HOUSE COMMITTEE ON
INFORMATION MANAGEMENT AND TECHNOLOGY
March 10, 2005 Hearing Room 357
1:00 P.M. Tapes 23 - 24
MEMBERS PRESENT: Rep. John Dallum, Chair
Rep. Jerry Krummel, Vice-Chair
Rep. Kelley Wirth, Vice-Chair
Rep. Chuck Burley
MEMBER EXCUSED: Rep. Brad Witt
STAFF PRESENT: Dallas Weyand, Committee Administrator
Louann Rahmig, Committee Assistant
MEASURES/ISSUES HEARD:
Proposed Oregon Liquor Control Commission Information Technology Upgrades - Informational Meeting
These minutes are in compliance with Senate and House Rules. Only text enclosed in quotation marks reports a speaker’s exact words. For complete contents, please refer to the tapes.
TAPE/# |
Speaker |
Comments |
TAPE 23, A |
||
005 |
Chair Dallum |
Calls the meeting to order at 1:00 p.m. and opens the informational meeting on proposed Oregon Liquor Control Commission information technology upgrades. |
PROPOSED OREGON LIQUOR CONTROL COMMISSION INFORMATION TECHOLOGY UPGRADES – INFORMATIONAL MEETING |
||
012 |
Rep. Burley |
Announces that the U.S. House of Representatives Committee on Energy and Commerce “passed out” House Resolution 29, which fights the invasive practice of software that monitors the activity of computer users without his/her consent. Explains that this is the spyware software that this committee discussed. |
019 |
Chair Dallum |
Responds that is good news and comments that this committee delayed state action awaiting federal legislation. |
025 |
Teresa Kaiser |
Executive Director, Oregon Liquor Control Commission (OLCC). Distributes printed OLCC Technology Modernization Package (EXHIBIT A). Explains plan to develop information technology (IT) in three areas simultaneously during the next biennium: merchandising, licensing and compliance. |
051 |
Kaiser |
Continues with a description of the agency’s organization, responsibilities, revenue and relationship with sales outlets. |
068 |
Kaiser |
Presents a six-minute videotape that portrays the activities of OLCC to underscore the agency’s IT needs. (Note: The voices/narratives on the audio tape are recorded from the videotape.) |
151 |
Kaiser |
Continues following videotape presentation. Expands on the IT needs in merchandising, licensing and compliance. Reports on the increase in liquor licenses issued and the liquor store sales growth as shown in the Appendix in EXHIBIT A. Advises that liquor sale profits are distributed to the general fund and local governments. |
187 |
Kaiser |
Continues that Oregon mirrors the nationally growing distilled spirits market. Advises that the agency is not getting additional staff to keep up with demand for licenses or product. |
199 |
Rep. Wirth |
Asks about the decrease in full time equivalencies (fte) between 1993 and 1994 (EXHIBIT A). |
208 |
Kaiser |
Replies that was due to cutbacks in staffing. Explains that the warehouse was partially automated to compensate for the reductions. |
215 |
Rep. Wirth |
Inquires about the staffing level prior to 1993. |
221 |
Steve Pharo |
Acting Director, OLCC Merchandising Program. Responds that there was a large restructuring required in the state to decrease the number of ftes, plus personnel for local deliveries were reduced. |
233 |
Kaiser |
Advises that OLCC’s business partners agree that technological improvements are necessary as they need current product sales information to properly manage their businesses. Cites sales growth projections. |
253 |
Kaiser |
Refers to Pages 35, 36, 38 and 41 of the agency’s budget narrative (EXHIBIT A) which describes one-time and ongoing needs. |
259 |
Kaiser |
Explains that she is personally handling the agency’s IT project. Describes experience with similar projects in other states. |
274 |
Kaiser |
States that Department of Administrative Services (DAS) has provided project management services in developing the charter and business analysis. |
290 |
Kaiser |
Comments that IT advances will allow the agency to handle workload increases without additional staff. |
308 |
Kaiser |
Emphasizes that the agency needs to position itself to provide citizens with online licensing. |
318 |
Chair Dallum |
Asks how long it takes to obtain a new license. |
322 |
Kaiser |
Responds, 90-120 days. |
325 |
Chair Dallum |
Inquires about the turn around time after implementation of IT. |
326 |
Kaiser |
Wants 90 percent within 30 days or less. |
330 |
Rep. Wirth |
Asks how much of the growth since 2002 is attributed to Sunday sales, which went into effect in 2002. |
340 |
Kaiser |
Answers that they are able to obtain that information on the “store within a store” project as grocery chains capture sales by the hour, and there are significant sales Sunday afternoons in those three stores. Advises they are unable to collect that data with the other liquor outlets. |
355 |
Rep. Wirth |
Inquires if the new technology will enable OLCC to collect and analyze that data. |
360 |
Kaiser |
Responds, that is correct. |
363 |
Rep. Burley |
Seeks clarification that the only information available is from liquor stores within grocery stores. |
366 |
Kaiser |
Answers, that is correct. |
368 |
Rep. Burley |
Asks why that is possible. |
369 |
Kaiser |
Replies that the stores have significant IT infrastructure in place and, by agreement, make that information available to OLCC. |
373 |
Rep. Burley |
Inquires if the agency has performance measures to keep track of that kind of information. |
383 |
Kaiser |
Responds that they do not have that kind of sophisticated performance measures. Explains how they track information now. |
TAPE 24, A |
||
007 |
Rep. Burley |
Comments that some businesses have the capability of capturing “real time” information into a data bank. Asks if that is where they want to be for merchandising and retail. |
013 |
Kaiser |
Replies, absolutely; we need the right product in the right place at the right time. |
017 |
Rep. Wirth |
Asks for the locations of the three stores in stores. |
019 |
Kaiser |
Responds there are two in the Portland suburban area and one in Bend. |
022 |
Rep. Krummel |
Points out that the time frame for the agency to issue a license may be impacted by a delay of a local government in rendering a decision on the application. |
037 |
Chair Dallum |
Assumes the agency is ordering just what is needed now. |
039 |
Kaiser |
Answers, absolutely. |
041 |
Bill Linden |
Represents three of OLCC’s business partners, 7-Eleven, Oregon Restaurant Association and Anheuser-Busch Company. States that OLCC needs significant enhancements to their IT capabilities and believes they have prepared a realistic plan. |
064 |
Linda Agnowski |
Director, Regulatory Field Operations. Gives overview of the agency’s regulatory program. |
084 |
Agnowski |
Describes duties of the field operations unit, which includes licensing and complaint investigations and liquor law violations. |
093 |
Agnowski |
Refers to the increase in number of licenses making it necessary for field operations to become more efficient. Cites the lack of an integrated IT system inhibits efficiency. |
121 |
Agnowski |
Explains the manual process for recording the compliance history of a business, which cannot be accessed electronically. |
148 |
Agnowski |
Cites the need for an integrated enforcement activity system that would include remote access devices for inspectors. |
162 |
Agnowski |
Explains how the enforcement activity system operates and the types of information captured. |
193 |
Agnowski |
Describes the benefits of IT improvements. |
208 |
Rep. Wirth |
States that there are legislators who believe the state should get out of the liquor business so wonders if it is wise to make a large investment at this time. |
219 |
Kaiser |
Responds that OLCC returns substantial revenues to the state. Explains that their request is for less than ½ of 1 percent to invest in technology to operate more efficiently for as long as it is the will of the legislature. |
230 |
Rep. Krummel |
Responds to Rep. Wirth’s question about privatizing. States there must be an incentive for a private business to bid; and if a large investment is needed, that is not likely to happen. |
247 |
Rep. Krummel |
Asks if the alcohol manufacturers listed in the budget narrative are in Oregon or nationwide. |
257 |
Agnowski |
Replies, it is a combination. Advises that anyone who manufactures alcohol in Oregon has to have a license, even if their parent company is in another state. |
266 |
Rep. Krummel |
Seeks clarification if that includes small wineries as well as large distilleries. |
273 |
Agnowski |
Responds, that is correct. States that most of the growth is in wineries. |
280 |
Chair Dallum |
Asks if DAS has reviewed OLCC’s security. |
289 |
Roger Deming |
IT Director, OLCC. States that there have been discussions with DAS. Explains that not all of the security requirements have been identified. |
299 |
Kaiser |
Points out that she has worked closely with a DAS project manager to ensure an integrated development that meets Oregon’s technology “big picture.” |
309 |
Chair Dallum |
Cites the committee’s concern for security and compatibility. |
312 |
Rep. Wirth |
Expresses concern with the threat of privatization of OLCC and asks how vulnerable the agency is by not having an IT upgrade. Inquires how much of the $2.2 million for one-time professional services is for a private contractor and how much is for DAS. |
343 |
Kaiser |
Replies that there has been no decision on how that will be broken down. Wants to get the most value for the cost. |
354 |
Kaiser |
Responds to the earlier question about privatization. Believes those pressures came from unhappy business partners. Explains that the gap between the agency’s performance and the industry’s needs has been closed by using work groups to resolve problems. |
384 |
Kaiser |
Advises that privatization pressures also came from citizens with concerns with the retail outlets. |
403 |
Rep. Wirth |
Expresses concern about the media. |
418 |
Kaiser |
Responds that OLCC needs to illustrate to citizens that they are getting the value from what is spent on the agency. |
TAPE 23, B |
||
001 |
Rep. Burley |
Asks if OLCC has made these requests before. |
005 |
Kaiser |
Understands that her predecessors regularly requested funding for projects to move the agency forward. |
012 |
Rep. Burley |
Inquires about Web-based inquiry systems referred to in the budget narrative (EXHIBIT A). |
019 |
Deming |
Answers that this is in response to a need that was identified to provide information easily to the public and to businesses. |
029 |
Rep. Burley |
Asks if custom-built packages or off-the-shelf solutions will be used. |
036 |
Deming |
Replies that they are working with DAS and may have to develop some solutions but prefer to use off-the-shelf packages that can be modified whenever possible. |
046 |
Chair Dallum |
Comments that DAS prefers use of off-the-shelf software. |
053 |
Rep. Krummel |
Reiterates that whatever is used, DAS will be sure it fits within the overall enterprise structure so there are no conflicts. |
058 |
Kaiser |
Emphasizes that there will be no conflict with the state’s decision regarding IT. |
061 |
Rep. Krummel |
Inquires about the need for Geographic Information System data mapping and what that adds to the overall picture. |
080 |
Kaiser |
Responds that OLCC interfaces with law enforcement. Discusses areas with high incidents of alcohol-related problems and how this information would be helpful in electronic license processing. |
099 |
Rep. Krummel |
Asks if the wireless connection ongoing expense is anticipated to be for a satellite connection (EXHIBIT A). |
113 |
Deming |
Explains that the initial estimate was based on a cellular network. |
117 |
Rep. Krummel |
Inquires about the types of servers and licensing fees. |
143 |
Deming |
Describes the servers and license fees, and explains that a more fault tolerant system is needed as the agency moves into more Web-based functions. |
154 |
Rep. Krummel |
Assumes that the secondary servers will be housed elsewhere. |
158 |
Deming |
Replies that they have not selected a secondary site. |
162 |
Rep. Krummel |
Asks that even though OLCC is not part of the initial consolidation, could not the servers be put into the new data center. |
165 |
Deming |
Responds that he sees no reason why that wouldn’t work. |
169 |
Rep. Krummel |
Inquires if it would be more cost effective to look at servers that give a wide array of possibilities, especially the add-on capabilities. |
174 |
Deming |
Answers that they will look at all options available. |
184 |
Rep. Krummel |
Asks who will use the developer work stations shown under capital outlay (EXHIBIT A). |
196 |
Deming |
Explains that staff and contractors will use this equipment. |
203 |
Rep. Wirth |
Inquires if the request for funding is for Phase 2. |
208 |
Deming |
Responds that Phase 2 is the current biennium and the funding request is for Phase 3. |
213 |
Rep. Wirth |
Asks if Phase 3 could be broken down if not fully funded. |
219 |
Kaiser |
Answers that they need to accomplish Phase 3 next biennium so they can get to online licensing. |
236 |
Rep. Wirth |
Refers to total budget package (EXHIBIT A). Comments that a large portion appears to be for staff. Seeks clarification. |
260 |
Kaiser |
Explains that some will be used for new staff and some for contracts. |
267 |
Rep. Wirth |
Asks if DAS staff can provide some of the services planned for contracting. |
279 |
Deming |
Responds that they will be consulting with DAS, and if DAS does not have the needed services available, they want the flexibility to obtain from the private sector. |
292 |
Michael Zanon |
Information Resource Management Division, DAS. Advises that over the past year OLCC in cooperation with DAS has focused on the business plan and business needs. Confirms their continued support. |
327 |
Rep. Wirth |
Asks if some of the money could be spent on training of current staff to provide necessary services. |
339 |
Zanon |
Replies that they are telling agencies that if DAS can provide a service at a cost competitive to the private sector, they want to be considered. |
353 |
Chair Dallum |
