March 4, 2005 Hearing Room NORTH PLAINS

3:00 P.M  Tapes 12 - 13

Corrected 10/10/05

MEMBERS PRESENT:            Rep. Derrick Kitts, Chair

Rep. Kim Thatcher, Vice-Chair

Rep. Billy Dalto

Rep. Mitch Greenlick

Rep. Steve March


MEMBER EXCUSED:             Rep. Paul Holvey

                                                Rep. Debi Farr


STAFF PRESENT:                  Cletus Moore, Committee Administrator

Annetta Mullins, Committee Assistant



                                                HB 2583 – Public Hearing

                                                HB 2551 – Public Hearing

                                                SB 162 – Public Hearing

                                                Introduction of Committee Measures – Work Session



These minutes are in compliance with Senate and House Rules.  Only text enclosed in quotation marks reports a speaker’s exact words.  For complete contents, please refer to the tapes.





TAPE 12, A


Chair Kitts

Calls meeting to order at 3:05 p.m., welcomes the audience, announces that Rep. Greenlick is just arriving and that Rep. Dalto is stuck in traffic.  Asks members to introduce themselves.


Rep. March

Introduces himself


Rep. Greenlick

Introduces himself.


Rep. Thatcher

Introduces herself.


Chair Kitts

Introduces himself and acknowledges the presence of Sen. Bruce Starr.


Chair Kitts

Opens a public hearing on HB 2583.



Cletus Moore

Committee Administrator.  Reads summary of HB 2583.


Sen. Bruce Starr

Senate District 15.  Thanks Chair Kitts for taking the committee meeting out of Salem.  Asks that he be allowed to comment on HB 2583 and HB 2551.


Chair. Kitts

Opens a concurrent public hearing on HB 2551.



Cletus Moore

Committee Administrator.  Reads summary of HB 2551.


Sen. Bruce Starr

Testifies in support of HB 2551 and HB 2583.  Comments that HB 2551 and HB 2583 are similar, if not identical to bills he introduced at the request of the same people, Ruth Bendl and Mike Balanesi, in 2001 and believes they are more important today.  Believes we have better information and believes the objections may be similar to those in 2001.   Thinks it is important to understand what it means to vote and to know the value of the vote and we should be careful about who has the opportunity to vote.  It is important that we do not open the ballots before the day of the election.  States that the committee may hear this will cost extra money because they do not have the manpower and that this would be an extra burden to county clerks.  Would respond, ‘what value do we place on the sanctity of our election process.’  There may be added costs to the system.  Appreciate this committee’s willingness to hear the issues and expects the committee will do a great job in deciding public policy.  Comments that one of the arguments for going to a vote by mail system was to save money and believes it has saved money, but the committee ought to look at taking part of the savings to make sure our system is one we can count on and is one that protects the vote.   Hopes if issues come up and the bill needs to amended, the committee will work on them and find the votes to move the bills to the full House so they can get to the Senate. 


Chair Kitts

Thanks Sen. B. Starr for taking the time to appear before the committee.


Rep. Greenlick

Comments that HB 2551 says that some things can only be done b y an elections official.  Asks what an “elections official” is.


Sen. B. Starr

 Responds he believes the committee ought to address what an election office is; it can be more than the county clerk. 


Chair Kitts

Announces the committee will meet until 5:00 p.m. and outlines process and time limitation of each witnesses.  Reminds witnesses that public hearings are open on HB 2583 and HB 2551. 


Rep. March

Comments that witnesses can also mail or email comments to the committee through the Committee Administrator, and that the mail and emails will be made a part of the record.


Chair Kitts

Reiterates that individuals may mail or email their testimony, and advises witnesses that if time does not permit them to testify, they may  submit their written testimony to the Committee Assistant and that it will be entered in the record.  


Mike Balanesi

Portland.  Testifies in support of HB 2583.  States that two of the terrorists who flew planes on 9/11 got their flight training, in part, by using their precinct cards as identification.  Comments on initiative proposition passing in Arizona that requires a person to prove their citizenship before registering to vote and that it has been deemed to be constitutional   States that an initiative would cost Oregon citizens several hundreds of thousands of dollars to put an initiative in the street.  Sixty to seventy percent of people say it is a no-brainer and that it is already in the Oregon Constitution.  They have not done an initiative because the chief opponent of this bill is the gatekeeper of the initiative process and that is a hindrance.  Speaking to HB 2551, shows picture of drop box behind county building at the curb (EXHIBIT A), and reads from The Vote by Mail Manual about secure ballot boxes and required attendance of an elections official. 


