SENATE COMMITTEE ON RULES
August 25, 2003 Hearing
Room B
4:15 PM Tapes
131-132
MEMBERS PRESENT: Sen. Kate Brown, Co-chair, Presiding
Sen. Roger Beyer, Co-chair
Sen. Jason Atkinson,
Vice-chair
Sen. Ginny Burdick,
Vice-chair
Sen. Tony Corcoran
Sen. Bill Fisher
STAFF PRESENT: Jim Stembridge, Committee
Administrator
Romy Dye, Committee
Assistant
MEASURES HEARD: SB
141 – Work Session
HB 3023 B – Public
Hearing and Work Session
SJR 12 – Work Session
Executive
Appointments
Public Employees Retirement Board
James Dalton
Thomas
Grimsley
Eva
Kripalani
Michael
Pittman
Brenda
Rocklin
Fair Dismissal Appeals Board
Mark Davalos
Paul
Duchin
Patrick
Neill
Frank
Brawner
Karen
Watters
Peggy
Penland
Oregon Economic & Community Development Commission
Pamela Hulsey Andrews
Walter
Van Valkenburg
Workers’ Compensation Board
Mustafa Kasubhai
HB 2356 B – Public
Hearing
These minutes are in
compliance with Senate and House Rules.
Only text enclosed in quotation marks reports a speaker’s exact
words. For complete contents,
please refer to the tapes.
|
TAPE/# |
Speaker |
Comments |
|
TAPE 131,
A |
||
|
005 |
Co-chair Beyer |
Calls the meeting to order at 4:34 PM. Opens a work session
on SB 141. |
|
SB 141
– WORK SESSION |
||
|
007 |
Rep. Jeff Merkley |
Oregon State Representative, District 47. Claims the
-5 amendments solves the conflicts. Presents -5 amendments dated 8/25/03 (EXHIBIT A). |
|
011 |
Rep. Mary Nolan |
Oregon State Representative, District 36. Asks for
any questions. |
|
013 |
Sen. Brown |
Understands technical issues with one of the amendments.
|
|
017 |
Co-chair Beyer |
Comments on changes in language in -5 amendments. |
|
030 |
Ted Reutlinger |
Legislative Counsel. Discusses the -5 amendments.
Refers to page 23, line 21 for language changes. Refers to page 24, line 18
for language changes. |
|
035 |
Co-chair Beyer |
Asks for clarification on whether boldfacing on the
language on page 25. |
|
040 |
Reutlinger |
Responds why the language is not boldfaced in
section 11. Claims when language changed in section 10 it will also be fixed
in section 11. Explains an additional language change on page 19, lines
22-24. Feels a new clause should be added on line 24. |
|
051 |
Co-chair
Beyer |
MOTION: Moves to SUSPEND the rules for the purpose
of amending the -5 amendments. |
|
055 |
|
VOTE:
4-0-2 EXCUSED: 2 - Sen. Atkinson, Sen. Corcoran |
|
|
Co-chair Beyer |
Hearing no objection, declares the
motion CARRIED. |
|
060 |
Sen. Brown
|
MOTION: Moves to ADOPT SB 141-5 amendments dated
8/25/03 and that the measure be FURTHER AMENDED on page 19, line 24, by
inserting "or the receipt by a public official or a relative of a public
official of any item, regardless of value, that is expressly excluded from
the definition of gift in ORS 244.020, subsection 8. " before
";" and on page 23, line 21, by changing "shall" to
"may" and on page 24, line 18, by changing “shall” to “may”. |
|
070 |
|
VOTE:
5-0-1 EXCUSED: 1 - Sen. Atkinson |
|
|
Co-chair Beyer |
Hearing no objection, declares the
motion CARRIED. |
|
080 |
Sen.
Burdick |
MOTION: Moves to ADOPT SB 141-5 amendments dated 8/25/03. |
|
085 |
|
VOTE:
5-0-1 EXCUSED: 1 - Sen. Atkinson |
|
|
Co-chair Beyer |
Hearing no objection, declares the
motion CARRIED. |
|
090 |
Sen.
