SENATE COMMITTEE ON BUSINESS AND ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT
April 26, 2005 Hearing Room B
1:00 P.M. Tapes 66 – 67
MEMBERS PRESENT: Sen. Rick Metsger, Chair
Sen. Bruce Starr, Vice-Chair
Sen. Jason Atkinson
Sen. Ryan Deckert
Sen. Laurie Monnes Anderson
STAFF PRESENT: Theresa Van Winkle, Committee Administrator
James Goulding, Committee Assistant
MEASURES/ISSUES HEARD :
HB 2439 – Public Hearing and Work Session
HB 2578A – Public Hearing and Work Session
HB 2637A – Public Hearing and Work Session
HB 2719A – Public Hearing and Work Session
HB 2604A – Public Hearing
SB 671 – Public Hearing
These minutes are in compliance with Senate and House Rules. Only text enclosed in quotation marks reports a speaker’s exact words. For complete contents, please refer to the tapes.
|
TAPE/# |
Speaker |
Comments |
|
TAPE 66, A |
||
|
003 |
Chair Metsger |
Calls the committee to order at 1:10 p.m. Opens a public hearing on HB 2439. |
|
HB 2439 – PUBLIC HEARING |
||
|
010 |
Rep. Greg Macpherson |
House District 38. Testifies in support of HB 2439, explaining its provisions. Introduces Mr. Morrow and Mr. Hull. |
|
034 |
Andrew Morrow |
Business Law Section, Oregon State Bar. Submits written testimony in favor of HB 2439 (EXHIBIT A). |
|
051 |
Chair Metsger |
Summarizes his understanding of the measure. |
|
056 |
Sen. Atkinson |
Wonders why they need this measure. |
|
060 |
Morrow |
Points out there were inadvertent changes in previous legislation and this is to restore the original language. |
|
073 |
Steven Hull |
Attorney, Portland. Submits his written testimony in favor of the measure (EXHIBIT B). |
|
075 |
Chair Metsger |
Closes public hearing on HB 2439 and opens a work session on HB 2439 |
|
HB 2439 – WORK SESSION |
||
|
077 |
Sen. B. Starr |
MOTION: Moves HB 2439 to the floor with a DO PASS recommendation. |
|
078 |
|
VOTE: 4-0-1 EXCUSED: 1 - Deckert |
|
|
Chair Metsger |
Hearing no objection, declares the motion CARRIED. SEN. B. STARR will lead discussion on the floor. |
|
079 |
Chair Metsger |
Closes work session on HB 2439. Opens a public hearing on HB 2578A. |
|
HB 2578A – PUBLIC HEARING |
||
|
082 |
Chair Metsger |
Declares a potential conflict of interest as his company works with credit unions. |
|
084 |
Pamela Leavitt |
Credit Union Association of Oregon (CUAO). Testifies in favor of HB 2578A. Defers to Mr. Scoggins. |
|
092 |
Harold Scoggins |
Attorney, Farleigh Witt. Presents written testimony in favor of HB 2578A (EXHIBIT C). Explains the provisions of the measure. |
|
129 |
Chair Metsger |
Close public hearing on HB 2578A. Opens a work session on HB 2578A. |
|
HB 2578A – WORK SESSION |
||
|
134 |
Sen. B. Starr |
MOTION: Moves HB 2578A to the floor with a DO PASS recommendation. |
|
136 |
|
VOTE: 4-0-1 EXCUSED: 1 - Deckert |
|
|
Chair Metsger |
Hearing no objection, declares the motion CARRIED. SEN. MONNES ANDERSON will lead discussion on the floor. |
|
138 |
Chair Metsger |
Closes the work session on HB 2578A. Opens a public hearing on HB 2637A. |
|
HB 2637A – PUBLIC HEARING |
||
|
141 |
John McCulley |
Oregon Association of Mortgage Professionals. Presents written testimony in favor of HB 2637A (EXHIBIT D). |
|
180 |
Chair Metsger |
Closes the public hearing on HB 2637A. Opens a work session on HB 2637A. |
|
HB 2637A – WORK SESSION |
||
|
191 |
Sen. B. Starr |
MOTION: Moves HB 2637A to the floor with a DO PASS recommendation. |
|
193 |
|
VOTE: 4-0-1 EXCUSED: 1 - Deckert |
|
|
Chair Metsger |
Hearing no objection, declares the motion CARRIED. SEN. METSGER will lead discussion on the floor. |
|
195 |
Chair Metsger |
Closes the work session on HB 2637A. Opens a public hearing on HB 2719A. |
