|
|
WORK SESSION: SB 391, SB 556, SB 807 |
|
|
TAPES 93-94,
A-B |
April 15,
2003 1:30 PM STATE CAPITOL BUILDING
Members Present: Senator Ryan Deckert, Chair
Senator Ted
Ferrioli, Vice Chair
Senator
Tony Corcoran
Senator
Lenn Hannon
Senator
Charlie Ringo
Senator
Bruce Starr
Witnesses Present: Senator Frank Shields, District 24
Carl
Meyers, Oregon Justice of the Peace Association
Senator
Vicki Walker, District 7
Gary
Bartholomew, Oregon Association of Tax Collectors
Dave
Canary, Garvey, Schubert, and Barer Law Firm
Dave
Carmichael, Attorney
Todd
Lebo, Real Estate Appraiser
Staff Present: Paul
Warner, Legislative Revenue Office
Mazen
Malik, Legislative Revenue Office
Steve
Meyer, Legislative Revenue Office
Tara
Lantz, Committee Assistant
TAPE
93, SIDE A
|
004 |
Chair Deckert |
Calls meeting to order at 1:36pm. |
OPENS WORK SESSION ON SB 391
|
035 |
Sen. Shields |
Explains SB 391, which establishes a
$25 fee for a marriage solemnized by a judicial officer of the state, county
judge, justice of the peace, city official, or county clerk to be placed in
the General Fund or with county and city treasurers. Discusses problems with
the original bill and the -1 amendment. Discusses further problems that need
to be addressed. |
|
|
|
|
|
069 |
Carl Meyers |
Discusses problems remaining with
the bill regarding justices of the peace and municipal courts. States that he
would be happy to clean up the bill on the house side. |
|
|
|
|
|
096 |
Sen. Shields |
States that he would make sure the
changes are made in the house and that the amendment proposed by Meyers makes
sense. |
|
|
|
|
|
111 |
Sen. Ferrioli |
MOTION: MOVES SB 391-1 AMENDMENTS
DATED 4/3/03 BE ADOPTED. |
|
|
|
|
|
131 |
Sen. Hannon |
Expresses concern that the money
goes to the general fund rather than the courts. |
|
|
|
|
|
157 |
Sen. Shields |
Responds that had he known about
that issue before he would have written an amendment and that if the
committee chooses he would make that change in the house at the same time as
fixing the other problems. Discussion follows. |
|
|
|
|
|
182 |
Sen. Deckert |
ORDER: HEARING NO OBJECTION, MOTION
PASSES: 6-0-0. |
|
|
|
|
|
191 |
Sen. Ferrioli |
MOTION: MOVES SB 391 TO THE SENATE
FLOOR WITH A DO PASS AS AMENDED RECOMMENDATION. |
|
|
|
|
|
187 |
Sen. Starr |
Asks for clarification on the bill. Discussion follows. |
|
|
|
|
|
209 |
Sen. Deckert |
ORDER: HEARING NO OBJECTION, MOTION
PASSES: 6-0-0. Sen. Shields will carry the bill on
the Senate Floor. |
CLOSES WORK SESSION ON SB
391
OPENS WORK SESSION ON SB 556
|
221 |
Mazen Malik |
Explains SB 556, which reduces the
rate of interest paid on certain property tax refunds and indexes interest
rate to changes in the commercial bank prime rate. |
|
|
|
|
|
243 |
Sen. Walker |
Testifies in support of SB 556.
Discusses opposition to the bill and compares Oregon’s interest rates to
surrounding states. Explains the -1 amendment, which takes out the daily
compounding. |
|
|
|
|
|
300 |
Sen. Deckert |
Asks about the intent of the bill |
|
|
|
|
|
306 |
Sen. Walker |
Responds that the intent of the bill
is to lower the rate of interest paid on tax refunds, because the rate of
interest in the market is so low. Discusses lack of funding for assessors. |
|
|
|
|
|
353 |
Gary Bartholomew |
Explains the -1 amendment. |
TAPE 94, SIDE A
|
006 |
Sen. Ferrioli |
Expresses concern with adjusting the
rate paid without proportionally adjusting the rate charged for delinquent
taxpayers. |
|
|
|
|
|
019 |
Sen. Walker |
Responds that there should be no
correlation between the two because the interest paid is to make up for lost
money and the interest charged is a penalty for not paying taxes on time. States
that the interest charged needs to be high to prevent delinquent taxpayers. |
|
|
|
|
|
055 |
Sen. Ferrioli |
Responds that the argument doesn’t
make any sense because a proportional spread would be providing the same four
percent to the jurisdiction regardless of what the rates would be. |
|
|
|
|
|
070 |
Sen. Ringo |
Asks if in talking about
proportional reduction he means reducing the interest rate for delinquent
taxpayers the same amount as reducing the interest rate for tax refunds. |
|
|
|
|
|
073 |
Sen. Ferrioli |
Responds affirmatively. |
|
|
|
|
|
083 |
Sen. Ringo |
States that he is not sure the
connection is so clear. |
|
|
|
|
|
094 |
Sen. Ferrioli |
States that a discount is a bigger
motivator than a big penalty. |
|
|
|
|
|
114 |
Sen. Walker |
Responds that the total interest
rate paid to the state is 12 percent which is not unreasonable considering
that many states charge interest and a penalty on top. |
|
|
|
|
|
150 |
Sen. Deckert |
Asks why there are a
disproportionate number of tax appeals in Lane County. |
|
|
|
|
|
156 |
Sen. Walker |
Responds that Lane County is
understaffed and has had a large number of industrial tax appeals. |
|
|
|
|
|
166 |
Bartholomew |
Discusses the discount referred to
by Sen. Ferrioli. Discussion follows. |
|
|
|
|
|
194 |
Malik |
Asks if the amendment addresses the
problem of changing the interest rate every year. |
|
|
|
|
|
200 |
Bartholomew |
Responds that by rounding it to the
nearest tenth, it reduces the chance of changing every year. |
|
|
|
|
|
219 |
Dave Canary |
Testifies in opposition to SB 556
because it is unfair to charge a higher rate than is being paid, and because it
penalizes everyone regardless of the reason. |
|
|
|
|
|
282 |
Sen. Ringo |
Asks about the Department of
Revenue’s policy for charging income tax penalties. |
|
|
|
|
|
290 |
Canary |
Responds that they have the
flexibility to look at each penalty case by case. |
|
|
|
|
|
298 |
Sen. Ringo |
Asks about payroll taxes. |
|
|
|
|
|
312 |
Canary |
Responds that he doesn’t know. |
|
|
|
|
|
315 |
Sen. Ringo |
States that there is a place for
penalties to encourage people to comply with deadlines. |
|
|
|
|
|
325 |
Canary |
Agrees but thinks that the situation
should be analyzed before a penalty is charged to see if there is a good
reason for being late. |
|
|
|
|
|
340 |
Sen. Ringo |
Asks if he would object to reducing
both the interest paid and interest charged and then put a penalty on top of interest
charged. |
|
|
|
|
|
350 |
Canary |
Responds negatively. States that he
believes the interest paid should be lower, but the interest charged should
also be reduced. Discusses figures which show that counties are collecting
more than they are paying out and costs to taxpayers in pursuing refunds. |
TAPE 93, SIDE B
|
030 |
Sen. Ringo |
Asks the typical reasons for being
delinquent on property taxes. |
|
|
|
|
|
033 |
Canary |
Responds that he typically
represents large utility and industrial companies that are not delinquent. |
|
|
|
|
|
043 |
Dave Carmichael |
Discusses cases where a penalty
should not be charged. |
|
|
|
|
|
065 |
Sen. Ringo |
Asks if Carmichael sees value in
seeing some penalty applying to delinquency.
|
|
|
|
|
|
067 |
Carmichael |
Responds affirmatively and discusses
historical link of delinquent and refund interest. Discussion follows. |
|
|
|
|
|
124 |
Carmichael |
Testifies that looking at other
states is only used when the state has no guidance. Discusses the history of
the statute. Refer to written testimony. Exhibit 7. |
|
|
|
|
|
175 |
Sen. Ringo |
Asks if the same group of people that
are seeking refunds are the ones that are delinquent. |
|
|
|
|
|
177 |
Carmichael |
Responds that the people that are
delinquent aren’t able to file for refunds. |
|
|
|
|
|
187 |
Sen. Ringo |
States that it seems that people who
seek refunds are not in financial distress and that people who are delinquent
are. Discussion follows. |
|
|
|
|
|
210 |
Sen. Ringo |
Asks why the two rates are linked. |
|
|
|
|
|
216 |
Carmichael |
Responds that they have historically
been linked. Discusses statements made in the public hearing that he believes
to be false. |
|
|
|
|
|
325 |
Todd Lebo |
Testifies against SB 556 because it
enhances distrust of taxpayers. |
|
|
|
|
|
385 |
Sen. Deckert |
States that they will not be moving
the bill this afternoon. |
CLOSES WORK SESSION ON SB
556
OPENS WORK SESSION ON SB 807
|
375 |
Sen. Ferrioli |
MOTION: MOVES SB 807-1 AMENDMENTS
DATED 3/18/03 BE ADOPTED. |
|
|
|
|
|
379 |
Sen. Deckert |
ORDER: HEARING NO OBJECTION, MOTION
PASSES: 4-0-2. SENATORS EXCUSED: HANNON, RINGO. |
|
|
|
|
|
383 |
Sen. Ferrioli |
MOTION: MOVES SB 807 TO THE SENATE
FLOOR WITH A DO PASS AS AMENDED RECOMMENDATION. |
|
|
|
|
|
388 |
Sen. Deckert |
ORDER: HEARING NO OBJECTION, MOTION
PASSES: 4-0-2. SENATORS EXCUSED: HANNON, RINGO. |
|
|
|
|
|
395 |
Sen. Deckert |
Adjourns meeting at 2:56pm. |
Tape Log Submitted by,
Tara Lantz, Committee Assistant
Exhibit Summary:
1.
SB 391, Paul Warner, Proposed SB 391-1 Amendments, 1p.
2.
SB 391, Paul Warner, Staff Measure Summary, 1p.
3.
SB 391, Paul Warner, Fiscal Impact Statement, 1p.
4.
SB 556, Mazen Malik, Proposed SB 556-1 Amendments, 1p.
5.
SB 556, Mazen Malik, Staff Measure Summary, 1p.
6.
SB 556, Mazen Malik, Revenue Impact Statement, 1p.
7.
SB 556, David Carmichael, Written Testimony, 7pp.
8.
SB 807, Steve Meyer, Proposed SB 807-1 Amendments, 1p.
9.
SB 807, Steve Meyer, Revenue Impact Statement, 1p.