SENATE COMMITTEE ON RULES
February 13, 2003 Hearing
Room 343
3:00 p.m. Tapes
8 - 10
MEMBERS PRESENT: Sen. Kate Brown, Co-chair, Presiding
Sen. Bev Clarno, Co-chair
Sen. Jason Atkinson, Vice-chair
Sen. Ginny Burdick, Vice-chair
Sen. Roger Beyer
Sen. Tony Corcoran
STAFF PRESENT: Jim Stembridge, Committee
Administrator
Pam Cox, Committee Assistant
MEASURE/ISSUES HEARD: Introduction
of Committee Measures – Work Session
Executive
Appointments – Public Hearing and Work Session
Department of Agriculture
State Lottery
SB 102 – Public
Hearing
These minutes are in
compliance with Senate and House Rules.
Only text enclosed in quotation marks reports a speaker’s exact
words. For complete contents,
please refer to the tapes.
|
TAPE/# |
Speaker |
Comments |
|
TAPE 8, A |
||
|
004 |
Co-chair Brown |
Opens committee meeting at 3:07 p.m. Opens a work session for introduction of
committee measures. |
|
WORK
SESSION |
||
|
005 |
Jim Stembridge |
Committee Administrator. Reads committee measure drafting
and introduction request from Sen. Bill Fisher. |
|
010 |
Sen. Clarno |
MOTION: Moves LEGISLATIVE CONCEPT BE DRAFTED AND INTRODUCED
as a committee measure. |
|
011 |
|
VOTE:
5-0 EXCUSED: 1 - Sen. Corcoran |
|
|
Co-chair Brown |
Hearing no
objection, declares the motion CARRIED. |
|
013 |
Co-chair Brown |
Closes work session and opens public hearing on the
appointment of Katy Coba to the Department of Agriculture. |
|
PUBLIC
HEARING DEPARTMENT
OF AGRICULTURE – KATY COBA (EXHIBIT A) |
||
|
016 |
Katy Coba |
Discusses her background and qualifications for the
appointment. |
|
043 |
Co-chair Brown |
Closes public hearing and opens work session. |
|
WORK
SESSION AGRICULTURE
– KATY COBA (EXHIBIT A) |
||
|
045 |
Sen. Clarno
|
MOTION: Moves the APPOINTMENT of Katy Coba to the Department
of Agriculture to the floor with the recommendation that the appointment BE
CONFIRMED. |
|
046 |
|
VOTE: 6-0 |
|
|
Co-chair Brown |
Hearing no
objection, declares the motion CARRIED. |
|
048 |
Co-chair
Brown |
Closes work session and opens a public hearing on
the appointment of Brenda Rocklin to the Department of the State Lottery. |
|
PUBLIC
HEARING STATE
LOTTERY – BRENDA ROCKLIN (EXHIBIT B) |
||
|
065 |
Brenda Rocklin |
Discusses her background and qualifications for the
appointment. |
|
076 |
Co-chair Brown |
Closes public hearing and opens work session on the
appointment of Brenda Rocklin to the Department of State Lottery. |
|
WORK
SESSION STATE
LOTTERY – BRENDA ROCKLIN (EXHIBIT B) |
||
|
077 |
Sen. Clarno
|
MOTION: Moves the APPOINTMENT of Brenda Rocklin to
the State Lottery to the floor with the recommendation that the appointment
BE CONFIRMED. |
|
078 |
|
VOTE: 6-0 |
|
|
Co-chair Brown |
Hearing no
objection, declares the motion CARRIED. |
|
079 |
Co-chair Brown |
Closes work session and opens public hearing on SB
102. |
|
SB 102
– PUBLIC HEARING |
||
|
080 |
Philip Schradle |
Special Counsel to the Attorney General, Oregon Department
of Justice. Testifies in support of
SB 102, which allows circulation of state initiative petition with summary
prepared by Attorney General. Submits
written testimony (EXHIBIT C). |
|
222 |
Sen. Clarno |
Asks for clarification on the fees from the Attorney
General’s office. |
|
229 |
Schradle |
Answers. |
|
240 |
Sen. Burdick |
Asks what that would include. |
|
247 |
Schradle |
Answers. |
|
252 |
Keith Garza |
Oregon Supreme Court. Provides input in the
process of ballot titles and submits proposed -2 amendments dated 2-4-03 (EXHIBIT D). |
|
299 |
Sen. Burdick |
Asks what other steps to this process his office
handles. |
|
300 |
Garza |
Answers. |
|
330 |
Sen. Beyer |
Asks what the savings would be in the next election. |
|
341 |
Garza |
Notes the reductions and impact of SB 102. |
|
419 |
Schradle |
Describes the passage of this measure and bringing
costs down. |
|
467 |
Sen. Beyer |
Asks for clarification on the differences if SB 102
passed. |
|
TAPE 9, A |
||
|
010 |
Schradle |
Answers the process would be different during
signature gathering. |
|
014 |
Sen. Beyer |
Clarifies some petitions in current election cycle
would be treated differently. |
|
015 |
Schradle |
Discusses effect of an emergency clause. |
|
045 |
Kappy Eaton |
League of Women Voters of Oregon. Testifies in support of SB 102. Outlines the League’s research and
discussion on SB 102. Submits written
testimony (EXHIBIT E). |
|
110 |
Greg Wasson |
Testifies in opposition to SB 102 and comments
regarding the Constitution. Submits
written testimony (EXHIBIT F). |
|
169 |
Sen. Burdick |
Comments that it does not change the number of
signatures. |
|
170 |
Wasson |
Responds a person would expend more effort. |
|
187 |
Sen. Burdick |
Asks if it would be harder to persuade people. |
|
188 |
Wasson |
Answers to the difficulty of writing ballot titles. |
|
221 |
Eric Winters |
Attorney. Testifies in opposition and explains. |
|
294 |
Sen. Burdick |
Asks about his experience on writing initiatives. |
|
295 |
Winters |
Describes these initiatives. |
|
300 |
Co-chair Brown |
Asks how many initiatives have become ballots. |
|
302 |
Winters |
Indicates he is not sure. |
|
316 |
Dave Hunnicutt |
Oregonians In Action. Testifies in opposition to
SB 102. Submits written testimony and
proposed amendments (EXHIBITS G, H). |
|
TAPE 8, B |
||
|
004 |
Co-chair Brown |
Continues and gives an explanation of an alternate
process. |
|
079 |
Sen. Clarno |
Asks whether he would support the bill if the
Attorney General’s office was taken out of the process. |
|
082 |
Hunnicutt |
Answers he would like to see ballot titles handled
like the explanatory statement. |
|
104 |
Co-chair Brown |
Asks if he is opposing those writing numerous ballot
titles. |
|
108 |
Hunnicutt |
Comments on ballot title shopping. |
|
131 |
Sen. Burdick |
Asks whether his concerns would be addressed if his recommended
process was used. |
|
132 |
Hunnicutt |
Responds no and recommends proponents preparing
explanatory statements at beginning of process. |
|
149 |
Sen. Burdick |
Asks if having no summary statement would remove his
concerns. |
|
151 |
Hunnicutt |
Answers signers would have nothing to educate them. |
|
172 |
Sen. Atkinson |
Comments the idea is on drafting ballot titles and
the need to save time. |
|
202 |
Hunnicutt |
Notes he has written testimony that states he would
like to help change the process. |
|
215 |
Gayle Attebery |
Oregon Right to Life. Testifies in opposition and
comments on ballot title shopping. |
|
266 |
Don McIntire |
Taxpayer Association of Oregon. Testifies in opposition.
Discusses constitutional limits on
the power of government. Submits
written testimony (EXHIBIT I). |
|
366 |
Sen. Burdick |
Asks if the Secretary of State becomes involved at
the end of the process. |
|
367 |
McIntire |
Answers negatively and comments on taking the
Attorney General’s office out of the process. |
|
TAPE 9, B |
||
|
001 |
McIntire |
Continues. |
|
037 |
Co-chair Brown |
Asks whether taking the Attorney General’s office
out of the process would be a positive direction. |
|
042 |
McIntire |
Answers this is in the right direction. |
|
060 |
Co-chair Brown |
Asks if he would be comfortable if the Supreme Court
wrote ballot titles. |
|
069 |
McIntire |
Responds it would not be necessary if statements
were understandable. |
|
073 |
Jason Williams |
Taxpayer Association of Oregon. Testifies in opposition
and comments on unfair ballot titles.
Submits written testimony (EXHIBIT
J). |
|
109 |
Bill Perry |
Oregon Restaurant Association. Testifies in support of SB
102 and explains. |
|
180 |
Kristen Leonard |
Oregon Education Association. Testifies in support of SB
102 and on the need for the chief petitioner to put forth effort. |
|
190 |
Tim Nesbitt |
Oregon AFL-CIO.
Testifies in support of SB 102.
Discusses experiences in moving measures to the ballot and in ballot
title challenges. Explains current
system encourages ballot title shopping, editing and marketing. Suggests there is no grass-roots issue. Argues there would be no additional delay. Asserts an explanatory statement committee
is not needed |
|
277 |
Julie Brandis |
Associated Oregon Industries (AOI). Testifies in support of SB 102. Comments on signature increases. |
|
308 |
Sen. Burdick |
Asks about their view on having a no-summary
process. |
|
309 |
Leonard |
Answers it will make process harder. |
|
343 |
Perry |
Comments on citizens becoming active. |
|
366 |
Ted Piccilo |
Testifies in opposition to SB 102. Explains the people’s rights would be
restricted. |
|
TAPE 10, A |
||
|
022 |
Sen. Burdick |
Clarifies others besides public servants would
benefit. |
|
024 |
Piccilo |
Explains we have a system that is designed to
protect people’s rights and this process should be a part of the Attorney
General’s office. |
|
The following prepared testimony is submitted for
the record without public testimony for SB 102: |
||
|
|
Keith Putman |
Submits written testimony (EXHIBIT K) |
|
068 |
Co-chair Brown |
Closes public hearing. Adjourns committee meeting at 5:06 p.m. |
EXHIBIT
SUMMARY
A
– Department of Agriculture, Governor’s office and staff, 5 pp
B
– Department of the State Lottery, Governor’s office and staff, 6 pp
C
– SB 102, written testimony, Philip Schradle, 2 pp
D
– SB 102, -2 amendments (2-4-03), Keith Garza, 6 pp
E
– SB 102, written testimony, Kappy Eaton, 1 p
F
– SB 102, written testimony, Greg Wasson, 2 pp
G
– SB 102, written testimony, Dave Hunnicutt, 5 pp
H
– SB 102, suggested amendments, Dave Hunnicutt, 2 pp
I
– SB 102, written testimony, Don McIntire, 1 p
J
– SB 102, written testimony, Jason Williams, 1 p
K
– SB 102, written testimony, Keith Putman, 2 pp