|
PUBLIC HEARING & WORK SESSION HB 2257 PUBLIC HEARING HB 2521, HB 3441 |
|
TAPES 94 A |
MARCH 30, 2005 1:00 PM STATE CAPITOL BUILDING
Members Present: Tom Butler, Chair
Rep. Vicki Berger, Chair
Rep. Mark Hass, Vice-Chair
Rep. Brian Boquist
Rep. Sal Esquivel
Rep. Larry Galizio
Rep. Betty Komp
Rep. Andy Olson
Rep. Chuck Riley
Witnesses Present: Sam Adams, Commissioner, City of Portland
Marge Kafoury, Govt. Relations, City of Portland
Michelle Deister, League of Oregon Cities
Staff Present: Lizbeth Martin-Mahar, Economist
Kristi Bowman, Committee Assistant
TAPE 94, SIDE A
002 |
Chair Butler |
Calls meeting to order at 1:05 p.m. |
|
|
|
OPENS PUBLIC HEARING FOR HOUSE BILL 3441 |
||
|
|
|
024 |
Sam Adams |
Submits Fact Sheet handout in support of HB 3441 (Exhibit 1). Explains the different budget committee processes in the City of Portland versus other municipalities. |
|
|
|
045 |
Chair Butler |
Asks if other entities such as the League of Oregon Cities or the Assn. of Oregon Counties would be commenting on this bill. |
|
|
|
048 |
Adams |
Responds that this bill only affects the City of Portland and potentially community colleges. |
|
|
|
053 |
Rep. Berger |
Comments that there is a unique budget process in Multnomah County affecting municipal employees. HB 3441 allows the county to change their budget committee process, but does not mandate it. |
|
|
|
062 |
Adams |
Adds that the 1963 legislation only affected Multnomah County. HB 3441 would allow Mt. Hood Community College, Portland Community College, and the City of Portland the option of adding citizens to their budget committees. |
|
|
|
CLOSES PUBLIC HEARING FOR HOUSE BILL 3441 |
||
|
|
|
OPENS PUBLIC HEARING FOR HOUSE BILL 2257 |
||
|
|
|
097 |
Lizbeth Martin-Mahar |
Explains that this bill corrects technical changes in the statute pertaining to bonds. |
|
|
|
116 |
Rep. Boquist |
Expresses concern about the wording change proposed between “shall” and “may” in line 9 of the bill. Comments that he would like to have someone from Legislative Counsel explain the wording change. |
|
|
|
CLOSES PUBLIC HEARING FOR HOUSE BILL 2257 |
||
|
|
|
OPENS PUBLIC HEARING FOR HOUSE BILL 2251 |
||
|
|
|
134 |
Martin-Mahar |
Gives overview of HB 2521 (Exhibit 2). Refers to Issue Brief (Exhibit 3) that gives a detailed chronology of legislation pertaining to public sector retirement income and taxation. Adds that in current law, local government plans must be equal to or better than the Public Employee Retirement System (PERS) benefits. |
|
|
|
174 |
Chair Butler |
Asks how many plans are affected. |
|
|
|
185 |
Michelle Deister |
Responds that there are 240 cities in Oregon, and 170 are members of PERS. There 7 cities with “equal to or better than” (ETOB) plans for fire and police employees. There are some cities so small (one full-time or part-time employee) that do not offer any kind of pension plan. Will provide revenue impact information to Martin-Mahar. |
|
|
|
214 |
Marge Kafoury |
Testifies in support HB 2521. It puts the City of Portland’s fire and police employee pensions on par with PERS in that both will be exempt from Oregon income tax in accordance with previous legislation affecting pubic sector pensions. |
|
|
|
223 |
Chair Butler |
Comments about previous lawsuits filed on behalf of other public employees who were being treated differently on their pension benefits. Asks if there are current pending lawsuits from affected public sector groups. |
|
|
|
235 |
Deister |
Responds that she believes that HB 2521 is linked to legislation following passage of HB 3349 enacted in 1995. |
|
|
|
250 |
Chair Butler |
General comments about previous pension legislation. Recommends seeking counsel from the attorney general’s office on this bill. |
|
|
|
274 |
Rep. Riley |
Comments about the language “equal to or better than PERS.” Asks about employees who are not at the same level as PERS employees. |
|
|
|
276 |
Kafoury |
Responds that the statute was amended many years ago requiring fire and police non-PERS employee benefit plans to be equal to or
better than those of PERS employees. There are periodic reviews done to compare PERS and non-PERS pension plans.
|
300 |
Deister |
Adds that some local governments are so small that they can only offer their employees other non-PERS plans. Whether they are more or less equal to PERS depends on “who you ask.” |
|
|
|
309 |
Rep. Berger |
Comments that the situation regarding federal employees may be a different issue than the issues addressed in HB 2521. Recommends seeking more information on this issue. |
|
|
|
330 |
Chair Butler |
Agrees with Rep. Berger and requests more information on this bill. |
|
|
|
CLOSES PUBLIC HEARING FOR HB 2521 |
||
|
|
|
360 |
Chair Butler |
Adjourns meeting at 1:28 p.m. |
Tape Log Submitted by: |
Reviewed by: |
Kristi Bowman, Committee Assistant |
Kim Taylor James, Committee Coordinator |
Exhibit Summary: