|
PUBLIC HEARING AND WORK SESSION SB 847, 996 A PUBLIC HEARING SB 31, HB 2775 WORK SESSION HB 2514 |
|
TAPES 180-181 A-B |
JUNE 1, 2005 1:00 PM STATE CAPITOL BUILDING
Members Present: Rep. Tom Butler, Chair
Rep. Vicki Berger, Vice-Chair
Rep. Mark Hass, Vice-Chair
Rep. Brian Boquist
Rep. Sal Esquivel
Rep. Larry Galizio
Rep. Betty Komp
Rep. Andy Olson
Rep. Chuck Riley
Witnesses Present: Rep. Gary Hansen, District 44
Marge Kafoury, City of Portland
Brian Morisky, City of Portland
John Miller, Homeowner Advisory Committee (HOAC)
Kevin O’Reilly, Oregon Paralyzed Veterans of America
Mark Nelson, Oregon Housing Alliance
Bill Van Vliet, Network for Oregon Affordable Housing (NOAH)
Rick Crager, Oregon Housing & Community Services
Bob Russell, Oregon Trucking Assn.
Gary Eichman, Oregon Transfer Co.
Debra Buchanan, Dept. of Revenue
Sen. Frank Morse, District 8
Sen. Betsy Johnson, District 16
Danelle Romain, Housing Alliance
Staff Present: Paul Warner, Legislative Revenue Officer
Mary Ayala, Economist
Lizbeth Martin-Mahar, Economist
Kristi Bowman, Committee Assistant
TAPE 180, SIDE A
002 |
Chair Butler |
Calls meeting to order at 1:12 p.m. |
|
|
|
OPENS PUBLIC HEARING FOR SENATE BILL 847 |
||
|
|
|
015 |
Mary Ayala |
Gives summary of SB 847 (Exhibit 1). The bill reactivates a property tax exemption for newly constructed single-unit housing in distressed urban areas. The bill permits condominiums to be eligible for the tax
exemption. Refers to the SB 847-1 amendment that adds a sunset provision (Exhibit 2). |
|
|
|
039 |
Chair Butler |
Comments on the fair market prices and income levels of the program. |
|
|
|
044 |
Rep. Gary Hansen |
Testifies in support of SB 847. By using this program with non-profit housing corporations, several hundred new homes were created in northeast Portland. Discusses the benefits of the program. It is one more tool for affordable housing and community renewal. |
|
|
|
090 |
Chair Butler |
Discusses the revenue impact (Exhibit 3) with Rep. Hansen. |
|
|
|
103 |
Rep. Komp |
Asks if there are other distressed areas outside of Portland. |
|
|
|
112 |
Marge Kafoury |
Responds that Portland is the only jurisdiction currently using the program. It is a local option program, so any community can activate the program with a 51% approval of the taxing jurisdictions. In response to Rep. Butler’s question about limits, the limit on the house price is $170,000, and the income maximum is $67,900 for a family of four. |
|
|
|
127 |
Rep. Berger |
Asks how often does Portland review the distressed areas designation. |
|
|
|
138 |
Brian Morisky |
Responds that the distressed area map is reviewed every three years and explains the review process. Submits written testimony (Exhibit 4). |
|
|
|
150 |
John Miller |
Relates an anecdote of a woman who has used this program at a development in Portland. |
|
|
|
166 |
Chair Butler |
Comments on the mechanics of the program with witnesses. |
|
|
|
184 |
Kafoury |
Clarifies that the tax abatement is on the improvements, not on the land. Discusses the mechanics of the program with Chair Butler. |
|
|
|
200 |
Miller |
Adds that the program is for new construction only. Discussion with Chair Butler. |
|
|
|
215 |
Morisky |
Discusses the application process and the outreach advertising to eligible home buyers. |
|
|
|
CLOSES PUBLIC HEARING FOR SENATE BILL 847 |
||
|
|
|
OPENS WORK SESSION FOR SENATE BILL 847 |
||
|
|
|
233 |
Rep. Berger |
MOTION: MOVES THE ADOPTION OF THE SB 847-1 AMENDMENT. |
|
|
|
238 |
Chair Butler |
ORDER: THERE BEING NO OBJECTION, THE CHAIR SO ORDERS. MOTION PASSES 8-0-1. VOTING AYE: ESQUIVEL, GALIZIO, KOMP, OLSON, RILEY, BERGER, HASS, BUTLER. EXCUSED: BOQUIST. |
|
|
|
242 |
Rep. Berger |
MOTION: MOVES SB 847 AS AMENDED TO THE HOUSE FLOOR WITH A DO PASS RECOMMENDATION. |
|
|
|
249 |
Chair Butler |
ORDER: THERE BEING NO OBJECTION, THE CHAIR SO ORDERS. MOTION PASSES 8-0-1. VOTING AYE: ESQUIVEL, GALIZIO, KOMP, OLSON, RILEY, BERGER, HASS, BUTLER. EXCUSED: BOQUIST. |
|
|
|
CLOSES WORK SESSION FOR SENATE BILL 847 |
||
|
|
|
OPENS PUBLIC HEARING FOR SENATE BILL 996 A |
||
|
|
|
266 |
Lizbeth Martin-Mahar |
Gives summary of SB 996 A (Exhibit 9). The bill increases the cap of the affordable housing certified by the Housing Dept. Discusses the SB 996 A-2 amendment that extends the sunset on the affordable tax credit (Exhibit 10). Refers to the revenue impact (Exhibit 11). |
|
|
|
302 |
Kevin O’Reilly |
Testifies in support of SB 996 A. The bill will help low-income and disabled persons to find affordable housing. Discusses housing programs in Lane Co. that he has been involved with. |
|
|
|
337 |
Rep. Berger |
Clarifies that the amendment extends the sunset date, and the bill only raises the cap. |
|
|
|
349 |
Mark Nelson |
Comments that HB 2775 is a mirror of this bill. |
|
|
|
360 |
Bill Van Vliet |
Comments that all the benefits go to the tenants, not to the banks or to the developers. The program generates a lot of leverage of private sector investment for affordable housing projects statewide. NOAH has used the program extensively. |
|
|
|
374 |
Rep. Berger |
Asks how long the program has been around. |
|
|
|
376 |
Van Vliet |
Responds that the program came into being in the early 1990’s. |
|
|
|
385 |
Chair Butler |
Discusses affordable housing issues with Van Vliet. |
|
|
|
426 |
Nelson |
In response to Chair Butler’s concerns, the Dept. of Housing has information regarding home ownership percentages in Oregon. |
|
|
|
TAPE 181, SIDE A |
||
021 |
Rick Crager |
Discusses ownership programs for low-income persons sponsored by the Dept. of Housing. Ownership percentage in Oregon is between 60-68%. |
|
|
|
030 |
Nelson |
Clarifies that the tax credit in SB 996 A only pertains to rental housing. Explains how the program works. |
|
|
|
040 |
Chair Butler |
Comments on a concern from one of his constituents that the legislature is not only extending credits to banks and developers. |
|
|
|
053 |
Rep. Esquivel |
Comments that some people just don’t want to own a house because of the responsibility. Is very supportive of affordable housing and discusses a plan involving a trust account. |
|
|
|
CLOSES PUBLIC HEARING FOR SENATE BILL 996 |
||
|
|
|
OPENS WORK SESSION FOR SENATE BILL 996 |
||
|
|
|
037 |
Rep. Berger |
MOTION: MOVES THE ADOPTION OF THE SB 996 A-2 AMENDMENT. |
|
|
|
038 |
Rep. Berger |
Comments that the program has a sufficient history and it works. This program helps people save money for a down payment to eventually purchase a home. |
|
|
|
053 |
Chair Butler |
ORDER: THERE BEING NO OBJECTION, THE CHAIR SO ORDERS. MOTION PASSES 8-0-1. VOTING AYE: ESQUIVEL, GALIZIO, KOMP, OLSON, RILEY, BERGER, HASS, BUTLER. EXCUSED: BOQUIST. |
|
|
|
056 |
Rep. Berger |
MOTION: MOVES SB 996 A AS AMENDED TO THE HOUSE FLOOR WITH A DO-PASS RECOMMENDATION. |
|
|
|
062 |
Chair Butler |
ORDER: THERE BEING NO OBJECTION, THE CHAIR SO ORDERS. MOTION PASSES 8-0-1. VOTING AYE: ESQUIVEL, GALIZIO, KOMP, OLSON, RILEY, BERGER, HASS, BUTLER. EXCUSED: BOQUIST. |
|
|
|
CLOSES WORK SESSION FOR SENATE BILL 996 A |
||
|
|
|
OPENS PUBLIC HEARING FOR SENATE BILL 31 |
||
|
|
|
070 |
Martin-Mahar |
Gives summary of SB 31 (Exhibit 12). The bill extends the Dept. of Revenue’s authority to bring a lawsuit against any office or employee who may be liable for not withholding personal income taxes from an employees’ wages. Discusses the SB 31-6 amendment (Exhibit 13). Explains the “throwback” exemption for corporate sales. Refers to the revenue impact statement for the SB 31-6 amendment (Exhibit 14). |
|
|
|
175 |
Chair Butler |
Discusses the intent of a public warehouse with Martin-Mahar. |
|
|
|
191 |
Rep. Riley |
Clarifies “throwback” exemption with Martin-Mahar. |
|
|
|
229 |
Bob Russell |
Testifies in support of the SB 31-6 amendment. Defers to Gary Eichman for a real-life story regarding the impact of SB 31. |
|
|
|
237 |
Gary Eichman |
Testifies in support of SB 31. Relates his personal experience as a public warehouse entity and how his company is affected by the throwback tax issue. |
|
|
|
292 |
Rep. Riley |
Discusses the throwback tax issue with Russell. |
|
|
|
310 |
Russell |
Comments that he is not asking for an exemption from income tax, but rather an exemption from the throw-back tax. |
|
|
|
318 |
Rep. Hass |
Asks what the original policy reason was for having the throwback tax when other states do not have an income tax. |
|
|
|
320 |
Martin-Mahar |
Responds that the sales were going untaxed. The sales are taxed in the state of origin, not the state of destination. |
|
|
|
334 |
Chair Butler |
Discusses the throwback tax with committee members. |
|
|
|
348 |
Rep. Riley |
Asks about Oregon companies that use public warehouses in Oregon to sell products to other states. |
|
|
|
350 |
Eichman |
Responds that in-state companies are being taxed appropriately because they have nexus in Oregon. |
|
|
|
355 |
Martin-Mahar |
Discussion with Rep. Riley on throwback sales. |
|
|
|
375 |
Russell |
Discussion with Martin-Mahar about the throwback tax and public warehouses. |
|
|
|
400 |
Chair Butler |
General comments about an Oregon company using a public warehouse. |
|
|
|
407 |
Debra Buchanan |
Concurs with Martin-Mahar’s analysis. Discusses the Dept. of Revenue’s position on the intent of the amendment. Discussion with Chair Butler regarding the taxing mechanism under the SB 31-6 amendment. Submits Executive Summary for SB 31 (Exhibit 15). |
|
|
|
TAPE 180, SIDE B |
||
031 |
Buchanan |
Discusses the original policy decisions regarding the throwback tax rule with Chair Butler. |
|
|
|
055 |
Chair Butler |
Comments on the SB 31-7 amendment (Exhibit 16). Discusses Oregon public warehousing with Martin-Mahar. |
|
|
|
095 |
Sen. Frank Morse |
Discusses the intent of the SB 31-8 amendment (Exhibit 17) and submits written testimony (Exhibit 18). The intent of the amendment is to provide funding for the intellectual concepts and technologies developed in Oregon’s universities and allow commercialization of those concepts. Discusses the funding mechanization. Describes the tax credit for donors. This bill would accelerate an untapped resource. |
|
|
|
177 |
Chair Butler |
Discusses the mechanics of the program with Sen. Morse. |
|
|
|
197 |
Sen. Betsy Johnson |
Comments that the fund-raising capabilities for this new credit exist in current university foundations. |
|
|
|
224 |
Rep. Galizio |
Asks how the program would benefit faculty recruitment. |
|
|
|
251 |
Sen. Morse |
Responds that knowing there would be a fund that a faculty member could tap to commercialize their research would be a retention and recruitment incentive. |
|
|
|
257 |
Sen. Johnson |
Discusses a current situation at Oregon Health and Science University involving a research scientist and his work on a drug for breast cancer. This program would be a more institutionalized funding source to take research from the Petri dish to commercialization. |
|
|
|
273 |
Rep. Galizio |
Asks about the origin of the 20% tax credit as stated in the amendment. |
|
|
|
275 |
Sen. Morse |
Responds that this percentage is the same amount that the Oregon Cultural Trust uses. |
|
|
|
288 |
Rep. Riley |
Asks about the typical percentage going back to a university of inventions. |
|
|
|
294 |
Sen. Johnson |
Responds that this type of credit does not have a long history and states she does not have a specific answer for Rep. Riley’s question. The state has not provided our [higher education] institutions with the tools to cash in on a researcher’s intellectual property. It is important to keep and develop the inventions in the state and “have the citizens of the state profit from the financial rewards of our scientists and clinicians.” |
|
|
|
341 |
Chair Butler |
Comments that the SB 31-8 amendment is a replication of SB 853 and there is concern about the cost of administering the tax credit. |
|
|
|
357 |
Rep. Hass |
Asks about coordinating this program with the current Oregon Growth Account. |
|
|
|
360 |
Sen. Morse |
Responds that the Fund proposed in the amendment are grants instead of investments. |
|
|
|
383 |
Sen. Johnson |
General comments on the Oregon Growth Account. Expresses concern about the rates of return on the Account.
