SENATE COMMITTEE ON WATER AND LAND USE
April 09, 2003 Hearing
Room D
3:00 p.m. Tapes
44 - 46
MEMBERS PRESENT: Sen. Ted Ferrioli, Chair
Sen. Charlie Ringo, Vice-Chair
Sen. Jason Atkinson
Sen. Rick Metsger
STAFF PRESENT: Judith Callens, Committee Administrator
Megan Jensen, Committee Assistant
MEASURE/ISSUES HEARD: SB 605 Public Hearing
SB 516 Public Hearing
and Work Session
SB 538 Public Hearing
SB 257 Public Hearing
SB 293 Public Hearing
SB 295 Public Hearing
SB 755 Public Hearing
These minutes are in
compliance with Senate and House Rules.
Only text enclosed in quotation marks reports a speaker’s exact
words. For complete contents,
please refer to the tapes.
|
TAPE/# |
Speaker |
Comments |
|
|
TAPE 44, A |
|||
|
003 |
Chair Ferrioli |
Calls meeting to order at 3:33 p.m. and opens public
hearing on SB 605. |
|
|
SB 605
- PUBLIC HEARING |
|||
|
010 |
Sen. Richard Devlin |
District 19 State Senator. Provides testimony in
support of SB 605 and explains that the bill would uphold the original intent
of HB 3661. States that SB 605 restores balance to decisions on when houses
can be built on forest zone lands and closes an unintended loophole. |
|
|
043 |
Sen. Metsger |
Asks for clarification on the loophole. |
|
|
045 |
Sen. Devlin |
Explains that in a single tract there could be
multiple forest parcels and by manipulating those parcels, more houses could
be built in a single forest tract. |
|
|
055 |
Pat Zimmerman |
Columbia County Citizens for Orderly Growth.
Provides testimony in support of SB 605. Believes that building houses in
forest tracts removes productive timber from the base. Provides an example of
a contractor taking advantage of the loophole to create a tract with several
parcels. |
|
|
122 |
Chair Ferrioli |
Discusses economic effects of house development on
the local area and asks if a comparison between the value gained and the
value lost exists. |
|
|
136 |
Zimmerman |
Replies that there is no cost benefit analysis and
elaborates on economic benefits and losses. States that the economic loss to
the county of a single family residence more than two miles outside the urban
growth boundary is approximately -$35,000. |
|
|
143 |
Chair Ferrioli |
Asks if the loss is for a one year period. |
|
|
145 |
Zimmerman |
Affirms. |
|
|
146 |
Chair Ferrioli |
Replies that the economic life of the house would be
50 to 60 years. |
|
|
149 |
Zimmerman |
Explains that the people who would reside in the
types of houses at issue are commuters. Believes the homes do not contribute
significantly to the local economic benefit of the county. |
|
|
155 |
Chair Ferrioli |
Requests a cost benefit analysis if any exists. |
|
|
158 |
Zimmerman |
Offers to research the subject. |
|
|
166 |
Harlan Levy |
Oregon Association of Realtors. Provides testimony
in opposition to SB 605 and asserts the bill restricts dwellings in forest
zones. Believes counties can disallow the template test for farm dwellings. |
|
|
193 |
Charles Swindells |
Multnomah County. Provides testimony in support of
SB 605. Discusses his land in Yamhill County. Asserts that the template test
is a liberal dwelling authorization that works poorly and elaborates. |
|
|
249 |
Chair Ferrioli |
Clarifies that the cost benefit inquiry was specific
to high value timberland. Inquires if Multnomah County a template county. |
|
|
270 |
Swindells |
Replies that Multnomah County allows template
development in some parts of the county. |
|
|
273 |
Chair Ferrioli |
Asks if Yamhill County a template county. |
|
|
275 |
Swindells |
Affirms. |
|
|
285 |
Chair Ferrioli |
Inquires what interest groups worked on the
compromises reached in HB 3661 (93). |
|
|
289 |
Levy |
Believes many different interest groups worked on HB
3661 (93) including timberland owners, landowners and 1000 Friends of Oregon. |
|
|
295 |
Carrie MacLaren |
1000 Friends of Oregon. Provides testimony in
support of SB 605 (EXHIBIT A).
