SENATE COMMITTEE ON BUSINESS AND ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT
February 3, 2005 Hearing Room B
1:00 P.M. Tapes 16 - 17
MEMBERS PRESENT: Sen. Rick Metsger, Chair
Sen. Bruce Starr, Vice-Chair
Sen. Jason Atkinson
Sen. Ryan Deckert
Sen. Laurie Monnes Anderson
STAFF PRESENT: Theresa Van Winkle, Committee Administrator
James Goulding, Committee Assistant
MEASURES/ISSUES HEARD:
SB 120 – Public Hearing
SB 121 – Public Hearing and Work Session
SB 83 – Public Hearing and Work Session
SB 86 – Public Hearing
These minutes are in compliance with Senate and House Rules. Only text enclosed in quotation marks reports a speaker’s exact words. For complete contents, please refer to the tapes.
|
TAPE/# |
Speaker |
Comments |
|
TAPE 16, A |
||
|
003 |
Chair Metsger |
Calls the meeting to order at 1:05 p.m. Notes that the proposed amendments to SB 55 are not yet ready. States they will not be able to have a public hearing on SB 55 today. Opens public hearing on SB 120. |
|
SB 120 – PUBLIC HEARING |
||
|
010 |
Theresa Van Winkle |
Committee Administrator. Provides a brief overview of SB 120. |
|
025 |
David Tatman |
Deputy Administrator, Department of Consumer and Business Services (DCBS). Notes he is filling in for Administrator Floyd Lanter, who was unable to appear before the committee today. Presents written testimony of Floyd Lanter in favor of SB 120 (EXHIBIT A). |
|
050 |
Tatman |
Expands upon the written testimony, clarifying the different programs and the need for uniformity. |
|
080 |
Tatman |
Discusses the need for additional ability to enforce their laws. |
|
095 |
Sen. Atkinson |
Refers to Mr. Tatman’s testimony about a case in Eugene where they needed to issue a cease and desist order. Wonders that if they didn’t have the power to issue one, how were they able to resolve the problem. |
|
100 |
Tatman |
Replies they took action and were able to reach a settlement. |
|
105 |
Sen. Atkinson |
Notes that was only one instance and wonders how often cases of this type occur. Wonders what the problem is that is being fixed. |
|
107 |
Tatman |
Reiterates it gives them the authority to act and solve these problems. |
|
110 |
Sen. Atkinson |
Asks if this will lead to requests for more funds so they can monitor companies. |
|
115 |
Tatman |
Responds they will not be requesting that. |
|
117 |
Sen. Atkinson |
Wants greater clarification on the purpose for granting them more regulatory power. Feels government is being granted more tools to work with than small businesses. |
|
120 |
Tatman |
States they need to be able to take action to fulfill their mandate. Feels a cease and desist order is more effective than a court procedure. |
|
130 |
Sen. B. Starr |
Observes that before taking action against unlicensed businesses, that they should be trying to get them licensed first. |
|
140 |
Tatman |
Concurs with his observation. Points out the scenarios in which the department would need this authority. Feels if they had the needed authority they could enforce laws more effectively. |
|
160 |
Chair Metsger |
Clarifies the situation and the current need for court action. Feels they are making sure businesses are competing fairly and following the rules. |
|
175 |
Sen. Monnes Anderson |
Asks if there is a fiscal impact on this. |
|
180 |
Tatman |
Doesn’t believe there will be an impact. Shares his belief that they already have the staff and resources to handle it. |
|
185 |
Sen. Deckert |
Inquires on the width of this problem and how often it occurs. |
|
190 |
Tatman |
Replies it depends on the specific business area. Relates it is fairly common in pawnbroker industry. |
|
200 |
Sen. Deckert |
Asks about how many cases it is. |
|
205 |
Tatman |
Replies he could provide him with figures at another time. |
|
210 |
Amy Lowry |
Funeral home operator. Offers her support of SB 120. Feels it is a good thing for the consumer after hearing about the cases in Eugene. Voices support for consumer protection and the bill. |
|
245 |
Floyd Lanter |
Administrator, Division of Finance and Corporate Securities. Begins testifying in support of SB 120. |
|
290 |
Chair Metsger |
Wonders how often these problems occur. |
|
300 |
Lanter |
Provides examples for occasions where businesses operate without licenses and they do not have authority to pursue them when consumers complain. Outlines examples where they write letters to unlicensed businesses and receive no responses. Discusses problems with unlicensed pawn brokers, and details investigations. |
|
360 |
Sen. B. Starr |
Inquires why it is the responsibility of DCBS to go and use authority to get businesses licensed. |
|
370 |
Lanter |
Outlines they have no authority. |
|
380 |
Sen. B. Starr |
Relates his experiences as construction contractor and the authority of the board to go after unlicensed contractors. |
|
390 |
Lanter |
Presumes they have the authority to recover the costs of their investigations. |
|
400 |
Sen. B. Starr |
Hopes that before they move forward they have more data on how often violations occur and their current enforcement abilities. |
|
415 |
Sen. Atkinson |
Voices his support for the funeral director portion of the bill, but feels the bill currently covers too many areas for him to be comfortable with it. |
|
TAPE 17, A |
||
|
010 |
Chair Metsger |
Feels they should hold onto this bill and await further testimony. Closes public hearing on SB 120, opens public hearing on SB 121. |
|
SB 121 – PUBLIC HEARING |
||
|
025 |
Lanter |
Reads written testimony in favor of SB 121 (EXHIBIT B). |
|
070 |
Chair Metsger |
Asks for a specific example where their department has lacked the ability to issue a cease and desist order. |
|
075 |
Lanter |
Offers they spent a lot of time pursuing a case involving the purchase of a pizza oven during the previous year. Discusses franchise issues that are pending. |
|
095 |
Sen. Atkinson |
Wonders if all the complaints are from out-of-state franchises. |
|
100 |
Lanter |
Offers their focus is on Oregonians investing in franchises, not the out-of-state franchises themselves. |
|
105 |
Sen. Deckert |
Asks for clarification of the issue with the oven purchase. |
|
110 |
Lanter |
States it involved the purchase of a pizza oven being sold by a franchise operation in California. Discusses the complaint and investigation that resulted. Enters into more detail on the issue. |
|
125 |
Sen. Deckert |
Inquires if this is a typical case. |
|
130 |
Lanter |
Replies the problem resulted in improper disclosure by the seller. |
|
132 |
Sen. Deckert |
Clarifies Mr. Lanter’s comments on the intent of this legislation. |
|
140 |
Chair Metsger |
Asks if Mr. Tatman has additional comments |
|
145 |
David Tatman |
Offers greater details on the franchise owner paid a specific fee to purchase an oven that had certain capabilities. Relays that the oven did not operate as promised and that it was very difficult to remedy the situation. |
|
150 |
Sen. Deckert |
Wonders who judges these cases. |
|
155 |
Tatman |
Notes they act on behalf of Oregonians with complaints and then act as necessary. |
|
170 |
Chair Metsger |
Closes public hearing on SB 121, opens work session on SB 121. |
|
SB 121 – WORK SESSION |
||
|
190 |
Sen. B. Starr |
MOTION: Moves SB 121 to the floor with a DO PASS recommendation. |
|
|
|
VOTE: 5-0-0 |
|
193 |
Chair Metsger |
Hearing no objection, declares the motion CARRIED. SEN. METSGER will lead discussion on the floor. |
|
195 |
Chair Metsger |
Closes work session on SB 121. Opens a public hearing on SB 83 |
|
SB 83 – PUBLIC HEARING |
||
|
200 |
Paul Kluvers |
Structural Engineers Association. Testifies in favor of SB 83. Discusses an error introduced in earlier legislation. Remarks how SB 83 would correct the issue. |
|
210 |
Mari Lopez |
Executive Secretary, Oregon State Board of Examiners for Land Surveying (OSBEELS). Introduces Mr. Bob Walker. |
|
220 |
Bob Walker |
Former board member, OSBEELS. Notes he was on the board when the error was discovered. Discusses building codes and the need to correct the statute error. Notes structure sizes where an architect or engineer is required. |
|
255 |
Dan Linscheid |
Yamhill County Surveyor, OSBEELS board member. Testifies in support of SB 83. |
|
265 |
Chair Metsger |
Asks if anyone has taken advantage of the error in current law. |
|
270 |
Linscheid |
Responds there have been a few minor instances. |
|
275 |
Sen. B. Starr |
Clarifies that this bill only covers essential structures. |
|
280 |
Linscheid |
Concurs that he is correct. |
|
285 |
Sen. B. Starr |
Clarifies the meaning of essential facilities. |
|
290 |
Linscheid |
Defines essential structures as response facilities such as fire and police stations. |
|
295 |
Sen. B Starr |
Reads off a list of structures currently defined as essential. |
|
300 |
Jennifer Gilbert |
Executive assistant, OSBEELS. Testifies on behalf of the board in support of SB 83. |
|
305 |
Sen. Deckert |
Wonders if those represented by the board are all in support of SB 83. |
|
310 |
Gilbert |
Expresses agreement. |
|
315 |
Chair Metsger |
Closes public hearing on SB 83. Opens a work session on SB 83. |
|
SB 83 – WORK SESSION |
||
|
320 |
Sen. B. Starr |
MOTION: Moves SB 83 to the floor with a DO PASS recommendation. |
|
|
|
VOTE: 5-0-0 |
|
323 |
Chair Metsger |
Hearing no objection, declares the motion CARRIED. SEN. B. STARR will lead discussion on the floor. |
|
325 |
Chair Metsger |
Closes work session on SB 83. Opens a public hearing on SB 86. |
|
SB 86 – PUBLIC HEARING |
||
|
330 |
Lopez |
Testifies in support of SB 86. Offers the bill would require engineers to stamp their documents. |
|
347 |
Linscheid |
States his support for SB 86. |
|
360 |
Chair Metsger |
Expresses his understand of the function of the bill. Asks what the issue is that they are trying to resolve. |
|
367 |
Linscheid |
Notes that engineers are exempt from having to stamp their documents. Offers this would grant some authority over engineers. |
|
370 |
Chair Metsger |
Clarifies that they are trying to make engineers accountable by requiring a stamp. Wonders why they were exempted to begin with. |
|
373 |
Gilbert |
Replies she doesn’t know the history of it. |
|
375 |
Linscheid |
Offers he doesn’t know when it occurred, but explains that the loophole occurred with the significant structures law was put into place. |
|
377 |
Chair Metsger |
Notes the original law was passed in 1999. |
|
380 |
Sen. B. Starr |
States his concerns with language in the bill addressing residential structures. Asks if those structures would require an engineer’s stamp, or if it would only need one if an engineer worked on the project. |
|
395 |
Gilbert |
Agrees. |
|
400 |
Sen. B. Starr |
Wonders what the problem is that this bill is addressing. |
|
405 |
Linscheid |
Replies that they currently have no ability to sanction engineers for poor workmanship on an exempt project. |
|
TAPE 16, B |
||
|
005 |
Linscheid |
Concludes his comments on bringing engineers into line. |
|
010 |
Chair Metsger |
Remarks that this bill is aiming to create an equal professional standard. |
|
015 |
Linscheid |
Concurs that the intent is to create uniformity. |
|
020 |
Sen. Atkinson |
Comments on recent legislation he has been hearing. Wonders if there is any real need for this law. |
|
027 |
Lopez |
Replies it is necessary for architecture laws. |
|
030 |
Sen. Atkinson |
Wonders if they will be hearing from architects on this issue. |
|
032 |
Chair Metsger |
Calls for a brief recess at 2:06 p.m. |
|
035 |
Chair Metsger |
Calls the committee back at 2:07 p.m. Remarks that they will need more testimony on this bill. Closes public hearing on SB 86. Adjourns the meeting at 2:08 p.m. |
EXHIBIT SUMMARY