HOUSE COMMITTEE ON TRANSPORTATION
March 07, 2005 Hearing Room C
1:00 P.M. Tapes 20 - 22
MEMBERS PRESENT: Rep. George Gilman, Chair
Rep. Terry Beyer, Vice-Chair
Rep. Chuck Burley, Vice-Chair
Rep. Deborah Boone
Rep. Scott Bruun
Rep. Dave Hunt
Rep. Kim Thatcher
STAFF PRESENT: John Houser, Committee Administrator
Mike Reiley, Committee Assistant
MEASURES/ISSUES HEARD:
Introduction of Committee Bill – Work Session
HB 2365 & HB 2481 – Public Hearing
These minutes are in compliance with Senate and House Rules. Only text enclosed in quotation marks reports a speaker’s exact words. For complete contents, please refer to the tapes.
TAPE/# |
Speaker |
Comments |
TAPE 20, A |
||
003 |
Chair Gilman |
Calls the meeting to order at 1:04 p.m. Discusses the issue of school speed zones and addresses the current and proposed legislation. Opens a work session on introduction of committee bills. |
INTRODUCTION OF COMMITTEE BILL – WORK SESSION |
||
035 |
John Houser |
Committee Administrator. Introduces LC 2354 (EXHIBIT A). |
050 |
Rep. Bruun |
MOTION: Moves LC 2354 BE INTRODUCED as a committee bill. |
|
|
VOTE: 5-0-2 EXCUSED: 2 - Burley, Boone |
|
Chair Gilman |
Hearing no objection, declares the motion CARRIED. |
060 |
Chair Gilman |
Closes the work session. Opens a public hearing on HB 2365 and HB 2481. |
HB 2365 & HB 2481 – PUBLIC HEARING |
||
064 |
Rep. Vicki Berger |
House District 20. Explains the intent of HB 2365 and notes the problems that have arisen from school zone speed limits. Discusses the inconsistency of implementation of the speed limits. Notes that the most common question she receives from constituents is why the speed limit is not 20 miles per hour when amber lights are flashing and explains that many jurisdictions have not invested in them. |
118 |
Charles Crose |
Monmouth. Testifies in support of HB 2481 and changing the current school speed zone law. Describes the speed zones by Central High School as an example and in Keizer where speed zones are inconsistently enforced. |
178 |
Chair Gilman |
Asks if anyone has received a ticket for speeding in school zones after midnight. |
182 |
Crose |
Answers that he does not know. |
184 |
Chair Gilman |
Notes that some forthcoming legislation may require refunds for citations issued for speeding in school zones, but he is not aware of any citations that have been issued. |
190 |
Wayne Hiebenthal |
Dallas. Testifies in support of HB 2365. Describes the ambiguity of the language, “when children are present.” |
235 |
Dan Reid |
Salem. Testifies in support of HB 2365. Discusses the problems with the current law. Urges the repeal of the existing law. |
292 |
Rep. Hunt |
Asks if specific time provisions for school speed zones are acceptable. |
300 |
Reid |
Notes that on some weekdays school is not in session. |
305 |
Rep. Hunt |
Asks if drivers are aware which days children are in school. |
307 |
Reid |
Answers that drivers may not know which days are school days and explains that “when children are present” should be sufficient. |
320 |
Rick Roberts |
Wilsonville. Testifies in support of HB 2481. Describes a school zone in Wilsonville that has a large sign and flashing lights at the beginning of the zone and a small sign at the end and the resulting confusion. |
TAPE 21, A |
||
005 |
Chair Gilman |
Explains previous legislation and the reasons it passed, noting that the safety of children was the primary concern. |
012 |
Roberts |
Addresses the fines issued for speeding in school zones. |
017 |
Chair Gilman |
Asks if Mr. Roberts knows anyone who has received a ticket in a school zone at night. |
020 |
Roberts |
Answers no. Emphasizes the importance of obeying the law and educating children to understand the laws. |
055 |
Dick Haglund |
Salem. Testifies in support of HB 2481. Thanks Rep. Berger for her efforts to address the school speed zone issue. |
066 |
Rep. Hunt |
Asks if a consistent, statewide set time would be appropriate. |
070 |
Haglund |
Answers that flashing lights would be ideal, but he would support a time frame such as 7 a.m. to 5 p.m. |
085 |
Paul Norris |
Keizer. Submits and summarizes prepared testimony in support of HB 2365 (EXHIBIT B). Discusses the potential problem of buses being delayed by school zones and passengers consequently missing transfers to other buses. |
130 |
Rep. Thatcher |
Reads from the Federal Highway Administration Manual on Uniform Traffic Control Devices, the five basic requirements for traffic control effectiveness: 1. Fulfill a need 2. Command attention 3. Convey a clear, simple meaning 4. Command respect from the road users 5. Give adequate time for proper response. Notes that many are lacking in current traffic control devices. |
143 |
Chair Gilman |
Speaks in favor of flashing lights. Notes that there may be federal funds available to help provide them to jurisdictions. |
155 |
Pete Christensen |
Dallas. Submits and summarizes prepared testimony in support of HB 2365 and HB 2481 (EXHIBIT C). |
206 |
Rep. Burley |
Asks if Mr. Christensen is referring to crosswalks near schools. |
210 |
Christensen |
Responds yes and includes those that a school district has marked as an area “where children are present.” |
217 |
Rep. Beyer |
Asks about signs encountered by Mr. Christensen that indicate “when children are present” but nothing else. |
222 |
Christensen |
Explains that the signs indicate 20 miles per hour when children are present and notes the resulting confusion. |
229 |
Chair Gilman |
Notes the “Slow Down in School Zones” brochures submitted by Troy Costales, Transportation Safety Division, Oregon Department of Transportation (ODOT) (EXHIBIT D). |
235 |
Donna Barchenger |
Salem. Submits and summarizes a letter in support of HB 2481 (EXHIBIT E). Describes her experiences driving in school zones. |
305 |
Rep. Burley |
Asks about the crosswalk on Center Street that is not adjacent to a school and asks who determined that the crosswalk should be equipped with flashing lights. |
301 |
Barchenger |
Answers that she does not know and points out that there are no “end of school zone” signs. |
328 |
John Turmon |
Former school teacher, Salem. Testifies in support of HB 2365. Expresses concern that funding has not been used to create standard traffic control devices for school zone speed limits. |
380 |
Jon Oshel |
County Road Program Manager, Association of Oregon Counties (AOC). Submits and summarizes prepared testimony regarding HB 2365 and HB 2481 (EXHIBIT F). Explains that AOC is neutral on the legislation and expresses concern about a “one size fits all” solution due to the number of different roads and situations throughout the state. |
TAPE 20, B |
||
054 |
Rep. Thatcher |
Asks about traffic control devices to give drivers advanced notice about approaching speed changes. |
058 |
Oshel |
Explains that it a good idea and expresses importance of warning drivers of changes in the speed limit. |
065 |
Rep. Thatcher |
Notes that she is a sign contractor and points out that most of the traffic control signs were made by the jurisdictions, not private contractors. |
070 |
Rep. Beyer |
Asks if it would be appropriate to give the cities or counties the ability to set signage. |
073 |
Oshel |
Explains that the road authorities (i.e. city or county) make the final determination in setting school zone speed limits and work closely with school districts to set the times the speed limit is in effect. |
085 |
Mark Lear |
Traffic Investigations Manager, Office of Transportation, City of Portland. Submits and summarizes prepared testimony and information regarding HB 2365 and HB 2481 (EXHIBIT G). |
184 |
Rep. Thatcher |
Explains that consistency is important to reduce drivers’ confusion. |
190 |
Lear |
Explains the challenges associated with setting consistent speed limits. |
214 |
Rep. Thatcher |
Asks for clarification of the number of children injured in school zones. |
220 |
Lear |
Explains that children are most often injured between 3-8 p.m. |
228 |
Rep. Thatcher |
Clarifies that it is not necessarily in school zones. |
230 |
Lear |
Answers yes. Describes the work being done to encourage paths and safe walking routes to schools. |
244 |
Rep. Thatcher |
Notes that the speed limits are still confusing and expresses concern about children and the “sickos and perverts” that spend time in parks and near schools. |
250 |
Lear |
Notes that traffic safety is the first concern identified by parents and kids followed by crime. |
258 |
Rep. Bruun |
Asks if a reduction in traffic incidents in school zones can be shown since the law changed. |
265 |
Lear |
Answers that there is a six-month delay in receiving data from the Division of Motor Vehicles. |
270 |
Rep. Bruun |
Asks for anecdotal evidence about traffic incidents in school zones. |
280 |
Lear |
Explains that the public has generally been supportive and the system appears to be working. |
305 |
Rep. Burley |
Expresses concern about the proposed 6 a.m. to 10 p.m. time frame. Asks how to get local jurisdictions involved in setting the crosswalks and speed in school zones. |
330 |
Lear |
States that there is a strong traffic safety community in Oregon around safe routes to schools and notes that there is work being done to address the different issues from around the state. |
358 |
Rep. Burley |
Asks if Mr. Lear is referring to his own proposal or that in HB 2365. |
360 |
Lear |
Answers that he is referring to his proposal. |
370 |
Roger Trygstad |
Retired ODOT Traffic Engineer. Notes that the current school speed zone law is the most confusing he has seen in 32 years with ODOT. Expresses concern that a disrespect for the signs is resulting from the confusion among drivers. Proposes a return to the sign “when children are present.” |
TAPE 21, B |
||
005 |
Scott Bricker |
Policy Director, Bicycle Transportation Alliance. Submits and summarizes prepared testimony regarding HB 2365 (EXHIBIT H). |
040 |
Vinita Howard |
Salem. Submits and summarizes prepared testimony in support of HB 2365 and HB 2481 (EXHIBIT I). |
140 |
Jack Straton |
Portland. Submits and summarizes prepared testimony in support of HB 2365 and HB 2481 (EXHIBIT J). Notes that it is not good policy to have a law that triggers resentment when it is followed. |
179 |
Rep. Beyer |
Asks what about the school speed zone law angers people. |
184 |
Straton |
Answers that there is resentment about “having to obey a law when there is no need for it.” |
191 |
Chair Gilman |
Asks about changing other traffic laws such as not having to stop at stop signs from 1-3 a.m. |
195 |
Straton |
Explains that there is no need to change what people are used to. |
206 |
Shelly Moore |
Crossing guard, Highland Elementary, Salem. Explains the abuse she receives from drivers upset at being stopped. Points out that if drivers do not stop for her, they will not stop for children. Argues that the “when children are present” language is too broad. |
247 |
Rep. Hunt |
Asks about the potential solutions that have been raised. |
253 |
Moore |
Explains the danger in having to slow down from 55 to 20 miles per hour in a school zone. Argues that school zones should be 20 miles per hour at all times. |
295 |
Karen Randall |
Salem. Explains the dangers for children in school zones and at crosswalks. Describes incidents in which she and her daughter and crossing guards were nearly struck in school zones by speeding drivers. |
388 |
Rep. Thatcher |
Asks if Ms. Randall would like to see the law left as it is. |
393 |
Randall |
Answers that she would like to see the current laws enforced to protect pedestrians. |
405 |
Rep. Thatcher |
Concurs with Ms. Randall regarding dangers to flaggers from speeding drivers. |
TAPE 22, A |
||
010 |
Troy Costales |
Transportation Safety Division, ODOT. Submits and summarizes prepared testimony regarding HB 2365 (EXHIBIT K) and HB 2481 (EXHIBIT L). |
055 |
Kent Smith |
Salem. Testifies in support of HB 2365 and HB 2481. |
The following material is submitted for the record without public testimony: |
||
|
Christy Monson |
League of Oregon Cities. Submits prepared testimony regarding HB 2365 and HB 2481 (EXHIBIT M). |
090 |
Chair Gilman |
Closes the public hearing on HB 2365 and HB 2481. Adjourns the meeting at 3:00 p.m. |
EXHIBIT SUMMARY