SENATE COMMITTEE ON
TRANSPORTATION AND ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT
March 27, 2003 Hearing
Room C
8:00 AM Tapes
72 - 74
MEMBERS PRESENT: Sen. Rick Metsger, Chair
Sen. Bruce Starr, Vice-Chair
Sen. Ryan Deckert
Sen. David Nelson
STAFF PRESENT: Amy Joyce, Committee Administrator
Annastasia Suess, Committee Assistant
MEASURE/ISSUES HEARD: SB 795
– Public Hearing and Work Session
SB 289 - Public
Hearing
SB 661 – Public
Hearing
SB 652 - Public
Hearing
These minutes are in
compliance with Senate and House Rules.
Only text enclosed in quotation marks reports a speaker’s exact
words. For complete contents,
please refer to the tapes.
|
TAPE/# |
Speaker |
Comments |
|
TAPE 72, A |
||
|
002 |
Chair Metsger |
Calls the committee to order at 8:07 a.m. and opens a
public hearing on SB 795. |
|
SB 795
- PUBLIC HEARING |
||
|
010 |
Sen. Bill Morrisette |
District 6. Provides summary of the dash one amendments to SB 795 (EXHIBIT A). |
|
040 |
Diane Amundson |
Provides written testimony in support of SB 795 (EXHIBIT B). |
|
107 |
Sen. Bev Clarno |
District 27. Introduces her grandson, an Oregon seventh grader to testify in support of SB 795. |
|
127 |
Tyler Henley |
Oregon Seventh Grader. Reads written testimony in support of SB 796 (EXHIBIT C). |
|
150 |
Chair Metsger |
Asks for an opinion, that if a helmet law is enacted, will children actually obey the law. |
|
155 |
Henley |
States that each child will need to make the choice to obey the law or face the consequences. |
|
165 |
Dr. Marcie Drury-Brown |
Oregon Pediatric Society. Reads written testimony in support of SB 795 (EXHIBT D). |
|
215 |
Chair Metsger |
Asks if the risks to scooter and in line skating users are comparable to the risks of bicycle riders. |
|
220 |
Drury-Brown |
States that both the momentum and the injuries are comparable. |
|
225 |
Dr. James Lace |
Oregon Medical Association, Oregon Red Cross Society and the Safe Kids program. Provides visual demonstration and written testimony in support of SB 795 (EXHIBIT E). |
|
280 |
Jean Lum |
Springfield Fire Department. Provides written testimony in support of SB 795 (EXHIBITS F, G, H). |
|
330 |
Joanne Fairchild |
Trauma Nurse Coordinator, Legacy Emmanuel Hospital. Begins discussion and provides written testimony in support of SB 795 (EXHIBIT I). |
|
402 |
Bill Olsen |
Brain Injury Association of Oregon. Provides testimony in support of SB 795. |
|
TAPE 73, A |
||
|
035 |
Chair Metsger |
Asks if there has been a notable increase at Emmanuel Hospital of scooter or in-line skating related injuries within the last ten years. |
|
055 |
Fairchild |
States there has been an increase. Adds that ten years ago there were no scooters nor in line skates, and that five years ago there were no injuries reported for scooters. |
|
065 |
Vice Chair B. Starr |
Asks if other states have similar helmet laws. |
|
070 |
Fairchild |
States there are at least three or four. Offers to provide information to the members. |
|
080 |
Chair Metsger |
Closes public hearing on SB 795 and opens a work session on SB 795. |
|
The following prepared testimony is submitted for the record without public testimony for SB 795: |
||
|
|
Tom Miller |
Submits written testimony (EXHIBIT Q). |
|
|
Lisa Millet |
Submits written testimony (EXHIBIT R). |
|
SB 795 – WORK
SESSION |
||
|
082 |
Vice Chair B. Starr
|
MOTION: Moves to ADOPT SB 795-1 amendments dated
03/20/03. |
|
|
|
VOTE: 3-0 EXCUSED: 1 – Deckert |
|
085 |
Chair |
Hearing no objection, declares the motion CARRIED. |
|
090 |
Vice Chair B. Starr
|
MOTION: Moves SB 795 to the floor with a DO PASS
AS AMENDED recommendation. |
|
|
|
VOTE: 3-0 EXCUSED: 1 – Deckert |
|
092 |
Chair Metsger |
Hearing no
objection, declares the motion CARRIED. SEN. CLARNO AND SEN. MORRISSETTE will lead discussion on the floor. |
|
095 |
Vice Chair B. Starr |
Comments on his personal experience with Ms. Fairchild’s trauma program. |
|
098 |
Chair Metsger |
Closes the work session on SB 795 and opens a public hearing on SB 289. |
|
SB 289 – PUBLIC
HEARING |
||
|
105 |
Sen. Jason Atkinson |
District 2. Provides summary of the dash four and dash five amendments to SB 289. Provides testimony in support of the dash four amendments to SB 289. |
|
150 |
Kelly Taylor |
Oregon Department of Transportation (ODOT). Provides clarification on the differences between the dash four and the dash five amendments to SB 289. |
|
192 |
Wayne Schumacher |
Provides written testimony in support of the dash four amendments to SB 289 (EXHIBIT J). |
|
210 |
Chair Metsger |
Asks for confirmation that the organization feels the dash four amendments will not jeopardize the safety of the individuals operating vehicles on highways. |
|
215 |
Schumacher |
Confirms. |
|
220 |
Taylor |
States ODOT supports the dash five amendments, not the dash four amendments due to the visual requirement levels. |
|
230 |
Chair Metsger |
Asks if it is known whether other states allow usage of the bioptic lenses during their drive test. |
|
240 |
Taylor |
States that twenty states that will allow the use of the bioptic during the vision portion of the drive test. States that only eight states allow the higher vision level. |
|
250 |
Chair Metsger |
Asks how many people will qualify under each of the two amendments. Wants to know if there will be a large difference. |
|
260 |
Sen. Atkinson |
States that the dash four amendments will qualify a very small number of people. |
|
270 |
Schumacher |
States that the difference between the dash four and five amendments will eliminate approximately 10 to 20 people in Oregon. |
|
290 |
Sen. Nelson |
Asks if there is potential for liability for eye doctors and is that a concern for Oregon eye doctors. |
|
300 |
Schumacher |
States that there was initially a concern from eye doctors, however the amendments clarified that doctors are not making the determination of an individual to drive, only measuring the individual’s visual acuity. |
|
320 |
Chair Metsger |
Closes the public hearing on SB 289 and opens a public hearing on SB 661. |
|
SB 661 – PUBLIC
HEARING |
||
|
330 |
Troy Costales |
Safety Manager, ODOT. Provides written testimony in support of SB 661 with the dash one amendments (EXHIBIT K). |
|
380 |
Chair Metsger |
Asks for clarification of the dash one amendments. |
|
390 |
Costales |
States that the dash one amendments address ODOT’s concerns. |
|
400 |
Curt Curtis |
Sergeant of the Oregon State Police. Provides written testimony in support of the dash one amendments to SB 661 (EXHIBIT L). |
|
TAPE 72, B |
||
|
015 |
Ken McDermott |
Legislative Assistant to Sen. Charles Starr. Provides written testimony in support of SB 661 with the dash one amendments, however expresses concerns regarding the type of vehicle outlined in the SB 661 (EXHIBIT M). |
|
060 |
Chair Metsger |
Asks for a work group to clarify the issues of the amber light vehicles and create dash two amendments to SB 661. |
|
075 |
Chair Metsger |
Closes the public hearing on SB 661 and opens a public hearing on SB 652. |
|
SB 652 – PUBLIC
HEARING |
||
|
080 |
Sen. Morrisette |
Provides written testimony in support of SB 652 (EXHIBIT N). |
|
100 |
Karey Wollam |
Provides written testimony in support of SB 652 (EXHIBIT O). |
|
135 |
Costales |
ODOT. Provides
clarification on SB 652 and notes several concerns ODOT has with the bill. Provides written testimony (EXHIBIT P). |
|
178 |
Chair Metsger |
Comments on the vehicle industry currently manufacturing vehicles with features automatically engaging lights upon ignition or when windshield wipers are engaged. |
|
190 |
Vice Chair B. Starr |
Asks if the bill were to pass, what will be the consequence for drivers failing to turn on their lights when engaging the windshield wipers. |
|
195 |
Costales |
States that most of the similar violations are seventy five dollars. |
|
208 |
Chair Metsger |
Clarifies the violation is a Class B violation and as such is subject to up to a 300 dollar fine. |
|
220 |
Chair Metsger |
Closes the informational hearing and adjourns the
committee at 9:17 a.m. |
EXHIBIT
SUMMARY
A
– SB 795, written testimony, Sen. Bill Morrisette, 2 pp
B
– SB 795, written testimony, Diane Amundson, 3 pp
C
– SB 795, written testimony, Tyler Henry, 2 pp
D
– SB 795, written testimony, Marcy Drury Brown, 1 p
E
– SB 795, written testimony, James Lace, 2 pp
F
– SB 795, written testimony, Jean Lum, 2 pp
G
– SB 795, written testimony, Jean Lum, 1 p
H
– SB 795, written testimony, Jean Lum, 1 p
I
– SB 795, written testimony, Joanne Fairchild, 1 p
J
– SB 289, written testimony, Wayne Schumacher, 2 pp
K
– SB 661, written testimony, Troy Costales, 1 p
L
– SB 661, written testimony, Curt Curtis, 2 pp
M
– SB 661, written testimony, Ken McDermott, 1 p
N
– SB 662, written testimony, Sen. Bill Morrisette, 1 p
O
– SB, 662, written testimony, Karey Wollam, 1 p
P
– SB 652, written testimony, Troy Costales, 2 pp
The
following exhibits are listed out of order in the body of the tape log:
Q
– SB 795, written testimony, Tom Miller, 1 p (not present in meeting)
R
– SB 795, written testimony, Lisa Millet, 2 pp (submitted following meeting)