Discusses forest template dwellings authorized by HB 3661 (93). Explains how
SB 605 fixes an unintentional loophole by allowing only one dwelling per
tract based on the configuration of the tract in 1993. |
|
|
390 |
MacLaren |
Concludes testimony on SB 605 and summarizes issues. |
|
|
TAPE 45, A |
|||
|
010 |
Chair Ferrioli |
Inquires if 1000 Friends of Oregon participated in
HB 3661 (93). |
|
|
012 |
MacLaren |
Replies that 1000 Friends of Oregon participated in
HB 3661 (93) and had significant concerns regarding the bill. |
|
|
013 |
Chair Ferrioli |
Asks if HB 3661 (93) was supported by 1000 Friends
of Oregon |
|
|
015 |
MacLaren |
Believes HB 3661 was not supported by 1000 Friends
of Oregon. |
|
|
020 |
Chair Ferrioli |
Talks about the variability in applications of
forest template dwellings. |
|
|
022 |
MacLaren |
Responds that counties can choose to disallow forest
template dwellings, otherwise forest template dwellings will be allowed by
default. |
|
|
029 |
Chair Ferrioli |
States that counties have control over how the
forest template applies. |
|
|
030 |
MacLaren |
Reiterates concern that by default counties are left
with the forest template dwellings. |
|
|
036 |
Chair Ferrioli |
Discusses the ability of counties to control whether
they use the forest template. |
|
|
048 |
Sid Friedman |
Yamhill County. Provides testimony in support of SB
605 (EXHIBIT B). Provides an
example of landowners accessing the loophole for forest template approvals. |
|
|
096 |
Chair Ferrioli |
Asks why he has not worked towards changing Yamhill
County’s attitude regarding forest templates. |
|
|
098 |
Friedman |
Replies that the state should not allow the de facto
subdivision conversion of the most productive forest lands. |
|
|
109 |
Chair Ferrioli |
Asks if “de facto subdivision conversion” depends on
a platted subdivision having been grandfathered. |
|
|
110 |
Friedman |
Replies that it does not depend on a platted
subdivision having been grandfathered. |
|
|
113 |
Chair Ferrioli |
Reiterates his concern regarding platted subdivisions. |
|
|
116 |
Friedman |
Discusses the loophole that SB 605 intends to
address. |
|
|
137 |
Dave Hunnicutt |
Oregonians In Action. Provides testimony against SB
605. Believes the Legislature did not intend for ambiguity in HB 3661 (93)
and states that HB 3661 (93) gave counties the flexibility to authorize or
disallow forest template dwellings. |
|
|
183 |
Mitch Rohse |
American Planning Association. Provides testimony in
support of SB 605. Believes that HB 3361 did not intend to create a loophole
and elaborates. |
|
|
224 |
Chair Ferrioli |
Comments on legislative intent. |
|
|
233 |
Rohse |
Believes that state policy should not allow overdevelopment
in prime forest land. |
|
|
242 |
Chair Ferrioli |
Asks why the counties are not exercising their
authority to deal with the issue as they see fit. |
|
|
256 |
Rohse |
Replies that counties should be allowed to make
policy issues regarding the issue. |
|
|
271 |
Merilyn Reeves |
Friends of Yamhill County. Provides testimony in
support of SB 605 (EXHIBIT C) and
states support for closing the loophole that adversely impacts timber production
by allowing multiple dwellings on large tracts of productive forest land. |
|
|
358 |
Glen Stonebrink |
Oregon Cattlemen Association. Provides testimony
against SB 605. Believes land use decisions should be made by local
governments. |
|
|
TAPE 44, B |
|||
|
010 |
Randy Tucker |
1000 Friends of Oregon. States that 1000 Friends of
Oregon protects the land base for its resource uses by forestry and
