SENATE COMMITTEE ON BUSINESS AND ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT
May 26, 2005 Hearing Room B
1:00 P.M. Tapes 74 – 75
MEMBERS PRESENT: Sen. Rick Metsger, Chair
Sen. Bruce Starr, Vice-Chair
Sen. Jason Atkinson
Sen. Laurie Monnes Anderson
MEMBER EXCUSED: Sen. Ryan Deckert
GUEST MEMBER: Sen. Vicki Walker
STAFF PRESENT: Theresa Van Winkle, Committee Administrator
James Goulding, Committee Assistant
MEASURES/ISSUES HEARD:
HB 2604A – Work Session
SB 955 – Work Session
HB 2071 – Public Hearing and Work Session
HB 2200 – Public Hearing and Work Session
HB 2579 – Public Hearing and Work Session
HB 2069 – Public Hearing and Work Session
SB 408 – Work Session
These minutes are in compliance with Senate and House Rules. Only text enclosed in quotation marks reports a speaker’s exact words. For complete contents, please refer to the tapes.
|
TAPE/# |
Speaker |
Comments |
|
TAPE 74, A |
||
|
003 |
Chair Metsger |
Calls the meeting to order at 1:08 p.m. Opens a work session on HB 2604A. |
|
HB 2604A – WORK SESSION |
||
|
012 |
Chair Metsger |
Mentions the -A6 amendments (EXHIBIT A). |
|
021 |
Dave Heynderickx |
Acting Legislative Counsel. Explains the provisions of the measure. Talks about the differences in standards between “negligence” and “gross negligence”. |
|
051 |
Heynderickx |
Explains the changes made in the –A6 amendments. |
|
078 |
Scott Taylor |
Oregon Real Estate Commissioner. Concurs with Mr. Heynderickx’s analysis of the –A6 amendments and states support for them. |
|
085 |
Jana Jarvis |
Oregon Association of Realtors. States support for the –A6 amendments. |
|
090 |
Sen. B. Starr |
MOTION: Moves to ADOPT HB 2604A-A6 amendments dated 5/18/05. |
|
|
|
VOTE: 4-0-1 EXCUSED: 1 - Deckert |
|
|
Chair Metsger |
Hearing no objection, declares the motion CARRIED. |
|
092 |
Sen. B. Starr |
MOTION: Moves HB 2604A to the floor with a DO PASS AS AMENDED recommendation. |
|
|
|
VOTE: 4-0-1 EXCUSED: 1 - Deckert |
|
|
Chair Metsger |
Hearing no objection, declares the motion CARRIED. SEN. B. STARR will lead discussion on the floor. |
|
096 |
Chair Metsger |
Closes the work session on HB 2604A. Opens a work session on SB 955. |
|
SB 955 – WORK SESSION |
||
|
091 |
Theresa Van Winkle |
Committee Administrator. Notes the -5 amendment (EXHIBIT B) to SB 955. |
|
098 |
Brian DeMarco |
Oregon Real Estate Agency. Notes the original objections to the measure. Talks about the compromise reached in the -5 amendments. |
|
110 |
Barry Pack |
Committee for the Protection of Condominium Owners and Builders. Explains the changes made by the -5 amendments. |
|
125 |
Sen. B. Starr |
Asks who was represented in the negotiations that resulted in the amendments. |
|
129 |
Pack |
Lists the parties involved in the compromise discussion. |
|
135 |
Sen. B. Starr |
MOTION: Moves to ADOPT SB 955-5 amendments dated 5/24/05. |
|
|
|
VOTE: 4-0-1 EXCUSED: 1 - Deckert |
|
|
Chair Metsger |
Hearing no objection, declares the motion CARRIED. |
|
140 |
Sen. B. Starr |
MOTION: Moves SB 955 to the floor with a DO PASS AS AMENDED recommendation. |
|
|
|
VOTE: 4-0-1 EXCUSED: 1 - Deckert |
|
|
Chair Metsger |
Hearing no objection, declares the motion CARRIED. SEN. B. STARR will lead discussion on the floor. |
|
147 |
Chair Metsger |
Closes the work session on SB 955. Opens a public hearing on HB 2071. |
|
HB 2071 – PUBLIC HEARING |
||
|
150 |
Teresa Van Winkle |
Committee Administrator. Introduces HB 2071. |
|
155 |
Bill Boyd |
Dispute Resolution Manager, Construction Contractors Board. Submits and summarizes prepared testimony in support of HB 2071 (EXHIBIT C). |
|
180 |
Chair Metsger |
Closes the public hearing and opens a work session on HB 2071. |
|
HB 2071 – WORK SESSION |
||
|
180 |
Sen. B. Starr |
MOTION: Moves HB 2071 to the floor with a DO PASS recommendation. |
|
|
|
VOTE: 4-0-1 EXCUSED: 1 - Deckert |
|
|
Chair Metsger |
Hearing no objection, declares the motion CARRIED. SEN. MONNES ANDERSON will lead discussion on the floor. |
|
190 |
Chair Metsger |
