BUSINESS, LABOR, AND CONSUMER AFFAIRS
January 24, 2005 Hearing Room B
8:30 AM Tapes 11 - 12
Corrected 09/26/05
MEMBERS PRESENT: Rep. Alan Brown, Chair
Rep. Sal Esquivel, Vice-Chair
Rep. Mike Schaufler, Vice-Chair
Rep. Paul Holvey
Rep. George Gilman
Rep. Derrick Kitts
Rep. Chip Shields
STAFF PRESENT: Janet Adkins, Committee Administrator
Katie Howard, Committee Assistant
MEASURES HEARD AND WITNESSES:
HB 2074- Public Hearing and Work Session
Jim Fairchild
Craig P Smith
HB 2071- Public Hearing and Work Session
Craig P Smith
William J. Boyd
HB 2072- Public Hearing and Work Session
William J. Boyd
Steven Kafoury
HB 2073 – Public Hearing and Work Session
Craig P Smith
William J. Boyd
Jim Fairchild
Edward Glad
HB 2078 – Public Hearing and Work Session
Craig P Smith
William J. Boyd
These minutes are in compliance with Senate and House Rules. Only text enclosed in quotation marks reports a speaker’s exact words. For complete contents, please refer to the tapes.
TAPE/# |
Speaker |
Comments |
TAPE 11, A |
||
003 |
Chair Brown |
Calls meeting to order at 8:33 a.m. Opens public hearing on HB 2074. |
HB 2074-PUBLIC HEARING |
||
012 |
Adkins |
Explains HB 2074. |
020 |
Jim Fairchild |
Chair, Construction Contractors Board (CCB). Speaks in favor of HB 2074. Will defer to Smith. |
038 |
Craig P Smith |
Administrator, CCB. Refers to page two (EXHBIT A). Explains the CCB and references mission statement. Explains and speaks in favor of HB 2074. Wants to create a definition for the two year period and eliminate current controversy. Does not know of any controversy surrounding the bill. |
086 |
Rep. Schaufler |
Asks if contractors are in support of the idea. States that he has no problem with this bill. |
092 |
Smith |
Answers that he does not believe that the industry lobbyist have “push back” on this concept. |
095 |
Adkins |
Asks how long a contractor can stay in inactive status. |
097 |
Smith |
Explains that they do not have a time limit. |
106 |
Rep. Holvey |
Asks if the contractors are required to be retrained when a long period of time has passed since the contractor has held a license |
110 |
Smith |
States that there are no provisions for continuing education. |
112 |
Rep. Esquivel |
Asks why there are no educational requirements. |
113 |
Smith |
Says that it is a good question. Says that they have discussion with the industry and it has not been a high priority for the current board. |
129 |
Chair Brown |
Closes public hearing on HB 2074. Opens work session on HB 2074. |
HB 2074-WORK SESSION |
||
135 |
Rep. Kitts |
MOTION: Moves HB 2074 to the floor with a DO PASS recommendation. |
|
|
VOTE: 7-0-0 AYE: In a roll call vote, all members present vote Aye. |
|
Chair Brown |
The motion CARRIES. REP. GILMAN will lead discussion on the floor. |
160 |
Chair Brown |
Closes work session on HB 2074. Opens public hearing on HB 2071. |
HB 2071-PUBLIC HEARING |
||
163 |
Craig P. Smith |
Administrator, CCB. Speaks about dispute resolution. |
175 |
William J. Boyd |
Dispute Resolution Manager, CCB. Explains how a claim is filed and processed by the CCB. Talks about the time limitation and how it relates to bond premiums. Indicates what happens when a settlement is made with a residential claim. Refers to page six (EXHIBIT B). Explains the commercial claim process. Speaks about the differences between arbitration rules and administrative law contested case hearings. |
298 |
Chair Brown |
Asks if a homeowner is required to be represented by an attorney. |
300 |
Boyd |
Explains that they do not have to be represented by an attorney and that most homeowners do not have an attorney. States that they have seen the monetary compensation people are seeking rise over the past several years. Explains HB 2071. Explains why CCB needs a statement of claim. |
351 |
Rep. Holvey |
Wants to know why the process should be different for commercial structures and residential structures. |
356 |
Boyd |
Explains that there is bill coming forward that would allow the commercial claims’ process be handled in the same way as residential claims’ process. Mentions that the details of the bill still need to be determined. |
377 |
Smith |
Explains the history of the board. |
393 |
Rep. Gilman |
Asks if they need the bill since they are going to present a bill that would treat commercial and residential structures in the same way. |
395 |
Boyd |
Explains that they have run into resistance in the commercial industry with the idea. |
412 |
Chair Brown |
Closes public hearing on HB 2071. Opens work session on HB 2071. |
HB 2071-WORK SESSION |
||
416 |
Rep. Kitts |
MOTION: Moves HB 2071 to the floor with a DO PASS recommendation. |
420 |
|
VOTE: 5-2-0 AYE: 5 - Rep. Esquivel, Rep. Kitts, Rep. Schaufler, Rep. Shields, Rep. Brown NAY: 2 - Rep. Gilman, Rep. Holvey |
|
Chair Brown |
The motion Carries. REP. KITTS will lead discussion on the floor. |
TAPE 12, A |
||
010 |
Chair Brown |
Closes work session on HB 2071. Opens public hearing on HB 2072. |
HB 2072-PUBLIC HEARING |
||
012 |
Adkins |
Explains HB 2072. |
025 |
William J. Boyd |
Dispute Resolution Manager, CCB. Explains hearing process and arbitration scheduling. Believes that bill would close loophole in the law. Speaks in support of HB 2072 (EXHIBIT C). |
062 |
Rep. Shields |
Asks if it would allow the board the leeway to set the time limitation and not put the actual time limit into statute. |
064 |
Boyd |
Explains that it does allow the board to set the time limit. Says that it works better this way, because they will not have to come back to the legislature in two years if the time limit is inadequate. |
069 |
Adkins |
Points out that the change is on lines 12 to 14 of the bill. |
070 |
Steven Kafoury |
Oregon Remodelers Association. Speaks in support of HB 2072. Talks about importance of contractors following the laws when remodeling homes and wants all contractors to be accountable. Speaks in support of HB 2073, HB 2074, and HB 2078. Does not speak in favor of HB 2071, because it does not pertain to the Oregon Remodelers Assocation. |
120 |
Chair Brown |
Closes public hearing on HB 2072. Opens work session on HB 2072. |
HB 2072-WORK SESSION |
||
122 |
Rep. Kitts |
MOTION: Moves HB 2072 to the floor with a DO PASS recommendation. |
126 |
|
VOTE: 7-0-0 AYE: In a roll call vote, all members present vote Aye. |
|
Chair Brown |
The motion CARRIES. |
130 |
Rep. Kitts |
MOTION: Moves HB 2072 be placed on the CONSENT CALENDAR. |
|
|
VOTE: 7-0-0 |
|
Chair Brown |
Hearing no objection, declares the motion CARRIED. |
133 |
Chair Brown |
Closes work session on HB 2072. Opens public hearing on HB 2073. |
HB 2073-PUBLIC HEARING |
||
135 |
Adkins |
Explains HB 2073. |
154 |
Craig P. Smith |
Administrator, CCB. Talks about laborers not being paid by general contractors and the process these employee claims undergo. Mentions that they receive a minimal amount of claims by employees who are seeking back wages from his/her employer (EXHIBIT D). |
174 |
William J. Boyd |
Dispute Resolution Manager, CCB. Says that two classes of employees exist, skilled and unskilled. States that there has been a drop-off in employee claims and suspects that it is due to the 50 dollar fee and the complexity of the process. Explains how bill would allow the 50 dollar fee waiver. |
198 |
Rep. Schaufler |
Asks how the information about the waiver will be given to the laborers. |
201 |
Boyd |
Explains that when a person wishes to file a claim they get a manual about the claims process. |
220 |
Chair Brown |
Asks if there is any concern about frivolous claims. |
223 |
Boyd |
Says that they do have a process other than the fee that weeds out needless claims. Believes that the 50 dollar fee has stopped some people from filing claims, and the possibility does exist that there would be frivolous claims. |
234 |
Rep. Kitts |
Asks how someone verifies that the laborer is unable to afford it. |
243 |
Boyd |
Says that it is tied to the federal poverty guidelines. Form asks questions about the person’s financial status and the information is sent to the contractor since it is public record. |
252 |
Rep. Kitts |
Asks if the CCB makes the decision about whether or not the laborer can afford the fifty dollar fee. |
260 |
Boyd |
Affirms that the CCB does make the decision. |
261 |
Rep. Kitts |
Asks why it is not the policy that the contractor pay the fee when it is determined that the contractor did not pay the employee. |
273 |
Boyd |
Says that worker gets the fifty dollar fee back if the worker’s claim is approved. |
278 |
Rep. Kitts |
States that he has a problem with the board looking into the finances of the workers who have been wronged. Indicates that he would like to see the policy of the CCB change. Maintains that he is inclined to vote no because the CCB wants to look into the financial record of the worker. |
306 |
Rep. Esquivel |
Agrees with Rep. Kitts, except he believes that eliminating the fee could open the door for illegitimate claims. Asks why the claims process is not under the Oregon Bureau of Labor. |
328 |
Smith |
Explains that today as the law is written the laborer has to prove that they do not have enough money and the reason to offer the bill is that this does not seem right. Mentions the possibility of an amendment and that the bill would eliminate the fee. Says that he was a hearings officer and never received a frivolous workers’ claims. |
349 |
Rep. Esquivel |
Asks again why the Bureau of Labor is not handling these claims. |
352 |
Smith |
Explains that it is because the CCB holds the bond and the license of contractors. Adds that they have the funds and the interest to do the hearings. Board sees twenty to thirty claims a quarter. |
373 |
Rep. Holvey |
Says that he shares the concern of Rep. Kitts about employees having the money up front but likes that they can get it back or have it waived if they prove that their funds are inadequate. Asks if a laborer, who works a labor broker, would be subject to this waiver or the same review of his/her finances. |
399 |
Boyd |
Says if it is a subcontractor claim falls under a different set of rules. |
411 |
Rep. Holvey |
Says that he would like to see more explicit wording in Section C. Concerns about it bringing labor contractors and brokers in the claims’ process. |
TAPE 11, B |
||
010 |
Rep. Esquivel |
Says that if people did what was right we would never have to make a law. |
016 |
Chair Brown |
Comments about the two claims processes, in the CCB and Bureau of Labor, that the workers have. |
022 |
Rep. Shields |
Asks if the board will waive the fee if it is found that a majority of the workers cannot afford the fee. |
028 |
Boyd |
Confirms that this is the intention of the bill. |
034 |
Rep. Kitts |
Asks where the section is that says that the board will waiver the fee if it is found that the majority of the workers cannot afford the fee. |
037 |
Smith |
Says that there would be a blanket waiver once they had seen that there is a majority of workers who cannot afford it. |
045 |
Boyd |
Reads HB 2073 on page two starting in the middle of line 38. |
050 |
Adkins |
Comments that it is a minimal fiscal impact. |
059 |
Smith |
Explains that more contractors may be paying the bill but with the hard economic times this probably is not the reason for the drop in the number of claims being made. Believes that the notice requirement and the fee have impeded these claims. |
069 |
Rep. Schaufler |
Says that, if they do not do this, there will still be a 50 dollar fee. Asks about the political makeup of the board and if they will make rules to waive the 50 dollar fee. |
075 |
Jim Fairchild |
Chair, CCB. Says that it appears that it is probably the case that the board will waive the fee. |
085 |
Edward Glad |
Pacific Northwest Regional Council of Carpenters. Speaks in support of the HB 2073. Important that those who do not understand the language and/or the system in Oregon can file at the CCB. |
115 |
Rep. Esquivel |
Asks whether the CCB is oblivious of claims made to the Bureau of Labor that should be under the jurisdiction of the CCB. |
122 |
Boyd |
Explains that the CCB regularly works with the Bureau of Labor. Admits that the system does not work as well as he would like, but the CCB is generally aware if there is a claim in the Bureau of Labor. |
133 |
Rep. Esquivel |
Reiterates that there could be a contractor who is not paying their substitutes and have claim against them in the Bureau of Labor that the CCB would not know about. Then there would be no marks against their license. |
138 |
Boyd |
States that there is no requirement that it be reported and the CCB can sanction a contractor if they fail to pay an administrative order by the CCB or another body, or if they fail to pay a judgment if it arises from the contractor’s contract. |
142 |
Rep. Schaufler |
Clarifies that 8.4.B of HB 2073 spells out the criteria for someone to receive a waiver. References section C of HB 2073 and states that the CCB would waive the fee once they found that a majority exists. |
152 |
Boyd |
Affirms that Rep. Schaufler is correct. |
160 |
Chair Brown |
Closes public hearing on HB 2073. Opens work session on HB 2073. |
HB 2073-WORK SESSION |
||
162 |
Rep. Kitts |
MOTION: Moves HB 2073 to the floor with a DO PASS recommendation. |
169 |
Rep. Schaufler |
Asks if currently workers cannot have the fee waived. |
171 |
Boyd |
States that they cannot waive the fee. |
173 |
Rep. Schaufler |
Asks if the CCB would enact a blanket waiver if the majority of the workers could not pay the fee. Asks if currently workers are not filing frivolous claims. |
179 |
Boyd |
Says it is a yes answer to both the question. |
180 |
Rep. Kitts |
Asks why the language says “may” waive the fee and not “will” waive the fee. |
185 |
Boyd |
Says he does not know. Believes that it would give the board some room for interpretation. |
191 |
Rep. Kitts |
Asks why HB 2073 does not specify that the decision to waive the fee has to be based on a majority and instead says that the decision is based on the opinion of the board. |
205 |
Boyd |
Says that he does not know. Believes that they wanted to keep the discretion of the board and indicates that they will most likely be working with imperfect evidence. |
220 |
Chair Brown |
Believes that they do not require any financial records so they do not know if there is a majority. |
223 |
Rep. Kitts |
Reads the financial requirements of HB 2073. Indicates misgivings about requirements. |
230 |
Adkins |
Clarifies that the information is only supplied when the applicant wants the waiver and the information may be there to prove that the majority qualifies for the waiver, because some applicants may not ask for the waiver. |
236 |
Rep. Kitts |
Clarifies that he has a deterrent, to HB 2073, because there are those who cannot afford it and they should not have to provide their financial information. Says that the bill is very ambiguous about its financial requirements. Appreciates the intent of HB 2073. |
264 |
Fairchild |
Says that this is exactly why they are trying to put the bill through so that the board has the legal room to waive the fee even if it does not have information down to the iota. States that they are reading the bill differently. |
278 |
|
VOTE: 7-0-0 AYE: In a roll call vote, all members present vote Aye. |
|
Chair Brown |
The motion CARRIES. REP. SCHAUFLER will lead discussion on the floor. |
290 |
Chair Brown |
Closes work session on HB 2073. Opens public hearing on HB 2078 |
HB 2078-PUBLIC HEARING |
||
293 |
Craig P Smith |
Administrator, CCB. Explains the bill (EXHIBIT E). |
310 |
William J Boyd |
Dispute Resolution Manager, CCB. Explains problem with the last bill. Allows them to have more freedom when giving notice. Speaks in support of HB 2078. |
400 |
Rep. Schaufler |
Speaks in support of the bill. |
410 |
Chair Brown |
Closes public hearing on HB 2078. Opens work session on HB 2078. |
HB 2078-WORK SESSION |
||
402 |
Rep. Kitts |
MOTION: Moves HB 2078 to the floor with a DO PASS recommendation and be placed on the CONSENT CALENDAR. |
410 |
|
VOTE: 7-0-0 AYE: In a roll call vote, all members present vote Aye. |
|
Chair Brown |
The motion CARRIES. |
TAPE 12, B |
||
008 |
Rep. Schaufler |
States that he is excited that so many representatives on the committee are concerned about labor in Oregon and hopes that it continues. |
011 |
Rep. Esquivel |
Says that he would like the CCB look into a continuing education program and people’s license records in other states who are seeking licenses in Oregon. |
035 |
Chair Brown |
Adjourns the meeting at 10:02 AM |
EXHIBIT SUMMARY