agriculture. |
|
|
030 |
Chair Ferrioli |
Closes public hearing on SB 605. Opens public
hearing on SB 516. |
|
|
SB 516
– PUBLIC HEARING |
|||
|
046 |
Harlan Levy |
Oregon Association of Realtors (OAR). Provides
testimony in support of SB 516 and -1 amendments. |
|
|
050 |
Chair Ferrioli |
Comments that SB 516 and -1 amendments are a
consensus of 1000 Friends of Oregon and OAR. |
|
|
052 |
Randy Tucker |
1000 Friends of Oregon. Comments that many interest
group participated in the work group. |
|
|
063 |
Dave Hunnicutt |
Oregonians in Action (OIA). Discusses the work group
progress. Expresses support for SB 516-1 amendments but opposes SB 516 as a
whole. |
|
|
070 |
Chair Ferrioli |
Asks if the opposition comes from the change to the notification
language. |
|
|
075 |
Hunnicutt |
Affirms. |
|
|
078 |
Tucker |
Remarks that the work group agreed to language
modifications recommended by Senator Ferrioli and OIA. |
|
|
080 |
Hunnicutt |
Comments that the proposed changes are substantially
improved from the original bill |
|
|
085 |
Chair Ferrioli |
Closes public hearing on SB 516 and opens work
session on SB 516. |
|
|
SB 516
– WORK SESSION |
|||
|
093 |
Judith Callens |
Committee Administrator. Provides overview of SB 516
and -1 amendments (EXHIBIT D). |
|
|
135 |
Sen.
Atkinson |
MOTION: Moves to ADOPT SB 516-1 amendments dated
4/4/03. |
|
|
140 |
|
VOTE: 4-0 |
|
|
|
Chair Ferrioli |
Hearing no
objection, declares the motion CARRIED. |
|
|
145 |
Sen.
Atkinson |
MOTION: Moves SB 516 to the floor with a DO PASS
AS AMENDED recommendation. |
|
|
150 |
|
VOTE: 4-0 |
|
|
|
Chair Ferrioli |
Hearing no objection, declares the
motion CARRIED. SEN. ATKINSON will lead discussion on
the floor. Closes work session on SB 516 and opens public
hearing on SB 257. |
|
|
SB 257
– PUBLIC HEARING |
|||
|
167 |
Judith Callens |
Committee Administrator. Provides overview of SB 257. |
|
|
170 |
Chair Ferrioli |
Closes public hearing on SB 257 and opens public
hearing on SB 293. |
|
|
SB 293
– PUBLIC HEARING |
|||
|
173 |
Judith Callens |
Committee Administrator. Provides overview of SB
293. |
|
|
175 |
Chair Ferrioli |
Opens public hearing on SB 295. |
|
|
SB 295
– PUBLIC HEARING |
|||
|
177 |
Judith Callens |
Committee Administrator. Provides overview of SB
295. |
|
|
179 |
Chair Ferrioli |
Asks for presentations by participants in the work
groups on SB 293 and SB 295. |
|
|
192 |
Inga Deckert |
Oregon State Treasury. Provides information on progress
made by the work group. Gives feedback from the work group and explains they will
regroup to work on another proposal which will be narrowed to the John Day
River and will be a pilot project. |
|
|
238 |
Phil Donovan |
Association of Northwest Steelheaders. Supports the
navigability work group and believes that a legislative compromise will
provide the best solution. |
|
|
260 |
Jean Wilkinson |
Oregon Farm Bureau. Supports a resolution to
maintain private property ownership of the beds and banks of rivers and allow
some public access for recreation. Elaborates on work group progress. |
|
|
302
Chair Ferrioli
Requests the work groups continue to work on SB 293 and SB 295 and summarizes issues. Closes
public hearings on SB 293 and SB 295
and opens public hearing on SB 755. The following prepared testimony is submitted for
the record without public testimony for SB 295 Ann Hanus Submits written testimony (EXHIBIT E) SB 755
– PUBLIC HEARING |
|||
|
|
|||
|
354 |
Judith Callens |
Committee Administrator. Provides overview of SB
755. |
|
|
358 |
Sen. Ringo |
States the bill will not be necessary. Talks about
Forest Park and asserts SB 755 will limit expansion in private holdings in
Forest Park. |
|
|
377 |
Chair Ferrioli |
Closes public haring on SB 755 and opens public
hearing on SB 538. |
|
|
SB 538
– PUBLIC HEARING |
|||
|
380 |
Judith Callens |
Committee Administrator. Provides overview of SB
538. |
|
|
390 |
Sen. Gary George |
District 12 State Senator. Provides testimony in
support of SB 538 (EXHIBIT F). |
|
|
TAPE
45, B |
|||
|
005 |
Sen. George |
States that counties are prepared to do their own
land use planning and elaborates. |
|
|
049 |
Ferrioli |
Asks about his occupation. |
|
|
050 |
Sen. George |
States he is a life-long farmer. |
|
|
060 |
Stonebrink |
Provides testimony in support of SB 538 (EXHIBIT G). Discusses constitutional
issues relating to SB 538. Believes that Oregon’s land use laws and policies
place people who own property under servitude. |
|
|
230 |
Sen. George |
Believes that local jurisdictions should manage land
use policies. |
|
|
268 |
Stephen Kafoury |
American Planning Association. Provides testimony
against SB 538. States the bill simply changes who does land use planning
from state to county management. |
|
|
282 |
Chair Ferrioli |
Asks about the history of land use planning in
Oregon and wonders if land use planning was intended be a state system that
would eventually be taken over by counties. |
|
|
293 |
Kafoury |
States that the original goal was for counties to implement
policies based on state guidelines. |
|
|
300 |
Chair Ferrioli |
Asks if an overarching goal of protecting prime
farmland has been accomplished. |
|
|
307 |
Kafoury |
Believes the goal has been partially attained. |
|
|
315 |
Reeves |
Provides testimony against SB 538 (EXHIBIT H). Believes the statewide
land use planning system has enabled Yamhill County to maintain a strong
agricultural and forest economy. |
|
|
TAPE 46, A |
|||
|
005 |
Randy Tucker |
1000 Friends of Oregon. Provides testimony against
SB 538 (EXHIBIT I). States SB 538
would abandon three decades of work that has made Oregon the envy of the
nation for its success in managing growth and discusses evidence of the
success of Oregon’s land use laws. Discusses |
|
|
070 |
Harlan Levy |
Oregon Association of Realtors. Provides testimony
on SB 538. Asserts a neutral stance but believes that some public dissatisfaction
exists with land use policies. |
|
|
100 |
Chair Ferrioli |
Comments
on the need to address some aspects of land use management. |
|
|
115 |
Don Schellenberg |
Oregon Farm Bureau. Provides testimony against SB
538 (EXHIBIT J). Talks about the
development of farmland and explains that his written testimony contains a
series of typographical errors in which SB 538 is shown as SB 358. |
|
|
165 |
Clif Kenagy |
Benton County. Provides testimony against SB 538.
Discusses Oregon’s land use program and states the program has been
successful. |
|
|
197 |
Chair Ferrioli |
Closes public hearing on SB 538 and adjourns meeting
at 5:40 p.m. |
|
EXHIBIT
SUMMARY
A
– SB 605, written testimony, Carrie MacLaren, 6 pp.
B
– SB 605, written testimony, Sid Friedman, 2 pp.
C
– SB 605, written testimony, Merilyn Reeves, 2 pp.
D
– SB 516, SB 516-1 amendments dated 4/4/03, staff, 3 pp.
E
– SB 295, written testimony, Ann Hanus, 15 pp.
F
– SB 538, written testimony, Sen. Gary George, 9 pp.
G
– SB 538, written testimony, Glen Stonebrink, 2 pp.
H
– SB 538, written testimony, Merilyn Reeves, 3 pp.
I
– SB 538, written testimony, Randy Tucker, 4 pp.
J
– SB 538, written testimony, Don Schellenberg, 2 pp.