SENATE COMMITTEE ON
TRANSPORTATION AND ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT
March 19, 2003 Hearing
Room C
8:00 AM Tapes
61-62
MEMBERS PRESENT: Sen. Rick Metsger, Chair
Sen. Bruce Starr, Vice-Chair
Sen. Ryan Deckert
Sen. David Nelson
HOUSE MEMBERS: Rep. Patti Smith, Chair
Rep. Vicki Berger, Vice
Chair
Rep. March
Rep. Monnes Anderson
GUEST MEMBERS: Speaker Sen. Minnis
STAFF PRESENT: Amy Joyce, Committee Administrator
Kim Medford, Committee Administrator
Annastasia Suess, Committee Assistant
MEASURE/ISSUES HEARD: SB
441 – Public Hearing
Informational - Joint
Meeting with House - Invited
Testimony
These minutes are in
compliance with Senate and House Rules.
Only text enclosed in quotation marks reports a speaker’s exact
words. For complete contents,
please refer to the tapes.
|
TAPE/# |
Speaker |
Comments |
|
TAPE 61, A |
||
|
005 |
Chair Metsger |
Calls the committee to order at 8:05 a.m. and opens
a public hearing on SB 441. |
|
SB 441
–PUBLIC HEARING |
||
|
010 |
Ed Glad |
Pacific Northwest Regional Council of Carpenters. Begins testimony in support of SB 441. |
|
|
Glad |
Continues testimony: ·
Boise Cascade ·
Prison Industries ·
Creation of a Quality
Jobs Board ·
Proposed amendments to
section two ·
Concludes presentation |
|
180 |
Sen. Ted Ferrioli |
District John Day. Provides a summary of SB 441 and elaborates on the definition of sustainability. |
|
260 |
Ferrioli |
Continues testimony: ·
Innovative Contracts ·
Coordination of
research investment ·
Concludes testimony |
|
280 |
Sen. Tony Corcoran |
District 4. Provides testimony in support of SB 441.
|
|
310 |
Sen. Nelson |
States that the Governor prefers boards of 5 at the
most 7 members, and wonders if there will be an issue with a nine person
board. |
|
320 |
Sen. Ferrioli |
Says that there will be discussion with the Governor
about restructuring the board to meet his preferences. |
|
325 |
Sen. Nelson |
Asks how this will work with federal agencies since
52 percent of the land is federal lands. |
|
330 |
Corcoran |
Comments on the changes in the Bush administration,
will allow for more partnerships and innovations coming from the state level. |
|
340 |
Sen. Ferrioli |
States that the goal is aimed at demonstration
projects on smaller scale that will not typically attract large scale
bidders. |
|
360 |
Sen. Deckert |
Comments on the creation of the board, and its coordination
with the governor’s office. |
|
370 |
Sen. Ferrioli |
States that there will be coordination with the
governor’s office as well as many state agencies. |
|
390 |
Sen. Corcoran |
Comments on the community solutions teams. |
|
420 |
Vice Chair B. Starr |
Asks for the definition of “the living wage”. |
|
440 |
Sen. Corcoran |
Defines the definition as ‘a net tax payer’. Offers
an example of a family of four with an income below 33 thousand a year were
basically beneficiary’s of the tax system and not contributors to the tax
system. States that the definition is not minimum wage but rather living
wage. |
|
TAPE 62, A |
||
|
020 |
Vice Chair B. Starr |
Asks if it is possible for the living wage to vary
depending on the area a person lives. |
|
035 |
Sen. Corcoran |
States there will need to be a very strong economic
evaluation to determine the distinctions versus the variations for the living
wage. |
|
045 |
Sen. Ferrioli |
Comments on the sustainability of jobs in Oregon. |
|
065 |
Charles Spencer |
Labor Co-Chair of the Restoration Jobs Working group
of the Alliance for Sustainable Jobs and Environment, Lane County. Provides
testimony in favor of SB 441. |
|
125 |
Spencer |
Concludes testimony. |
|
148 |
Danny Scott |
Western Council of Industrial Workers. Provides
testimony in support of SB 441. |
|
200 |
Scott |
Concludes testimony. |
|
205 |
Sen. Nelson |
Asks how the infrastructure is going to blend
together with the demonstration projects. |
|
210 |
Glad |
States that one of the amendments being proposed to
SB 441 will create an action plan to be able to market the model contract
templates as well as identify the work forces’ ability. |
|
240 |
Sen. Nelson |
Comments on previous infrastructures that are no
longer operable and asks where the people will come from. |
|
245 |
Scott |
States that SB 441 will not put the people back to
work, but rather test some models to do the work in restoration differently. |
|
260 |
Spencer |
States that the essence of the bill is innovation. |
|
300 |
Jess McKinley |
Oregon Economic and Community Development
Department. Provides testimony in support of SB 441. States there are several
components of the bill that are unclear. Encourages further dialogue of SB
441. |
|
345 |
Chair Metsger |
Asks if Mr. McKinley would be available to work with
the proponents on the amendments to the bill. |
|
350 |
Vice Chair B. Starr |
Asks if there have been conversations with the
governor’s staff on this issue and if the testimony today was a reflection of
the governor’s staff. |
|
360 |
McKinley |
States there have been informal conversations and
that the testimony was not a reflection of the governor’s staff’s
standpoints. |
|
375 |
Chair Metsger |
Closes the public hearing on SB 441 and welcomes
House Economic Development Committee. Opens an informational hearing. |
|
JOINT
MEETING WITH HOUSE ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT COMMITTEE - INFORMATIONAL HEARING |
||
|
420 |
Chair Metsger |
Introduces the Gresham Springwater Community Industrial
Land Project as an example on a community that moving forward rapidly in
economic development. |
|
430 |
Rob Fussell |
Community Economic Development Director. Introduces
the staff that will testify and provides written materials (EXHIBIT A). |
|
440 |
Charles J. Becker |
Mayor of Gresham. Provides a summary of the
Springwater Urban Growth Boundary Proposal. |
|
460 |
Terry Vanderkooy |
New communities and Annexation Manager. Begins
discussion on the Springwater Industrial Land Project. |
|
TAPE 61, B |
||
|
030 |
Vanderkooy |
Continues discussion: ·
Springwater Phase 1 ·
State Impact ·
Making Springwater
Happen |
|
075 |
Shelly Parini |
Economic Development Manager. Begins discussion on
Springwater’s economic potential. |
|
125 |
Parini |
Continues testimony: ·
Oregon Science and
Technology Partnership (OSTP) ·
OSTP Site
opportunities ·
Proposed OSTP
Alliances ·
OSTP Education
Alliances ·
Gresham’s Economic
Tools ·
Gresham’s success
stories |
|
158 |
John Dorst |
Transportation Manager. Begins discussion on
Springwater’s transportation and infrastructure preparedness. |
|
200 |
Dorst |
Continues testimony: ·
185th
Project ·
262nd &
Orient Project ·
Civic Neighborhood ·
Gresham’s “green
development” goal ·
Wastewater ·
Water reservoirs |
|
270 |
Fussell |
Begins discussion on Springwater partnerships and
next steps. |
|
320 |
Chair Smith |
Asks how the agriculture lands to the east of
Gresham will be protected. |
|
330 |
Fussell |
States that Gresham partners with Multnomah to
create an IGA with the county. |
|
333 |
Chair P. Smith |
Asks if there will be partnership with Clackamas
county |
|
335 |
Fussell |
Confirms. |
|
340 |
Dorst |
States that transportation design will assist in the
protection of the lands. |
|
350 |
Chair P. Smith |
Asks how Gresham will expediate the permitting
process. |
|
360 |
Fussell |
States there is a Rapid Response team that is in
place to handle the expediation of the process. |
|
370 |
Speaker Karen Minnis |
Commends the Rapid Response team’s ability to
outreach to the community. |
|
400 |
Vice Chair B. Starr |
Asks if the Oregon Department of Land Conservation
will be funding the 600 thousand
dollars. |
|
406 |
Fussell |
States that currently the ground work is being laid
with the state during the concept planning, and that there have not been any
signs that the LCD will be funding the project. |
|
425 |
Vice Chair B. Starr |
Asks if the 600 hundred thousand dollars would be
for a period of three to four years. |
|
430 |
Fussell |
States that the Phase 1 will be completed in another
three to four months and that 50 thousand dollars are earmarked for this
Phase. States that all three phases will be completed by the end of 2004. The
600 hundred thousand will be needed in approximately 6 months from now. |
|
450 |
Vice Chair B. Starr |
Asks for clarification that the money would be
needed this year. |
|
TAPE 62, B |
||
|
005 |
Fussell |
Confirms. |
|
015 |
Vice Chair B. Starr |
Asks if the implementation dates of January through
December 2004 to complete major infrastructure include the interchange as
well. |
|
028 |
Fussell |
Confirms. States that the interchange will be needed
to complete the Springwater project. |
|
035 |
Vice Chair B. Starr |
States that it is hard to believe that moving an interchange
through the process in less than a year could be possible. |
|
040 |
Dorst |
States that the commitment needs to be made, while
the construction is in process. |
|
050 |
Vice Chair B. Starr |
Asks if this area is served by rail. |
|
053 |
Dorst |
States there is no heavy rail in this area. |
|
055 |
Robin Roberts |
Community Solutions Office. Elaborates on the time line and funding.
States that the entire 17 million in funds will not be set prior to
construction, but alternative solutions are being looked into. |
|
060 |
Rep. Monnes Anderson |
Commends the proponents of the bill on the hard work
and effort put into this bill. |
|
065 |
Sen. Nelson |
Asks for clarification on the amount of acreage in
the project. |
|
070 |
Fussell |
States that amount is 1,400, not 14,000 acres as
stated in the testimony. |
|
075 |
Sen. Nelson |
Asks for clarification on the urban growth boundary,
and if the project is in the boundary. |
|
085 |
Fussell |
Clarifies and states yes, the phases are in the
urban growth areas. |
|
090 |
Sen. Nelson |
Asks if the vision is for campus type industries. |
|
095 |
Fussell |
States the vision is a technology campus. |
|
120 |
Dorst |
Elaborates on the area and states that Phase 1 is
1,400 acres and Phase 2 is 2,200 additional acres. |
|
125 |
Fussell |
States that a partnership with Clackamas is in
process as well. |
|
130 |
Rep. March |
Inquires about the Johnson Creek Watershed and the 210
acres that have been set aside, and asks what sort of a buffer along the
creeks and trail will be provided. |
|
140 |
Dorst |
Comments on the Johnson Creek Watershed buffer
planning. |
|
145 |
Rep. March |
Inquires about whether there is future consideration
for moderate to low income housing in the Village. |
|
150 |
Fussell |
States there is the vision of urban housing elements
that will deal with affordability. |
|
155 |
Rep. Monnes Anderson |
States that Gresham does not have a multitude of
high end housing, and that with the growth of industry, the need for higher
end housing will be necessary to keep higher salary workers from commuting
from West Linn or Lake Oswego. |
|
180 |
Chair Metsger |
Comments on the hard, aggressive actions taken by
Gresham and commends the coordination of the project. |
|
185 |
Chair Metsger |
Closes the informational hearing and adjourns the
committee at 9:45 a.m. |
EXHIBIT
SUMMARY
A
– Informational, written materials, Rob Fussell, 37 pp