HOUSE COMMITTEE ON TRANSPORTATION
April 4, 2005 Hearing Room C
1:00 P.M. Tapes 37 - 38
MEMBERS PRESENT: Rep. George Gilman, Chair
Rep. Terry Beyer, Vice-Chair
Rep. Chuck Burley, Vice-Chair
Rep. Deborah Boone
Rep. Scott Bruun
Rep. Dave Hunt
Rep. Kim Thatcher
STAFF PRESENT: John Houser, Committee Administrator
Mike Reiley, Committee Assistant
MEASURES/ISSUES HEARD:
HB 2811 – Public Hearing
HB 2609 – Public Hearing
HB 2830 – Public Hearing
These minutes are in compliance with Senate and House Rules. Only text enclosed in quotation marks reports a speaker’s exact words. For complete contents, please refer to the tapes.
TAPE/# |
Speaker |
Comments |
TAPE 37, A |
||
003 |
Chair Gilman |
Calls the meeting to order at 1:03 p.m. Opens a public hearing on HB 2811. |
HB 2811 – PUBLIC HEARING |
||
006 |
John Houser |
Committee Administrator. Introduces HB 2811 which prohibits certain types of display devices to be in operation in a car while driving, if located where the driver can see it. |
015 |
Rep. Andy Olson |
House District 15. Testifies in support of HB 2811. Points out the changes in the Motor Vehicle Code. Refers to ORS 815.240. Explains the changes in technology and how they are addressed by HB 2811. |
050 |
Mark Landauer |
Office of Government Relations, City of Portland. Testifies and submits written testimony in support of HB 2811 (EXHIBIT A). Explains that HB 2811 expands the spirit of ORS 815.240. Points out the difficulties law enforcement officers have in stopping erratic drivers before a reckless act occurs. |
092 |
Landauer |
States that HB 2811 limits its application to screens that can be used only for entertainment purposes. Continues that image display devices related to navigation or operation of the vehicle are exempted. Describes the -5 amendments (EXHIBIT B) which add to the exemptions in HB 2811. |
126 |
Lt. Vince Jarmer |
Portland Traffic Bureau, City of Portland. Testifies in support of HB 2811. Explains the importance of updating statute to more accurately reflect current standards. Reiterates that HB 2811 continues to allow officers to be more preemptive. |
157 |
Jarmer |
Describes traffic problems in Portland and the large numbers of vehicles with portable DVD players. |
185 |
Landauer |
Refers to the CNN article on a “DVD murder case” included in EXHIBIT A. |
191 |
Rep. Thatcher |
Agrees with the concept of prohibiting watching videos while driving. Refers to Line 6 of the -5 amendments. Asks how a commercial motor vehicle is determined. |
211 |
Landauer |
Explains the intent of HB 2811 and indicates that clarifying language may be needed. |
234 |
Rep. Thatcher |
Suggests some wording to address the problem. |
238 |
Landauer |
Explains the difficulty in defining “entertainment.” Offers that the list of exemptions was an attempt to deal with the issue. |
255 |
Rep. Thatcher |
Asks how law enforcement officers would be able to determine that a device was being used improperly. |
264 |
Jarmer |
Responds that officers would have the authority to stop and investigate. |
277 |
Rep. Boone |
Inquires how map screens would be addressed. |
280 |
Landauer |
Cites language in Line 16 of HB 2811 that exempts navigation systems. |
290 |
Rep. Boone |
Wonders if driving while viewing a map is different from watching videos. |
298 |
Landauer |
Acknowledges the difficulty in addressing the issue and regrets that some drivers do not use common sense causing legislation to allow officers to investigate suspicious behavior. |
312 |
Rep. Boone |
Comments about reading while driving. |
320 |
Rep. Hunt |
Seeks clarification that HB 2811 exempts use of navigational equipment. |
327 |
Landauer |
Refers to Line 4 of the -5 amendments and Line 18 of HB 2811 that exempt devices not attached to the car. |
346 |
Rep. Burley |
Expresses concern about changing the specific language “vehicle television equipment” to “image displaying device” which is now all inclusive. Asks about changing “vehicle television equipment” to “use of any visual entertainment equipment.” |
371 |
Landauer |
Reiterates the intent of HB 2811. Indicates openness to suggestions. |
389 |
Rep. Thatcher |
Asks if this law were in place now, how many opportunities there would have been to stop a vehicle. |
394 |
Jarmer |
Restates the situation in Portland but is unable to quantify how often it happens. |
420 |
Landauer |
Comments that since it is not currently an offense, there is no opportunity to document the issue. |
429 |
Chair Gilman |
Asks about accident figures attributable to this problem. |
434 |
Jarmer |
Answers that they would be able to determine that an individual was distracted but not the specific cause. |
TAPE 38, A |
||
014 |
Chair Gilman |
Closes the public hearing on HB 2811. Opens a public hearing on HB 2609. |
HB 2609 – PUBLIC HEARING |
||
025 |
John Houser |
Committee Administrator. Explains HB 2609 which adds the eye color of the licensee to the information on an Oregon driver’s license. |
033 |
Mike Dewey |
Digimark. Explains that his company provides driver’s license services through contract to many states. Testifies as neutral on HB 2609. Advises there would be additional costs for software development but believes the change is within the scope of the contract. Notes that proposed SB 640 dealing with fingerprinting and biometrics may affect their contracts. |
066 |
Rep. Burley |
Asks what happened previously. |
068 |
Dewey |
Responds that HB 2609 has been on the schedule three times, but this is the first hearing. |
070 |
Rep. Thatcher |
Inquires if eye color used to be on driver’s licenses. |
073 |
Dewey |
Answers yes, but the use of colored contact lenses may have been the reason for removing that information. |
081 |
Rep. Thatcher |
Asks who determines eye color. |
084 |
Dewey |
Replies, the applicant. |
090 |
Rep. Burley |
Inquires about the purpose of HB 2609. |
097 |
Rep. Scott Bruun |
House District 37. Explains that HB 2609 provides another tool to help law enforcement identify people. |
125 |
Chair Gilman |
Closes the public hearing on HB 2609 and opens a public hearing on HB 2830. |
HB 2830 – PUBLIC HEARING |
||
128 |
John Houser |
Committee Administrator. Describes HB 2830 which requires participants in the Adopt-A-Highway program to pay all of the costs associated with their participation; appear in person at any public meeting where an application will be discussed; and have their identities provided to the news media. |
140 |
John Jackley |
Oregon Department of Transportation (ODOT). Testifies and submits written testimony on HB 2830 (EXHIBIT C). Expresses concern about potential unintended consequences of some of the provisions. Provides information on and costs of the Adopt-A-Highway and Youth Litter programs. Continues that shifting the cost burden onto volunteer organizations may significantly reduce participation. |
186 |
Rep. Beyer |
Asks if costs are reimbursed or paid up front. |
192 |
Jackley |
Answers that volunteers for the Adopt-A-Highway program bear their own transportation costs and the department pays for safety vests and necessary equipment. Continues that the Youth Litter patrol is a paid program and the department provides transportation and equipment. |
201 |
Rep. Thatcher |
Inquires about Line 16 of HB 2830 that requires providing the applicant‘s identity to media. |
206 |
Jackley |
Replies that someone can currently request that information in a public records request. |
208 |
Rep. Burley |
Refers to existing law that says the department may adopt any rules considered necessary for implementation of the Adopt-A-Highway program. Inquires why ODOT doesn’t just amend their rules. |
214 |
Jackley |
Responds that the department has the authority to adopt rules. |
221 |
Rep. Burley |
Believes that volunteer organizations will discontinue their services if they have to pay all the costs. |
224 |
Jackley |
Shares that concern. |
235 |
Andrea Meyer |
Legislative Affairs Director, American Civil Liberties Union (ACLU). Testifies on HB 2830. Believes that signing a statement attesting to representation of an organization would address concerns and insure against misrepresentation. Continues that HB 2830 appears to require the department to distribute information to the media. |
270 |
Rep. Thatcher |
Asks if there are rules to ensure that an organization is legitimate. |
280 |
Meyer |
Believes the programs run fine and there is not a problem. |
287 |
Rep. Beyer |
Inquires if there are requirements on how often a highway must be cleaned up under the Adopt-A-Highway program. |
298 |
Jackley |
Responds that HB 2830 requires two pickups and two safety meetings per year. |
308 |
Rep. Beyer |
Seeks clarification that the requirement is to clean the roadway two times per year and attend two safety meetings. |
310 |
Jackley |
Answers yes. |
315 |
Chair Gilman |
Closes the public hearing on HB 2830. |
318 |
Rep. Boone |
Asks about the agenda for Bend. |
325 |
Rep. Burley |
Explains that the agenda will be the school zone speed limit bills, the Smokey Bear license plate, and the safe route to schools bill and describes the meeting location. |
346 |
Rep. Bruun |
Asks about transportation. |
348 |
Houser |
Provides the alternatives. |
370 |
Chair Gilman |
Adjourns the meeting at 1:57 p.m. |
EXHIBIT SUMMARY