|
|
INFORMATIONAL:
MAY 15 REVENUE FORECAST |
|
|
HOUSE
REVENUE TAPES 165-166, A-B |
May 15,
2003 9:00 AM STATE CAPITOL BUILDING
Members Present: Representative Lane Shetterly, Chair
Representative
Wayne Scott, Vice Chair
Representative
Joanne Verger, Vice Chair
Representative
Phil Barnhart
Representative
Vicki Berger
Representative
Pat Farr
Representative
Mark Hass
Representative
Elaine Hopson
Representative
Max Williams
Senator
Ryan Deckert, Chair
Senator
Ted Ferrioli, Vice Chair
Senator
Tony Corcoran
Senator
Charlie Ringo
Senator
Bruce Starr
Members Excused: Senator Lenn Hannon
Witness Present: Tom Potiowsky, State Economist
Michael
Kennedy, Revenue Economist
Staff Present: Paul
Warner, Legislative Revenue Office
Lizbeth
Martin-Mahar, Legislative Revenue Office
Tara
Lantz, Committee Assistant
TAPE 165, SIDE A
|
004 |
Chair Shetterly |
Calls meeting to order at 9:04 am. |
|
017 |
Tom Potiowsky |
Gives brief overview of the economic
forecast process (Exhibit 1, slide 2). |
|
|
|
|
|
041 |
Potiowsky |
Discusses U.S. business investment
from the last four years (Exhibit 1, slide 3). |
|
|
|
|
|
055 |
Potiowsky |
Discusses consumer sentiment
(Exhibit 1, slide 4). |
|
|
|
|
|
062 |
Potiowsky |
Discusses federal funds rate
(Exhibit 1, slide 5). |
|
|
|
|
|
072 |
Potiowsky |
Discusses recent news and national
economic recovery signs (Exhibit 1, slide 6). |
|
|
|
|
|
106 |
Potiowsky |
Discusses Oregon’s exports (Exhibit
1, slide 8). |
|
|
|
|
|
127 |
Potiowsky |
Discusses Oregon employment growth
(Exhibit 1, slide 9) and unemployment rates (Exhibit 1, slide 10). |
|
|
|
|
|
155 |
Potiowsky |
Discusses flat employment after
recovery (Exhibit 1, slide 11). Discussion on confidence in data
follows. |
|
|
|
|
|
190 |
Sen. Deckert |
Asks what factors lead them to believe
there is a recovery. |
|
|
|
|
|
191 |
Potiowsky |
Responds that low interest rates,
federal fiscal packages, stabilizing industries, and consumer spending are
all factors. |
|
|
|
|
|
222 |
Potiowsky |
Discusses expected employment growth
(Exhibit 1, slide 12). |
|
|
|
|
|
235 |
Potiowsky |
Discusses lumber and wood product
employment growth (Exhibit 1, slide 13), high tech employment growth (Exhibit
1, slide 14), and construction employment growth (Exhibit 1, slide 15). |
|
|
|
|
|
272 |
Potiowsky |
Discusses per capita income (Exhibit
1, slide 16). |
|
|
|
|
|
279 |
Rep. Barnhart |
Asks if there are any significant
changes in national per capita income. |
|
|
|
|
|
281 |
Potiowsky |
Responds that Oregon is following in
step with the U.S. |
|
|
|
|
|
298 |
Potiowsky |
Discusses risk factors to the
forecast 2003-2005 (Exhibit 1, slide 17). |
|
|
|
|
|
336 |
Potiowsky |
Discusses national deflation. |
|
|
|
|
|
399 |
Sen. Corcoran |
Asks about the federal tax break
package and how it would benefit. |
|
|
|
|
|
401 |
Potiowsky |
Responds that the upper class would
not spend money in the short term, but would invest in companies in the long
term. |
|
|
|
|
|
421 |
Sen. Corcoran |
Asks why they don’t give tax breaks
to lower class people who will spend it. |
|
|
|
|
|
425 |
Potiowsky |
Responds that he agrees. |
|
|
|
|
|
431 |
Potiowsky |
Continues discussion of risk
factors. |
TAPE 166, SIDE A
|
024 |
Rep. Farr |
Asks at what point the federal tax
breaks would make an impact on the economy. |
|
|
|
|
|
035 |
Potiowsky |
Responds that there will be
indications such as personal savings, which wouldn’t be bad, but wouldn’t
have an immediate effect. Discussion follows. |
|
|
|
|
|
066 |
Rep. Barnhart |
Asks to what extent SARS would
affect tourism in Oregon. |
|
|
|
|
|
069 |
Potiowsky |