Asks Rep. Wirth if her concern is that when it comes time to hire fte, that current IT people will have an opportunity to apply. |
363 |
Rep. Wirth |
Answers, no. Suggests using some of the money to train current staff so in the long run they can provide needed services. |
377 |
Zanon |
Replies that is part of the ongoing discussion with OLCC. Explains that there is a need to balance their existing resources with all of the state agency projects. |
TAPE 24, B |
||
003 |
Rep. Burley |
Asks if the OLCC business plan is part of EXHIBIT A. |
006 |
Deming |
Responds, yes; it is in the Appendix. |
011 |
Rep. Krummel |
Points out that the amount for professional services is a one-time expense for such items as system architects and developers, skill sets that may or may not be available on staff. |
033 |
Michael Miliccui |
Director, OLCC Licensing, Policy and Process. Comments on business needs and how they can be addressed by IT solutions. Explains responsibilities of the section. Quotes number of new licenses, license renewals, service permit applications and server education tests processed annually. |
055 |
Miliccui |
Covers how they plan to automate licensing and service permit processes into an integrated system so data can be shared by a variety of users. |
095 |
Pharo |
Cites statistics on product sales and projected future growth. |
123 |
Pharo |
Explains that currently they don’t get information on when a product sells for up to six weeks. |
133 |
Rep. Burley |
Stresses that this is where the payoff is. Asks about the carrying cost of inventory in the warehouse waiting to be shipped. |
142 |
Pharo |
Responds that of the approximate $30 million in product, all but about $300,000-500,000 worth is still owned by the companies, as it is not paid for until shipped. |
150 |
Rep. Burley |
Seeks clarification that the people in stores are not state employees. |
152 |
Pharo |
Replies, that is correct; they are contractor employees. |
154 |
Rep. Burley |
Asks if the 49 fte in merchandising work in the warehouse. |
161 |
Pharo |
Explains where the staff all work. |
164 |
Rep. Burley |
Asks how many are actually in the warehouse. |
167 |
Pharo |
Responds, about 30. |
168 |
Rep. Burley |
Inquires about possibility of automating the warehouse operation. |
170 |
Pharo |
Explains current automation in the distribution center and future improvements contemplated. |
189 |
Pharo |
Continues that they need a system to work with contractors to obtain daily sales information and to be able to adjust inventory and forecast needs. |
225 |
Rep. Burley |
Asks about sales in Bend. |
227 |
Pharo |
Answers, the store within a store is doing very well. |
229 |
Kaiser |
Interjects that sales projections for the stores within a store have been exceeded. Reports that they want to open a few stores each year. |
252 |
Pharo |
Advises that with up-to-date sales information, they will be able to more accurately predict patterns to meet customers’ needs. |
267 |
Rep. Burley |
Wants to review EXHIBIT A in more detail. |
271 |
Chair Dallum |
Asks if OLCC has been through Ways and Means, |
273 |
Kaiser |
Answers, no, but are scheduled before the subcommittee early in April. |
276 |
Chair Dallum |
Seeks committee consensus to support OLCC with Ways and Means, providing security, compatibility and coherence have been taken care of and this committee gets an IT update. |
282 |
Rep. Krummel |
Asks Rep. Burley if the additional time he requests is needed before giving the Chair consent on support. |
293 |
Rep. Burley |
Responds that the areas he wants to review are the ones in the caveat presented by the Chair. |
297 |
Chair Dallum |
Announces that barring any dissent, the committee will support. |
299 |
Rep. Wirth |
Has serious reservations about all the projects statewide making IT investments with vast outlay for contracted services. Needs reassurances that there will be training of our own people. |
330 |
Chair Dallum |
States that he will wait a week or two, and if the concerns raised by Rep. Wirth and Rep. Burley are addressed, he will prepare a letter of support to Ways and Means. |
336 |
Rep. Krummel |
Suggests Rep. Burley talk further with Ms. Kaiser and Mr. Pharo and take a tour of OLCC’s facility. |
364 |
Chair Dallum |
Announces that after the last meeting on computer security, it was the consensus of this committee to submit a bill, so he did a “gut and stuff” on a bill to meet the filing deadline. |
385 |
Weyand |
Comments that the suggested language for an amendment to the “security bill” has been discussed with DAS (EXHIBIT B). |
406 |
Chair Dallum |
Closes the informational meeting on proposed Oregon Liquor Control Commission information technology upgrades and adjourns the meeting at 2:50 p.m. |
EXHIBIT SUMMARY