|
TAPE 181, SIDE B |
||
001 |
Chair Butler |
General comments about the SB 31-9 amendment (Exhibit 19). |
|
|
|
011 |
Martin-Mahar |
Discusses the SB 31-9 amendment which provides a personal income tax exemption for a senior executive manager of a venture capitalist firm. Refers to the revenue impact statement (Exhibit 20). |
|
|
|
050 |
Chair Butler |
General comments about the challenges of attracting new venture capital firms to Oregon. |
|
|
|
066 |
Rep. Riley |
Discussion with Chair Butler about venture capital companies with a nexus in Oregon. |
|
|
|
101 |
Sen. Johnson |
Discusses the SB 31-9 amendment and expresses concern about specific sections of the bill and the amendments. Expresses concern about the involvement of the Dept. of Economic Development (OECDD) for certification. |
|
|
|
150 |
Chair Butler |
Concurs with Sen. Johnson about her assessment of OECDD. |
|
|
|
167 |
Sen. Morse |
Suggests having this program put into the Treasurer’s Dept. because of their involvement with the Oregon Growth Fund. |
|
|
|
177 |
Rep. Hass |
Comments that there are venture capital firms in Oregon. Asks if this bill is passed, would they qualify. Asks if there is any data to support the policy decisions behind this bill. |
|
|
|
195 |
Chair Butler |
General comments about new venture capital firms. |
|
|
|
CLOSES PUBLIC HEARING ON SENATE BILL 31 |
||
|
|
|
OPENS PUBLIC HEARING ON HOUSE BILL 2775 |
||
|
|
|
240 |
Martin-Mahar |
Gives summary of HB 2775 (Exhibit 23). Refers to the HB 2775-2 amendment (Exhibit 24) that sets a cap on the affordable housing credits and extends the sunset date. |
|
|
|
272 |
Danelle Romain |
Testifies that this is another vehicle for affordable housing tax credits. |
|
|
|
CLOSES PUBLIC HEARING ON HOUSE BILL 2775 |
||
|
|
|
OPENS WORK SESSION FOR HOUSE BILL 2514 |
||
|
|
|
290 |
Martin-Mahar |
Gives summary of HB 2514. This bill adds psychologists to the eligible medical practitioners who can claim the tax credit for rural practitioners. Discusses revenue loss beginning in 2009. |
|
|
|
330 |
Rep. Hass |
Comments that while this is a good idea, there has been no analysis to prioritize the tax credits. Asks why this one is better. |
|
|
|
349 |
Chair Butler |
Agrees that there needs to be work done about a measuring device for these tax credits, and the Office of Rural Health will be asked to provide input during the interim session. |
|
|
|
361 |
Rep. Boquist |
For the record, comments that he is very interested in addressing rural health tax credits during the interim. |
|
|
|
366 |
Chair Butler |
Calls for roll-call vote. |
|
|
|
376 |
Chair Butler |
THE MOTION HAVING RECEIVED THE REQUIRED MAJORITY IS DECLARED PASSED. VOTE: 8-1-0. VOTING AYE: BOQUIST, ESQUIVEL, GALIZIO, KOMP, OLSON, RILEY, BERGER, BUTLER. VOTING NO: HASS. |
|
|
|
380 |
Chair Butler |
CLOSES WORK SESSION FOR HOUSE BILL 2514 |
|
|
|
389 |
Chair Butler |
Adjourns meeting at 3:00 p.m. |
Tape Log Submitted by: |
Reviewed by: |
Kristi Bowman, Committee Assistant |
Kim Taylor James, Committee Coordinator |
Exhibit Summary: