|
INFORMATIONAL MEETING |
|
TAPES 43-44 A, 43 B |
FEBRUARY 16, 2005 1:00 PM STATE CAPITOL BUILDING
Members Present: Rep. Tom Butler, Chair
Rep. Vicki Berger, Vice-Chair
Rep. Mark Hass, Vice-Chair
Rep. Brian Boquist
Rep. Sal Esquivel
Rep. Larry Galizio
Rep. Betty Komp
Rep. Andy Olson
Rep. Chuck Riley
Witnesses Present: Pete Shepherd, Dept. of Justice
Steve Briggs, Dept. of Justice
Eric Smith, Dept. of Revenue
Mike McKiernan, Oregon State Police
Staff Present: Paul Warner, Legislative Revenue Officer
Kristi Bowman, Committee Assistant
TAPE 43, SIDE A
|
|
|
INFORMATIONAL MEETING
|
||
003 |
Acting Chair Berger |
Calls meeting to order at 1:03 p.m. |
|
|
|
006 |
Paul Warner |
Gives overview of Oregon Tobacco Task Force (Exhibit 1). Discusses decrease of revenue from cigarette sales and increases in other tobacco products (OTP). |
|
|
|
033 |
Pete Shepherd |
Gives overview of Task Force (Exhibit 2). Gives overview of Master Settlement Agreement (MSA) and Non-Participating Manufacturer (NPM) Law. |
|
|
|
057 |
Shepherd |
Discusses Master Settlement Agreement (MSA). It gives a financial benefit by providing annual payments and requires companies to adhere to certain codes of conduct such as advertising to minors. Discusses financial impacts of the MSA. |
|
|
|
097 |
Shepherd |
Discusses NPM law. Every manufacturer who doesn’t participate in MSA pays an amount into an escrow fund equal to the amount they would have paid had they belonged to the MSA. The NPM law doesn’t generate revenue for OR. |
|
|
|
159 |
Shepherd |
Discusses Task Force created in 2001. Discusses internet purchasing of cigarettes and the tax collection process involved.
Taxes for in-state sales are collected from the distributor by using revenue stamps. |
|
|
|
246 |
Shepherd |
Discusses task force accomplishments regarding compliance issues. Discusses current revenue projections. |
|
|
|
390 |
Shepherd |
Discusses internet sales compliance issues. This is an area of focus for the task force. |
|
|
|
TAPE 44, SIDE A |
||
|
|
|
009 |
Shepherd |
Discusses statutory funding of task force. |
|
|
|
035 |
Rep. Olson |
Asks what measurement is used to show that the state has failed to enforce its NPM law? |
|
|
|
042 |
Shepherd |
Responds that there has not yet been a litigated challenge to a state not receiving its share of the MSA by failing to enforce its NPM law. The mechanism is an uncertainty because this situation has not yet occurred. |
|
|
|
061 |
Rep. Olson |
Asks what is the measurement rate for the compliance rate? |
|
|
|
071 |
Eric Smith |
Responds that the Dept. of Revenue field agents did a statistical survey of retailers. The two measures used were: how many retailers were out of compliance, and how many cigarette packs didn’t have an OR tax stamp. Findings were that 99% of the packs had legitimate OR tax stamps. |
|
|
|
093 |
Rep. Boquist |
Asks for recap of how each agency is funded for the task force. |
|
|
|
095 |
Shepherd |
Responds that the total funding is first received by the Dept. of Revenue from cigarette tax collections. Both the Dept. of Justice and State Police send bills to the Dept. of Revenue for the personnel costs and are then reimbursed by the Dept. of Revenue. Dept. of Revenue funds for the task force are considered “other funds” |
|
|
|
138 |
Chair Butler |
Requests clarification of the term “other funds” for freshmen members.
|
142 |
Smith |
Defines “other funds” as revenue from other tobacco products (OTP) to operate the task forces. Discusses the two task forces (see Exhibit 1, page 4) created in the 2001 and 2003 legislatures and how they were funded. |
|
|
|
178 |
Rep. Boquist |
Asks about Task Force 1 and Task Force 2 funding for the full-time equivalent (FTE) positions. |
|
|
|
185 |
Shepherd |
Discusses proposed budget proposals to consolidate both task forces and the impact on the staffing. |
|
|
|
210 |
Rep. Boquist |
Asks what is the rationale to eliminate 27 positions on task force 2? |
|
|
|
220 |
Shepherd |
Responds that while the Dept. of Justice does not agree with the governor’s proposal, all three agencies have already downsized most of the affected positions. There is merit in reducing the size of task force 2, but targeting internet sales still needs to be pursued.
|
240 |
Chair Butler |
Asks if the Dept. of Justice has a position regarding re-selling of tobacco products from other states? |
|
|
|
250 |
Shepherd |
Refers this question to the Oregon State Police representative, Mike McKiernan. |
|
|
|
260 |
Mike McKiernan |
Responds to resale question. Rarely sees double-stamped packets. |
|
|
|
282 |
Chair Butler |
Asks if he has seen OTP stamping by other states. |
|
|
|
285 |
McKiernan |
Responds that he has seen some stamping of OTP, but not very many. |
|
|
|
295 |
Chair Butler |
Asks about fair market pricing of tobacco. |
|
|
|
296 |
Shepherd |
Discusses distributor market in OR. There are 244 licensed distributors in the state. One distributor in Portland has discussed a proposal with the Dept. of Justice regarding fair market pricing. The Dept. of Justice has not taken a policy position on this issue. |
|
|
|
345 |
Chair Butler |
Asks about surveillance of neighboring states’ non-taxation of other tobacco products that have no revenue stamps. |
|
|
|
372 |
McKiernan |
The State Police frequently monitors other state operations, such as the Yakima Nation, where some Oregon retailers purchase their products. |
|
|
|
400 |
Chair Butler |
Asks about the standard operating procedure on the surveillance program. |
|
|
|
425 |
McKiernan |
Responds that some of the steps include identifying suspects. Then the Dept. of Revenue identifies products that are suspect by reviewing suspect invoices. Law enforcement then steps in and investigates. |
|
|
|
TAPE 43, SIDE B |
||
|
|
|
022 |
Chair Butler |
Provides information to members regarding reselling issues. Asks Mr. Shepherd about which state receives the share of the MSA or NPM if the cigarette pack is double-stamped by two states |
|
|
|
055 |
Shepherd |
The OR share of the MSA is fixed, independent of the jurisdiction where the sale takes place. Will check on information requested and respond to the Chair. |
|
|
|
103 |
Smith |
Dept. of Revenue is actively pursuing this issue and has meetings scheduled in March with distributors to update technology on preventing the reselling. |
|
|
|
128 |
Rep. Berger |
Asks: 1) what percentage of tobacco tax revenue is attributed to cigarettes as opposed to OTP. 2) what strategies are proposed for the internet cigarette sales issue. |
|
|
|
136 |
Smith |
Cigarette revenues for this biennium were $463 M as of 12/04; OTP was $42 M for a total of $505 M. |
|
|
|
143 |
Steve Briggs |
Responds to internet strategies question: 1) the task force is making an outreach to third party facilitators such as credit card companies, pay pal, USPS, distributors in order to make them aware of their obligations. (see letter in Exhibit 2). 2) serving indictments against internet distributors for racketeering. 3) pursuing civil lawsuits against distributors to provide a list of consumers to recoup tax that was evaded. |
|
|
|
192 |
Rep. Hass |
Asks about similar communication with shippers such as UPS and Fed Ex. |
|
|
|
199 |
Smith |
Responds that is being done |
|
|
|
204 |
Rep. Boquist |
Discusses issue of smuggling. |
|
|
|
240 |
Chair Butler |
Responds that the task force is addressing this issue. Dept. of Justice has an interim work group working on this and suggest Rep. Boquist follow-up with them.
|
250 |
Chair Butler |
Committee business discussed. |
|
|
|
290 |
Warner |
Discusses schedule for week of 2/21/05. Revenue projection meeting on 2/25/05. |
|
|
|
308 |
Rep. Hass |
Committee business discussed. |
|
|
|
328 |
Chair Butler |
Adjourns meeting at 2:20 p.m. |
|
|
|
Tape Log Submitted by: |
Reviewed by: |
Kristi Bowman, Committee Assistant |
Kim Taylor James, Committee Coordinator |
Exhibit Summary: