|
WORK SESSION HB 3481 A, HB 2070A, SB 23 A |
|
TAPES 190-191 A,190 B |
JUNE 9, 2005 1:30 PM STATE CAPITOL BUILDING
Members Present: Rep. Tom Butler, Chair
Rep. Vicki Berger, Vice-Chair
Rep. Mark Hass, Vice-Chair
Rep. Brian Boquist
Rep. Sal Esquivel
Rep. Larry Galizio
Rep. Betty Komp
Rep. Chuck Riley
Member Excused: Rep. Andy Olson
Witnesses Present: Dave Nelson, Oregon Seed Council & Oregon Dairy Farmers Assn.
Paul Cosgrove, American Forest & Paper Assn.
Rep. Chuck Burley, Dist. 54
Maggie Vandehey, Dept. of Environmental Quality (DEQ)
Staff Present: Paul Warner, Legislative Revenue Officer
Lizbeth Martin-Mahar, Economist
Mazen Malik, Economist
Steve Meyer, Economist
Kristi Bowman, Committee Assistant
TAPE 190, SIDE A
006 |
Acting Chair Berger |
Calls meeting to order at 1:49 p.m. |
|
|
|
OPENS WORK SESSION FOR SENATE BILL 23 A |
||
|
|
|
011 |
Mazen Malik |
Discusses the SB 23 A-3 amendment (Exhibit 4 from 06/08/05). |
|
|
|
023 |
Rep. Hass |
MOTION: MOVES THE ADOPTION OF THE SB 23 A-3 AMENDMENT. |
|
|
|
026 |
Acting Chair Berger |
Discussion with Malik about the amendment. Makes reference to HB 2395 (Exhibit 6 from 06/08/05). |
|
|
|
078 |
Chair Butler |
ORDER: THERE BEING NO OBJECTION, THE CHAIR SO ORDERS. MOTION PASSES 8-0-1. VOTING AYE: BOQUIST, ESQUIVEL, GALIZIO, KOMP, RILEY, BERGER, HASS, BUTLER. EXCUSED: OLSON. |
|
|
|
084 |
Rep. Boquist |
MOTION: MOVES SB 23 A AS AMENDED TO THE HOUSE FLOOR WITH A DO PASS RECOMMENDATION AND BE PLACED ON THE CONSENT CALENDAR. |
|
|
|
092 |
Rep. Komp |
Asks why this bill would be placed on the consent calendar instead of going to the floor for debate. |
|
|
|
094 |
Rep. Boquist |
Responds that this bill contains technical changes, and it has been discussed thoroughly in the Senate. |
|
|
|
100 |
Chair Butler |
ORDER: THERE BEING NO OBJECTION, THE CHAIR SO ORDERS. MOTION PASSES 8-0-1. VOTING AYE: BOQUIST, ESQUIVEL, GALIZIO, KOMP, RILEY, BERGER, HASS, BUTLER. EXCUSED: OLSON. |
|
|
|
CLOSES WORK SESSION FOR SENATE BILL 23 A |
||
|
|
|
OPENS WORK SESSION FOR HOUSE BILL 3481 A |
||
|
|
|
103 |
Lizbeth Martin-Mahar |
Discusses the main points of possible amendments that will clarify certain sections of the bill: (discussion interspersed)
|
|
|
|
140 |
Rep. Berger |
Asks if the references to farm storage facilities pertain to the pollution control tax credit or to the property tax credit. |
|
|
|
145 |
Martin-Mahar |
Responds that they pertain to the pollution control tax credit. |
|
|
|
149 |
Chair Butler |
General comments about the definition of storage facilities. Additional comments by Rep. Berger. |
|
|
|
169 |
Dave Nelson |
Discusses the definition of storage facilities. |
|
|
|
185 |
Rep. Berger |
Asks if the two tax credits are mutually exclusive or if they can use both. |
|
|
|
187 |
Martin-Mahar |
Explains the statutes that will apply to each credit. A person with a new storage facility for biofuel storage could use both the pollution control and property tax credits. |
208 |
Nelson |
Additional comments on storage facilities and tax credits. |
|
|
|
213 |
Rep. Boquist |
Comments that the bill has broad language regarding farm storage facilities. |
|
|
|
230 |
Chair Butler |
Expresses concern that the amendment language reflect that the credit is for new facilities only. |
|
|
|
243 |
Rep. Komp |
Asks if an existing storage facility could be retrofitted to claim a credit. |
|
|
|
245 |
Nelson |
Responds that a facility built since 1987 would be eligible for the pollution tax credit. |
|
|
|
264 |
Paul Cosgrove |
Discusses Section 6 of the bill referring to farm storage facilities. |