|
HB 2719A – PUBLIC HEARING |
||
|
202 |
Rep. Chip Shields |
House District 43. Presents written testimony in favor of HB 2719A (EXHIBIT E). |
|
229 |
Shawn Miller |
Property Casualty Insurers Association of America (PCI). Voices additional support for the measure. |
|
237 |
Chair Metsger |
Closes the public hearing on HB 2719A. Opens a work session on HB 2719A. |
|
HB 2719A – WORK SESSION |
||
|
240 |
Sen. B. Starr |
MOTION: Moves HB 2719A to the floor with a DO PASS recommendation. |
|
242 |
|
VOTE: 4-0-1 EXCUSED: 1 - Deckert |
|
|
Chair Metsger |
Hearing no objection, declares the motion CARRIED. SEN. ATKINSON will lead discussion on the floor. |
|
247 |
Chair Metsger |
Closes work session on HB 2719A. Opens a public hearing on HB 2604A. |
|
HB 2604A – PUBLIC HEARING |
||
|
260 |
Jana Jarvis |
Government Affairs Director, Oregon Association of Realtors. Presents written testimony in favor of HB 2604A (EXHIBIT F). |
|
275 |
Matt Farmer |
Associate General Counsel, Oregon Association of Realtors. Explains the provisions of the measure before the committee. |
|
310 |
Farmer |
Provides additional testimony on statutory duties of real estate licensees. |
|
360 |
Farmer |
Notes the desire to set a clear standard of conduct. |
|
390 |
Farmer |
Discusses consequences of violating standards to promote better conduct. |
|
423 |
Cynthia Balzola |
President, Oregon Association of Realtors. Testifies in favor of HB 2604A. |
|
TAPE 67, A |
||
|
005 |
Balzola |
Provides background on the previous realtors conference in deciding needed legislative action. |
|
033 |
Brian DeMarco |
Manager, Land Development and Policy Coordination, Oregon Real Estate Agency. Presents a packet of written testimony in opposition to HB 2604A (EXHIBIT G). Advocates the adoption of the -A4 amendments (EXHIBIT H). |
|
061 |
Sen. B. Starr |
Observes there was a public hearing in the other chamber. Asks if he was involved in that process. |
|
064 |
DeMarco |
Offers he was involved peripherally. States Ms. Osborne will provide additional details. |
|
065 |
Sen. B. Starr |
Wonders about his agency supporting the compromise reached in the previous work group. |
|
076 |
DeMarco |
Notes that everything occurred quickly in the other chamber. |
|
080 |
Becky Osborne |
Regulation Manager, Oregon Real Estate Agency. Discusses her involvement in the previous work group. Talks about objections voiced within the work group. |
|
097 |
Sen. B. Starr |
Asks if their testimony on HB 2604 in the other chamber was in support, neutral, or opposed to the measure. |
|
103 |
Osborne |
Replies their agency opposed the bill in the public hearing. Offers their objections were noted in the work group. |
|
117 |
Sen. Deckert |
Desires to know what their objections are. |
|
121 |
Osborne |
Testifies in opposition to the measure. Submits an e-mail correspondence from Phil Querin (EXHIBIT I). Apologizes for not having her written testimony, notes she will make sure that they receive it. |
|
161 |
Osborne |
Continues to testify in regards to their concerns with the measure. |
|
195 |
Osborne |
Opposes the change from a “negligence” standard to a “gross negligence” standard. |
|
227 |
Christine Chute |
Business Activities Section, Oregon Department of Justice. Submits written testimony relating their concerns with HB 2604A (EXHIBIT J). |
|
265 |
Chute |
Continues to discuss the litigation problems that will arise from the passage of the measure. |
|
297 |
Chair Metsger |
Asks what the current “negligence” standard is. |
|
303 |
Chute |
Offers the legal definition of “negligence”. |
|
313 |
Sen. B. Starr |
Questions the current statute standard for architects. |
|
317 |
Chute |
Replies that there is currently a “gross negligence” standard in statute for architects. States there are other related provisions that are similar to the “negligence” standard. |
|
330 |
Sen. B. Starr |
Wonders if the standard is similar for tax consultants. |
|
333 |
Chute |
Understands that it is similar, replies she will provide additional details. |
|
340 |
Sen. Atkinson |
Wonders where the head of their agency is. |
|
350 |
Osborne |
Notes why the head of the agency is not present. |
|
370 |
Sen. Atkinson |
Questions if the agency has recruited anyone to testify against the measure. |
|
373 |
Osborne |
Relays that she has stepped in to testify. |
|
380 |
Sen. Atkinson |
Reads from a transcript of the work group held in the House. Notes his concern that she did not object to the language at that time. |
|
390 |
Osborne |
Explains that she was talking about language omitted by legislative counsel. |
|
407 |
Sen. Atkinson |
Asks why she didn’t object to the bill. |
|
410 |
Osborne |
Replies. |
|
TAPE 66, B |
||
|
003 |
Osborne |
Continues to explain that they were not aware of a number of the changes. |
|
005 |
Sen. Atkinson |
Asks when she first received the bill. |
|
007 |
Osborne |
Replies that they received it on February 21. |
|
010 |
Sen. Atkinson |
Comments on his frustration. Discusses the volume of legislation moving through the process and the importance of honoring agreements. |
|
019 |
Sen. Monnes Anderson |
Views this as a “consumer protection” measure. Discusses the need to streamline the language. |
|
042 |
Chair Metsger |
Comments on the previous discussions held on the bill. |
|
051 |
Sen. Deckert |
Considers how this language will be a problem for the consumer. Asks that he be able to meet with them at another time. |
|
055 |
Osborne |
Replies they would be happy to provide him with additional details. |
|
059 |
Chair Metsger |
Asks about the proposal of having a standard for “repeated negligence”. |
|
065 |
Chute |
Comments on the difference of combining “gross negligence” with “repeated negligence”. |
|
073 |
Rep. Derrick Kitts |
House District 30. States his name for the record. |
|
075 |
Rep. Sal Esquivel |
House District 6. States his name for the record. |
|
078 |
Rep. Kitts |
Testifies in regard to the work group held on HB 2604A. Notes the compromise reached in the work group. |
|
097 |
Rep. Esquivel |
Testifies on HB 2604A. Talks about the seven page agreement to protect consumers. |
|
130 |
Rep. Esquivel |
Notes the harsh “negligence” penalty currently imposed on realtors. |
|
155 |
Rep. Esquivel |
Details the difference between a “negligence” and a “gross negligence” standards. Offers there is a need for distinction between penalties. |
|
160 |
Sen. Atkinson |
Asks if an agreement was reached on the House side that has changed on the Senate side. |
|
162 |
Rep. Esquivel |
Agrees that is the case. |
|
173 |
Arthur Kegler |
Oregon Association of Realtors. Testifies in favor of HB 2604A. |
|
200 |
Kegler |
Observes the primary issue is “intent” in defining “negligence” and “gross negligence”. |
|
The following material is submitted for the record without public testimony: |
||
|
|
Emily Cedarleaf |
Executive Director, Multifamily Housing Council of Oregon. Submits written testimony for the record (EXHIBIT K). |
|
|
Rick Harris |
Oregon Association of Realtors. Submits written testimony for the record (EXHIBIT L). |
|
|
Tim Pfau |
AFSCME, Council 75. Submits written testimony for the record (EXHIBIT M). |
|
220 |
Chair Metsger |
Notes the committee needs more time to weigh the issue before them. Closes public hearing on HB 2604A. Opens a public hearing on SB 671. |
|
SB 671 – PUBLIC HEARING |
||
|
232 |
John Stageberg |
Oregon Mutual Utility Development (OMUD). Testifies in favor of SB 671. |
|
270 |
Stageberg |
Continues to explain the measure and the current situation with Portland General Electric (PGE). |
|
300 |
Stageberg |
Observes this provides for customer ownership of PGE. |
|
324 |
Chair Metsger |
Points out the issue of Oregon Public Utility Commission’s (PUC) oversight and what the PUC actually has power to oversee. |
|
344 |
Ivan Gold |
Attorney, Perkins Coie, representing OMUD. Clarifies the PUC’s ability to regulate a public utility. |
|
381 |
Sen. Deckert |
Wonders how the PUC could regulate PGE in this scenario. |
|
407 |
Gold |
Replies that nothing would change from the current scenario. Clarifies PUC’s regulatory ability. |
|
TAPE 67, B |
||
|
005 |
Gold |
Continues explaining the PUC’s regulatory authority. |
|
014 |
Sen. Deckert |
Relates his concern that the PUC only has the ability to pass on rate increases to the consumer. |
|
020 |
Gold |
Replies, relating his experience in the industry. |
|
037 |
Sen. Deckert |
Questions the tax status of the entity. |
|
048 |
J.T. Pendergraft |
Certified Public Accountant, OMUD. Notes the Internal Revenue Service is evaluating the status. Replies that for tax purposes you can be a co-op without actually being a co-op. Talks about the requirements. |
|
079 |
Sen. Deckert |
Notes the difficulty of this decision without clear research results. |
|
091 |
Sen. B. Starr |
Considers if their company would proceed without passage of SB 671. |
|
101 |
Stageberg |
Replies this provides the best financial offer for returning PGE to a publicly owned utility. |
|
117 |
Sen. B. Starr |
Wonders about the financial impact of issuance of bonds on the ratepayer. |
|
119 |
Stageberg |
Provides an example on the rate bond maturity and credit. |
|
135 |
Sen. Monnes Anderson |
Requests greater clarity on potential tariffs. |
|
145 |
Stageberg |
Explains that it would be the principal and interest on their debt payments. |
|
179 |
Chair Metsger |
Observes the mixed signals he is receiving on this issue. Asks about additional components needed in this bill. |
|
189 |
Rick Willis |
PUC. Affirms that he is correct. Details the number of areas where current laws are not written to address a mutual. Notes amendments would be needed to allow regulation of this company. |
|
201 |
Jeff Bissonnette |
Citizens Utility Board (CUB). Offers his views on the mutual utilities concept. Offers a number of concerns. |
|
230 |
Bissonnette |
Voices his concerns with this proposal as it is not “self-contained” like the proposal in SB 1008. |
|
240 |
Chair Metsger |
Asks for clarification. |
|
245 |
Bissonnette |
Replies in regard to the language in the measure he is referring to. |
|
263 |
Chair Metsger |
Offers it would be helpful to have additional clarity on this issue. |
|
271 |
Sen. Monnes Anderson |
Considers the issue of liability if something goes wrong. |
|
277 |
Willis |
States that it is likely to be passed on to the customers. |
|
282 |
Sen. Monnes Anderson |
Asks about the scenario of PGE going bankrupt. |
|
288 |
Willis |
Describes that as a mutual utility it would be very difficult for PGE to go bankrupt. |
|
295 |
Sen. Monnes Anderson |
States that PGE customers might see their rates go up in the event of financial difficulty. |
|
297 |
Willis |
Replies that is correct. |
|
304 |
Chair Metsger |
Asks the proponents to work on language for a governance structure for the PUC. Closes the public hearing on SB 671. Adjourns the committee at 3:00 PM. |
EXHIBIT SUMMARY