SENATE COMMITTEE ON WATER AND LAND USE
March 03, 2003 Hearing
Room D
3:00 p.m. Tapes
20 - 22
MEMBERS PRESENT: Sen. Ted Ferrioli, Chair
Sen. Charlie Ringo, Vice-Chair
Sen. Jason Atkinson
Sen. Rick Metsger
STAFF PRESENT: Judith Callens, Committee Administrator
Megan Jensen, Committee Assistant
MEASURE/ISSUES HEARD: SB 398 Public Hearing
SB 399 Public Hearing
These minutes are in
compliance with Senate and House Rules.
Only text enclosed in quotation marks reports a speaker’s exact
words. For complete contents,
please refer to the tapes.
|
TAPE/# |
Speaker |
Comments |
|
TAPE 20, A |
||
|
005 |
Chair Ferrioli |
Calls meeting to order at 3:06 p.m. and opens public
hearings on SB 398 and SB 399. |
|
SB 398
and SB 399 – PUBLIC HEARING |
||
|
010 |
Sen. Ken Messerle |
Senate District 5. Gives testimony in support of SB
398 and SB 399. |
|
068 |
Sen. Ringo |
Inquires who purchases farmland for wetlands
preservation. |
|
075 |
Messerle |
Replies that private nonprofit organizations and
state and federal government agencies purchase farmland for wetlands
preservation. |
|
080 |
Sen. Ringo |
Asks if that land is taken out of the tax base. |
|
087 |
Messerle |
Replies that the biggest concern is that the land is
removed from the farming economy. |
|
089 |
Chair Ferrioli |
Asks about the repealed sections of the bill. |
|
091 |
Messerle |
Defers to Coos County Commissioner. |
|
099 |
Chair Ferrioli |
Closes public hearing on SB 399. |
|
SB 398 –
PUBLIC HEARING |
||
|
110 |
John Griffith |
Coos County Commissioner. Gives testimony in support
of SB 398 (EXHIBIT A). Provides an
overview of SB 398 and explains that Coos County is losing agricultural areas
to federal acquisitions. |
|
205 |
Chair Ferrioli |
Asks about the revenue loss to Coos County. |
|
210 |
Griffith |
Replies that the revenue loss is minimal and
elaborates. |
|
218 |
Chair Ferrioli |
Inquires if agricultural land prices are being
inflated by the federal purchases prices. |
|
220 |
Griffith |
Affirms. |
|
247 |
Don Schellenberg |
Oregon Farm Bureau. Provides testimony in support of
SB 398 (EXHIBIT B). Believes that
local governments should participate in the planning process of its land. |
|
269 |
Sen. Ringo |
Asks about a possible amendment to SB 398 to allow
the county to approve land use purchases notwithstanding a state decision. |
|
279 |
Schellenberg |
Agrees an amendment might be necessary. |
|
|
Glen Stonebrink |
Oregon Cattlemen Association. Provides testimony in
support of SB 398 (EXHIBIT C).
Recommends amendments to the bill. |
|
387 |
Chair Ferrioli |
Asks if the committee should consider adding the
repealed clauses back to the bill. |
|
389 |
Stonebrink |
Affirms. |
|
393 |
Chair Ferrioli |
Requests information on repealed sections in SB 398.
|
|
TAPE 21, A |
||
|
002 |
Griffith |
Clarifies. |
|
018 |
Tom Bowerman |
Lane County. Provides testimony against SB 398. |
|
048 |
Brendan McCarthy |
Legislative Counsel. Explains constitutional issues
regarding SB 398 (EXHIBIT D). |
|
091 |
Chair Ferrioli |
Requests clarification of the requirement that the federal
government acquire a state’s consent to purchase lands for environmental
purposes. |
|
095 |
McCarthy |
Explains. |
|
104 |
Chair Ferrioli |
Inquires if the state would have to approve any
county land acquisitions under SB 398. |
|
125 |
McCarthy |
Advises that the Legislature’s consent would only be
necessary if the state deemed it desirable to give the federal government
exclusive jurisdiction on lands that it had acquired. |
|
138 |
Chair Ferrioli |
Repeats that if the state is willing to concede
exclusive jurisdiction to the federal government on lands it acquired, the
state would go through a process of approval to release its jurisdiction. |
|
154 |
McCarthy |
Responds and clarifies. |
|
176 |
Chair Ferrioli |
Summarizes the bill and suggests an amendment is in
order. Closes public hearing on SB 398 and opens public hearing on SB 399. |
|
The following prepared testimony is submitted for
the record without public testimony for SB 398: |
||
|
|
Robin Hartmann |
Submits written testimony (EXHIBIT K). |
|
SB 399
– PUBLIC HEARING |
||
|
219 |
Judith Callens |
Committee Administrator. Gives overview of SB 399. |
|
275 |
Teresa Miller |
Nature Conservancy. Gives testimony in opposition to
SB 399 (EXHIBIT E). |
|
287 |
Chair Ferrioli |
Asks about the Nature Conservancy’s view on the protection
of farm zones for wetland use. |
|
290 |
Miller |
Offers to present that information at a later date. |
|
316 |
Sen. Atkinson |
Inquires if the Defenders of Wildlife organization owns
land. |
|
318 |
Miller |
Responds that the Defenders of Wildlife most likely
does own land and offers to research the subject. |
|
320 |
Sen. Atkinson |
Asks how SB 399 would derail progress in wetlands
preservation. |
|
330 |
Miller |
Offers to research that information. |
|
360 |
Chair Ferrioli |
Inquires how much land the Nature Conservancy owns
in Oregon. |
|
370 |
Miller |
Offers to research that information. |
|
383 |
Mark Knaupp |
Polk County. Provides testimony against SB 399 (EXHIBIT F). Believes that
restrictions on wetlands restoration could have negative implications on farm
operations. |
|
467 |
Sen. Atkinson |
Inquires if he owns farmland zoned for exclusive
farm use. |
|
TAPE 20, B |
||
|
003 |
Knaupp |
Affirms. |
|
018 |
Sen. Metsger |
Asks for clarification on how conservation
compensation programs work. |
|
024 |
Knaupp |
Explains the compensation program. |
|
039 |
Chair Ferrioli |
States that a farmer could use money received from
wetlands preservation to purchase more land for agricultural use. |
|
042 |
Knaupp |
Affirms. |
|
048 |
Chair Ferrioli |
Asks about taxes on the wetlands. |
|
050 |
Knaupp |
Replies that property taxes remain the same. |
|
052 |
Chair Ferrioli |
Asks if his conversion to wetlands is irrevocable. |
|
053 |
Knaupp |
Affirms. |
|
056 |
Sen. Metsger |
Asks about permanent and temporary conversion
programs. |
|
058 |
Knaupp |
Responds that there are both permanent and temporary
program and elaborates. |
|
067 |
Sen. Atkinson |
Suggests that SB 399 might be too broad. Asks if the
Oregon Plan has been as successful as the Conservation Reserve Program. |
|
097 |
Chair Ferrioli |
Asks when wetlands restoration projects began on his
land. |
|
100 |
Knaupp |
Replies that the initial project began in 1996. |
|
102 |
Chair Ferrioli |
Inquires if the wetlands mitigation bank was a
result of the current farm bill. |
|
104 |
Knaupp |
Clarifies the wetlands mitigation process. |
|
112 |
Chair Ferrioli |
Inquires if the program is funded by the state of
Oregon. |
|
113 |
Knaupp |
Replies that the mitigation banks are funded by
farmers. |
|
118 |
Chair Ferrioli |
Asks how mitigation credits are sold. |
|
120 |
Knaupp |
Explains the process. |
|
128 |
Chair Ferrioli |
Asks who is in charge of mitigation banks. |
|
130 |
Knaupp |
Replies that the Division of State Lands is
responsible. |
|
132 |
Chair Ferrioli |
Talks about conversion of private lands to public
property. |
|
150 |
Knaupp |
Discusses the conversion of his farmland to public
wetlands. |
|
194 |
David Buchanan |
Benton County. Provides testimony against SB 399 (EXHIBIT G). |
|
259 |
Chair Ferrioli |
Asks if his tax base changed after converting
farmland to wetlands. |
|
260 |
Buchanan |
Responds that the tax rate has risen slightly. |
|
274 |
Tom Jones |
Ducks Unlimited. Provides testimony against SB 399 (EXHIBIT H). Believes that without an
active program of wetland restoration, waterfowl hunting would decrease. |
|
331 |
Sen. Atkinson |
Asks for his organization’s position on SB 398. |
|
336 |
Jones |
Responds that SB 399 is more significant to Ducks
Unlimited. |
|
346 |
Chair Ferrioli |
Asks why Ducks Unlimited might have difficulties
working with county jurisdictions. |
|
351 |
Jones |
Responds that it would deter farmers’ willingness to
proceed with conversion projects. |
|
362 |
Chair Ferrioli |
Suggests that Ducks Unlimited has been very
successful. |
|
380 |
Jones |
Talks about the Ducks Unlimited program. |
|
TAPE 21, B |
||
|
002 |
Sen. Atkinson |
Comments that the number of waterfowl has decreased
in southern Oregon. |
|
011 |
Sen. Metsger |
Comments on the growing numbers of non-migratory
Canadian geese. |
|
030 |
Glen Stonebrink |
Oregon Cattlemen Association. Gives testimony in
support of SB 399. |
|
065 |
Don Schellenberg |
Oregon Farm Bureau. Provides testimony in support of
SB 399 (EXHIBIT I). Believes that
exclusive farm use zones should remain farmland. Discusses the permit process
for non-farm use of farm zone land. |
|
093 |
Chair Ferrioli |
Asks if there is a public process regarding the
issue of the permit. |
|
095 |
Schellenberg |
Describes the public hearing process and discusses
amendments options for SB 399. |
|
154 |
Richard Angstrom |
Oregon Concrete and Aggregate Producers. Gives
testimony in support of SB 399 and suggests an amendment to the bill. |
|
195 |
Tom Bowerman |
Lane County. Provides testimony against SB 399. |
|
228 |
John Griffith |
Coos County Commissioners. Provides testimony in
support of SB 399. Suggests amendments to the bill. |
|
303 |
Sen. Atkinson |
Asks how much Coos County land is being turned into
public land. |
|
305 |
Griffith |
Replies that 5000 acres are public lands. |
|
321 |
Sen. Atkinson |
Inquires how much land is included in South Slough. |
|
323 |
Griffith |
Responds that the South Slough is 4000 acres. |
|
327 |
Sen. Metsger |
Asks if SB 398 could be limited to specific areas of
the state. |
|
340 |
Griffith |
Responds that it could be an option. |
|
350 |
Chair Ferrioli |
Discusses issues surrounding SB 399. |
|
TAPE 22, A |
||
|
010 |
Karlene McCabe |
Greenbelt Land Trust. Gives testimony against SB 399
(EXHIBIT J). Discusses work done
by the Greenbelt Land Trust and expresses the concern that it puts another
hurdle in the process of land conservation projects. |
|
050 |
Chair Ferrioli |
Confirms that the Greenbelt Land Trust would not
like the bill to pass. |
|
052 |
McCabe |
Affirms. |
|
063 |
Sen. Atkinson |
Asks for clarification about the Greenbelt Land
Trust. |
|
064 |
McCabe |
Explains. |
|
069 |
Sen. Atkinson |
Asks what easement the Greenbelt Land Trust works
for. |
|
070 |
McCabe |
Replies that it is an easement to protect wetlands
along both sides of Muddy Creek. |
|
072 |
Chair Ferrioli |
Inquires if the project is funded by the Oregon
Watershed Enhancement Board. |
|
074 |
McCabe |
Responds that the project is funded by the North American
Wetland Conservation Act. |
|
The following prepared testimony is submitted for
the record without public testimony for SB 399: |
||
|
|
Robin Hartmann |
Submits written testimony (EXHIBIT L). |
|
077 |
Chair Ferrioli |
Closes public hearing on SB 399 and adjourns the meeting
at 5:00 p.m. |
EXHIBIT
SUMMARY
A
– SB 398, written testimony by John Shank, J. Griffith, 12 pp.
B
– SB 398, written testimony, Don Schellenberg, 1 p.
C
– SB 398, written testimony, Glen Stonebrink, 1 p.
D
– SB 398, written testimony, staff, 1 p.
E
– SB 399, written testimony, Teresa Miller, 2 pp.
F
– SB 399, written testimony, Mark Knaupp, 1 p.
G
– SB 399, written testimony, David Buchanan, 1 p.
H
– SB 399, written testimony, Tom Jones, 2 pp.
I
– SB 399, written testimony, Don Schellenberg, 3 pp.
J
– SB 399, written testimony, Karlene McCabe, 2 pp.
L
– SB 399, written testimony, Robin Hartman, 3 pp.
The
following exhibit is listed out of order in the body of the tape log:
K
– SB 398, written testimony, Robin Hartmann, 3 pp.