruecker |
Responds that they have not referred
a bill out to the voters that is this specific. |
|
|
|
|
|
058 |
Hayes |
Agrees with Ruecker and discusses positive
public response that he has received. |
|
|
|
|
|
067 |
Sen. Ferrioli |
Expresses appreciation for both
displaced troopers who have maintained professionalism and the agency which
has kept its mission even during budget cuts. |
|
|
|
|
|
107 |
John Ledger |
Testifies in support of SJR 13 and
the amendments because they believe the lack of police on state highways has
reached a critical state and is a safety concern for tourism and employees. |
|
|
|
|
|
133 |
Andrea Fogue |
Testifies that SJR 13 is an
inadequate source of funding and that it takes away from the highway fund.
States that there is a significant amount of maintenance that needs to be
done on roads and bridges to keep them open and accessible. Refer to written
testimony. Exhibit 32. |
|
|
|
|
|
165 |
Bill Pinhollow |
Testifies that they need to narrow
the scope of the bill to ensure that future legislature’s don’t dig deep into
the existing highway funds and that a gas tax relates directly to the
maintenance of roads while a vehicle fee relates to the driver enforced by
the state police. |
CLOSES PUBLIC HEARING ON SJR
13
OPENS PUBLIC HEARING ON SB
511 AND SB 493
|
223 |
Sen. Ringo |
Discusses growth of Beaverton and Washington
County during the 1990’s and the costs associated with it. States that he
views system development charges as giving communities more local control and
local options and points out that they are optional. |
|
|
|
|
|
273 |
Sen. Schrader |
Testifies in support of SB 511 and
SB 493 because it is a powerful optional tool for local school districts to
fund services. Discusses affordable housing exemption. |
|
|
|
|
|
356 |
Sen. Deckert |
Asks how the exemption for
affordable housing works. |
|
|
|
|
|
376 |
Sen. Schrader |
Responds that they worked with the
affordable housing industry so that people with a certain income level would
have their houses excluded from the levying of a system development charge. |
|
|
|
|
|
399 |
Rep. Prozanski |
Testifies in favor of SB 511 because
it gives local communities the opportunity to decide if they want to impose
these fees and discusses personal experience with the police department
needing more options to provide services. |
TAPE 89, SIDE B
|
015 |
Sen. Ringo |
Asks if Eugene schools would use
this opportunity. |
|
|
|
|
|
016 |
Rep. Prozanski |
Responds positively. |
|
|
|
|
|
026 |
Randy Tucker |
Testifies in support of allowing
communities to recover costs associated with new development and discusses
system development charges. Refer to information on system development charges.
Exhibit 10. |
|
|
|
|
|
069 |
Sen. Ringo |
States that the law currently allows
system development charges for other things such as transportation and asks
why they are not allowed for schools. |
|
|
|
|
|
076 |
Tucker |
Responds that some things, such as
transportation are needed to even begin development and are considered
leading development. |
|
|
|
|
|
104 |
Barbara McAusland |
Testifies in support of SB 511
because Bend is in desperate need for more schools even with several bonds
being passed in the last few years. Refer to written testimony. |
|
|
|
|
|
142 |
Jan Auxier |
Testifies in support of SB 511 on
behalf of senior citizens on a fixed income who are forced to pay for the
growth of communities. Refer to written testimony. Exhibit 12. |
|
|
|
|
|
192 |
Robb Reavill |
Testifies on behalf of James Clinton
in support of SB 511 citing Bend’s high growth grate and lack of funds to pay
for construction of new facilities and expanded services. Refer to written
testimony. Exhibit 13. |
|
|
|
|
|
221 |
Bill Boyer |
Testifies in support of SB 511
because areas of fast growth are especially in need, as development produces
rapid expansion while school construction lags behind. Refer to written
testimony. Exhibit 14. |
|
|
|
|
|
296 |
Jim Long |
Testifies in support of SB 511
because high growth has taken a toll on North Plains, which is has a lot of
people on fixed incomes. Expresses concern about affordable housing. |
|
|
|
|
|
316 |
Don Ganer |
Testifies in support of SB 511
because there has been consistent support for bond measures in Beaverton but
have had trouble passing them because of the double majority. States that
this would be a great tool. |
|
|
|
|
|
363 |
Laurie Wimmer Whelan |
Testifies in support of SB 511 and
SB 493 because it is a fair way to provide funding for high growth areas of
the state without negatively impacting other areas of the state. |
|
|
|
|
|
420 |
Ed Dennis |
Testifies in support of SB 511 and
SB 493 on behalf of the Superintendent of Public Instruction. |
|
|
|
|
|
446 |
Gary Conkling |
Testifies in support of SB 493 because
it is an additional financial tool for school districts. Discusses
differences between school impact fees and system development charges. Refer
to written testimony. Exhibit 15. |
TAPE 90, SIDE B
|
058 |
Dodds |
Testifies in support of SB 511.
Discusses letter writing campaign in support of SDC’s and positive responses.