Denise Wendler

Director of Business Affairs, Portland State University.  Testifies in opposition to HB 2583 (EXHIBIT B)


Chair Kitts

Comments that the intent of Motor Voter was to register as many people as possible.  Asks if it is not possible for students to request a birth certificate.



Responds the students could request the documents from their home state or contact their parents.  The concern is whether the students would take the extra step or choose not to register. 

TAPE 13, A


Ruth Bendl

Portland resident.  Comments that if financial aid is attached to a requirement for voter registration, she believes most students who need financial aid would make the effort to ask their parents or whoever they need to for a copy of their birth certificate.  Testifies in support of HB 2583 (EXHIBIT C).



Testifies in support of HB 2551 (EXHIBIT D).


David Johnson

Oregon Action, Portland.  Testifies in opposition to HB 2583 (EXHIBIT E) and HB 2551 (EXHIBIT F).


Rep. Thatcher

Asks if the volunteers of Oregon Action get training.



Responds affirmatively and comments on training process. 


Jeri Bitz

Clackamas County Election Integrity Project.  Concerned about integrity of opening ballots early.  Proposes amendments to HB 2551 (EXHIBIT G).


Rep. Greenlick

Asks Bitz to explain her comments about write in votes.



Comments on other parties mounting a write in campaign against their group’s write in name.  States that is legitimate activity unless someone from their group saw the write ins on the ballots that were opened seven to ten days prior to election day.   


Barbara Anderson

Multnomah County, Portland resident.  Explains she worked on election committees and campaigns when we had voting polls.  When the polls closed, they separated the ballots.  States it is better to do it right than to do it in seven to ten days in advance.  States that she does not understand what the big deal is about proving ones citizenship before registering to vote the first time.  States that everyone has to have a passport to travel and it is not difficult to get a birth certificate or prove that one is a citizen.  Voting is a privilege, not a right that we have to protect. 


Jerry Hanson

Director of Assessment and Taxation, Washington County.  Explains that their office includes the Election Division.  Introduces Yamhill County Clerk, Jan Coleman, and Washington County Election Manager, Mikki Kawai.  States that voting is a right, not a privilege, for every citizen.  Presents concerns in statement prepared by Annette Newingham, Legislative Chair, Association of County Clerks (EXHIBIT H). 


Jan Coleman

Yamhill County Clerk.  States that the statement prepared by Newingham (EXHIBIT H) covers their concerns.  States that the county clerks are not opposed to HB 2583 but believe it has some loopholes that need to be worked through.   Comments that she received a letter threatening to take her to court and received abusive remarks toward her because she asked for proof of identification.


Rep. Dalto

Asks how the proof of citizenship, when people are mailing in their registrations, would affect the county clerks’ offices to get everyone registered and ballots mailed by election time. 


Mikkie Kawai

Responds that if proof were not attached, they would not be able to register the person; they would return the registration form.


Rep. Dalto

Asks why they could not add additional staff.



Responds it would not help because the document would not be there. 


Rep. Dalto

Asks if they can increase their staff to take care of those who have the proof of identification.



Responds they would be able to register the person but is not sure if they are to scan the document or somehow attach it to the voter’s record because she is not clear about what the bill says.

TAPE 12, B


Rep. Greenlick

Comments there have been a lot of Supreme Court decisions on how many barriers can be placed to allowing a citizen to exercise his right to vote.  Asks how big a barrier can be before we are infringing on the right of the American citizens.



Responds that it seems if an undue amount of hardship is placed on someone to register, it seems to infringe on the person’s rights.  Believes requiring a person to provide a document that costs $18 to $30 would be an extra burden.


Jerry Hanson

Comments he sees that as a significant issue because they cannot assume it is okay for a few people to have a burden placed on them.  Comments on the process of issuing passports and reasons that some people cannot get a birth certificate.


Rep. Greenlick

Asks if the committee can have legal counsel brief the committee on the question of where the line on burden is at a later meeting.


Chair Kitts

Advises Rep. Greenlick that he will check with legal counsel. 


Chair Kitts

Encourages the county clerks to have amendments drafted to make the bill a better bill. 


Chair Kitts

Invites representatives of the county clerks to submit any statements they have for the record. 



Submits statement prepared by Annette Newingham, Elections Legislative Chair, Association of County Clerks in opposition to HB 2551 (EXHIBIT I).


Jan Coleman

Yamhill County Clerk.  Submits but does not present a prepared statement on behalf of the county clerks in opposition to HB 2551 (EXHIBIT J).