Closes the work session on HB 2071. Opens a public hearing on HB 2200. |
|
HB 2200 – PUBLIC HEARING |
||
|
200 |
Bill Boyd |
Dispute Resolution Manager, Construction Contractors Board (CCB). Submits and summarizes prepared testimony in support of HB 2071 (EXHIBIT D). |
|
255 |
Sen. B. Starr |
Asks what administrative issues led to the move away from four-year licenses. |
|
261 |
Kristie Patton |
Licensing Section Manager, CCB. Explains the licensing process and the associated administrative challenges. |
|
273 |
Sen. B. Starr |
Asks how many contractors are administered by CCB. |
|
277 |
Patton |
Answers approximately 40,000. |
|
279 |
Sen. B. Starr |
Wonders how many contractors per month change their business status. |
|
280 |
Patton |
Answers that it is approximately 60 per month. |
|
287 |
Sen. B. Starr |
Remarks that the number of contractors affected is small and wonders if it is necessary to change the law to accommodate them. |
|
303 |
Boyd |
Explains the hope that the bill will make business operations move more smoothly. Notes that expenses would be reduced for the CCB. |
|
316 |
Sen. B. Starr |
Asks what licensing options contractors have. |
|
319 |
Patton |
Answers that there is a mandatory two-year license and an optional four-year license. |
|
325 |
Chair Metsger |
Closes the public hearing and opens a work session on HB 2200. |
|
HB 2200 – WORK SESSION |
||
|
328 |
Sen. B. Starr |
MOTION: Moves HB 2200 to the floor with a DO PASS recommendation. |
|
|
|
VOTE: 4-0-1 EXCUSED: 1 - Deckert |
|
|
Chair Metsger |
Hearing no objection, declares the motion CARRIED. SEN. METSGER will lead discussion on the floor. |
|
335 |
Chair Metsger |
Closes the work session on HB 2200. Opens a public hearing on HB 2579. |
|
HB 2579 – PUBLIC HEARING |
||
|
340 |
Don Miner |
Executive Director, Oregon Manufactured Housing Association. Submits and summarizes prepared testimony in favor of HB 2579 (EXHIBIT E). |
|
360 |
Joan Fraser |
Building Codes Division, Department of Consumer and Business Services. Testifies in support of HB 2579. Notes the similar legislation HB 2389. |
|
375 |
Chair Metsger |
Closes the public hearing and opens a work session on HB 2579. |
|
HB 2579 – WORK SESSION |
||
|
380 |
Sen. B. Starr |
MOTION: Moves HB 2579 to the floor with a DO PASS recommendation. |
|
|
|
VOTE: 4-0-1 EXCUSED: 1 - Deckert |
|
|
Chair Metsger |
Hearing no objection, declares the motion CARRIED. SEN. B. STARR will lead discussion on the floor. |
|
390 |
Chair Metsger |
Closes the work session on HB 2579. Opens a public hearing on HB 2069. |
|
HB 2069 – PUBLIC HEARING |
||
|
410 |
Michael Snyder |
Administrator, Landscape Contractors Board (LCB). Testifies in support of HB 2069. |
|
TAPE 75, A |
||
|
005 |
Snyder |
Submits a packet of testimony and information (EXHIBIT F). |
|
045 |
Bill Cross |
Oregon Landscape Contractors Association. Submits written testimony in favor of HB 2069 (EXHIBIT G). |
|
085 |
Chair Metsger |
Notes the difference between the proposed -A2 amendments (EXHIBIT H), -A3 amendments (EXHIBIT I),and -A4 amendments (EXHIBIT J). |
|
085 |
Sen. Monnes Anderson |
Asks about fees associated with continuing education for landscape contractors. |
|
090 |
Snyder |
Replies that no fees for continuing education would be charged by the LCB because it is part of the licensing fees. |
|
096 |
Sen. Monnes Anderson |
Asks if continuing education issues could be reported online. |
|
097 |
Snyder |
Answers yes. |
|
098 |
Sen. Atkinson |
Asks about the composition of the LCB. |
|
101 |
Snyder |
States that the board is made up of five industry-related members and two public members. |
|
103 |
Sen. Atkinson |
Asks for a further clarification of the composition of the LCB industry-related members. |
|
106 |
Snyder |
Offers further clarification of the industry-related members of the LCB. |
|
110 |
Sen. Atkinson |
Expresses skepticism about education credits. Feels that industry boards can present barriers-to-entry to an industry. Cites a similar issue faced by the used car industry in the past. |
|
125 |
Snyder |
Explains that the initial landscape contractor examination is the first standard of competency and the continuing education would enhance the knowledge of landscape contractors. Expresses the desire to have the examination certified by the national organization of accreditation certification. |
|
154 |
Sen. B. Starr |
Asks for a comparison of the state requirements in HB 2069 to the requirements for LCB licenses. |
|
163 |
Snyder |
Highlights the differences between the two. |
|
193 |
Brian McDermott |
Legislative Assistant, Office of Senator Charles Starr. Explains the -A2 amendments, -A3 amendments,and -A4 amendments. Presents the written testimony of Rep. Kim Thatcher (EXHIBIT K) and Rep. Linda Flores (EXHIBIT L) regarding HB 2069. |
|
265 |
Wes Butler |
Silverton Licensed Landscaper. Testifies in regard to the importance to the amendments of the measure. Observes the heavy regulations on the landscape contracting industry in Oregon. |
|
299 |
Mike Schrock |
Business Contractor. Expresses concerns over additional regulations regarding continuing education and standards of professional conduct. |
|
330 |
Schrock |
Elaborates on the subjective nature of the landscaping industry. |
|
369 |
Chair Metsger |
Asks Mr. Cross about moving forward without sections 2 and 3 of the bill. |
|
380 |
Cross |
Asks for additional time to work out a compromise on the continuing education portion of the bill. |
|
410 |
Chair Metsger |
Explains that the bill can be passed with the -A4 amendments or held over until the next meeting to work out a compromise. |
|
TAPE 74, B |
||
|
013 |
Sen. Monnes Anderson |
Addresses the importance of the professional conduct portion of the bill. |
|
023 |
Sen. B. Starr |
Offers there are elements of the bill that are very positive that should be passed. |
|
035 |
Snyder |
States support for the bill. |
|
The following material is submitted for the record without public testimony: |
||
|
|
Patrick Griffiths |
Water Resources Coordinator, City of Bend. Submits written testimony and information in support of HB 2069 (EXHIBIT P). |
|
040 |
Chair Metsger |
Notes the concerns expressed by Mr. Cross. Closes the public hearing and opens a work session on HB 2069. |
|
HB 2069 – PUBLIC HEARING |
||
|
042 |
Sen. B. Starr |
MOTION: Moves to ADOPT HB 2069-A4 amendments dated 5/25/05. |
|
045 |
Sen. Monnes Anderson |
Argues that the consumer protection provisions should remain in the bill. |
|
|
|
VOTE: 3-1-1 AYE: 3 - Atkinson, Starr B., Metsger NAY: 1 - Monnes Anderson EXCUSED: 1 - Deckert |
|
|
Chair Metsger |
The motion CARRIES. |
|
055 |
Sen. B. Starr |
MOTION: Moves HB 2069 to the floor with a DO PASS AS AMENDED recommendation. |
|
|
|
VOTE: 4-0-1 EXCUSED: 1 - Deckert |
|
|
Chair Metsger |
Hearing no objection, declares the motion CARRIED. SEN. B. STARR will lead discussion on the floor. |
|
060 |
Chair Metsger |
Closes the work session on HB 2069. Opens a work session on SB 408. |
|
SB 408 – WORK SESSION |
||
|
065 |
Chair Metsger |
Introduces SB 408. |
|
075 |
Dexter Johnson |
Office of Legislative Counsel. Explains the –A7 amendments (EXHIBIT M). |
|
100 |
Johnson |
Explains the provisions for rate filing of a utility. |
|
117 |
Chair Metsger |
Asks for a clarification of the tax reporting provisions. |
|
119 |
Johnson |
Offers clarification of tax reporting. Continues his description of the amendments. |
|
150 |
Johnson |
Discusses deferred taxes in relation to depreciation. |
|
175 |
Johnson |
Details section 5 of the amendments. |
|
186 |
Sen. Vicki Walker |
Senate District 7. Asks if there is precedent for the automatic adjustment clause. |
|
190 |
Johnson |
Answers that there is a precedent and clarifies the automatic adjustment clause. |
|
199 |
Mark Nelson |
Industrial Customer of Northwest Utilities. Testifies in support of SB 408 and the –A7 amendments. |
|
237 |
Jeff Bissonette |
Citizens Utility Board (CUB). Testifies in support of SB 408. |
|
254 |
Sen. B. Starr |
Asks how the measure will affect rate stability. |
|
274 |
Bissonette |
Observes the importance of rate stability and rate adjustments. Notes that the bill includes provisions that allow tax issues to be examined. |
|
301 |
Nelson |
Concurs with Mr. Bissonette’s comments. Talks about rate changes over time. |
|
325 |
Dan Meek |
Attorney, Utility Reform Project. Testifies in support of SB 408. Describes problems with the bill related to the charges to ratepayers and the elimination of tax practices. States support for the –A7 amendments. |
|
360 |
Meek |
Proposes that deadlines for PUC review of rates and operations be included in the measure. |
|
390 |
Meek |
Objects to the limitation of the definition of “tax” in the measure. Argues that the definition should be further refined. |
|
412 |
Pamela Lesh |
Vice President for Regulatory Affairs, Portland General Electric (PGE). Notes she came prepared to address the –A6 amendments (EXHIBIT N). Expresses uncertainty about the –A7 amendments and the one-way adjustment clause. |
|
TAPE 75, B |
||
|
005 |
Lesh |
Admits some concerns over the –A7 amendments. Submits and summarizes Tax True-up examples (EXHIBIT O) |
|
033 |
Sen. Monnes Anderson |
Asks for a clarification of the figures in Ms. Lesh’s examples. |
|
040 |
Lesh |
Explains Oregon’s Minimum Corporate Tax and offers a clarification of the figures. Continues describing the scenario in which PGE would receive more revenue than anticipated. |
|
080 |
Lesh |
Provides additional rate-setting scenarios. |
|
120 |
Scott Bolton |
PacificCorp. Testifies that SB 408 will hurt ratepayers and utilities. Explains regulations and taxes. |
|
136 |
Chair Metsger |
Clarifies attributable taxes related to utilities and affiliated groups. |
|
143 |
Bolton |
Asks for a clarification of the changes in the amendments. |
|
149 |
Chair Metsger |
Clarifies the changes in the –A7 amendments. |
|
154 |
Lesh |
Asks if losses would be impacted as well. |
|
158 |
Chair Metsger |
Answers that only utilities would be affected. |
|
163 |
Bolton |
Argues that the tax responsibility provisions in the measure are unclear. |
|
168 |
Chair Metsger |
Offers further clarification of the provision. |
|
170 |
Gary Bauer |
NW Natural. Describes the rate-setting process and tax liability. |
|
200 |
Bauer |
Discusses the shifts in tax liabilities and costs. Notes an issue of language related to deferred taxes paid and charges to ratepayers. |
|
230 |
Chair Metsger |
Offers clarification of the bill language. |
|
240 |
Sen. B. Starr |
Asks about the underlying issue of fairness regarding utilities’ ability to add taxes into their rates even if they don’t pay taxes. |
|
249 |
Lesh |
Explains the setting of utility rates and taxes. |
|
280 |
Melinda Davison |
Industrial Customers of Northwest Utilities. Notes that the examples Ms. Lesh provided are not considering the “Enron impact” related to Enron not paying the appropriate taxes. |
|
314 |
Sen. Monnes Anderson |
Asks if the amount of taxes would be so significant as to keep businesses from operating in Oregon. |
|
320 |
Davison |
Replies that SB 408 will not create a business disincentive, but will resolve the tax issues. |
|
336 |
Chair Metsger |
States that Pete Shepherd was involved in the discussions on the issue and asks if the Attorney General has taken a position on the issue. |
|
345 |
Pete Shepherd |
Deputy Attorney General. States that Attorney General Hardy Myers would like the law to connect the actual taxes received by governments to the amounts that utilities are recovering as that element of their cost. Notes the constitutional limitations of the legislature in addressing the issue. |
|
378 |
Julie Brandis |
Associated Oregon Industries (AOI). Notes AOI’s previous neutral position on the measure. Concurs with Sen. Starr’s observation on fairness on tax collection and payments. |
|
415 |
Chair Metsger |
Closes the work session on SB 408. Adjourns the meeting at 3:02 p.m. |
EXHIBIT SUMMARY