HOUSE COMMITTEE ON TRANSPORTATION
April 13, 2005 Hearing Room C
1:00 P.M. Tapes 46 - 47
MEMBERS PRESENT: Rep. George Gilman, Chair
Rep. Terry Beyer, Vice-Chair
Rep. Chuck Burley, Vice-Chair
Rep. Deborah Boone
Rep. Scott Bruun
Rep. Dave Hunt
Rep. Kim Thatcher
STAFF PRESENT: Patrick Brennan, Committee Administrator
Mike Reiley, Committee Assistant
MEASURES/ISSUES HEARD:
HB 2937 – Public Hearing and Work Session
HB 3088 – Public Hearing and Work Session
HB 3089 – Public Hearing and Work Session
HB 2429 – Public Hearing
These minutes are in compliance with Senate and House Rules. Only text enclosed in quotation marks reports a speaker’s exact words. For complete contents, please refer to the tapes.
TAPE/# |
Speaker |
Comments |
TAPE 46, A |
||
003 |
Chair Gilman |
Calls the meeting to order at 1:09 p.m. Opens a public hearing on HB 2937. |
HB 2937 – PUBLIC HEARING |
||
007 |
Patrick Brennan |
Committee Administrator. Introduces HB 2937. |
014 |
Paul Romain |
Oregon Petroleum Association (OPA). Submits prepared information materials (EXHIBIT A) and testifies in support of HB 2937. |
047 |
Ed Johnston |
Resident, Lincoln County. Testifies in opposition to HB 2937. Explains the potential for mistakes and misuse of the system. |
098 |
Rep. Bruun |
Asks if driving is a constitutional right. |
101 |
Johnston |
Answers that driver’s licenses were first issued when automobiles began to be used and that privileges associated with the licenses were introduced in the 1960s. |
107 |
Rep. Hunt |
Points out that a driver’s license may be revoked for a number of reasons. Asks if any of those reasons are appropriate for revoking a driver’s license. |
110 |
Johnston |
Explains that the use of some breath mints or cough medicines that contain alcohol can result in a false positive breathalyzer test and loss of a driver’s license. |
129 |
Rep. Hunt |
Notes that the loss of a driver’s license results from a conviction, not an accusation. |
132 |
Johnston |
Concurs and reiterates that the process may be misused. |
148 |
Rep. Hunt |
Asks if the logical extension of Mr. Johnston’s argument is that no one should be punished by local governments. |
151 |
Johnston |
Argues that laws are already in place to address crimes and that more of the same type of laws are not needed. |
192 |
Rep. Thatcher |
Expresses concern that the language in the bill is too broad. Asks if the bill was intended to address those who drive away from gas stations without paying or those who steal gas from other vehicles. |
210 |
Chair Gilman |
Presumes that HB 2937 would cover both instances. |
214 |
Romain |
Concurs that the measure would cover both instances. |
222 |
Rep. Thatcher |
Points out that not all who steal gasoline have a driver license to be revoked. |
226 |
Romain |
Explains that one would still be convicted of theft, but that in such cases the revocation of driver’s license would not be triggered. |
240 |
Rep. Thatcher |
Inquires if other states that have addressed the issue have used similar language. |
242 |
Romain |
Answers that he thinks it is similar to other states. |
251 |
Rep. Bruun |
Asks whether assessing one set of penalties for someone with a driver’s license and another set for those without would amount ot unequal treatment and thus create a constitutional issue. |
260 |
Romain |
Replies that the crime punishment can be set for an individual location. |
273 |
Rep. Bruun |
Asks for the difference in punishment for one who has a license versus those who do not. |
281 |
Romain |
Maintains that there is no constitutional issue. |
293 |
Chair Gilman |
Asks how often gas is stolen from gas stations. |
296 |
Romain |
Answers that he does not have statistics on the number of instances, only more anecdotal reports of theft. |
303 |
Rep. Thatcher |
Asks if there have been fewer instances of gas theft in other states where similar laws have been passed. |
307 |
Romain |
Answers that the evidence is anecdotal, but that it seems to be working as a deterrent. |
310 |
Rep. Hunt |
Asks who would pay for the decals at gas stations warning people of the penalties if the law was passed. |
313 |
Romain |
Answers that OPA would probably produce such signs. |
324 |
Rep. Beyer |
Asks if police typically follow up on gas theft cases. |
330 |
Romain |
Answers that it depends on the jurisdictions and the amount of time and effort the police can dedicate to the cases. |
334 |
Rep. Boone |
Notes the current high cost of gasoline. |
347 |
Romain |
Responds that the dealers do not set the price of gas and they lose money when the price of gas goes up. |
356 |
Johnston |
Explains that gas station workers are expected to pay for gas that is stolen. |
393 |
Rep. Beyer |
Asks for a rebuttal of employees being required to pay for gas that is stolen. |
406 |
Romain |
Explains that workers are not fired for gas stolen by someone else. |
415 |
Rep. Beyer |
Asks if gas station workers are responsible for gas stolen by someone else. |
419 |
Romain |
Answers no. |
423 |
Chair Gilman |
Closes the public hearing and opens a work session on HB 2937. |
HB 2937 – WORK SESSION |
||
428 |
Rep. Hunt |
MOTION: Moves HB 2937 to the floor with a DO PASS recommendation. |
432 |
Rep. Thatcher |
States that she would prefer that the intent of the bill be narrowed to address the specific problem of gasoline theft from filling stations. |
|
|
VOTE: 6-0-1 AYE: In a roll call vote, all members present vote Aye. EXCUSED: 1 – Burley (Note: See Tape 47, A at 150 and Page 4 of these minutes) |
440 |
Chair Gilman |
The motion CARRIES. REP. GILMAN will lead discussion on the floor. |
444 |
Chair Gilman |
Closes the work session on HB 2937. Opens a public hearing on HB 3088. |
TAPE 47, A |
||
HB 3088 – PUBLIC HEARING |
||
024 |
Patrick Brennan |
Committee Administrator. Introduces HB 3088. |
035 |
Darrell Fuller |
Regulatory Affairs Director, Oregon Automobile Dealers Association. Submits and summarizes prepared testimony in support of HB 3088 (EXHIBIT B). Explains the problem with dealer license plates that under current law are invalid if on a vehicle that has expired registration tags from another state. |
081 |
Rep. Boone |
Notes that there have been few complaints and asks why the exemption was initially placed in statute. |
085 |
Fuller |
Explains that he worked with the Division of Motor Vehicles (DMV) to determine that but says they could not determine why it was there. |
095 |
Rep. Boone |
Asks if the problem could be rectified by rule rather than statute. |
098 |
Fuller |
Answers that the language is statutory and cannot be changed by administrative rule. |
103 |
Rep. Boone |
Asks how dealers would purchase vehicles with expired registration since they could not be driven legally. |
106 |
Fuller |
Answers that dealers get cars from auctions and elsewhere and they often expire on the lot. |
136 |
Chair Gilman |
Closes the public hearing and opens a work session on HB 3088. |
HB 3088 – WORK SESSION |
||
140 |
Rep. Bruun |
MOTION: Moves HB 3088 to the floor with a DO PASS recommendation.
|
|
|
VOTE: 7-0-0 AYE: In a roll call vote, all members present vote Aye. |
|
Chair Gilman |
The motion CARRIES. |
147 |
Chair Gilman |
Closes the work session on HB 3088 and reopens the work session on HB 2937. |
HB 2937 – WORK SESSION |
||
150 |
Rep. Burley |
MOTION: Requests unanimous consent that the rules be SUSPENDED to allow REP. BURLEY to BE RECORDED as voting AYE on the motion to move HB 2937 to the floor with a DO PASS recommendation. |
|
|
VOTE: 7-0-0 |
|
Chair Gilman |
Hearing no objection, declares the motion CARRIED. |
165 |
Chair Gilman |
Closes the work session on HB 2937. Reopens the work session on HB 3088. |
HB 3088 – WORK SESSION |
||
167 |
Rep. Bruun |
MOTION: Moves HB 3088 be placed on the CONSENT CALENDAR. |
|
|
VOTE: 7-0-0 |
|
Chair Gilman |
Hearing no objection, declares the motion CARRIED. |
170 |
Chair Gilman |
Closes the work session on HB 3088. Opens a public hearing on HB 3089. |
HB 3089 – PUBLIC HEARING |
||
174 |
Patrick Brennan |
Committee Administrator. Introduces HB 3089. |
179 |
Darrell Fuller |
Regulatory Affairs Director, Oregon Automobile Dealers Association (OADA). Submits and summarizes prepared testimony in support of HB 3089 (EXHIBIT C) and HB 3089-1 amendments (EXHIBIT D). |
262 |
Rep. Hunt |
Asks if anyone sells cars without holding a valid vehicle dealer’s certificate. |
265 |
Fuller |
Answers that anyone who sells cars in Oregon must have a vehicle dealer’s certificate. |
268 |
Rep. Thatcher |
Asks if the Division of Motor Vehicles (DMV) works with the Oregon Dealers Association Committee (ODAC). |
272 |
Fuller |
Answers that DMV is not required to work with them, but says the department usually brings issues to the committee before beginning the rulemaking process. Notes that ODAC is a statutory committee. |
303 |
Robin Freeman |
Oregon Department of Transportation (ODOT). Submits and summarizes prepared testimony regarding HB 3089 (EXHIBIT E). |
312 |
Rep. Burley |
Asks if the -1 amendments are acceptable to ODOT. |
314 |
Freeman |
Answers yes. |
320 |
Rep. Burley |
Asks for a clarification for the reason that the amendments use “may” as opposed to “shall”. |
329 |
Fuller |
Explains that it was Legislative Counsel’s decision to use that particular language. States that OADA works to ensure that proper rules are written and followed. |
343 |
Rep. Hunt |
Requests clarification that if ODOT does not establish rules, then dealers could operate under conditions outlined in statute. |
353 |
Freeman |
Answers affirmatively. |
357 |
Rep. Hunt |
Requests clarification that until such rules are adopted dealers could operate under conditions outlined in statute. |
360 |
Freeman |
Answers yes. |
365 |
Chair Gilman |
Closes the public hearing opens a work session on HB 3089. |
HB 3089 – WORK SESSION |
||
368 |
Rep. Hunt |
MOTION: Moves to ADOPT HB 3089-1 amendments dated 4/12/05. |
|
|
VOTE: 7-0-0 |
|
Chair Gilman |
Hearing no objection, declares the motion CARRIED.
|
373 |
Rep. Hunt |
MOTION: Moves HB 3089 to the floor with a DO PASS AS AMENDED recommendation. |
|
|
VOTE: 7-0-0 AYE: In a roll call vote, all members present vote Aye. |
|
Chair Gilman |
The motion CARRIES. REP. HUNT will lead discussion on the floor. |
384 |
Chair Gilman |
Closes the work session on HB 3089. Opens a public hearing on HB 2429. |
HB 2429 – PUBLIC HEARING |
||
400 |
Patrick Brennan |
Committee Administrator. Introduces HB 2429. |
TAPE 46, B |
||
011 |
MaryAnn Trout |
Hillsboro Auto Wrecking. Testifies in support of HB 2429. Explains the intent of the bill. |
034 |
Mark Forcum |
Foster Auto Parts. Testifies in support of HB 2429. Explains the record keeping requirements in the bill and the language change from “wrecker” to “dismantler” throughout statute. Describes the consumer protection aspects of the bill. |
072 |
Rep. Thatcher |
Asks for an explanation of the -1 amendments (EXHIBIT F). |
080 |
Forcum |
Explains the intent of the amendments. |
090 |
Rep. Thatcher |
Asks why the sum of the bond is being changed from $2,000 to $10,000. |
098 |
Forcum |
Answers that the bond reflects the increased costs of salvage. |
111 |
Rep. Bruun |
Asks how long the bond has been set at $2,000. |
113 |
Forcum |
Answers that it has been $2,000 for 30 years. |
115 |
Rep. Bruun |
Asks what the cost to a dismantler would be on a $10,000 bond. |
118 |
Trout |
Answers that the cost of a three-year, $40,000 bond is $1,000. |
126 |
Barbara Crest |
Northwest Automotive Trades Association (NATA). Submits prepared testimony and information including proposed -1 amendments in support of HB 2429 (EXHIBIT F).
|
129 |
Robert Anderson |
President, NATA. Submits and summarizes prepared testimony in support of HB 2429 (EXHIBIT G). |
175 |
Rep. Boone |
Offers the example of a dealership on the Tillamook Bay that has been cited by the Environmental Protection Agency (EPA). Asks for an explanation of clean-up provisions. |
183 |
Anderson |
Explains that Marion County cannot afford to close and take over lands. |
193 |
Rep. Thatcher |
Asks if NATA coordinates with the Oregon Department of Transportation (ODOT). |
198 |
Crest |
States that the auto recyclers are represented on ODAC. |
200 |
Rep. Beyer |
Commends the work done on HB 2429. States that the bill addresses a significant consumer protection issue. |
210 |
Darrell Fuller |
Regulatory Affairs Director, Oregon Automobile Dealers Association (OADA). Expresses concerns with HB 2429. |
241 |
Rep. Burley |
Asks if the -1 amendments address the concerns of OADA regarding dealing auto parts. |
250 |
Fuller |
Answers no. |
255 |
Rep. Thatcher |
Asks about the effect of the bill on auto parts dealers. |
260 |
Forcum |
Reiterates that the intent of the bill is not to affect auto parts dealers. |
271 |
Fuller |
Explains that auto dealers sometimes buy used component parts as requested by customers. |
278 |
Rep. Thatcher |
Asks if the bill is intended to track the parts used in auto repairs. |
287 |
Forcum |
Explains auto parts requirements. |
296 |
Rep. Thatcher |
Asks if a clearer definition is needed. |
298 |
Forcum |
Answers no. |
306 |
Rep. Thatcher |
Clarifies that small auto repair operations are not affected. |
311 |
Forcum |
Answers no, unless they are buying cars to procure parts to put on customers’ cars. |
316 |
Rep. Burley |
Asks if mechanics are considered dismantlers. |
320 |
Forcum |
Answers no. |
325 |
Rep. Burley |
Asks about reconditioned parts sold in retail stores. |
328 |
Forcum |
Answers that retail stores are documented separately. |
344 |
Robin Freeman |
ODOT. Submits and summarizes prepared testimony regarding HB 2429 (EXHIBIT H). |
404 |
Rep. Burley |
Asks for a citation of amendment language regarding what constitutes a loss. |
412 |
Freeman |
Answers that she will provide the information. |
422 |
Chair Gilman |
Closes the public hearing on HB 2429. States that the committee will be scheduling a field trip to the Mexican Consulate in Portland. Adjourns the meeting at 2:33 p.m. |
EXHIBIT SUMMARY