SENATE COMMITTEE ON COMMERCE
March 24, 2005 Hearing Room C
3:10 P.M. Tapes 41 - 44
Corrected 8/12/05
MEMBERS PRESENT: Sen. Floyd Prozanski, Chair
Sen. Roger Beyer, Vice-Chair
Sen. Ginny Burdick
Sen. Charlie Ringo
Sen. Doug Whitsett
STAFF PRESENT: Anna Braun, Committee Administrator
Karen Scoffield, Committee Assistant
MEASURES/ISSUES HEARD:
SB 355 – Public Hearing
SB 935 – Public Hearing
SB 738 – Work Session
SB 912 – Work Session
SB 133 – Work Session
SB 434 – Work Session
SB 386 – Work Session
SB 132 – Work Session
SB 576 – Work Session
SB 119 – Work Session
SB 37 – Work Session
SB 334 – Public Hearing
SB 339 – Public Hearing
These minutes are in compliance with Senate and House Rules. Only text enclosed in quotation marks reports a speaker’s exact words. For complete contents, please refer to the tapes.
|
TAPE/# |
Speaker |
Comments |
|
TAPE 41, A |
||
|
005 |
Chair Prozanski |
Calls the meeting to order at 3:15 p.m. Opens public hearing on SB 355. |
|
SB 355 – PUBLIC HEARING |
||
|
013 |
Anna Braun |
Committee Administrator. Provides an overview of SB 355. Introduces the -1 amendments to SB 355 (EXHIBIT A). |
|
017 |
Sen. David Nelson |
Senate District 29. Introduces constituent, Margaret Davidson. Testifies in support of SB 355. |
|
032 |
Margaret Davidson |
Executive Director, Community Connection of Northeast Oregon. Discusses and submits written testimony in support of SB 355 (EXHIBIT B). |
|
050 |
Sen. Nelson |
Comments that they will stay in contact with the committee to work further on SB 355. |
|
052 |
Chair Prozanski |
Submits written testimony on behalf of Ross Laybourn, Oregon Department of Justice, regarding SB 355 (EXHIBIT C). |
|
056 |
Chair Prozanski |
Closes public hearing on SB 355 and opens public hearing on SB 935. |
|
SB 935 – PUBLIC HEARING |
||
|
060 |
Anna Braun |
Committee Administrator. Provides an overview of SB 935. |
|
070 |
Sen. Charlie Ringo |
Senate District 17. Testifies in support of SB 935. Introduces Robin Kilpatrick. |
|
100 |
Robin Kilpatrick |
Citizen, Clackamas County, Oregon. Discusses and submits a letter in support of SB 935 (EXHIBIT D). Relates personal anecdote regarding total loss of auto. |
|
125 |
Sen. Ringo |
Asks Kilpatrick to describe the cost comparisons she found. |
|
127 |
Kilpatrick |
Continues testimony. Discusses the cost comparisons she found to her vehicle. |
|
160 |
Sen. Beyer |
Inquires what CCC and ADP are. |
|
165 |
Kilpatrick |
Responds that they are valuation organizations and are different from an appraisal. The companies are CCC Information Services, Inc. (CCC) and ADP Claims Services Group (ADP). |
|
170 |
Sen. Ringo |
Remarks that he understands that CCC and ADP work solely for the insurance industry. States that this is the most common complaint that the Insurance Division of the Department of Consumer and Business Services (DCBS) receives and that the language of SB 935 was drafted by the Insurance Division. |
|
190 |
Sen. Beyer |
Asks for clarification. |
|
194 |
Sen. Ringo |
Responds. |
|
200 |
Sen. Beyer |
Asks Sen. Ringo how he envisions SB 935 will take effect. |
|
205 |
Sen. Ringo |
Responds. |
|
207 |
Sen. Beyer |
Raises concern with the procedure. |
|
210 |
Sen. Ringo |
Remarks that it provides more guarantee. |
|
213 |
Sen. Beyer |
States that he would like to speak with DCBS about the procedure. |
|
214 |
Sen. Ringo |
Responds that it is a fair question. |
|
225 |
Neil Jackson |
Oregon Trial Lawyers Association. Discusses and submits written testimony in support of SB 935 (EXHIBIT E). |
|
260 |
Carl Lundberg |
Deputy Administrator, Insurance Division, DCBS. Discusses and submits written testimony on behalf of Joel Ario, Administrator, Insurance Division, DCBS, in support of SB 935 (EXHIBIT F). |
|
340 |
Sen. Beyer |
Inquires how Lundberg would determine who is on the list. |
|
349 |
Lundberg |
Responds. Discusses past procedures. |
|
372 |
Sen. Beyer |
Asks who will be compiling the list. |
|
380 |
Lundberg |
Responds. Comments that SB 935 does not specify who makes the decision. |
|
405 |
Sen. Beyer |
Comments on the desire to know which criteria will be used. |
|
410 |
Chair Prozanski |
Discusses plans regarding SB 935. |
|
425 |
Sen. Beyer |
Responds to Chair Prozanski. |
|
TAPE 42, A |
||
|
010 |
Lundberg |
Comments that they would be happy to work with other parties on SB 935. |
|
015 |
Sen. Ringo |
Asks Lundberg’s interpretation of SB 935. Asks if the insurance company selects the two valuation services that are used. |
|
017 |
Lundberg |
Responds. |
|
018 |
Sen. Ringo |
Clarifies his understanding of the valuation process. |
|
020 |
Lundberg |
States that Ringo understands correctly. |
|
025 |
Shawn Miller |
Property Casualty Insurers Association of America (PCI), ADP Claims Services Group. Discusses and submits written testimony in opposition to SB 935 (EXHIBIT G) and an auto source valuation in opposition to SB 935 (EXHIBIT H). |
|
090 |
Miller |
Summarizes and concludes testimony. |
|
115 |
Art Chartrand |
CCC Information Services, Inc. Testifies in opposition to SB 935. Submits written testimony of David D. Merritt, Assistant General Counsel, CCC Information Services, Inc., in opposition to SB 935 (EXHIBIT I). |
|
200 |
Chartrand |
Concludes testimony. |
|
225 |
Jack Munro |
American Insurance Association. Testifies in opposition to SB 935. |
|
275 |
Sen. Ringo |
Discusses errors in auto source valuations. |
|
295 |
Chartrand |
Remarks that they guarantee the accuracy of their data. |
|
305 |
Sen. Ringo |
Inquires how much money CCC profits per valuation. |
|
307 |
Chartrand |
Responds. |
|
309 |
Sen. Ringo |
Asks if competition is an issue with CCC. |
|
311 |
Chartrand |
Responds. |
|
315 |
Sen. Ringo |
Discusses the need for guidelines in the rule making. |
|
320 |
Munro |
Responds to Sen. Ringo. |
|
330 |
Chair Prozanski |
Discusses the need of a work group. |
|
340 |
Sen. Ringo |
Comments on appreciation of forming a work group. |
|
343 |
Miller |
Comments on the work group. |
|
350 |
John Powell |
State Farm Insurance Companies, Liberty Northwest. Testifies in opposition to SB 935. Submits an excerpt from the DCBS Insurance Division Trade Practices (EXHIBIT J). |
|
390 |
Ernie Hebert |
Claim Training Team Manager, State Farm Insurance Companies. Testifies in opposition to SB 935. Discusses State Farm’s procedures in evaluating total loss vehicles. |
|
TAPE 41, B |
||
|
025 |
John Powell |
Asks if committee members have questions for Hebert. |
|
030 |
Sen. Ringo |
Asks if Hebert would join the workgroup. |
|
032 |
Hebert |
Answers, yes. |
|
040 |
Chair Prozanski |
Closes public hearing on SB 935 and announces that SB 311 will not be heard today and will be carried over. |
|
043 |
Chair Prozanski |
Opens work session on SB 738. |
|
SB 738 – WORK SESSION |
||
|
|
Anna Braun |
Committee Administrator. Submits the -6 amendments (EXHIBIT K) and the -7 amendments (EXHIBIT L) to SB 738. |
|
050 |
Sen. Burdick |
MOTION: Moves to ADOPT SB 738-6 amendments dated 3/21/05. |
|
055 |
Anna Braun |
Committee Administrator. Provides an overview of SB 738 and the -6 amendments. |
|
060 |
Chair Prozanski |
Clarifies that SB 738 has a subsequent referral to the Ways and Means Committee. |
|
065 |
Braun |
Answers, yes. |
|
070 |
Sen. Beyer |
Discusses concern regarding the revenue impact of SB 738. |
|
075 |
Sen. Beyer |
MOTION: Moves to ADOPT SB 738-7 amendments dated 3/24/05. |
|
080 |
Chair Prozanski |
Discusses the revenue impact of SB 738. |
|
083 |
Braun |
Discusses previous testimony regarding the revenue impact of SB 738. |
|
087 |
Chair Prozanski |
Asks Braun to give an overview of the -7 amendments to SB 738. |
|
090 |
Braun |
States understanding that the -7 amendments delay the effective date of SB 738 for two years. |
|
093 |
Sen. Beyer |
Remarks that the -7 amendments asks Congress to implement a federal act. |
|
098 |
Chair Prozanski |
Responds to Sen. Beyer. Comments on the -7 amendments. |
|
107 |
Sen. Beyer |
Comments that SB 738 would be better addressed at a national level. |
|
115 |
Chair Prozanski |
Comments that a national standard would be preferred, but it has not happened. Remarks that SB 738 will limit fires in Oregon. States that the -6 amendments need to be moved on and he will not be able to support the -7 amendments. |
|
125 |
Sen. Whitsett |
Comments on his disagreement of SB 738 to prevent forest fires. |
|
135 |
Chair Prozanski |
Responds. |
|
143 |
Sen. Beyer |
Comments on previous testimony regarding forest fires. Remarks that SB 738 will have not any affect on wild fires. |
|
160 |
Chair Prozanski |
Responds. States that he will not support the -7 amendments. Asks for a roll call vote on the -7 amendments to SB 738. |
|
170 |
|
VOTE: 2-3-0 AYE: 2 - Beyer, Whitsett NAY: 3 - Burdick, Ringo, Prozanski |
|
|
Chair Prozanski |
The motion FAILS. |
|
175 |
Chair Prozanski |
Asks for a roll call vote on the -6 amendments to SB 738. |
|
178 |
|
VOTE: 3-2-0 AYE: 3 - Burdick, Ringo, Prozanski NAY: 2 - Beyer, Whitsett |
|
|
Chair Prozanski |
The motion CARRIES. |
|
182 |
Sen. Burdick |
MOTION: Moves SB 738 to the floor with a DO PASS AS AMENDED recommendation and BE REFERRED to the committee on Ways and Means by prior reference. |
|
|
|
VOTE: 3-2-0 AYE: 3 - Burdick, Ringo, Prozanski NAY: 2 - Beyer, Whitsett |
|
|
Chair Prozanski |
The motion CARRIES. |
|
193 |
Chair Prozanski |
Closes work session on SB 738 and opens work session on SB 912. |
|
SB 912 – WORK SESSION |
||
|
198 |
Anna Braun |
Committee Administrator. Introduces the -5 amendments (EXHIBIT M) and the -6 amendments (EXHIBIT N) to SB 912. Provides on overview of SB 912 and the -6 amendments. States that the -6 amendments direct the Board of Pharmacy to classify over the counter pseudoephedrine (except in liquid and gel cap dosage forms) as not less than a Schedule V controlled substance. |
|
220 |
Chair Prozanski |
Clarifies that the Veterinarian Association’s concerns will be alleviated by the -6 amendments. |
|
223 |
Braun |
Answers, yes. |
|
225 |
Sen. Beyer |
Asks if anyone is in attendance from the Board of Pharmacy. Clarifies the need for the -6 amendments. |
|
235 |
Chair Prozanski |
States understanding. Remarks that the statute is needed to prohibit the hard tablets containing pseudoephedrine from sale over the counter in Oregon. |
|
255 |
Sen. Beyer |
Remarks that he does not disagree with Chair Prozanski, but questions the need to put the language in statute if it is currently in rule. Inquires regarding the intent of the -5 amendments to SB 912. |
|
260 |
Chair Prozanski |
States that although he had the -5 amendments drafted, they are an outright ban of the sale of pseudoephedrine hard tablets in Oregon and he feels more comfortable with the -6 amendments. States that the -6 amendments are necessary to ensure the process of how pseudoephedrine hard tablets are available is not changed without the oversight of the legislature. |
|
273 |
Sen. Beyer |
States that he would like to have a discussion with the Board of Pharmacy on the -5 amendments to SB 912. Discusses desire to understand the problem with the -5 amendments. |
|
288 |
Chair Prozanski |
Responds. Discusses potential opposition to the -5 amendments. |
|
300 |
Sen. Beyer |
Asks if the -6 amendments require a prescription for hard tablets containing pseudoephedrine. |
|
302 |
Braun |
States that they allow the Board of Pharmacy to require a prescription. |
|
303 |
Sen. Beyer |
Clarifies that the -6 amendments allow the Board of Pharmacy to require a prescription on the hard form of pseudoephedrine. |
|
304 |
Chair Prozanski |
Answers, that is correct. |
|
305 |
Braun |
States that it makes it a Schedule V controlled substance. |
|
309 |
Sen. Burdick |
Asks if the Board of Pharmacy has a mandate to require a prescription. |
|
311 |
Gary Schnabel |
Executive Director, Oregon Board of Pharmacy. Remarks that Tom Holt represents the Oregon State Pharmacy Association and that they represent different organizations. |
|
317 |
Chair Prozanski |
Asks Tom Holt to come to the witness stand. |
|
320 |
Schnabel |
States that the board would not have an option, but would have to require a prescription because a Schedule V controlled substance requires it. |
|
323 |
Chair Prozanski |
States understanding of the administrative rule regarding pseudoephedrine and discusses the emergency rules. |
|
337 |
Schnabel |
Responds. Explains the emergency rules. |
|
353 |
Tom Holt |
Oregon State Pharmacy Association. Discusses ORS 475.045. Discusses the effects of the -6 amendments. |
|
400 |
Sen. Beyer |
Clarifies that the -6 amendments do not require a prescription for pseudoephedrine in hard form, but are required to be dispensed by a pharmacist. |
|
405 |
Holt |
Answers, that is correct. |
|
407 |
Sen. Burdick |
Clarifies that they would have the authority to choose to make it required by prescription. |
|
412 |
Holt |
Responds, yes and that he understands it will continue to stay this way. |
|
422 |
Schnabel |
States that he misstated earlier and that Schedule V does not automatically require a prescription. |
|
430 |
Sen. Whitsett |
Asks how the -6 amendments will address veterinarian’s use of pseudoephedrine. |
|
439 |
Braun |
Responds that the -6 amendments state that if a veterinarian is covered by a separate law requiring record keeping, they are exempt from the record keeping part of SB 912. |
|
447 |
Chair Prozanski |
States that the -6 amendments are a step in the right direction, but he will consider the -5 amendments if the other committee members so choose. |
|
TAPE 42, B |
||
|
035 |
Sen. Burdick |
States that she would like Sen. Beyer to know that she would support the -5 amendments, but the -6 amendments are a step in the right direction. |
|
050 |
Sen. Beyer |
Responds to Sen. Burdick. |
|
052 |
Chair Prozanski |
Responds to Sen. Beyer. |
|
055 |
Sen. Whitsett |
Asks if the -6 amendments would require a veterinarian to write a prescription for pseudoephedrine. |
|
063 |
Holt |
Discusses the -5 amendments to SB 912. |
|
067 |
Sen. Beyer |
Asks if the Board of Pharmacy needs SB 912 to adopt a permanent rule. |
|
070 |
Schnabel |
Remarks that he feels that they have the authority, but there has been some question by stakeholders regarding the Board’s authority. |
|
075 |
Chair Prozanski |
Clarifies that the passage of SB 912 will make certain that the Board of Pharmacy does have the authority. |
|
076 |
Schnabel |
Answers, yes. |
|
077 |
Sen. Beyer |
MOTION: Moves to ADOPT SB 912-6 amendments dated 3/24/05. |
|
|
|
VOTE: 5-0-0 |
|
|
Chair Prozanski |
Hearing no objection, declares the motion CARRIED. |
|
082 |
Sen. Beyer |
MOTION: Moves SB 912 to the floor with a DO PASS AS AMENDED recommendation. |
|
087 |
Sen. Beyer |
Comments that there are several bills currently in the legislature regarding Methamphetamine. Discusses desire for leadership to discuss a plan to combine the bills. |
|
097 |
Sen. Burdick |
Comments that she as the Senate Judiciary Committee Chair held a meeting with the House Judiciary Committee Chair to work on this and they do plan to combine the bills. |
|
103 |
Chair Prozanski |
Comments that he attended the meeting and they plan to do as Sen. Beyer has requested. |
|
|
|
VOTE: 5-0-0 |
|
|
Chair Prozanski |
Hearing no objection, declares the motion CARRIED. SEN. PROZANSKI AND SEN. BEYER will lead discussion on the floor. |
|
108 |
Chair Prozanski |
Closes work session on SB 912 and opens work session on SB 133. |
|
SB 133 – WORK SESSION |
||
|
115 |
Anna Braun |
Committee Administrator. Provides an overview of SB 133. Introduces the -1 amendments (EXHIBIT O) and the -2 amendments (EXHIBIT P) to SB 133. |
|
125 |
Sen. Beyer |
MOTION: Moves to ADOPT SB 133-1 amendments dated 2/7/05. |
|
|
|
VOTE: 4-0-1 EXCUSED: 1 - Ringo |
|
|
Chair Prozanski |
Hearing no objection, declares the motion CARRIED. |
|
130 |
Sen. Beyer |
Comments that the -2 amendments were drafted at his request. States that the Legislative Counsel office notified him that the -2 amendments are already in statute. |
|
147 |
Chair Prozanski |
States understanding. |
|
149 |
Sen. Beyer |
States that the -2 amendments are not necessary. |
|
150 |
Sen. Beyer |
MOTION: Moves SB 133 to the floor with a DO PASS AS AMENDED recommendation. |
|
152 |
Sen. Whitsett |
Discusses previous testimony on SB 133. States that he questions the need of SB 133. |
|
158 |
Chair Prozanski |
Responds. |
|
175 |
Christine Hammond |
Administrator, Wage and Hour Division, Bureau of Labor and Industries (BOLI). Responds to Sen. Whitsett’s comments. States that this is not a provision that BOLI typically uses. Remarks that SB 133 provides damages for anyone who is damaged by a contractor acting without a license. |
|
182 |
Chair Prozanski |
Clarifies that SB 133 is not for BOLI’s benefit. |
|
184 |
Hammond |
Responds. |
|
187 |
Sen. Whitsett |
Comments that the language of SB 133 says that BOLI may bring a lawsuit. |
|
190 |
Chair Prozanski |
Discusses BOLI’s intent to use SB 133. |
|
195 |
Hammond |
Adds that the Bureau is typically not damaged by the action of a farm labor contractor and that is why they would not use the provision. |
|
200 |
Sen. Whitsett |
Comments on confusion of why BOLI needs the right to file suit. |
|
204 |
Chair Prozanski |
Responds. |
|
207 |
Annette Talbott |
Deputy Labor Commissioner, BOLI. Responds to Sen. Whitsett’s concerns. |
|
214 |
Sen. Beyer |
Asks if any other people have used the provision. |
|
219 |
Hammond |
Responds that farm labor contractors who have lost a contract to someone who acted without a license have used this provision to sue for damages. |
|
230 |
|
VOTE: 4-0-1 EXCUSED: 1 - Ringo |
|
|
Chair Prozanski |
Hearing no objection, declares the motion CARRIED. SEN. RINGO will lead discussion on the floor. |
|
245 |
Chair Prozanski |
Closes work session on SB 133 and opens work session on SB 434. |
|
SB 434 – WORK SESSION |
||
|
250 |
Anna Braun |
Committee Administrator. Provides an overview of SB 434. Introduces the -1 amendments to SB 434 (EXHIBIT Q). States that the City of Portland is in support of the -1 amendments. |
|
255 |
Sen. Beyer |
MOTION: Moves to ADOPT SB 434-1 amendments dated 3/16/05. |
|
262 |
Chair Prozanski |
Comments that the City of Portland and the Bureau of Labor and Industries (BOLI) worked together to agree on the -1 amendments. |
|
270 |
|
VOTE: 4-0-1 EXCUSED: 1 - Ringo |
|
|
Chair Prozanski |
Hearing no objection, declares the motion CARRIED. |
|
275 |
Sen. Beyer |
Asks if Braun hand engrossed the -1 amendments into SB 434. |
|
276 |
Braun |
States that she did not because of the length of the amendments. |
|
277 |
Sen. Beyer |
Remarks that he understands the amendments to be a gut and stuff. |
|
278 |
Sen. Whitsett |
Discusses understanding of the -1 amendments to SB 434. |
|
288 |
Chair Prozanski |
Recognizes a nod from BOLI agreeing to Sen. Whitsett’s understanding of the -1 amendments to SB 434. |
|
290 |
Sen. Beyer |
MOTION: Moves SB 434 to the floor with a DO PASS AS AMENDED recommendation. |
|
|
|
VOTE: 4-0-1 EXCUSED: 1 - Ringo |
|
|
Chair Prozanski |
Hearing no objection, declares the motion CARRIED. SEN. BURDICK will lead discussion on the floor. |
|
299 |
Chair Prozanski |
Closes work session on SB 434 and opens work session on SB 386. |
|
SB 386 – WORK SESSION |
||
|
302 |
Anna Braun |
Committee Administrator. Provides an overview of SB 386. Introduces the -3 amendments to SB 386 (EXHIBIT R). |
|
320 |
Chair Prozanski |
Clarifies that Braun provided the committee members a document showing the changes from the -2 amendments to the -3 amendments. |
|
323 |
Braun |
Responds. |
|
328 |
Sen. Beyer |
Asks if the Management Labor Advisory Committee (MLAC) has reviewed the -3 amendments. |
|
330 |
Braun |
Answers, yes. |
|
332 |
Chair Prozanski |
Responds to Sen. Beyer. |
|
333 |
Braun |
Comments that MLAC met on March 17th. Remarks that the -3 amendments are not a substantive change. |
|
345 |
Sen. Beyer |
MOTION: Moves to ADOPT SB 386-3 amendments dated 3/24/05. |
|
|
|
VOTE: 4-0-1 EXCUSED: 1 - Ringo |
|
|
Chair Prozanski |
Hearing no objection, declares the motion CARRIED. |
|
350 |
Sen. Beyer |
MOTION: Moves SB 386 to the floor with a DO PASS AS AMENDED recommendation. |
|
|
|
VOTE: 4-0-1 EXCUSED: 1 - Ringo |
|
|
Chair Prozanski |
Hearing no objection, declares the motion CARRIED. SEN. BEYER will lead discussion on the floor. |
|
360 |
Chair Prozanski |
Closes work session on SB 386 and opens work session on SB 132. |
|
SB 132 – WORK SESSION |
||
|
365 |
Anna Braun |
Committee Administrator. Provides an overview of SB 132. Introduces the -1 amendments to SB 132 (EXHIBIT S). |
|
375 |
Sen. Beyer |
Asks if the Management Labor Advisory Committee (MLAC) has reviewed SB 132. |
|
380 |
John Shilts |
Administrator, Workers Compensation Division, Department of Consumer and Business Services. Nods from the audience that MLAC did review SB 132. |
|
385 |
Sen. Beyer |
MOTION: Moves to ADOPT SB 132-1 amendments dated 3/10/05. |
|
|
|
VOTE: 4-0-1 EXCUSED: 1 - Ringo |
|
|
Chair Prozanski |
Hearing no objection, declares the motion CARRIED. |
|
390 |
Sen. Beyer |
MOTION: Moves SB 132 to the floor with a DO PASS AS AMENDED recommendation. |
|
395 |
Sen. Beyer |
Asks if there is an issue of contractors not providing workers’ compensation coverage. |
|
400 |
Christine Hammond |
Administrator, Wage and Hour Division, Bureau of Labor and Industries (BOLI). Responds to Sen. Beyer. |
|
410 |
Sen. Beyer |
Clarifies that there has not been a case where workers were injured and not covered. |
|
412 |
Hammond |
Responds that there was not a case, but that it could happen. |
|
TAPE 43, A |
||
|
010 |
|
VOTE: 4-0-1 EXCUSED: 1 - Ringo |
|
|
Chair Prozanski |
Hearing no objection, declares the motion CARRIED. SEN. PROZANSKI will lead discussion on the floor. |
|
015 |
Chair Prozanski |
Closes work session on SB 132 and opens work session on SB 576. |
|
SB 576 – WORK SESSION |
||
|
016 |
Anna Braun |
Committee Administrator. Provides an overview of SB 576. Introduces the -1 amendments to SB 576 (EXHIBIT T). |
|
019 |
Chair Prozanski |
Asks about the -1 amendments. |
|
020 |
Sen. Beyer |
Comments that a work group was going to be formed for SB 576. |
|
025 |
Chair Prozanski |
Discusses intent of the -1 amendments. |
|
028 |
Sen. Beyer |
Discusses concern that caused the need of the -1 amendments. |
|
030 |
Chair Prozanski |
Comments that the -1 amendments should ensure that the scope is narrowed to the person’s professional license or certificate. |
|
033 |
Sen. Beyer |
MOTION: Moves to ADOPT SB 576-1 amendments dated 3/16/05. |
|
|
|
VOTE: 4-0-1 EXCUSED: 1 - Ringo |
|
|
Chair Prozanski |
Hearing no objection, declares the motion CARRIED. |
|
035 |
Sen. Beyer |
MOTION: Moves SB 576 to the floor with a DO PASS AS AMENDED recommendation. |
|
|
|
VOTE: 4-0-1 EXCUSED: 1 - Ringo |
|
|
Chair Prozanski |
Hearing no objection, declares the motion CARRIED. SEN. WHITSETT will lead discussion on the floor. |
|
040 |
Chair Prozanski |
Closes work session on SB 576 and opens work session on SB 119. |
|
SB 119 – WORK SESSION |
||
|
043 |
Anna Braun |
Committee Administrator. Provides an overview of SB 119. Introduces the -1 amendments to SB 119 (EXHIBIT U). Discusses the fiscal impact of SB 119. |
|
050 |
Chair Prozanski |
Clarifies that SB 119 does not have to go to the Ways and Means Committee because it is in the Governor’s budget. |
|
052 |
Braun |
Answers, yes. |
|
053 |
Sen. Beyer |
Asks if written testimony was provided on SB 119. |
|
055 |
Braun |
Directs Sen. Beyer to the information. |
|
059 |
Sen. Beyer |
Asks if SB 119 has been reviewed by the Management Labor Advisory Committee (MLAC). |
|
060 |
Braun |
Answers, yes. |
|
061 |
Chair Prozanski |
Answers, yes to Sen. Beyer. |
|
062 |
Sen. Beyer |
MOTION: Moves to ADOPT SB 119-1 amendments dated 3/18/05. |
|
|
|
VOTE: 4-0-1 EXCUSED: 1 - Ringo |
|
|
Chair Prozanski |
Hearing no objection, declares the motion CARRIED. |
|
067 |
Sen. Beyer |
MOTION: Moves SB 119 to the floor with a DO PASS AS AMENDED recommendation. |
|
|
|
VOTE: 4-0-1 EXCUSED: 1 - Ringo |
|
|
Chair Prozanski |
Hearing no objection, declares the motion CARRIED. SEN. RINGO will lead discussion on the floor. |
|
073 |
Chair Prozanski |
Closes work session on SB 119 and opens work session on SB 37. |
|
SB 37 – WORK SESSION |
||
|
075 |
Anna Braun |
Committee Administrator. Provides an overview of SB 37. Introduces the -1 amendments to SB 37 (EXHIBIT V). |
|
083 |
Chair Prozanski |
Asks Sen. Beyer if he worked with the Employment Department on the -1 amendments. |
|
085 |
Sen. Beyer |
Discusses work on the -1 amendments to SB 37. |
|
095 |
Renée Bryant |
Tax Section Manager, Employment Department. Discusses the -1 amendments to SB 37. |
|
100 |
Sen. Beyer |
MOTION: Moves to ADOPT SB 37-1 amendments dated 3/14/05. |
|
|
|
VOTE: 4-0-1 EXCUSED: 1 - Ringo |
|
|
Chair Prozanski |
Hearing no objection, declares the motion CARRIED. |
|
103 |
Sen. Beyer |
MOTION: Moves SB 37 to the floor with a DO PASS AS AMENDED recommendation. |
|
|
|
VOTE: 4-0-1 EXCUSED: 1 - Ringo |
|
|
Chair Prozanski |
Hearing no objection, declares the motion CARRIED. SEN. BEYER will lead discussion on the floor. |
|
108 |
Chair Prozanski |
Closes work session on SB 37 and opens public hearing on SB 334 and SB 339. |
|
SB 334, SB 339 – PUBLIC HEARING |
||
|
123 |
Anna Braun |
Committee Administrator. Provides an overview of SB 334 and SB 339. |
|
140 |
Neil Jackson |
Oregon Trial Lawyers Association. Discusses and submits written testimony in support of SB 334 (EXHIBIT W). |
|
The following is submitted for the record without public testimony: |
||
|
|
Billy Sime |
Oregon Association of Defense Counsel. Submits written testimony in opposition to SB 339 (EXHIBIT X). |
|
|
John Clements |
Claims Analyst, Safeco Insurance Company of Oregon. Submits written testimony in opposition to SB 339 (EXHIBIT Y). |
|
|
Joan Buck |
Oregon Self-Insurers Association. Submits written testimony in opposition to SB 339 (EXHIBIT Z). |
|
162 |
Chair Prozanski |
Asks John Powell and Billy Sime if he can close the public hearing for SB 339 as they are signed up as opponents to SB 339 and there are no proponents present for the bill. |
|
163 |
John Powell |
State Farm Insurance Companies. Nods, yes from the audience. |
|
164 |
Billy Sime |
Oregon Association of Defense Counsel. Nods, yes from the audience. |
|
165 |
Chair Prozanski |
Closes public hearing on SB 339 and opens public hearing on SB 334. |
|
SB 334 – PUBLIC HEARING |
||
|
170 |
Neil Jackson |
Oregon Trial Lawyers Association. Continues testimony in support of SB 334. Relates anecdote of a clients’ experience regarding an Independent Medical Examination (IME). Discusses protections available in SB 334. |
|
255 |
Sen. Whitsett |
Asks Jackson if items he discussed were reported to the Oregon Board of Medical Examiners. |
|
260 |
Jackson |
Responds that there is no violation of the ethical rules because medicine is considered an art and not a science. |
|
265 |
Chair Prozanski |
Clarifies Jackson’s comments. |
|
273 |
Jackson |
Responds. |
|
278 |
Sen. Whitsett |
States concern that an IME requires diagnosis and therefore a patient doctor relationship is created. |
|
285 |
Chair Prozanski |
Asks the Committee Administrator to arrange to hear testimony from the Board of Medical Examiners regarding the items discussed. |
|
290 |
Sen. Whitsett |
States desire to speak with the Board of Medical Examiners. |
|
300 |
Jackson |
Comments that the IME reports say on them that no doctor patient relationship is established. |
|
305 |
Chair Prozanski |
Discusses the need for clarification from the Board of Medical Examiners. |
|
310 |
Sen. Beyer |
Asks how subsection 1 and 2 of SB 334 will work. |
|
317 |
Jackson |
Responds. |
|
325 |
John Powell |
State Farm Insurance Companies. Discusses opposition to SB 334. Defers to Sime to provide testimony. |
|
345 |
Sime |
Oregon Association of Defense Counsel. Discusses and submits written testimony in opposition to SB 334 (EXHIBIT X) and an informational packet on Independent Medical Examinations, The Selection and Qualifications of the Examiner (EXHIBIT AA). |
|
TAPE 44, A |
||
|
033 |
Chair Prozanski |
Inquires about attorney client privilege. |
|
040 |
Sime |
Responds. Continues testimony. |
|
080 |
Sime |
Summarizes and concludes. |
|
100 |
Powell |
Testifies in opposition to SB 334. Discusses costs incurred by SB 334. |
|
117 |
Steve Murrell |
Claim Attorney, State Farm Insurance Companies. Testifies in opposition to SB 334. |
|
135 |
Sen. Ringo |
Discusses concerns with the IME process. |
|
160 |
Sime |
Responds to Sen. Ringo. |
|
170 |
Sen. Ringo |
States that SB 334 is to help people have impartial and independent exams. |
|
180 |
Sime |
Remarks that he does not see how SB 334 will assist with Sen. Ringo’s concerns. |
|
180 |
Hasina Squires |
Independent Medical Examination Association. Testifies in opposition to SB 334. Responds to Sen. Ringo that her clients’ doctors spend 30-45 minutes in the room with the patient. |
|
200 |
Sen. Ringo |
Remarks that he wishes that was the standard. |
|
203 |
Squires |
Concludes testimony. |
|
The following testimony is submitted for the record without public testimony: |
||
|
|
Joan Buck |
Oregon Self-Insurers Association. Submits written testimony in opposition to SB 334 (EXHIBIT Z). |
|
|
Faith Bachmeier |
Personal Injury Protection product lines manager, Safeco Insurance Company of Oregon. Submits written testimony in opposition to SB 334 (EXHIBIT BB). |
|
215 |
Chair Prozanski |
Closes public hearing on SB 334. Adjourns the meeting at 5:48 p.m. |
EXHIBIT SUMMARY
AA. SB 334, informational packet, Billy Sime, 3 pp
BB. SB 334, written testimony, Faith Bachmeier, 1 p