HOUSE COMMITTEE ON
VETERANS' AFFAIRS
April 28. 2005 Hearing Room C
8:30 A.M. Tapes 83 - 85
MEMBERS PRESENT: Rep. Donna Nelson, Chair
Rep. Phil Barnhart, Vice-Chair
Rep. Brian Boquist
Rep. Scott Bruun
Rep. Dave Hunt
Rep. Betty Komp
MEMBER EXCUSED: Rep. Debi Farr, Vice-Chair
STAFF PRESENT: Jim Stembridge, Committee Administrator
Erin Seiler, Committee Assistant
MEASURES/ISSUES HEARD:
Health Care Benefits for National Guard & Reserve Members & Their Families – Informational Meeting
HB 2737 – Work Session
HB 2847 – Work Session
HB 2862 – Work Session
These minutes are in compliance with Senate and House Rules. Only text enclosed in quotation marks reports a speaker’s exact words. For complete contents, please refer to the tapes.
TAPE/# |
Speaker |
Comments |
TAPE 83, A |
||
001 |
Chair Nelson |
Opens the meeting at 8:38 a.m. Open the informational meeting on Health Care Benefits for National Guard & Reserve Members & Their Families. |
HEALTH CARE BENEFITS FOR NATIONAL GUARD & RESERVE MEMBERS & THEIR FAMILIES – INFORMATIONAL MEETING |
||
055 |
Rear Admiral James Johnson |
Regional Director, TRICARE Regional Office West. Submits and summarizes written testimony on health care benefits for National Guard and Reserve Members (EXHIBIT A). |
151 |
Johnson |
Submits TRICARE Regional Office West PowerPoint presentation (EXHIBIT B). |
155 |
Johnson |
Explains TRICARE Health Care programs (EXHIBIT B, Pages 3 -5). |
197 |
Rep. Nelson |
Asks how the TRICARE health care program “meshes” with Oregon Veterans’ Administration Medical facilities. |
205 |
Johnson |
Explains TRICARE Northwest Hub support services in Oregon (EXHIBIT B, Page 6). |
270 |
Rep. Nelson |
Addresses the need to increase advertising and marketing of veterans’ health care services and benefits. |
275 |
Johnson |
Speaks to efforts of TRICARE to provide information to veterans’ about available health care benefits. |
292 |
Rep. Nelson |
Asks if TRICARE has a public relations budget to market program in Oregon. |
317 |
Johnson |
Identifies where the Prime Service Areas are in Oregon and the areas in Oregon where provider availability is inadequate (EXHIBIT B, Pages 7 -9). |
361 |
Rep. Boquist |
Asks why it is a challenge to get providers in the Pendleton Area. |
370 |
Johnson |
Addresses why the Pendleton and Bend area have challenges with getting TRICARE network providers. |
TAPE 84, A |
||
037 |
Rep. Barnhart |
Points out that Medicare reimbursement rates are “incredibly inadequate” and suggests that TRICARE attempt to differentiate their reimbursement rates from Medicare rates in order to improve provider retention. |
059 |
Johnson |
Comments on the difficulty of recruiting and retaining network providers because of low reimbursement rates. |
083 |
Chair Nelson |
Explains why veterans have limited access to medical treatment in Oregon. |
115 |
Johnson |
Speaks to Congressional oversight of military medical facility and Veterans’ Administration medical facilities. |
170 |
Johnson |
Explains CHAMPUS Maximum Allowable Charge rates (EXHIBIT B, Page 10). |
205 |
Johnson |
Speaks to TRICARE mental health parity (EXHIBIT B, Page 11). |
239 |
Johnson |
Explains TRICARE Prime Benefit Program (EXHIBIT B, Page 12). |
325 |
Johnson |
Addresses Congressional efforts to increase Reserve Component Health Care Benefits (EXHIBIT B, Pages 13- 14). |
TAPE 83, B |
||
001 |
Johnson |
Explains the Transitional Assistance Management Program (TAMP) (EXHIBIT B, Page 15). |
015 |
Johnson |
Explains the TRICARE Reserve Select Benefit (EXHIBIT B, Pages 16 – 18). |
046 |
Rep. Boquist |
Asks what the purpose is of TRICARE Reserve Select Benefit and if there are alternative health care benefit options. |
060 |
Johnson |
Explains why Congress developed the TRICARE Reserve Select Benefit Program. |
108 |
Rep. Hunt |
Inquires as to who has the authority to amend eligibility requirements for TRICARE Prime Benefits. |
120 |
Johnson |
States that eligibility is Congressionally mandated. |
124 |
Rep. Boquist |
Asks how to ensure that Reservists are all registered and eligible for health care benefits before leaving active duty. |
130 |
Johnson |
Explains TAMP coverage and TRICARE Outreach Programs (EXHIBIT B, Pages 19 - 20). |
161 |
Johnson |
Addresses how health care benefits for Reservists used to be administered. |
209 |
Chair Nelson |
Closes the informational meeting on Health Care Benefits for National Guard & Reserve Members & Their Families. |
220 |
Chair Nelson |
Recesses meeting at 9:50 a.m. |
221 |
Chair Nelson |
Reconvenes the meeting at 10:00 a.m. |
223 |
Chair Nelson |
Opens the work session on HB 2737. |
HB 2737 – WORK SESSION |
||
225 |
Jim Stembridge |
Committee Administrator. Explains HB 2737, which creates Oregon Military Family Relief Program in Oregon Military Department. Submits -1 amendments (EXHIBIT C). |
245 |
Rep. Barnhart |
Explains the changes made by –1 amendments. |
289 |
Colonel Mike Caldwell |
Deputy Director, Oregon Military Department. Confirms that the language in –1 amendments is accurate. |
311 |
Chair Nelson |
Questions whether the amendment adequately resolves issues of residence and legal dependent status. |
320 |
Rep. Boquist |
Verifies that a legal dependent can be whomever the soldier designates. |
352 |
Chair Nelson |
Asks what language should be used regarding legal dependent status. |
375 |
Caldwell |
Suggests language relating to the recognition of a soldiers’ legal dependents and how to establish eligibility for soldiers who are members of the Oregon National Guard but do not reside in Oregon. |
408 |
Rep. Barnhart |
Clarifies the difference in residency status of Oregon National Guard and Oregon Reservists in the Armed Forces who do not reside in Oregon. |
TAPE 84, B |
||
012 |
Rep. Komp |
Points out difficulties in getting another amendment before committees close. |
016 |
Rep. Boquist |
Expresses how important it is to establish “at least one” of the proposed military relief funds. |
022 |
Mac MacDonald |
Representatives, Veterans’ Organizations. Suggests additional amendments to HB 2737. |
065 |
Rep. Barnhart |
Suggests adopting -1 amendments and moving HB 2737 to House Revenue far further amendments. |
083 |
Chair Nelson |
Opens the work session on HB 2847. |
HB 2847 – WORK SESSION |
||
085 |
Jim Stembridge |
Explains HB 2847, which requires that Oregon Veterans’ Home Account be permanently listed on individual tax return form for charitable contribution purpose. Submits -1 amendments (EXHIBIT D). |
102 |
Rep. Barnhart |
Asks if the amendment replaces the $50,000 dollar requirement. |
111 |
Stembridge |
Summarizes -1 amendments. |
127 |
Rep. Barnhart |
Points out what language is removed from HB 2847 by -1 amendments. |
136 |
Rep. Barnhart |
Restates the importance of sending the bills to House Revenue. |
147 |
Chair Nelson |
States why HB 2737 and HB 2847 will remain in committee until each is amended correctly. |
204 |
Chair Nelson |
Closes the work sessions on HB 2737 and HB 2847. |
208 |
Chair Nelson |
Opens the work session on HB 2862. |
HB 2862 – WORK SESSION |
||
214 |
Jim Stembridge |
Committee Administrator. Explains HB 2862, which directs public post-secondary education institutions to award credit for education and training obtained while serving in Armed Forces of United States. Submits and summarizes -1 amendments (EXHIBIT E). Submits and summarizes -2 amendments (EXHIBIT F). |
247 |
Rep. Bruun |
MOTION: Moves to ADOPT HB 2862-2 amendments dated 04/25/05. |
253 |
Rep. Barnhart |
Explains why there needs to be parallel language for universities and community colleges. |
284 |
Rep. Barnhart |
Explains why -1 amendments are necessary and -2 amendments are unnecessary. |
304 |
Julie Suchanek |
Government Relations Specialist, Oregon Community College Association (OCCA). Explains why OCCA requested and supports the adoption of -2 amendments. |
330 |
Rep. Barnhart |
Asks if it is the position of OCCA that community colleges should not be required to give credit for education and training, even if all program requirements are met. |
346 |
Suchanek |
Explains how OCCA interprets -1 amendments as usurping the policy control of local community college boards. |
365 |
Rep. Barnhart |
MOTION: Moves to ADOPT HB 2862-1 amendments dated 04/25/05. |
370 |
Chair Nelson |
Clarifies how HB 2862 would be changed by -2 amendments. |
380 |
Rep. Barnhart |
Restates why -2 amendments are “not necessary” since universities and community colleges already have complete control over transfer credit. |
385 |
Suchanek |
Explains how -2 amendments recognize the different governing structures of community colleges and universities. |
399 |
Suchanek |
Restates why OCCA supports -2 amendments. |
TAPE 85, A |
||
005 |
Rep. Komp |
Asks if Oregon University Systems (OUS) or Oregon Health Sciences University (OHSU) have commented on HB 2862. |
010 |
Stembridge |
States that institutions governed by OUS already award credit using guidelines provided by American Counsel of Education. |
026 |
Rep. Komp |
States hesitance to take action on HB 2862 because of existing problems within OUS of transferring credits between community colleges and universities. |
040 |
Rep. Barnhart |
Disagrees with the analysis that HB 2862 affects the transfer of any credits within OUS. |
050 |
Rep. Boquist |
Agrees with Rep. Komps’ interpretation of HB 2862 because Chancellor’s Office would be directed to establish system wide guidelines for transferring credits. |
059 |
Chair Nelson |
Points out that OUS did agree to draft the necessary rules. |
064 |
Rep. Bruun |
Withdraws motion to adopt -2 amendments. |
068 |
Chair Nelson |
Closes the work session on HB 2862. |
078 |
Chair Nelson |
Adjourns the meeting at 10:46 a.m. |
EXHIBIT SUMMARY