SENATE COMMITTEE ON BUSINESS AND ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT
April 21, 2005 Hearing Room B
1:00 P.M. Tapes 63 – 65
MEMBERS PRESENT: Sen. Rick Metsger, Chair
Sen. Bruce Starr, Vice-Chair
Sen. Jason Atkinson
Sen. Ryan Deckert
Sen. Laurie Monnes Anderson
GUEST MEMBERS: Rep. Vicki Berger
STAFF PRESENT: Theresa Van Winkle, Committee Administrator
James Goulding, Committee Assistant
MEASURES/ISSUES HEARD :
HB 2460 – Public Hearing and Work Session
HB 2590A – Public Hearing and Work Session
SB 1008 – Public Hearing and Work Session
These minutes are in compliance with Senate and House Rules. Only text enclosed in quotation marks reports a speaker’s exact words. For complete contents, please refer to the tapes.
|
TAPE/# |
Speaker |
Comments |
|
TAPE 63, A |
||
|
003 |
Chair Metsger |
Calls the committee to order at 1:08 p.m. Opens a public hearing on HB 2460. |
|
HB 2460 – PUBLIC HEARING |
||
|
010 |
Jan Coleman |
Yamhill County Clerk. Submits written testimony in favor of HB 2460 (EXHIBIT A). |
|
030 |
Chair Metsger |
Closes public hearing on HB 2460. Opens a work session on HB 2460 |
|
HB 2460 – WORK SESSION |
||
|
032 |
Sen. B. Starr |
MOTION: Moves HB 2460 to the floor with a DO PASS recommendation. |
|
034 |
|
VOTE: 4-0-1 EXCUSED: 1 - Atkinson |
|
|
Chair Metsger |
Hearing no objection, declares the motion CARRIED. SEN. DECKERT will lead discussion on the floor. |
|
036 |
Chair Metsger |
Closes work session on HB 2460. Open a public hearing on HB 2590A. |
|
HB 2590A – PUBLIC HEARING |
||
|
040 |
Andrew Leisinger |
Chair, Landscape Architect Board. Submits written testimony in favor of HB 2590A (EXHIBIT B). |
|
065 |
Susanna Knight |
Administrator, Landscape Architect Board. Testifies in favor of HB 2590A. |
|
075 |
Chair Metsger |
Closes public hearing on HB 2590A. Opens a work session on HB 2590A. |
|
HB 2590A – WORK SESSION |
||
|
077 |
Sen. B. Starr |
MOTION: Moves HB 2590A to the floor with a DO PASS recommendation. |
|
078 |
|
VOTE: 4-0-1 EXCUSED: 1 - Atkinson |
|
|
Chair Metsger |
Hearing no objection, declares the motion CARRIED. SEN. MONNES ANDERSON will lead discussion on the floor. |
|
080 |
Chair Metsger |
Closes work session HB 2590A. Opens a public hearing on SB 1008. |
|
SB 1008 – PUBLIC HEARING |
||
|
085 |
Chair Metsger |
Notes they have -8 amendments before the committee (EXHIBIT C). |
|
090 |
Libby Henry |
Eugene Water & Electric Board. Submits written testimony discussing the measure’s impact on dealing with the liabilities of the Trojan Nuclear Facility (EXHIBIT D). |
|
110 |
Larry Cable |
Cable, Huston, Benedict, and Haagensen Law Firm. Testifies in regards to his thoughts on SB 1008. |
|
130 |
Chair Metsger |
Asks if the language in the -8 amendments satisfies their needs. |
|
132 |
Henry |
Confirms that it does. Makes remarks on the support for the language. |
|
143 |
Andrea Fogue |
League of Oregon Cities. Submits the written testimony of Ken Strobeck (EXHIBIT E) and testifies on his behalf. |
|
190 |
Fogue |
Relays the efforts of the league to make sure that franchise fees and agreements are honored. |
|
205 |
Chair Metsger |
Asks if they have a position on the city of Portland’s proposal for purchasing Portland General Electric (PGE). |
|
207 |
Fogue |
Replies that they have been actively involved in the discussion process. |
|
228 |
Sen. B. Starr |
Wonders what their position is on PGE being owned publicly or privately. |
|
240 |
Fogue |
Replies that they favor a public PGE. Comments on the previous Texas Pacific Group (TPG) sale offer. |
|
253 |
Sen. B. Starr |
Asks about rate payer involvement in deciding the purchase of PGE. |
|
261 |
Fogue |
Replies in regard to public involvement. |
|
270 |
Sen. B. Starr |
Considers if there would be a reason the league would oppose a public vote process. |
|
275 |
Fogue |
Feels they need to take a closer look at the government structure. |
|
279 |
Sen. B. Starr |
Clarifies his question. |
|
285 |
Fogue |
Replies the public needs to have a voice in the process and feels that they will. |
|
293 |
Chair Metsger |
Points out that the vast majority of PGE’s rate payers are outside of the city of Portland. |
|
303 |
Fogue |
Discusses the involvement of the city of Portland in communicating with other cities. |
|
320 |
Liz Trojan |
Oregon Public Power Coalition. Expresses her support for the city of Portland plan. Testifies on the important opportunity to form a public utility. States that with the governor’s support for the Portland plan, she does not see a need to move this through the legislature. |
|
355 |
Chair Metsger |
Comments on her remarks. Notes that legislative change is moved through the chambers and not the governor’s office. Feels the legislature needs to have an active role on behalf of their constituents. |
|
369 |
Sandra Flicker |
Executive Director, Oregon Rural Electric Cooperative Association (ORECA). Provides testimony on SB 1008. Discusses the resolving of issues with consumer owned utilities. |
|
410 |
Flicker |
Details the concerns of consumer owned utilities in relation to changes in ownership of PGE. |
|
TAPE 64, A |
||
|
005 |
Flicker |
Describes the sale of preference power and the impact on rate payers if SB 1008 should pass. |
|
035 |
Flicker |
Talks about scenarios for potential rate impacts and increases. |
|
047 |
Sen. Deckert |
Requests that they continue to work together on this issue. |
|
063 |
Gary Conkling |
Washington County. Provides a comprehensive breakdown of the sections of SB 1008 as amended by the -8 amendments (EXHIBIT F). |
|
100 |
Conkling |
Explains section 12 of the measure. |
|
131 |
Conkling |
Explain section 14. |
|
139 |
Sen. Deckert |
Asks the rationale of the provision relating to imminent domain. |
|
140 |
Conkling |
Replies that it is to prevent any perceived hostile takeover of other utilities. Continues to describe the sections of the measure. |
|
170 |
Conkling |
Talks about section 19. |
|
210 |
Conkling |
Describes the provisions of section 20. |
|
250 |
Conkling |
Details section 26. |
|
280 |
Conkling |
Applauds the efforts of the work group and legislative counsel in drafting this measure and amendments. |
|
297 |
Chair Metsger |
Asks if this measure is self executing upon passage. |
|
305 |
Conkling |
Offers that the measure does provide momentum for formation of the board and sets timelines for action. |
|
327 |
Chair Metsger |
Observes the 120 day period for nominating the board. Feels there is a need for a temporary governing body to guide the process until the election of a full board. |
|
353 |
Jason Eisdorfer |
Citizens Utility Board (CUB). Concurs that they should address that issue. |
|
358 |
Sen. B. Starr |
Requests a list of statutes that apply and don’t apply. |
|
360 |
Conkling |
Responds that he will provide that information. |
|
367 |
Sen. B. Starr |
Wonders if he still represents the Industrial Customers of Northwest Utilities. |
|
373 |
Conkling |
States that he no longer represents them. |
|
375 |
Sen. Deckert |
Comments on the need to act. Considers what the best path of action would be. |
|
395 |
Conkling |
Responds that speed is not as important as creating a credible offer. |
|
TAPE 63, B |
||
|
005 |
Conkling |
Talks about the interaction between a buyer and a seller. |
|
033 |
Sen. Monnes Anderson |
Voices her disappointment that all parties are not working together. Feels there is a collision course between this plan and the city of Portland’s proposal. |
|
050 |
Eisdorfer |
Remarks SB 1008 provides a clear picture of what a public utility would look like. Feels moving the bill along is valuable. |
|
090 |
Eisdorfer |
Considers the timetable for holding a public vote. |
|
100 |
Brad Van Cleve |
Industrial Customers of Northwest Utilities. Testifies in regards to the -8 amendments. Notes there is greater clarity in the SB 1008 proposal than in other public purchase proposals. |
|
110 |
Chair Metsger |
Remarks on the previous discussion of this issue. Wonders where the ultimate responsibility rests. |
|
140 |
Van Cleve |
Notes the city of Portland would be responsible for bonds. Feels the city council would have some authority over the assets of the company. Offers that there would be limitations as well. |
|
160 |
Sen. B. Starr |
Wonders what this would mean to the average PGE ratepayer should SB 1008 pass. |
|
176 |
Conkling |
Explains that the provisions relating to various rate paying groups and how they would be impacted. |
|
200 |
Conkling |
Observes that not all ratepayers will notice an immediate change. |
|
230 |
Ronald Nichols |
Managing Director, Navigant Consulting. Submits an overview of the benefits of a public purchase (EXHIBIT G) and a comparison chart of PGE to other public power entities (EXHIBIT H). |
|
270 |
Nichols |
Compares the current PGE situation with a similar situation with the state of New York’s purchase of Long Island Power Authority (LIPA). |
|
305 |
Nichols |
Notes the unique opportunity for an across the board rate decrease. |
|
339 |
Nichols |
Discusses various debt financing approaches. |
|
379 |
Nichols |
Provides a summary of details on page 5 of his written overview. |
|
410 |
Nichols |
Talks about page 7 of the provided written overview. |
|
TAPE 64, B |
||
|
005 |
Nichols |
Outlines the Long Island Power purchase example. |
|
024 |
Nichols |
Comments on the comparison chart. |
|
035 |
Sen. Deckert |
Wonders what the fastest a pro forma could be done in a best case scenario. |
|
044 |
Nichols |
Feels the fastest a pro forma could be done is a few weeks. Details how it could be done in a month’s time. |
|
061 |
Douglas Goe |
Orrick, Herrington & Sutcliffe LLP, Pacific Northwest Office. Describes the bond issues involved. |
|
100 |
Goe |
Raises some policy issues he feels need to be addressed. |
|
116 |
Chair Metsger |
Requests clarification on how they could effectively structure their assets. |
|
120 |
Goe |
Talks about the need to change the language in the bill to reflect that there is financial independence of the company from the state. |
|
139 |
Chair Metsger |
Asks if they structured the business as independent from the state, would they still be able to use State Treasury bonding authority like Oregon Health and Science University (OHSU). |
|
142 |
Goe |
Notes that OHSU issues its own bonds. |
|
157 |
Chair Metsger |
Questions if the city of Portland has the flexibility that the state has to adapt to different scenarios. |
|
171 |
Goe |
Offers the City of Portland would have limitations when offering stock. Discusses the methods of overcoming potential financial hurdles. |
|
187 |
Sen. B. Starr |
Wonders if there are valid comparisons between Oregon Community Power and the State Accident Insurance Fund (SAIF). |
|
195 |
Goe |
Replies there are some parallels. |
|
237 |
Chair Metsger |
Asks what the committee’s thought are on this measure. |
|
241 |
Sen. B. Starr |
Considers if there is a way for the public to place the proposal for purchase of PGE by the city of Portland on the ballot for a vote. |
|
255 |
Chair Metsger |
Offers that legislative counsel would have a better answer for that question. |
|
263 |
Sen. Deckert |
Ventures he is fully supportive of moving forward on this measure. |
|
273 |
Dexter Johnson |
Legislative Counsel. Asks for clarification on Sen. Starr’s question. |
|
278 |
Sen. B. Starr |
Wonders if a referendum by the voters could overturn the city of Portland’s acquisition of PGE. |
|
297 |
Johnson |
Offers his interpretation that after the acquisition occurs, it could not be undone. States an initiative could direct other actions. |
|
327 |
Chair Metsger |
Closes the public hearing on SB 1008. Opens a work session on SB 1008. |
|
SB 1008 – WORK SESSION |
||
|
330 |
Sen. Deckert |
MOTION: Moves to ADOPT SB 1008-8 amendments dated 4/21/05. |
|
333 |
Monnes Anderson |
Feels it is important to move the process along. Offers her concern that they are competing with the city of Portland. Wishes to see a more cooperative solution. |
|
360 |
Sen. Deckert |
Urges the movement of this measure. Details his belief that this is most comprehensive and viable proposal for the state. |
|
375 |
|
VOTE: 4-1-0 AYE: 4 - Deckert, Monnes Anderson, Starr B., Metsger NAY: 1 - Atkinson |
|
|
Chair Metsger |
The motion CARRIES. |
|
382 |
Chair Metsger |
Calls for a recess at 3:01 p.m. |
|
RECESS |
||
|
383 |
Chair Metsger |
Calls the committee back to order at 3:21 p.m. |
|
388 |
Sen. Deckert |
MOTION: Moves SB 1008 to the floor with a DO PASS AS AMENDED recommendation and the SUBSEQUENT REFERRALS to the committee on General Government and the committee on Ways and Means BE RESCINDED. |
|
390 |
Sen. B. Starr |
Notes his concern over the removal of the Ways and Means referral. |
|
TAPE 65,A |
||
|
010 |
Theresa Van Winkle |
Committee Administrator. Informs that the -8 amendments were given to Revenue and Fiscal and the statements are in progress. |
|
013 |
Sen. B. Starr |
Wonders about the assumption that the measure would not have a fiscal or revenue impact. |
|
015 |
Chair Metsger |
Offers that once it gets to the floor it will have statements on potential impact. Points out the other chamber can take action as needed. |
|
020 |
Sen. Deckert |
Observes no need for a Ways and Means referral on the measure at this time. Reiterates the motion to move SB 1008 to the floor with a do pass recommendation. |
|
030 |
Sen. B. Starr |
Notes his concern over moving this to the floor at this time. |
|
045 |
Sen. Monnes Anderson |
Offers she has some unanswered questions as well, but feels the process needs to move forward. |
|
053 |
Sen. Atkinson |
Feels this is poor public policy. Opposes the state becoming involved in public utilities. |
|
068 |
Chair Metsger |
Contributes concluding comments and summarizes the importance of the state determining the future of its economic development. |
|
093 |
Chair Metsger |
Outlines the necessity for the state to provide input on the process. |
|
120 |
|
VOTE: 3-2-0 AYE: 3 - Deckert, Monnes Anderson, Metsger NAY: 2 - Atkinson, Starr B. |
|
|
Chair Metsger |
The motion CARRIES. SEN. DECKERT and SEN. NELSON will lead discussion on the floor. |
|
124 |
Sen. B. Starr |
Serves notice that he will be filing a minority report. |
|
125 |
Chair Metsger |
Closes work session on SB 1008. Adjourns the committee at 3:31 p.m. |
EXHIBIT SUMMARY