Exhibit 16. |
|
|
|
|
|
089 |
Chuck Adams |
Testifies in support of SB 511
because it is merely allowing communities to make choices. Refer to written
testimony. Exhibit 20. |
|
|
|
|
|
104 |
Richard Reid |
Testifies in support of SB 511
because amortization of debt has grown larger and larger. Refer to written
testimony. Exhibits 17-18. |
|
|
|
|
|
131 |
Jeff Winston |
Testifies in support of SB 511
because new developments need to take responsibility for the school messes
they have created. Refer to written testimony. Exhibit 19. |
CLOSES PUBLIC HEARING ON SB
511 AND SB 493
OPENS PUBLIC HEARING ON SB
847
|
170 |
Sen. Ringo |
States that there are services, such
as pesticide reporting, that should be funded by fees if there is not enough
in the general fund. |
|
|
|
|
|
179 |
Laura Weiss |
Testifies in support of SB 847 with
amendments because it would provide non general fund dollars to support the
landmark pesticide use reporting system. Refer to written testimony. Exhibit
27. |
|
|
|
|
|
236 |
Sen. Ferrioli |
Points out that the relating clause
of the bill indicates that the bill can not be introduced in the Senate. |
|
|
|
|
|
241 |
Sen. Ringo |
Responds that they are allowed to
impose a tax if there is a reasonable nexus as to its use. |
|
|
|
|
|
274 |
Dexter Johnson |
Responds that you can have a public
hearing and pass a bill that is required to originate in the house, but it
would have a big defect. |
|
|
|
|
|
301 |
Sen. Deckert |
Points out that the -1 amendment
might solve the problem. |
|
|
|
|
|
305 |
Sen. Ferrioli |
Responds that you cannot modify the
relating clause. Discussion follows. |
|
|
|
|
|
320 |
Johnson |
States that a bill for raising
revenue must originate in the house, but a relating clause to taxation does
not mean that it must. |
|
|
|
|
|
340 |
Sen. Ringo |
Asks that if a bill imposes a charge
and those funds are donated to a program with some sort of nexus is it
permissible to originate in the Senate. |
|
|
|
|
|
345 |
Johnson |
Responds positively. Discussion follows. |
|
|
|
|
|
370 |
Will Newman |
Testifies in support of SB 847
because there is no data on the question of pesticides and that there is no
way to get the data without funding the program to obtain it. Refer to
written testimony. Exhibit 28. |
|
|
|
|
|
384 |
Brad Witt |
Testifies in support of SB 847
because there is a need for the data that the pesticide use reporting system
has been designed to produce in order to protect workers and endangered
species. Refer to written testimony. Exhibit 29. |
TAPE 91, SIDE A
|
015 |
Sen. Starr |
Asks if the -1 amendment eliminate
charging the fee to retailers such as home depot. |
|
|
|
|
|
024 |
Weiss |
Responds that there are some issues
in the amendments that don’t reflect the intent of the bill and discusses
retailer fees. Discussion follows. |
|
|
|
|
|
052 |
Paulette Pyle |
Testifies against SB 847 because
individuals, businesses, corporations, and associations rely on the availability
and economics of using pesticides. Expresses concern for amendments. Refer to
written testimony. Exhibit 30. |
|
|
|
|
|
076 |
Jean Wilkinson |
Testifies against SB 847 because
additional costs for farmers would be a great financial burden. |
|
|
|
|
|
101 |
Julie Brandis |
Testifies against SB 847 because
they oppose all specialty product taxes which put retailers in the awkward
position of collecting individual taxes. |
|
|
|
|
|
119 |
Marcia Keith |
Testifies in opposition to SB 847
because veterinarians use pesticides to treat animals, such as flea and tick
medication. |
CLOSES PUBLIC HEARING ON SB
847
|
133 |
Sen. Deckert |
Adjourns meeting at 3:14pm |
Tape Log Submitted by,
Tara Lantz, Committee Assistant
Exhibit Summary:
1.
SB 863, Richard Yates, Staff Measure Summary, 1p.
2.
SJR 13, Richard Yates, Staff Measure Summary, 1p.
3.
SJR 13, Richard Yates, Fiscal Impact Statement, 1p.
4.
SJR 13, Bruce Warner, Written Testimony, 1p.
5.
SJR 13, Jim Botwinis, Written Testimony, 4pp.
6.
SJR 13, Chuck Hayes, Written Testimony, 3pp.
7.
SB 511, Mazen Malik, Staff Measure Summary, 1p.
8.
SB 493, Steve Meyer, Staff Measure Summary, 1p.
9.
SB 511, Sharon Konopa, Written Testimony, 4pp.
10.
SB 511, Randy Tucker, System Development Charges Fact Sheet,
2pp.
11.
SB 511, Barbara McAusland, Written Testimony, 1p.
12.
SB 511, Jan Auxier, Written Testimony, 2pp.
13.
SB 511, Robb Reavill, Written Testimony from James Clinton,
1p.
14.
SB 511, Bill Boyer, Written Testimony, 2pp.
15.
SB 493, Gary Conkling, Written Testimony, 2pp.
16.
SB 511, David Dodds, Written Testimony, 3pp.
17.
SB 511, Written Testimony, 2pp.
18.
SB 511, Supplemental Testimony, 6pp.
19.
SB 493, Jeff Winston, 2pp.
20.
SB 511, Chuck Adams, Written Testimony, 2pp.
21.
SB 511, Jeff Boyer, Written Testimony, 2pp.
22.
SB 847, Richard Yates, Staff Measure Summary, 1p.
23.
SB 847, Richard Yates, Proposed SB 847-1 Amendments, 9pp.
24.
SB 847, Kirsten Jensen, Written Testimony, 1p.
25.
SB 847, Annie Hoy, Written Testimony, 2pp.
26.
SB 847, Lisa Hanson, Written Testimony, 1p.
27.
SB 847, Laura Weiss, Written Testimony, 3pp.
28.
SB 847, Will Newman, Written Testimony, 2pp.
29.
SB 847, Bradley Witt, Written Testimony, 6pp.
30.
SB 847, Paulette Pyle, Written Testimony, 2pp.
31.
SB 847, Andy Harris, Written Testimony, 1p.
32.
SJR 13, Andrea Fogue, Written Testimony, 2pp.