HOUSE COMMITTEE ON GENERAL GOVERNMENT
March 10, 2005 Hearing Room B
8:30 A.M. Tapes 24 - 25
MEMBERS PRESENT: Rep. Vicki Berger, Chair
Rep. Peter Buckley, Vice-Chair
Rep. Mac Sumner, Vice-Chair
Rep. Kevin Cameron
Rep. Sal Esquivel
Rep. Larry Galizio
STAFF PRESENT: Caralyn Fischer, Committee Administrator
Linda K. Gatto, Committee Assistant
MEASURES/ISSUES HEARD:
HB 2674 – Public Hearing
HB 2738 – Public Hearing
These minutes are in compliance with Senate and House Rules. Only text enclosed in quotation marks reports a speaker’s exact words. For complete contents, please refer to the tapes.
TAPE/# |
Speaker |
Comments |
TAPE 24, A |
||
004 |
Chair Berger |
Calls the meeting to order at 8:34 a.m. and opens the public hearing on HB 2674. |
HB 2674 – PUBLIC HEARING |
||
010 |
Caralyn Fisher |
Committee Administrator. Reviews what HB 2674 does. |
018 |
Roger Martin |
Lobbyist for Confederate Tribes of the Umatilla Indian Reservation. Introduces Malissa Minthorn. Testifies in support of HB 2674 stating that the library offers a number of programs for children and seniors. |
040 |
Malissa Minthorn-Winks |
Library & Archives Manager for Tamastslikt and member of the Umatilla Tribe. Submits prepared testimony in support of HB 2674 (EXHIBIT A). |
120 |
Justin Martin |
Confederated Tribes of the Grand Ronde. Submits testimony in support of HB 2674 (EXHIBIT B). |
173 |
Chair Berger |
Notes for the record that written testimony has been submitted from Minerva Soucie of the Burns Paiute Tribe (EXHIBIT C) and Christopher Tanner of the Coquille Indian Tribe (EXHIBIT D). Notes the fiscal impact statement from the State Library (EXHIBIT E). Invites Jim Scheppke and Nam Heim to comment. |
185 |
Jim Scheppke |
Director, State Library. Explains that the library board has not made a final declaration of support. States that the board has had conceptual discussions and this bill is an important step in bringing the tribal libraries into the library community. Explains the resource sharing programs of the state library. |
251 |
Nam Heim |
Oregon Library Association. States that the board meets in the morning and believes there is support. |
266 |
Chair Berger |
Closes the public hearing on HB 2674 and opens the public hearing on HB 2738. |
HB 2738 – PUBLIC HEARING |
||
275 |
Caralyn Fischer |
Committee Administrator. Explains what HB 2738 does. |
304 |
Mike Marsh |
Deputy Director, Oregon Department of Transportation. Submits and reads prepared testimony in support of HB 2738 (EXHIBIT F) which summarizes the background and explains why HB 2738 is needed. |
348 |
Chair Berger |
Clarifies that this bill does not authorize new employees or make new managers in ODOT. |
357 |
Rep. Galizio |
Asks how many people are affected. |
381 |
Marsh |
Answers three people. |
383 |
Rep. Witt |
Asks why this had not been noticed before. |
386 |
Marsh |
Responds by explaining the background in the 1993 organizational discussions. Notes that the changes are needed for clarity. |
409 |
Rep. Esquivel |
Asks if there will be a fiscal impact. |
414 |
Fischer |
Responds that before the bill comes to work session the paperwork will be ready. |
436 |
Rep. Buckley |
Asks if salary changes are anticipated. |
436 |
Marsh |
Answers no and states there will not be a fiscal impact. |
TAPE 25, A |
||
010 |
Rep. Galizio |
Asks if the three employees are currently included in collective bargaining. |
011 |
Marsh |
Answers affirmatively and clarifies that it is the same job description and almost the exact same salary. |
012 |
Rep. Witt |
Asks how a manager is in a collective bargaining unit. |
019 |
Marsh |
Explains that the administrator is not in a collective bargaining unit but the administrative support person is at this time. Clarifies further. |
027 |
Rep. Cameron |
Asks what the cut off is for those employed “at will” and those that are not. |
038 |
Marsh |
Explains that the limitations are from the 1993 statute. |
046 |
Chair Berger |
Asks what these employees do on the job that might relate to bargaining units and information about personnel. |
052 |
Marsh |
Explains there are agency heads and division managers dealing with confidential activity. In unclassified service the employee has access to confidential information and reports to the administrator or director who can remove the employee if confidentiality is breached. |
070 |
Chair Berger |
Asks for a description of “at will.” |
071 |
Marsh |
Explains that the agency head or division administrator can remove the person “at will” and the employee does not have the same civil service protections that a person in classified service would have. |
077 |
Chair Berger |
Asks how many ODOT employees would fit into this classification. |
079 |
Marsh |
Answers about 25 in unclassified service out of 4,600. |
083 |
Chair Berger |
Closes the public hearing on HB 2738 and adjourns the meeting at 9:08 a.m. |
EXHIBIT SUMMARY
C. HB 2674, prepared testimony, Minerva Soucie, 1 p
D. HB 2674, prepared testimony, Christopher Tanner, 2 pp
E. HB 2674, fiscal statement, Jim Scheppke, 1 p
F. HB 2738, prepared testimony, Mike Marsh, 2 pp