Burdick |
MOTION: Moves to ADOPT SB 141-4 amendments dated 8/23/03 (EXHIBIT B). |
|
092 |
Co-chair Beyer |
Asks what the purpose of the -4 amendments is. |
|
093 |
Sen. Burdick |
Explains the -4 amendments. |
|
098 |
Co-chair Beyer |
Asks for further clarification. |
|
100 |
Sen. Burdick |
Claims work on the amendment was complicated. |
|
102 |
Co-chair Beyer |
Asks if Sen. Burdick was aware the -5 amendments
deleted the rest of SB 141. |
|
105 |
Sen. Burdick |
Responds correct. States the -4 amendments restore
the one provision in section 1, subsection 4b. |
|
110 |
Reutlinger |
Provides explanation of the -4 amendments. |
|
120 |
Co-chair Beyer |
Claims this is the “candy at a parade” amendment
from March. Asks for clarification. |
|
132 |
John Lindback |
Director of Elections, Secretary of State’s office. Discusses
what the provision in the bill does. Explains campaigns. Claims there needs
to be a dollar limit placed on items that can be given away. States there are
no restrictions on throwing candy at a parade. |
|
152 |
Co-chair Beyer |
Asks what other things are being discussed. |
|
158 |
Lindback |
Explains there is a list of inexpensive items the
office has that can be given away free by campaigns. Describes the procedure
of items being presented that are not on the list. Discusses investigating
complaints that occur. Feels simpler for campaigns to follow if a monetary
value limit is put in statute for people to follow. |
|
170 |
Co-chair Beyer |
Recalls the bill. Clarifies reason the bill did not
move forward previously is under the amendment a candidate could take dollar
bills and write “vote for” on them and hand them out. |
|
177 |
Lindback |
Disagrees. Claims under the definition of undo
influence it includes money as something you cannot give away. |
|
180 |
Co-chair Beyer |
Asks for the location of the definition in the bill.
|
|
182 |
Lindback |
Responds section 1 has the definition of undo
influence. |
|
183 |
Co-chair Beyer |
Asks if Mr. Reutlinger agrees. |
|
184 |
Reutlinger |
Responds the definition of undo influence also
covers other things of value. |
|
186 |
Sen. Burdick |
Comments on the language of a dollar. |
|
194 |
Lindback |
Refers to line 7 of the bill. |
|
198 |
Sen. Burdick |
Claims other provisions were controversial in March but
this one is different. |
|
206 |
Co-chair Beyer |
Claims not knowing the amendment was being offered.
Opposes the bill. |
|
218 |
Sen. Fisher |
Asks why this would not be a good idea. |
|
220 |
Co-chair Beyer |
Expresses concern with the language making it look
fishy to the public. |
|
225 |
|
VOTE:
3-3 AYE: 3 - Sen. Burdick, Sen. Corcoran, Sen. Brown NAY: 3 - Sen. Atkinson, Sen. Fisher, Co-chair Beyer |
|
|
Co-chair Beyer |
The motion Fails. |
|
230 |
Sen. Brown
|
MOTION: Moves SB 141 to the floor with a DO PASS
AS AMENDED recommendation. |
|
240 |
|
VOTE:
6-0 |
|
|
Co-chair Beyer |
Hearing no objection, declares the
motion CARRIED. SEN. BURDICK will lead discussion on
the floor. |
|
248 |
Co-chair Beyer |
Closes the work session on SB 141 and opens a public
hearing on HB 3023 B. |
|
|
||
|
|
||
|
HB 3023
B – PUBLIC HEARING |
||
|
266 |
Marjorie Taylor |
Committee Administrator. Provides an overview of HB
3023 B, which requires state agency to odder delinquent account to Department
of Revenue or private collection agency not later than 90 days after
specified occurrences. Presents –B6 amendments dated 8/20/03 (EXHIBIT
C). |
|
280 |
Matt Markee |
Oregon Collectors Association. Testifies in support
of HB 3023 B with the –B6 amendments. Explains the benefits of the bill. Submits
written testimony (EXHIBIT D). |
|
305 |
Jessica Stevens |
SEIU Local 503, Oregon Public Employees Union (OPEU).
Notes HB 3023 B is a good bill with –B6 amendments. Claims okay with the one
year timeline. Discusses conflict areas:
|
|
346 |
Co-chair Beyer |
Closes the public hearing on HB 3023 B and opens a work
session on HB 3023 B. |
|
HB 3023
B – WORK SESSION |
||
|
350 |
Sen.
Burdick |
MOTION: Moves to ADOPT HB 3023 B-B6 amendments
dated 8/20/03. |
|
355 |
|
VOTE:
4-0-2 EXCUSED: 2 - Sen. Corcoran, Sen. Brown |
|
|
Co-chair Beyer |
Hearing no objection, declares the
motion CARRIED. |
|
360 |
Sen.
Burdick |
MOTION: Moves HB 3023 B to the floor with a DO
PASS AS AMENDED recommendation. |
|
375 |
|
VOTE:
4-0-2 EXCUSED: 2 - Sen. Corcoran, Sen. Brown |
|
|
Co-chair Beyer |
Hearing no objection, declares the
motion CARRIED. CO-CHAIR BEYER will lead discussion on
the floor. |
|
378 |
Co-chair Beyer |
Closes the work session on HB 3023 B and opens a work
session on SJR 12. |
|
SJR 12
– WORK SESSION |
||
|
380 |
Sen.
Atkinson |
MOTION: Moves SJR 12 be sent to the floor with a
BE ADOPTED recommendation. |
|
383 |
Co-chair Beyer |
Claims there are amendments. |
|
385 |
Sen.
Atkinson |
Withdraws
motion. |
|
390 |
Sen.
Atkinson |
MOTION: Moves to ADOPT SJR 12-2 amendments dated 8/20/03
(EXHIBIT E). |
|
395 |
|
VOTE:
4-0-2 EXCUSED: 2 - Sen. Corcoran. Sen. Brown |
|
|
Co-chair Beyer |
Hearing no objection, declares the
motion CARRIED. |
|
400 |
Sen.
Atkinson |
MOTION: Moves SJR 12 be sent to the floor with a
BE ADOPTED AS AMENDED recommendation. |
|
405 |
|
VOTE:
4-0 EXCUSED: 2 - Sen. Corcoran. Sen. Brown |
|
|
Co-chair Beyer |
Hearing no objection, declares the
motion CARRIED. SEN. ATKINSON will lead discussion on
the floor. |
|
407 |
Co-chair Beyer |
Closes the work session on SJR 12 and opens a work session
on executive appointments. |
|
WORK
SESSION |
||
|
409 |
Jim Stembridge |
Committee Administrator. Provides summary of
qualifications of appointees. |
|
TAPE 132,
A |
||
|
005 |
Sen. Brown |
MOTION: Moves
the appearances be waived and that the committee recommend the following
appointments and reappointments be confirmed by the Senate, with multiple
appointments made to a single board or commission to be considered en bloc: |
|
PUBLIC
EMPLOYEES RETIREMENT BOARD – APPOINTMENT OF JAMES DALTON, TOMAS GRIMSLEY, EVA
KRIPALANI, MICHAEL PITTMAN AND BRENDA ROCKLIN (EXHIBIT F) |
||
|
FAIR
DISMISSAL APPEALS BOARD – APPOINTMENT OF PEGGY PENLAND AND KAREN WATTERS AND REAPPOINTMENT
OF FRANK BRAWNER, MARK DAVALOS, PAUL DUCHIN, AND PATRICK NEILL (EXHIBIT G) |
||
|
OREGON
ECONOMIC & COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT COMMISSION – APPOINTMENT OF PAMELA
HULSEY ANDREWS AND WALTER VAN VALKENBURG (EXHIBIT H) |
||
|
015 |
|
VOTE:
5-0-1 EXCUSED: 1 – Sen. Corcoran |
|
|
Co-chair Beyer |
Hearing no objection, declares the
motion CARRIED. SEN. ATKINSON will lead discussion on
the floor. |
|
020 |
Sen. Brown |
MOTION: Moves
the appearances be waived and that the committee recommend the following appointments
be confirmed by the Senate: |
|
WORKERS’
COMPENSATION BOARD – APPOINTMENT OF MUSTAFA KASUBHAI (EXHIBIT I) |
||
|
015 |
|
VOTE:
5-0-1 EXCUSED: 1 – Sen. Corcoran |
|
|
Co-chair Beyer |
Hearing no objection, declares the
motion CARRIED. SEN. BROWN will lead discussion on the
floor. |
|
023 |
Co-chair Beyer |
Closes the work session on Executive Appointments
and opens a public hearing on HB 2356 B. |
|
HB 2356
B – PUBLIC HEARING |
||
|
029 |
Jim Stembridge |
Committee Administrator. Provides an overview of HB
2356 B, which prohibits city with population of greater than 500,000 from
acquiring property by condemnation if property belongs to electric company
and acquisition is for purpose of providing electricity services. Presents –B17 amendments dated 8/21/03, -B18 amendments dated 8/21/03
and –B19 amendments dated 8/21/03 (EXHIBITS
J-L). |
|
033 |
Sen. Brown |
Understood when the hearing was planned that
consensus reached on two issues under Sen. Rick Metsger. Notes that is not
true. Claims it is unlikely the bill will move forward. |
|
041 |
Grieg Anderson |
Portland General Electric (PGE)retiree. Testifies in
a neutral position on HB 2356 B. Discusses three key points from testimony. Requests
amendment distributed to be included in the bill. Submits written testimony (EXHIBIT M). |
|
091 |
Sen. Brown |
Asks if Mr. Anderson is currently retired. |
|
092 |
Anderson |
Responds yes, for five years. |
|
095 |
Sen. Brown |
Asks whether legal counsel has been consulted. |
|
101 |
Anderson |
Responds they are in conversation with legal counsel
on the issue. Claims many small
issues do not get much consideration. Points out it is an out-of-pocket expense
for any legal advice sought. |
|
106 |
Sen. Burdick |
Points out Mr. Anderson is one of the constituents
in the situation. Feels the issue far from being done. Expresses appreciation
in Mr. Anderson coming forward with a summary and amendments. |
|
119 |
Sen. Brown |
Recesses the committee at 5:12 PM. |
|
******************************RECESS**************************** |
||
|
|
Sen. Brown |
Reconvenes the committee at 5:15 PM. |
|
130 |
John DiLorenzo, Jr. |
Attorney. Testifies in support of HB 2356 B.
Discusses reasons why the House passed the bill. Points out they are advocating
-B18 and -B19 amendments. Discusses –B18, -B19 and -B17
amendments. Submits written testimony (EXHIBIT
N). |
|
211 |
Beth Vargas Duncan |
Franchise Coordinator, City of Salem. Testifies in
support of HB 2356 B. Claims not having seen the amendments. Notes City
Council would support amendments in alignment with various concerns. |
|
250 |
Sen. Rick Metsger |
Oregon State Senator, District 26. Claims the President
asked him to bring people together on the issue in this bill. Notes it was decided
there were such large issues it would be hard to cover them all accurately.
Discusses three issues before the Legislature:
|
|
323 |
Marge Kafoury |
Representing City of Portland. Discusses intent of -B17
amendments. Notes subsection 2 was added to -B17 amendments. Notes this is the only amendment the City
of Portland supports. |
|
373 |
Sen. Fisher |
Asks how this amendment differs from the -B19
amendments. |
|
381 |
Kafoury |
Responds unclear of Mr. DiLorenzo’s intent on accomplishment.
Comments it addresses in subsection 2 a different issue than addressed
before. |
|
396 |
Sen. Fisher |
Expresses confusion as to the difference in subsection
2 of section 2. |
|
TAPE 131,
B |
||
|
005 |
Kafoury |
Responds it appears it is an attempt to say that
there will be no expansion of condemnation authority to cities that does not
exist under current statute or common law. |
|
006 |
Sen. Fisher |
Asks about -B17 amendments of subsection 2. |
|
007 |
Kafoury |
Explains there would be no expansion of payments of
franchise fees to jurisdictions that do not have the authority to impose
franchise fees targeted at counties. |
|
012 |
Jeff Bissonnette |
Citizens Utility Board. Testifies in opposition of
HB 2356 B. States took part in workgroup on condemnation issue. Notes
engaging in the workgroup to try to find compromise discovering condemnation
was not off the table for the company so did not see any point in continuing
conversation. |
|
025 |
Sen. Brown |
Expresses concern if the City of Portland should
condemn assets of PGE ratepayers outside of the city limits would not be
protected with respect to rates. Asks for Mr. Bissonette’s perspective. |
|
032 |
Bissonette |
Responds rate payers are not worried about the City
of Portland but worried about Enron. Notes PGE is still owned by Enron.
Claims this is a different issue than issue of condemnation. States there is
no direction at this point so keep options open. |
|
050 |
Sen. Brown |
Inquires on protective alternatives for consumers
outside of Portland in event Portland would condemn PGE. |
|
053 |
Bissonette |
Claims were willing to live with the franchise fee
payments and property tax payments. Discusses condemnation issues. Notes PGE
has power to condemn outside of service territory. |
|
072 |
Co-chair Beyer |
Asks what CUB (Citizens Utility Board) is. |
|
075 |
Bissonette |
Responds it is a private, non-profit organization
called Citizens Utility Board. Discusses nature of the business. |
|
082 |
Co-chair Beyer |
Asks who Mr. Bissonette is referring to when saying
residential ratepayers outside Portland are concerned with Enron. |
|
090 |
Bissonette |
Responds their members and some of the residential
ratepayers. |
|
101 |
Co-chair Beyer |
Asks how many people living outside Portland have
been spoken to about this issue. |
|
104 |
Bissonette |
Comments public presentations are done on a weekly
basis. Notes does not have an exact figure but people are interested in the
issue. Adds primary concern of residential ratepayers is making sure despite
PGE’s fate that it is continued to remain a safe and reliable electricity
system. |
|
122 |
Co-chair Beyer |
Comments Mr. Bissonette does not speak for all
residential rate payers outside Portland. |
|
126 |
Sen. Fisher |
Asks how many members are out there and how they can
be represented if work is not done directly with them at all times. |
|
130 |
Bissonette |
Comments there are fifty cities within the PGE
service territory with concerns. Notes trying to address concerns. Comments
will be looking at making sure consumers benefit from purchases of PGE.
States ratepayers are not well served
with any options removed from the table at this time because of not knowing
direction Enron is going so need to maintain all options. |
|
164 |
Sen. Fisher |
Asks where Mr. Bissonette was when Enron purchased. |
|
171 |
Bissonette |
Responds at the table involved in the negotiations
putting a lot of demands on the purchase. Discusses why Enron purchased PGE. Explains
why PGE was for sale. |
|
184 |
Co-chair Beyer |
Closes the public hearing on HB 2356. Adjourns the
meeting at 5:48 PM. |
EXHIBIT
SUMMARY
A
– SB 141, -5 amendments dated 8/25/03, staff, 26 pp
B
– SB 141, -4 amendments dated 8/23/03, staff, 1 p
C
– HB 3023 B, -B6 amendments dated 8/20/03, staff, 1 p
D
– HB 3023 B, written testimony, Matt Markee, 2 pp
E
– SJR 12, -2 amendments dated 8/20/03, staff, 2 pp
F
– Public Employees Retirement Board, staff and Governor’s office, 26 pp
G
– Fair Dismissal Appeals Board, staff and Governor’s office, 22 pp
H
– Oregon Economic & Community Development Commission, staff and Governor’s
office, 12 pp
I
– Workers’ Compensation Board, staff and Governor’s office, 6 pp
J
– HB 2356 B, -B17 amendments dated 8/21/03, staff, 1 p
K
– HB 2356 B, -B18 amendments dated 8/21/03, staff, 1 p
L
– HB 2356 B, -B19 amendments dated 8/21/03, staff, 1 p
M
– HB 2356 B, written testimony, Grieg Anderson, 2 pp
N
– HB 2356 B, written testimony, John DiLorenzo, Jr. 5 pp
O
– HB 2356 B, -B12 amendments dated 8/20/03, staff, 3 pp