|
PUBLIC HEARING HB 3453, 3454 WORK SESSION HB 2197, 2089, 2776, 2511, 3359 |
|
TAPES 109 A-B, 110 A |
APRIL 12, 2005 1:00 PM STATE CAPITOL BUILDING
Members Present: Rep. Vicki Berger, Acting Chair
Rep. Mark Hass, Vice-Chair
Rep. Brian Boquist
Rep. Sal Esquivel
Rep. Larry Galizio
Rep. Betty Komp
Rep. Andy Olson
Rep. Chuck Riley
Member Excused: Rep. Tom Butler
Witnesses Present: Shawn Miller, PPM Energy
Norm Ross, Pacific Corp. Energy
Bill Linden, City of Klamath Falls
Gil Riddell, Assn. of Oregon Counties (AOC)
Mike Long, Tax Collector, Klamath County
John DiLorenzo, Attorney, City of Seattle and Tacoma
John Phillips, Dept. of Revenue (DOR)
Staff Present: Paul Warner, Legislative Revenue Officer
Mazen Malik, Economist
Mary Ayala, Economist
Kristi Bowman, Committee Assistant
TAPE 109, SIDE A
002 |
Acting Chair Berger |
Calls meeting to order at 1:03 p.m. |
|
|
|
OPENS PUBLIC HEARING FOR HOUSE BILL 3453 |
||
|
|
|
011 |
Mary Ayala |
Gives overview of HB 3453 (Exhibit 1). The bill exempts from property taxation any tangible or intangible property whose use arises from contracts between qualified government entities and energy marketing companies. Refers to the revenue impact statement (Exhibit 2). |
|
|
|
057 |
Shawn Miller |
Gives background of HB 3453. HB 3453 is identical to HB 2047 and its amendment. [The amendment did not connect to the relating clause and HB 3453 was substituted for HB 2047]. The only change to HB 3453 is on page 2, line 36 defining qualified government entities. That line deletes the reference to tribal entities. |
|
|
|
082 |
Norm Ross |
Discusses the narrow scope of HB 3453 pertaining to an assessment issue affecting PPM Energy and the City of Klamath Falls. Submits written testimony (Exhibit 3). The assessment concerns a commodity, e.g., energy. It is a purchase power agreement. Testifies in support of HB 3453 because the Dept. of Revenue (DOR) does not assess similar utility companies for energy contracts. Adds that the DOR disagrees with the Oregon Tax Court decision against PPM. |
|
|
|
141 |
Bill Linden |
Gives historical perspective of HB 3453. Comments that this facility is located within an enterprise zone, and had there been notice that there would be a tax assessment, the City could have exercised tax exemption options available for enterprise zones. Comments that he believes that the bill is a reasonable compromise and supports HB 3453. |
|
|
|
161 |
Rep. Olson |
Asks if there are other public sector-private enterprise relationships like this in other states. |
|
|
|
166 |
Ross |
Responds that there are similar public sector-private enterprise relationships in other states, and he is not aware of any state agency taxing the contract rights like the Oregon DOR has done. |
|
|
|
171 |
Rep. Berger |
Asks if this is essentially the original bill |
|
|
|
180 |
Miller |
Responds that HB 3453 was originally HB 2047 with the HB 2047-1 amendment. |
|
|
|
197 |
Gil Riddell |
Testifies against HB 3453 and reads from written testimony (Exhibit 4) to support AOC’s position. |
|
|
|
239 |
Mike Long |
Testifies against HB 3453. Discusses the history of the taxation of PPM in Klamath County. When he received notice that PPM Energy was appealing the Tax Court ruling, the Tax Court advised him to put those taxes in reserve until the suit was settled. If PPM Energy wins the lawsuit, other taxing districts will have to pay an additional 12% interest on taxes paid. Comments that the state would have to make up the taxes lost to schools under the state school funding formula. |
|
|
|
287 |
Rep. Boquist |
Asks Riddell to define “unnecessary property tax expenditure.” |
|
|
|
290 |
Riddell |
Responds that he is basing that term on three standards for new property tax expenditures (as stated in Exhibit 4):
Adds that none of these standards have been demonstrated. |
|
|
|
308 |
Rep. Boquist |
Comments to Riddell that not collecting the tax is now an expenditure. Questions and answers exchanged with Long regarding Klamath County’s taxation of PPM’s intangible property.
|
320 |
Long |
Explains how he projected revenue from the potential of a tax assessment on intangible property. |
|
|
|
378 |
Riddell |
Comments on the DOR’s distribution of tax revenue to county assessors. Adds that one of the Klamath County Commissioners told him that they “had not had conversations about this item with the city”. |
|
|
|
394 |
Acting Chair Berger |
Asks Riddell about his belief that there is not enough self-limiting language in HB 3453. Asks if this bill would apply to any other energy company. |
|
|
|
405 |
Riddell |
Responds that the bill could apply to future situations, such as the City of Portland’s purchase of PGE and having a private company run it. However, he is not aware of any other utility company with this arrangement at this time. |
|
|
|
CLOSES PUBLIC HEARING FOR HOUSE BILL 3453 |
||
|
|
|
OPENS PUBLIC HEARING FOR HOUSE BILL 3454 |
||
|
|
|
TAPE 110, SIDE A |
||
007 |
Ayala |
Gives background of HB 3454 (Exhibit 5). This bill exempts from property tax tangible or intangible property rights related to members of the Pacific Northwest AC Intertie. Refers to proposed amendment HB 3454-1 (Exhibit 6) that would exclude “property rights”. Refers to the revenue impact statement (Exhibit 7). |
|
|
|
044 |
John DiLorenzo |
Testifies in support of HB 3454 and the HB 3454-1 amendment. Reads verbatim from written testimony (Exhibit 8). |
|
|
|
173 |
Rep. Galizio |
Asks for elaboration on the statement in the testimony regarding the DOR’s awareness of the Seattle and Tacoma Intertie contracts with Bonneville Power Administration (BPA) in 1995. |
|
|
|
175 |
DiLorenzo |
Responds that the DOR taxed a private party Intertie contract, and the DOR won that lawsuit in tax court because it was a private party. However, the DOR did not tax Seattle and Tacoma until 2001 when they tried to make the assessment retroactive to 1995. |
|
|
|
182 |
Rep. Hass |
Asks if there is any scenario in which DiLorenzo thinks that an entity should pay for the right to use the Intertie. |
|
|
|
185 |
DiLorenzo |
Responds that this scenario is a larger policy question than what this bill proposes. Comments that there should be uniformity in which cities are assessed. |
|
|
|
218 |
Riddell |
Testifies in opposition to HB 3454. Submits written testimony (Exhibit 9). Discusses the differences in taxation between Washington and Oregon pertaining to tangible and intangible property.
|
245 |
Rep. Riley |
Asks if Riddell thinks that in-state cities should be taxed on profit-making enterprises. Follow-up question: Is the Klamath Falls enterprise [with PPM Energy] a profit-making business. |
|
|
|
247 |
Riddell |
Responds that if there is profit involved, there is tax liability and would ask for clarification from the DOR. Regarding Klamath Falls, the ownership of that facility should not be taxable. |
|
|
|
280 |
John Phillips |
Responds to questions from the committee. HB 3454 presents a straightforward policy decision regarding taxation of out-of-state entities and provides direction for the DOR. Discusses line 7 in the bill regarding public entities using properties for corporate purposes. |
|
|
|
334 |
Rep. Boquist |
Suggests that the DOR provide information to the committee regarding intangible property taxation and the cost of enforcing the tax. |
|
|
|
375 |
Acting Chair Berger |
Adds that it is the legislature’s responsibility to make policy statements to the DOR. |
|
|
|
CLOSES PUBLIC HEARING FOR HOUSE BILL 3454 |
||
|
|
|
OPENS WORK SESSION FOR HOUSE BILL 2197 |
||
|
|
|
TAPE 109, SIDE B |
||
008 |
Mazen Malik |
Discusses HB 2197-4 amendment (Exhibit 10) that combines references to health care facilities and non-profit groups noted in previous amendments. |
|
|
|
036 |
Acting Chair Berger |
Discusses the intent of the HB 2197-4 amendment. |
|
|
|
043 |
Rep. Hass |
MOTION: MOVES THE ADOPTION OF THE HB 2197-4 AMENDMENT. |
|
|
|
049 |
Acting Chair Berger |
ORDER: THERE BEING NO OBJECTION, THE CHAIR SO ORDERS. MOTION PASSES 8-0-1. ANSWERING AYE: HASS, BOQUIST, ESQUIVEL, GALIZIO, KOMP, OLSON, RILEY, BERGER. EXCUSED: BUTLER |
|
|
|
048 |
Rep. Hass |
MOTION: MOVES HB 2197-4 AS AMENDED TO THE HOUSE WITH A DO-PASS RECOMMENDATION. |
|
|
|
050 |
Acting Chair Berger |
ORDER: THERE BEING NO OBJECTION, THE CHAIR SO ORDERS. MOTION PASSES 8-0-1. ANSWERING AYE: HASS, BOQUIST, ESQUIVEL, GALIZIO, KOMP, OLSON, RILEY, BERGER. EXCUSED: BUTLER |
CLOSES WORK SESSION FOR HOUSE BILL 2197. |
||
|
|
|
OPENS WORK SESSION FOR HOUSE BILL 2089. |
||
|
||
060 |
Malik |
Gives summary of HB 2089 and HB 2089-1 amendment (Exhibit 12). The bill allows the amounts for the collection of lodging tax by local governments to accumulate to $100 before transfer to the state agency involved. The amendment addresses the issue of having private entities be able to accumulate fees up to $100 before transferring the funds and have an open-ended date of remitting the tax. |
|
|
|
103 |
Rep. Hass |
MOTION: MOVES THE ADOPTION OF THE HB 2089-1 AMENDMENT. |
|
|
|
105 |
Acting Chair Berger |
ORDER: THERE BEING NO OBJECTION, THE CHAIR SO ORDERS. MOTION PASSES 8-0-1. ANSWERING AYE: HASS, BOQUIST, ESQUIVEL, GALIZIO, KOMP, OLSON, RILEY, BERGER. EXCUSED: BUTLER |
|
|
|
107 |
Hass |
MOTION: MOVES HB 2089-1 AS AMENDED WITH A DO PASS RECOMMENDATION AND BE REFERRED TO THE WAYS AND MEANS COMMITTEE. |
|
|
|
110 |
Acting Chair Berger |
ORDER: THERE BEING NO OBJECTION, THE CHAIR SO ORDERS. MOTION PASSES 8-0-1. ANSWERING AYE: HASS, BOQUIST, ESQUIVEL, GALIZIO, KOMP, OLSON, RILEY, BERGER. EXCUSED: BUTLER |
|
|
|
CLOSES WORK SESSION FOR HOUSE BILL 2089 |
||
|
|
|
OPENS WORK SESSION FOR HOUSE BILL 2776 |
||
|
|
|
120 |
Ayala |
Gives summary of HB 2776 (Exhibit 13). |
|
|
|
132 |
Acting Chair Berger |
Comments that the work group is still waiting for amendments to be drafted and carries-over the bill to a future date. |
|
|
|
CLOSES WORK SESSION FOR HOUSE BILL 2776 |
||
|
|
|
OPENS WORK SESSION FOR HOUSE BILL 2511 |
||
|
|
|
147 |
Ayala |
Gives summary of HB 2511 (Exhibit 15). The bill adds four organizations to the list of fraternal organizations that qualify for an exemption from property tax, and changes the definition of fraternal organizations. Refers to the revenue impact statement (Exhibit 16). |
|
|
|
201 |
Rep. Boquist |
Asks if amendments have been submitted regarding adding or deleting language in certain sections of the bill. |
|
|
|
211 |
Ayala |
Responds that there are no amendments at this time. |
|
|
|
220 |
Rep. Hass |
Asks about cost recovery. The bill seems a little vague on that issue. Adds that he is willing to work on amendments to clarify the cost recovery issue. |
|
|
|
CLOSES WORK SESSION FOR HOUSE BILL 2511 |
||
|
|
|
OPENS WORK SESSION FOR HOUSE BILL 3359 |
||
|
|
|
246 |
Ayala |
Gives summary of HB 3359 (Exhibit 17). The bill exempts property taxation on aircraft used or held by foreign-owned carriers. |
|
|
|
274 |
Rep. Hass |
MOTION: MOVES HB 3359 TO THE HOUSE WITH A DO-PASS RECOMMENDATION. |
|
|
|
280 |
Acting Chair Berger |
ORDER: THERE BEING NO OBJECTION, THE CHAIR SO ORDERS. MOTION PASSES 8-0-1. ANSWERING AYE: HASS, BOQUIST, ESQUIVEL, GALIZIO, KOMP, OLSON, RILEY, BERGER. EXCUSED: BUTLER |
|
|
|
CLOSES WORK SESSION FOR HOUSE BILL 3359
|
||
288 |
Acting Chair Berger |
Adjourns meeting at 2:18 p.m. |
Tape Log Submitted by: |
Reviewed by: |
Kristi Bowman, Committee Assistant |
Kim Taylor James, Committee Coordinator |
Exhibit Summary: