|
PUBLIC HEARING AND WORK SESSION HB 2033, HB 2041, HB 2034 |
|
TAPES 30-31, A-B |
FEBRUARY 3, 2005 1:30 PM STATE CAPITOL BUILDING
Members Present: Rep. Tom Butler, Chair
Rep. Vicki Berger, Vice-Chair
Rep. Mark Hass, Vice-Chair
Rep. Brian Boquist
Rep. Sal Esquivel
Rep. Larry Galizio
Rep. Betty Komp
Rep. Andy Olson
Rep. Chuck Riley
Witnesses Present: Darren Bond, Director of Finance, State Treasury Office
Pamela Leavitt, Credit Union Assn. of Oregon
Laura Lockwood-McCall, Director, Debt Management, State Treasury Office
Kate Richardson, Chief of Staff, State Treasury Office
Cynthia Byrnes, Dept. of Justice
Rick Ruby, Oregon Bankers Assn.
Tim Martinez, Oregon Bankers Assn.
Staff Present: Paul Warner, Legislative Revenue Officer
Mazen Malik, Economist
Kristi Bowman, Committee Assistant
TAPE 30, SIDE A
002 |
Chair Butler |
Calls meeting to order at 1:30 p.m. |
|
|
|
OPENS PUBLIC HEARING FOR HOUSE BILL 2033 |
||
|
|
|
006 |
Mazen Malik |
Gives background information for House Bill 2033 (Exhibit 1). It allows the Treasurer to reorganize some of the details of the way banks receive public funds, exempting institutions with deposits of less that $100,000. No fiscal impact (Exhibit 2). |
|
|
|
037 |
Darren Bond |
Testifies in support of House Bill 2033 because it clarifies language currently found in ORS 295.005 and eliminates a conflict between ORS Chapters 294 and 295. There is no substantive change to the statute, but rather House Bill 2033 consolidates the information in a more organized way. Reads from written testimony (Exhibit 3). |
|
|
|
080 |
Pamela Leavitt |
Testifies in support of House Bill 2033 because it would allow credit unions to be their own custodians. Current legislation only allows banks to be their own custodians (Exhibit 3). |
|
|
|
100 |
Chair Butler |
Asks Darren Bond about section 4 language regarding any additional risks to public funds by consolidations. |
|
|
|
111 |
Bond |
Responds that there will be no additional risks involved.
|
CLOSES PUBLIC HEARING FOR HB 2033 |
||
|
|
|
OPENS WORK SESSION FOR HB 2033 |
||
|
|
|
120 |
Rep. Esquivel |
MOTION: MOVES HB 2033 TO THE FLOOR WITH A DO PASS RECOMMENDATION.
|
125 |
Chair Butler |
ORDER: THERE BEING NO OBJECTION, THE CHAIR SO ORDERS. MOTION PASSES 8-0-1. ANSWERING AYE: BERGER, HASS, BOQUIST, GALIZIO, OLSON, BUTLER. MEMBERS EXCUSED: KOMP. |
|
|
|
CLOSES WORK SESSION FOR HB 2033 (see tape log # 300 for reconsideration of HB 2033).
|
||
OPENS PUBLIC HEARING FOR HB 2041 |
||
|
|
|
138 |
Laura Lockwood-McCall |
Slide presentation titled State Debt Capacity (Exhibit 4). It is a background overview of long-term debt policies and state practices. |
|
|
|
405 |
Chair Butler |
Asks if the lottery bonds (page 17) are private activity bonds. |
|
|
|
408 |
McCall |
Responds that lottery bonds are considered public purpose.
|
423 |
Rep. Hass |
Asks if there has been much restructuring of the lottery bonds. |
|
|
|
425 |
McCall |
Responds that it is her understanding that refinancing has been done in the past (she will verify that information and respond to Rep. Hass). In 2005 the bonds will be amortized at 20 years instead of 15 years.
|
440 |
McCall |
Continues slide presentation.
|
TAPE 31 SIDE A |
||
|
|
|
030 |
Chair Butler |
Asks about veteran’s welfare bonds for housing. Are they general obligation bonds, not a private activity bond? |
|
|
|
033 |
McCall |
Responds that OR is one of 5 states that has a “federal carve-out” where the veteran’s bonds are not considered private activity bonds. |
|
|
|
037 |
Chair Butler |
Defines “federal carve-out” as a special bond program that is treated as a municipal general obligation, unlike affordable housing bonds that require a special private activity bond allocation . |
040 |
McCall |
Slide: Conclusions (page 25). |
|
|
|
054 |
Kate Richardson |
Testifies in support of House Bill 2041 because it amends ORS 286.605 to align it with federal law regarding the private activity bond volume cap. It allows any qualified applicant under federal law is also eligible to apply under state law. Submits written testimony (Exhibit 5). |
|
|
|
090 |
Cynthia Byrnes |
States that she will provide background information about the law and answer any questions by the committee. |
|
|
|
092 |
Rep. Boquist |
Clarification question about the bill. House Bill 2041 is just suggesting allocation caps, changing terminology—the bill doesn’t change bonding authority. |
|
|
|
094 |
Richardson |
Responds yes. The bill aligns the state statute with the federal law, changing the state definition of who can apply for the bonds. |
|
|
|
120 |
Chair Butler |
Asks the witnesses to provide the members with further written information on private activity bonds from the Oregon Facilities Authority (OFA). Suggests this avenue of funding as a possibility for local facility completion. |
|
|
|
160 |
Rep. Boquist |
Asks chair about the issue of raising the allocation cap. What entities can utilize this bond, and is there an approving authority in the legislature or spread among various state agencies? |
|
|
|
166 |
Chair Butler |
Responds that bond disbursements or receipts of monies go through the ways and means process. Money received would be allocated as a receipt. Disbursements go through the ways and means process via the revenue committee and the floor to address expenditures |
|
|
|
170 |
Richardson |
Provides further clarification on bond cap allocation. |
|
|
|
195 |
Chair Butler |
Clarifies previous response about bonds and the ways and means process to specify the private activity bond process. |
|
|
|
210 |
Richardson |
Discusses the private bond activity committee and gives further clarification of conduit bonds and private activity bonds.
|
214 |
Rep. Boquist |
Restates previous question: if an entity fails, how does that affect Oregon’s credit rating? |
|
|
|
224 |
McCall |
Responds that general obligation bonds, direct revenue bonds, and appropriation credits (see page 27 of Exhibit 4) affect OR’s credit rating. However, regarding conduit revenue bonds, if an entity fails, OR‘s rating is not affected as long as the state does not have a moral obligation pledge or illegal pledge in place. |
|
|
|
243 |
Richardson |
Adds that since some of these entities are not state entities but rather local government or 501-C3’s [non-profit] entities, there is further removal from the State of OR credit ratings. |
|
|
|
245 |
Rep. Boquist |
Requests a list of entities and where state allocates the authority. |
|
|
|
275 |
Richardson |
Comments that information regarding the entities and the last five years of private bond activities will be provided to all of the members.
|
CLOSES PUBLIC HEARING FOR HOUSE BILL 2041
OPENS WORK SESSION FOR HOUSE BILL 2041 |
||
|
|
|
285 |
Chair Butler |
MOTION: STATES THAT REP. ESQUIVEL MOVES HB 2041 TO THE FLOOR WITH A DO PASS RECOMMENDATION AND BE PLACED ON THE CONSENT CALENDAR. |
|
|
|
290 |
Chair Butler |
ORDER: THERE BEING NO OBJECTION, THE CHAIR SO ORDERS. MOTION PASSES 9-0-0. ANSWERING AYE: BERGER, HASS, BOQUIST, GALIZIO, KOMP, OLSON, RILEY, BUTLER. |
|
|
|
CLOSES WORK SESSION FOR HOUSE BILL 2041. |
||
|
|
|
OPEN WORK SESSION FOR HOUSE BILL 2033. |
||
|
|
|
300 |
Chair Butler |
MOTION: STATES THAT REP. ESQUIVEL MOVES TO RECONSIDER THE VOTE BY WHICH THE COMMITTEE MOVED HB 2033 TO THE FLOOR WITH A DO PASS RECOMMENDATION. |
|
|
|
306 |
Chair Butler |
ORDER: THERE BEING NO OBJECTION, THE CHAIR SO ORDERS. MOTION PASSES 9-0-0. ANSWERING AYE: BERGER, HASS, BOQUIST, GALIZIO, KOMP, OLSON, RILEY, BUTLER. |
|
|
|
311 |
Chair Butler |
MOTION: STATES REP. ESQUIVEL MOVES HB 2033 TO THE FLOOR WITH A DO PASS RECOMMENDATION AND BE REFERRED TO THE BUSINESS, LABOR, AND CONSUMER AFFAIRS COMMITTEE BY PRIOR REFERENCE. |
|
|
|
320 |
Chair Butler |
ORDER: THERE BEING NO OBJECTION, THE CHAIR SO ORDERS. MOTION PASSES 9-0-0. ANSWERING AYE: BERGER, HASS, BOQUIST, GALIZIO, KOMP, OLSON, RILEY, BUTLER. |
|
|
|
CLOSES WORK SESSION FOR HOUSE BILL 2033. |
||
|
|
|
OPENS PUBLIC HEARING FOR HOUSE BILL 2034. |
||
|
|
|
325 |
Malik |
Summary of House Bill 2034 (Exhibit 7). The bill provides enabling language to continue insurance of deposits higher than $100,000. No fiscal impact (Exhibit 8). |
|
|
|
345 |
Bond |
Reads from written testimony in support of HB 2034 (Exhibit 9) The state treasury office supports the bill because it allows a single large deposit to be made at a local bank, and it insures public funds to the fullest FDIC limit. |
|
|
|
398 |
Roby |
Gives testimony on behalf of the Oregon Bankers Association. Written testimony provided (Exhibit 10). Supports the bill because it would give smaller banks more flexibility in handling large public deposits exceeding $100,000. It would allow local banks to participate in the Certificate of Deposit Account Registry Services (CDARS). |
|
|
|
|
|
|
465 |
Chair Butler |
Discusses net settlement process that involves making reciprocal deposits among different banks, including out-of-state banks. |
|
|
|
TAPE 30 SIDE B |
||
031 |
Roby |
Responds that House Bill 2034 would allow those deposits to be controlled at a local level. |
|
|
|
050 |
Roby |
Continues testimony |
|
|
|
065 |
Rep. Berger |
Clarifies that the purpose of House Bill 2034 is to allow local banks to deposit public funds of a large amount. Asks if is this a banking practice that has been in place a long time? Who does the accounting management of the program? |
|
|
|
075 |
Roby |
Responds that the program has been in place for 2-3 years. There is a private company that manages this program. The process is done through the Federal Reserve system on a wiring basis, not the internet. |
|
|
|
096 |
Rep. Boquist |
Asks for comments from witnesses: 1) define “several” states; 2) general consensus of FDIC board members regarding program; 3) has Federal Reserve taken a position on this type of activity |
|
|
|
113 |
Roby |
1) Responds that he believes all states involved, but will respond to the committee on any exceptions. |
|
|
|
115 |
Tim Martinez |
2) Responds that the people behind the CDARS program intend to grow their business under existing state laws. 3) Responds that the regulators have reviewed this program support it. The State Treasury Office supports the program by providing supporting testimony today. |
|
|
|
128 |
Bond |
FDIC has “blessed” the program which allows deposits of up to $10 M. All reports are centralized through one bank. |
|
|
|
146 |
Martinez |
Comments that this bill allows local banks to invest in the local community because funds are held locally. |
|
|
|
150 |
Chair Butler |
Comments about the potential of opening up the CDARS program to credit unions in order to take part in this program. |
|
|
|
170 |
Bond |
Responds that the language as written would allow for credit unions to participate. |
|
|
|
179 |
Martinez |
Asks about this bill’s subsequent referral to the committee on business, labor, and consumer affairs. States that Chairman Brown of the Business, Labor, and Consumer Affairs Committee is very supportive of this bill. |
|
|
|
CLOSES PUBLIC HEARING FOR HOUSE BILL 2034 |
||
|
|
|
OPENS WORK SESSION FOR HOUSE BILL 2034 |
||
|
|
|
209 |
Rep. Esquivel |
MOTION: REP. ESQUIVEL MOVES HOUSE BILL 2034 TO THE FLOOR WITH A DO PASS RECOMMENDATION AND BE REFERRED TO THE COMMITTEE ON BUSINESS, LABOR, AND CONSUMER AFFAIRS. |
|
|
|
203 |
Rep. Boquist |
Requests that comments regarding future expansion to credit unions be forwarded to the subsequent committee. |
|
|
|
220 |
Chair Butler |
ORDER: THERE BEING NO OBJECTION, THE CHAIR SO ORDERS. MOTION PASSES 9-0-0. ANSWERING AYE: BERGER, HASS, BOQUIST, GALIZIO, KOMP, OLSON, RILEY, BUTLER. |
|
|
|
CLOSES WORK SESSION FOR HOUSE BILL 2034 |
||
|
|
|
240 |
Rep. Boquist |
Committee business regarding field trip 2/4/05. |
|
|
|
270 |
Chair Butler |
Meeting adjourned at 2:45 p.m. |
Tape Log Submitted by: |
Reviewed by: |
Kristi Bowman, Committee Assistant |
Kim Taylor James, Committee Coordinator |
Exhibit Summary:
1. HB 2033, Staff Measure Summary, Malik, 1 pg.
2. HB 2033, No Expenditure Impact Statement, Legislative Fiscal Office, 1 pg.
3. HB 2033, Testimony in Support of House Bill 2033, Bond, 2 pp.
4. HB 2033, Testimony in Support of House Bill 2033, Leavitt, 1 pg.
5. HB 2041, Slide Presentation: State Debt Capacity, State Treasury Debt Management, 27 pp.
6. HB 2041, Testimony in Support of House Bill 2041, Bond, 1 pg.
7. HB 2041, Staff Measure Summary, Malik, 1 pg.
8. HB 2041, No Expenditure Impact Statement, Legislative Fiscal Office, 1 pg.
9. HB 2034, Staff Measure Summary, Malik, 1 pg.
10. HB 2034, No Expenditure Impact Statement, Legislative Fiscal Office, 1 pg.
11. HB 2034, Testimony in Support of House Bill 2034, Bond, 1 pg.
12. HB 2034, Testimony in Support of House Bill 2034, Roby, 1 pg.