Responds that it will not be large. |
|
|
|
|
|
090 |
Sen. Corcoran |
Asks why capital projects that
involve tax increases would strain the economy. |
|
|
|
|
|
093 |
Potiowsky |
Responds that they would not. |
|
|
|
|
|
108 |
Rep. Hass |
Asks about the effect of loss of
federal money due to budget cuts. |
|
|
|
|
|
111 |
Potiowsky |
Responds that it would not greatly
affect the federal side and for Oregon it is a double hit. |
|
|
|
|
|
119 |
Potiowsky |
Continues discussing risk factors. |
|
|
|
|
|
145 |
Potiowsky |
Compares personal income growth for
the last three forecasts (Exhibit 1, slide 18) and employment growth for the
last three forecasts (Exhibit 1, slide 19). |
|
|
|
|
|
156 |
Michael Kennedy |
Discusses significant revisions of
personal income tax factors (Exhibit 1, slide 22). |
|
|
|
|
|
181 |
Kennedy |
Discusses estimate liability from
collections (Exhibit 1, slide 23). |
|
|
|
|
|
200 |
Kennedy |
Compares final tax payments with
refunds (Exhibit 1, slide 24). |
|
|
|
|
|
243 |
Kennedy |
Discussion weakening withholding
(Exhibit 1, slide 26). |
|
|
|
|
|
254 |
Kennedy |
Discusses flat estimated payment in
2003 (Exhibit 1, slide 27). |
|
|
|
|
|
264 |
Sen. Deckert |
Asks if there would be more
assurance of predictability now. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Kennedy |
Responds affirmatively. |
|
|
|
|
|
287 |
Kennedy |
Compares the May and March income
and liability forecasts (Exhibit 1, slide 28). |
|
|
|
|
|
342 |
Kennedy |
Discusses effect tax rates (Exhibit
1, slide 29). |
|
|
|
|
|
400 |
Kennedy |
Discusses signs of corporate
recovery (Exhibit 1, slide 30). |
|
|
|
|
|
415 |
Kennedy |
Discusses the general fund forecast
(Exhibit 1, slide 32). |
|
|
|
|
|
440 |
Kennedy |
Discusses immediate risks (Exhibit
1, slide 33). |
|
|
|
|
|
478 |
Kennedy |
Discusses general fund revenue
forecast (Exhibit 1, slide 34). |
TAPE 165, SIDE B
|
042 |
Kennedy |
Compares actual revenue with COS
forecast (Exhibit 1, slide 35). |
|
|
|
|
|
072 |
Kennedy |
Gives recommendations (Exhibit 1,
slide 36). Clarifying questions and answers
interspersed. |
|
|
|
|
|
100 |
Rep. Barnhart |
Asks if the high rate concerns them
as well. |
|
|
|
|
|
112 |
Kennedy |
Discusses extended general fund
forecast (Exhibit 1, slide 37). |
|
|
|
|
|
121 |
Kennedy |
Discusses general fund revenue
growth (Exhibit 1, slide 38). |
|
|
|
|
|
140 |
Kennedy |
Discusses long-term risks (Exhibit
1, slide 39). |
|
|
|
|
|
171 |
Kennedy |
Discusses lottery revenues (Exhibit
1, slide 41). |
|
|
|
|
|
201 |
Kennedy |
Discusses extended lottery forecast
(Exhibit 1, slide 42). |
|
|
|
|
|
213 |
Kennedy |
Discusses lottery resources
available to the state (Exhibit 1, slide 43). |
|
|
|
|
|
226 |
Rep. Hass |
States that Oregon is too dependent
on the income tax and should look at a sales tax. |
|
|
|
|
|
246 |
Sen. Corcoran |
States that they should look at a
rainy fund with such a high possibility of a kicker. |
|
|
|
|
|
254 |
Rep. Barnhart |
Agrees with Sen. Corcoran in looking
at policy changes. |
|
|
|
|
|
262 |
Sen. Ferrioli |
Questions the assumption that
research and development won’t follow manufacturing trends. |
|
|
|
|
|
276 |
Potiowsky |
Responds that it is one of the
recognized risks and that it is unknown how technology will change. |
|
297 |
Chair Shetterly |
Meeting adjourned at 10:17 pm. |
Tape Log Submitted by,
Tara Lantz, Committee Assistant
Exhibit Summary:
1.
Tom Potiowsky, Oregon’s Economic and
Revenue Outlook Presentation, 22pp.
2.
Tom Potiowsky, Oregon Economic and
Revenue Forecast, 17pp.
3.
Lizbeth Martin-Mahar, LRO Forecast
Summary, 6pp.