|
|
|
278 |
Chair Butler |
Clarifies that the credit would be for new construction only. Discussion with Nelson, Cosgrove, and Martin-Mahar about the credit. |
|
|
|
338 |
Rep. Boquist |
Comments on the “per ton of biomass” and the relating tax credit in the bill. Discussion with Nelson about the density of different commodities. |
|
|
|
383 |
Chair Butler |
Comments and discussion about whether the tax credit applies to the producer or to the user. |
|
|
|
TAPE 191, SIDE A |
||
047 |
Rep. Chuck Burley |
Discusses the amount of the tax credit and what it is supposed to cover. Discussion with Chair Butler. |
|
|
|
076 |
Rep. Burley |
Comments that the tax credit was originally intended for the producer. Discusses the credit as it applies to a purchaser in the wood products industry. Comments on the federal program for biofuels. Discussion with Chair Butler. |
|
|
|
151 |
Martin-Mahar |
Explains the DEQ handout (Exhibit 1). |
|
|
|
199 |
Rep. Hass |
Points out that the largest credit was claimed by PGE/Enron in 2004. |
|
|
|
212 |
Martin-Mahar |
Comments that there is not a complete fiscal analysis available at this time. Discussion with Chair Butler. |
|
|
|
236 |
Rep. Boquist |
Asks about the pollution control tax credit regarding the percentage increase of expenses stated in the Revenue Impact Statement (Exhibit 3 from 06/08/05). |
|
|
|
250 |
Martin-Mahar |
Responds that the figures add together. Once DEQ determines the type of companies involved, the other figures will be completed.
|
266 |
Maggie Vandehey |
Discusses potential amendments from DEQ:
|
|
|
|
301 |
Rep. Galizio |
Asks about the 164 applications for PGE/Enron as stated on the handout (Exhibit 1). |
|
|
|
303 |
Vandehey |
Responds that those applications are for the life of the program. Only one application was used for the Trojan decommission. |
|
|
|
337 |
Rep. Hass |
Asks about DEQ’s opinion of the pollution tax credit program. Discussion with Vandehey about the intent of the credits. |
|
|
|
360 |
Vandehey |
Discussion with Rep. Boquist about specific industries that received tax credits. Comments that 2004 was an anomaly. Most credits that year went to wood chippers, material and recovery facilities, and high-tech firms. |
|
|
|
CLOSES WORK SESSION FOR HOUSE BILL 3481 A |
||
|
|
|
OPENS WORK SESSION FOR HOUSE BILL 2070 A |
||
|
|
|
423 |
Steve Meyer |
Gives overview of HB 2070 A (Exhibit 2). The bill requires that a resident school district contract with another district regarding the transfer of a student with an Individual Education Program (IEP). |
|
|
|
445 |
Chair Butler |
General comments about the bill. |
|
|
|
470 |
Rep. Berger |
Asks if a district must agree to transfer a student, or if they can opt-out. |
|
|
|
TAPE 190, SIDE B |
||
035 |
Chair Butler |
Responds that a district is not mandated to accept an IEP student. The resident district would transfer their allotted IEP funds to the accepting district. |
|
|
|
044 |
Rep. Hass |
Discussion with Chair Butler about the need for this bill. |
|
|
|
061 |
Rep. Komp |
MOTION: MOVES HB 2070 A TO THE HOUSE FLOOR WITH A DO PASS RECOMMENDATION. |
|
|
|
066 |
Chair Butler |
ORDER: THERE BEING NO OBJECTION, THE CHAIR SO ORDERS. MOTION PASSES 8-0-1. VOTING AYE: BOQUIST, ESQUIVEL, GALIZIO, KOMP, RILEY, BERGER, HASS, BUTLER. EXCUSED: OLSON. |
|
|
|
CLOSES WORK SESSION FOR HOUSE BILL 2070 A |
||
|
|
|
072 |
Chair Butler |
Adjourns meeting at 2:49 p.m. |
Tape Log Submitted by: |
Reviewed by: |
Kristi Bowman, Committee Assistant |
Kim Taylor James, Committee Coordinator |
Exhibit Summary: