SENATE COMMITTEE ON BUSINESS AND ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT
February 8, 2005 Hearing Room B
1:00 P.M. Tapes 18 - 19
MEMBERS PRESENT: Sen. Rick Metsger, Chair
Sen. Bruce Starr, Vice-Chair
Sen. Jason Atkinson
Sen. Ryan Deckert
Sen. Laurie Monnes Anderson
STAFF PRESENT: Theresa Van Winkle, Committee Administrator
James Goulding, Committee Assistant
MEASURES/ISSUES HEARD:
SB 158 – Public Hearing
SB 81 – Public Hearing
SB 84 – Public Hearing
SB 171 – Public Hearing
These minutes are in compliance with Senate and House Rules. Only text enclosed in quotation marks reports a speaker’s exact words. For complete contents, please refer to the tapes.
|
TAPE/# |
Speaker |
Comments |
|
TAPE 18, A |
||
|
003 |
Chair Metsger |
Calls the meeting to order at 1:06 p.m. Opens public hearing on SB 158. |
|
SB 158 – PUBLIC HEARING |
||
|
010 |
Peter Threlkel |
Corporation Division Director, Office of the Secretary of State. Presents written testimony in favor of SB 158 (EXHIBIT A). |
|
035 |
Threlkel |
Discusses positive feedback from various groups on the proposed legislation. |
|
060 |
Chair Metsger |
Inquires how long he has held his current position. |
|
063 |
Threlkel |
Relates he has been there three years. |
|
065 |
Chair Metsger |
Wonders about non profits groups that are covered. Asks if United Way and Providence Health System are covered. |
|
070 |
Threlkel |
Answers they are covered. |
|
073 |
Chair Metsger |
Asks if they could differentiate the types of groups that would not be burdened by the fee. |
|
075 |
Threlkel |
Replies there are three classifications for non-profit groups. |
|
085 |
Chair Metsger |
Asks if this has been anticipated in the Governor’s budget |
|
087 |
Threlkel |
Responds that it is not. |
|
090 |
Chair Metsger |
Inquires if the bill has been through the Ways and Means process. |
|
093 |
Threlkel |
States that a hearing is not scheduled until late February. |
|
095 |
Sen. Monnes Anderson |
Questions if a non-profit organization could waive the fee if it is something they cannot afford. |
|
097 |
Threlkel |
Offers that on a case by case basis it is something that can be done. |
|
100 |
Sen. Atkinson |
Disagrees with some of the reasoning for the bill. Inquires why they aren’t including small businesses in this measure. |
|
115 |
Threlkel |
States it is something they had considered. Replies they have heard from a number of small businesses, and that there was a lot of opposition to a fee increase. Explains that they decided to address non-profit businesses first. |
|
140 |
Sen. Atkinson |
Feels that to be fair they need to also lower fees for small businesses. Suggests an amendment to add small businesses into the bill. |
|
145 |
Threlkel |
Offers that is a possibility. |
|
147 |
Sen. Atkinson |
States that he will get an amendment drafted. |
|
150 |
Sen. B. Starr |
References 2003 session bill HB 3656 essentially changed the fee from an administrative fund to a tax increase to support the general fund. |
|
165 |
Threlkel |
Concurs that is correct. |
|
167 |
Sen. B. Starr |
Observes the Secretary of State has received a lot of negative reactions from non profit groups over the fee increase and that is why this bill is being proposed. |
|
170 |
Threlkel |
Agrees that is the case. |
|
175 |
Chair Metsger |
Closes public hearing on SB 158. Opens a public hearing on SB 81. |
|
SB 81 – PUBLIC HEARING |
||
|
180 |
Lee Beyer |
Chair, Oregon Public Utilities Commission (PUC). Submits and presents his written testimony in favor of SB 81 (EXHIBIT B). |
|
210 |
Sen. Monnes Anderson |
Asks for a specific example where this issue would occur. |
|
225 |
Beyer |
Explains that a large industrial user could cut back usage during a peak time. |
|
230 |
Sen. B. Starr |
Asks if this could apply to both residential and commercial users. |
|
233 |
Beyer |
Agrees it could. |
|
235 |
Sen. Monnes Anderson |
Wonders how feasible that aspect of the program would be. |
|
237 |
Beyer |
Notes there is potential for it being successful. |
|
245 |
Chair Metsger |
Closes public hearing on SB 81. Opens public hearing on SB 84. |
|
SB 84 – PUBLIC HEARING |
||
|
250 |
Beyer |
Gives testimony in favor of SB 84. Explains the purpose of the bill and its intended effect. |
|
280 |
Sen. Monnes Anderson |
Offers that he is working to save users money. |
|
285 |
Beyer |
Replies that it provides options and perhaps saves some money. Offers that this will help to diversify the system. Feels they are small changes, but moving in the right direction. |
|
295 |
Chair Metsger |
Asks if there are possible negative ramifications. |
|
300 |
Beyer |
Responds that there are none that he knows of. |
|
310 |
Sara Chieffo |
Legislative Assistant, Senator Shields. Presents testimony on behalf of Senator Frank Shields. Discusses a net metering proposal being drafted by Sen. Shields and how it differs from SB 84. Defers to industry experts seated with her. |
|
335 |
Jeff Bissonnette |
Fair and Clean Energy Coalition. Discusses the original 1999 net metering bill and the need to amend it to compensate for the technology currently available. |
|
365 |
Jon Miller |
Executive Director, Oregon Solar Energy Industries Association. States they do not oppose SB 84, but wish to have a broader discussion on the matter. Feels there is a problem with the megawatt limitations imposed. |
|
400 |
Chair Metsger |
Points out an issue he has in the bill as written. Asks if they would like to define the bill more specifically in regards to increasing the limit. |
|
410 |
Jon Miller |
Feels they would like to see the PUC being able to raise the maximum limit but would like to see the minimum level set higher. |
|
420 |
Chair Metsger |
Asks about the effects on small users. |
|
423 |
Jon Miller |
Replies there would be no effect. |
|
425 |
Bissonnette |
Advises that it would be up to the individual to decide what form of power generation they want to use or if they want to connect to the power grid. |
|
TAPE 19, A |
||
|
005 |
Bissonnette |
Continues discussing improvements in technology and the need to make statute changes to keep up. |
|
025 |
Sen. Monnes Anderson |
Asks if a privately owned utility would be reluctant to endorse net metering as opposed to a publicly owned utility. |
|
030 |
Jon Miller |
Answers that decreasing the revenue of a utility by using an alternative source would not be an issue. Points out there might be other issues. |
|
037 |
Sen. Monnes Anderson |
Inquires what those other issues might be. |
|
040 |
Jon Miller |
Discusses a scenario where an individual installs an overpowered energy source that exceeds their needs. Notes net metering is only to offset individual energy use, not to create independent power users. |
|
045 |
Chair Metsger |
Thanks him for his testimony. |
|
050 |
Shawn Miller |
Pacific Corporation. Testifies in favor of SB 84. Recognizes the benefits of encouraging energy conservation. Talks about a Southern Oregon Pepsi Cola plant that worked with the PUC to increase its net metering limit. |
|
070 |
Teresa Miller |
Portland General Electric (PGE). Supports the bill and asks that they move it forward. |
|
080 |
Chair Metsger |
Discusses the importance of considering possible changes to the bill before moving it forward. Closes Public Hearing on SB 84. Opens a public hearing on SB 171. |
|
SB 171 – PUBLIC HEARING |
||
|
095 |
Lee Beyer |
Testifies in favor of SB 171, presenting written testimony (EXHIBIT C). |
|
110 |
Chair Metsger |
Closes public hearing on SB 171. Adjourns the meeting at 1:44 p.m. |
EXHIBIT SUMMARY