Billie Goodwin

Resident of Multnomah County.  Comments that the law says we must be a citizen of the United States in order to vote and we need to enforce that.  States she is in favor of encouraging new voters to vote but providing proof of citizenship is nothing compared to the hardship men and women who have been in service have gone through to help maintain this right for us to vote.  Believes it is our duty to do what we can to continue putting forth more effort to have people vote.  Anything worth doing is worth going through some barriers and hurdles.  Comment that her son had a misfortune five years ago and he had to provide his birth certificate and believes everyone should put forth the effort if they want to vote.


Chair Kitts

Declares the meeting in recess from 4:09 p.m. to 4:13 p.m.


Bill Bradbury

Secretary of State.  Testifies in Opposition to HB 2583States that as Secretary of State and the chief elections officer for Oregon, one of the most important duties he has is to make sure that as many Oregonians as possible have the opportunity to exercise their right to vote.  Explains that his office conducts voter outreach, provides citizens with information about how to register and cast their ballots.  They also work hard to make sure there are no unnecessary barriers that would prevent eligible voters from registering or voting.  This bill is a solution in search of a problem—there is no evidence of a widespread attempt by non-citizens to register and vote in Oregon.  Under current federal law, citizens who send their voter’s registration card by mail include a photo copy of their identification, indicating their current name and address.  At the bottom of every registration card, the citizen is required to sign an affidavit that they are a U. S. citizen.  States that falsely swearing citizenship on the voter registration form is already a Class C felony.  The issue is not whether Oregonians must be U. S. citizens to vote; it is already clearly established by law.  The issue is by enacting onerous requirements, HB 2583 would discourage eligible citizens from registering and voting.   The bill would be devastating to voter registration drives.  Does not believe anyone walks around with the documents in their pocket.  We should do everything possible to encourage eligible citizens to register, not make it harder for them to do so.   



Explains there are problems with Section 4 (5) of HB 2583.  It specifies that voter registration occurs on the date the confirmation notice is mailed by the county.  This provision, combined with the constitutional 20-day voter registration cutoff, is a formula for an equal protection challenge under the United States Constitution.  Gives examples of people attempting to register to vote, and some not being able to vote because the county, due to workload, could not get the registration process done 20 days prior to the election.  If enacted, HB 2583 would have devastating consequences for our electoral system and democracy by actively discouraging voter registration and participation.  Urges the committee to reject HB 2583.


Rep. Thatcher

Asks if anyone has been prosecuted on false swearing on their registration.



Responds there are a couple of cases every year or two.  They are currently prosecuting two people who were not citizens of the United States and voted in Oregon. 


Rep. Thatcher

Asks how the two were discovered.



Responds that he does not know the details of how it was discovered. 


Rep. Thatcher

Comments that if an overseas ballot being returned is postmarked in adequate time but the ballot does not arrive by the deadline, the ballots are not counted.  Asks if there is any similarity between that and the county election offices not being able to complete the voter registration prior to 20 days before the election, and whether the process for returning ballots from overseas should be changed.



Responds that Oregon gets their overseas ballots out 45 days before an election.  There is a challenge for some overseas citizens to get their ballots back.  Oregon has, basically, adopted a policy that says ballots have to be back to the elections staff by 8:00 p.m. on election day for them to be counted.  One of the reasons for that is the postmarks cannot be read.  States there is some difficulty with that but they do not see any reason to change it because people are treated by the government very equally. 


Rep. Greenlick

Asks Bradbury how the courts have balanced the question of putting barriers up to prevent citizens from exercising their right to vote, and when is it not appropriate. 



Responds that he can give a general statement that the courts always require that there must be a very compelling reason to limit free speech and it needs to be equally applied to everybody. 


Rep. Greenlick

Comments on efforts to enhance voter registration and adds that the committee can ask how that line is drawn. 



Testifies in opposition to HB 2551.  States that the provision of HB 2551 in Section 1, delays processing ballots until 8:30 a.m. on the day of the election.  Section 3 effectively requires the county elections office to staff all drop boxes.  There is no evidence that ballots from drop boxes have been tampered with.  There is no evidence that ballots have been tampered with once they are in the county elections office.  The problems the bill causes with the so-called solution are very real.  The delay of opening the envelopes creates a delay in counting the votes and announcing the results.  The longer the counting takes, the less confidence the voters have that the election was conducted fairly and openly and accurately.  By compressing the time the counties have to process the ballots, we do not get more security.  It places huge pressure on the county staff to process the same workload in a much shorter period of time.  The drop box provision creates an unfunded mandate to staff drop boxes.  Without accompanying funding it is more likely to eliminate drop boxes entirely but there is a provision in the law that says every county will have at least two drop boxes.  That law would have to be amended.  It creates a hardship on voters by making the election system less accessible.  States his office and the County Clerks Association are in favor making the system more accessible.  The bottom line is that fixing the problem that does not exist decreases access for voters and undermines their confidence by increasing the time it takes to count votes.  Urges the committee to reject HB 2551. 


The following prepared testimony is submitted for the record without public testimony due to time constraint:


Margaret Noel

President, League of Women Voters of Oregon.  Submits prepared statement in opposition to HB 2551 (EXHIBIT O).


Margaret Noel

President, League of Women Voters of Oregon.  Submits prepared statement in opposite to HB 2583 (EXHIBIT P).


Andi Miller

Executive Director, Common Cause Oregon.  Submits prepared statement in opposition to HB 2551 and HB 2583 (EXHIBIT Q).


Arlie Adkins

Oregon Student Association.  Submits prepared statement in opposition to HB 2583 (EXHIBIT R).


Rep. Donna Nelson

H.D. 24.  Submits a prepared statement prior to the meeting in support of HB 2551 (EXHIBIT S).

The following statements have been received by mail/email and are hereby made a part of the record (See Tape 12A at 214, page 2 of these minutes).


John E. Velehradsky

Submits via U.S. Mail a letter in support of HB 2551 and HB 2583 (EXHIBIT T).


Paul Murray

North Plains resident.  Submits via email a statement in support of HB 2551 (EXHIBIT U) and HB 2583 (EXHIBIT V) and in opposition to SB 162 (EXHIBIT U).


Chair Kitts

Closes the public hearings on HB 2583 and HB 2551 and opens a public hearing on SB 162.



Cletus Moore

Committee Administrator.  Reads summary of SB 162.


Bob Gang

Small business owner and resident of Oregon for 29 years.  Comments that elections are for U. S. citizens who are residents of Oregon.  Believes vote by mail is taking away from those who want to vote at the ballot box in person.  Voting is a right granted to U. S. citizens, not visitors or illegal aliens, who are registered in the state of Oregon.  Comments that his son left for college in 1987 and he received a ballot for him for every election because his son was a registered voter in this state.  Questions how many others are still receiving ballots.  Believes vote by mail is open to fraud; anybody can fill out the ballot and mail it in.  States he is concerned about the lack of security in our voting system and we are leaving ourselves wide open to major fraud if we do not bring the situation under control. 

TAPE 13, B



Comments that major corrections should be made to toughen up our laws requiring identification of the voter that she or he is a registered resident of this county and a U. S. citizen in order to vote. 


Bonnie Bishop

Multnomah County.  Testifies in support of SB 162.  Comments she does not fully understand the bill but can describe a specific incident when she was serving as a volunteer on a bank of phones during the last election.  Tells about a report to her of voter fraud by two foreign students who were solicited to register to vote by the offer of money.   The landlord of the boarding house where the students were living recognized the mail to the two students was ballots and she knew the students were not citizens of this county.  The landlord initiated the call to her to have someone check out the situation.  Questions how many times that may be happening throughout Oregon in vote by mail with no proof of citizenship.


Rep. March

Asks if Bishop is an election official.



Responds she was only serving as a volunteer on a phone bank.


Rep. March

Asks if Bishop encouraged the caller to contact the local county elections official or the Secretary of State’s office.



Responds that she told the caller that the caller needed to talk to someone higher up the chain of command and referred the call to the campaign office. 


Rep. March

Asks what the campaign office did with the information.



Responds that she does not know. 


Norman Turrill

League of Women Voters of Oregon.  Submits statement and copy of report by Priscilla Southwell.  Presents statement on behalf of Margaret Noel, President (EXHIBIT K).


Margaret Noel

President, League of Women Voters of Oregon.  Comments he testified in front of Representative Blumenauer and Representative Hooley.  They were very interested in looking at vote by mail as something that could be used in other states.  Believes the evidence is that Oregon’s system is less prone to fraud and she is proud to be asked by people in other states how Oregon does it.  States he has been sworn in when there were calls for deputies.  They must swear to uphold the Constitution of the United States, and she has been told when the people at the library are told to watch the boxes, they are deputized and must also uphold the Constitution. 


Mike Balanesi

Portland.  Comments that SB 162 would make vote by mail the standard in the state and would remove the term "polling place" from the statutes.  Comments on being told to move away from the ballot drop box even though he was 100 feet away gathering signatures on something that had nothing to do with what was being voted on.  If “polling place” is removed from the statutes, the picture he submitted (EXHIBIT A) of the mail box drop site would  no longer be a poling place.  Comments that he listened to the previous hearing on this bill.  Believes the Secretary of State wants the $700,000 so he can get $18 million in matching funds to get the centralized voter registration system going.  States he supports the registration system but until those funds are released, believes SB 162 should be gone through with a fine tooth comb because there is more in the bill than in either of the two measures discussed earlier. 


Chair Kitts

Comments that the appropriation bill for the $700,000 will probably begin in this committee and then be referred to the Ways and Means Committee.  The Secretary of State and the majority of this committee want to get the $18 million and the committee wants to make sure it is spent properly and to make sure that people get to vote and vote accurately. 



Comments that with $18 million, no one should be able to tell the committee that we cannot afford HB 2551 and HB 2583.


Andi Miller

Executive Director, Common Cause Oregon.  Comments that SB 162 merely codifies what we are already doing in vote by mail.  States she is disturbed by the effort to bring up the subject of vote by mail again.  The voters have decided that and it is how things are.  It is very successful and other states are looking at Oregon with envy for the number of people that participate and the ease of participation.  States she did not vote in many elections other than the General Elections before vote by mail and now votes in every election. 


Rep. March

Comments on being an internal auditor for six years.  Explains that federal funds come with specific requirements.  Funds that are designed for a centralized registration system are not likely to be used for the election process itself. 


Chair Kitts

Comments that he thinks there is some flexibility considering those funds are not simply earmarked for the centralized voter registration system, but rather the Help America Vote Act (HAVA). 


Ruth Bendl

Portland.  Submits a prepared statement and testifies in opposition to SB 162 because she does not think vote by mail in its present form should be the only option in Oregon (EXHIBIT L).  Thinks there should be an open option to returning to polling places.


Rep. Dalto

Comments on turnout at last election in his district; more than 90 percent of the registered voters voted.

The following statement has been received by email and is hereby made a part of the record (See Tape 12A at 214, page 2 of these minutes).


Paul Murray

North Plains resident.  Submits via email a statement in opposition to SB 162 (EXHIBIT W).


Chair Kitts

Closes the public hearing on SB 162 and opens a work session for the purpose of introducing committee bills.



Rep. March

MOTION:  Moves LC 2502 (EXHIBIT M) AND LC 2575 (EXHIBIT N) BE INTRODUCED as committee bills.



VOTE:  5-0-2

EXCUSED:  2 - Rep. Farr and Holvey


Chair Kitts

Hearing no objection, declares the motion CARRIED.


Chair Kitts

Closes the work session on Introduction of Committee Measures and adjourns meeting at 5:00 p.m.





  1. HB 2551, photo of ballot drop site, Mike Balanesi, 1 p
  2. HB 2583, prepared statement, Denise Wendler, 3 pp
  3. HB 2583, prepared statement, Ruth Bendl, 3 pp
  4. HB 2551, prepared statement, Ruth Bendl, 1 p
  5. HB 2583, prepared statement, David Johnson, 1 p
  6. HB 2551, prepared statement, David Johnson, 1 p
  7. HB 2551, proposed amendments, Geri Bitz, 1 p
  8. HB 2583, prepared statement of Annette Newingham, Jerry Hanson, 2 pp
  9. HB 2551, prepared statement of Annette Newingham, Jerry Hanson, 2 pp
  10. HB 2551, prepared statement, Jan Coleman, 9 pp
  11. SB 162, prepared statement, Norman Turrill, 6 pp
  12. SB 162, prepared statement, Ruth Bendl, 1 p
  13. Introductions, LC 2502, staff, 1 p
  14. Introductions, LC 2575, staff, 1 p
  15. HB 2551, prepared statement, Margaret Noel, 1 p
  16. HB 2583, prepared statement, Margaret Noel, 1 p
  17. HB 2551 and HB 2583, prepared statement, Andi Miller, 12 pp
  18. HB 2583, prepared statement, Arlie Adkins, 1 p
  19. HB 2551, prepared statement, Rep. Donna Nelson, 1 p
  20. HB 2551 and HB 2583, prepared statement, John E. Velehradsky, 2 pp
  21. HB 2551, email statement, Paul Murray, 1 p
  22. HB 2583, email statement, Paul Murray, 1 p
  23. SB 162, email statement, Paul Murray, 1 p