SENATE COMMITTEE ON ENVIRONMENT & LAND USE
February 14, 2005 Hearing Room B
3:00 P.M. Tapes 23 - 24
Corrected 10/18/05
MEMBERS PRESENT: Sen. Charlie Ringo, Chair
Sen. Jason Atkinson, Vice-Chair
Sen. Roger Beyer
Sen. Ginny Burdick
Sen. Frank Shields
STAFF PRESENT: Matt Shields, Committee Administrator
Katie Lowry, Committee Assistant
MEASURES/ISSUES HEARD:
SB 346 – Public Hearing
Introduction of Committee Measures – Work Session
SB 351 – Public Hearing
SB 352 – Public Hearing
These minutes are in compliance with Senate and House Rules. Only text enclosed in quotation marks reports a speaker’s exact words. For complete contents, please refer to the tapes.
|
TAPE/# |
Speaker |
Comments |
|
TAPE 23, A |
||
|
005 |
Vice-Chair Atkinson |
Calls meeting to order at 3:05 p.m. and opens a public hearing on SB 346. |
|
SB 346 – PUBLIC HEARING |
||
|
012 |
Matt Shields |
Committee Administrator. Explains SB 346. States that there is a set of -1 amendments (EXHIBIT A). Explains amendments. |
|
020 |
Chair Ringo |
Recesses public hearing on SB 346 and opens a work session on introduction of committee measures. |
|
INTRODUCTION OF COMMITTEE MEASURES – WORK SESSION |
||
|
025 |
Matt Shields |
Committee Administrator. Introduces Legislative Counsel (LC) drafts. Reads LC numbers and relating to clauses. Lists bills: LC’s: 1299 (EXHIBIT B), 1300 (EXHIBIT C), 1407 (EXHIBIT D), 1442 (EXHIBIT E), 2174 (EXHIBIT F), 2327 (EXHIBIT G), 2390 (EXHIBIT H), 2391 (EXHIBIT I), 2392 (EXHIBIT J), 2395 (EXHIBIT K), 2452 (EXHIBIT L), 2512 (EXHIBIT M), 2595 (EXHIBIT N), 2625 (EXHIBIT O), 2639 (EXHIBIT P), 2694 (EXHIBIT Q), 2701 (EXHIBIT R), 2738 (EXHIBIT S), 2741 (EXHIBIT T), 2760 (EXHIBIT U), 2793 (EXHIBIT V), 2794 (EXHIBIT W), 2795 (EXHIBIT X), and 2796 (EXHIBIT Y). |
|
044 |
Chair Ringo |
MOTION: Moves LC's: 1299, 1300, 1407, 1442, 2174, 2327, 2390, 2391, 2392, 2395, 2452, 2512, 2595, 2625, 2639, 2694, 2701, 2738, 2741, 2760, 2793, 2794, 2795, 2796 BE INTRODUCED as committee bills. |
|
045 |
Sen. Atkinson |
States that he does not support LC 2327, but will not object to the measures being introduced as committee bills. |
|
|
|
VOTE: 4-0-1 EXCUSED: 1 - Burdick |
|
|
Chair Ringo |
Hearing no objection, declares the motion CARRIED. NOTE: LC 1299 printed as SB 743 LC 1300 printed as SB 742 LC 1407 printed as SB 741 LC 1442 printed as SB 740 LC 2174 printed as SB 739 LC 2327 printed as SB 738 LC 2390 printed as SB 737 LC 2391 printed as SB 736 LC 2392 printed as SB 735 LC 2395 printed as SB 734 LC 2452 printed as SB 733 LC 2512 printed as SB 732 LC 2595 printed as SB 731 LC 2625 printed as SB 730 LC 2639 printed as SB 729 LC 2694 printed as SB 728 LC 2701 printed as SB 727 LC 2738 printed as SB 726 LC 2741 printed as SB 725 LC 2760 printed as SB 724 LC 2793 printed as SB 723 LC 2794 printed as SB 722 LC 2795 printed as SB 721 LC 2796 printed as SB 720 |
|
047 |
Chair Ringo |
Closes work session on introduction of committee measures and returns to public hearing on SB 346. |
|
SB 346 – PUBLIC HEARING |
||
|
050 |
Sen. Beyer |
Discusses SB 346 and -1 amendments (EXHIBIT A). Asks witnesses to focus the testimony of SB 346 on the -1 amendments. |
|
055 |
Chair Ringo |
Asks if the -1 amendments were made available to interested parties before the hearing. |
|
056 |
Sen. Beyer |
Believes they were. |
|
059 |
Joe Rohleder |
Government Affairs Representative, Oregon Aquaculture Association (OAA). Submits written testimony in support of SB 346 (EXHIBIT Z). Introduces Clint Bentz. |
|
060 |
Clint Bentz |
President, OAA. Submits written testimony in support of SB 346 (EXHIBIT AA). Gives background information on why some counties identify aquaculture as agriculture and why some do not. Discusses purpose of SB 346. |
|
085 |
Anne Rystrom |
Clear Creek Rainbow Ranch. Submits and highlights written testimony in support of SB 346 (EXHIBIT BB). |
|
100 |
Bentz |
Explains SB 346 briefly. |
|
105 |
Chair Ringo |
Asks how many employees she has. |
|
106 |
Rystrom |
Explains. Gives background information on facility. Discusses aquaculture industry. |
|
120 |
Chair Ringo |
Asks if the facility’s operation is currently on hold. |
|
121 |
Rystrom |
States that it is at one facility. Explains. Discusses second facility. |
|
135 |
Chair Ringo |
Asks who the fish are sold to. |
|
136 |
Rystrom |
Explains. |
|
145 |
Sen. Burdick |
Asks why the whole section of SB 346 had to be re-written. |
|
150 |
Bentz |
Explains. |
|
159 |
Sen. Burdick |
Wonders why a conditional use is a problem. |
|
160 |
Rystrom |
Explains. |
|
170 |
Sen. Burdick |
Asks what kind of conflicts the facilities pose to surrounding farms or orchards. |
|
174 |
Rystrom |
Explains that there is no water drainage. |
|
180 |
Sen. Burdick |
Wonders about conflicts if a farmer uses a pesticide that might get into a fish tank. |
|
183 |
Rystrom |
Gives an example. |
|
185 |
Bentz |
Explains precautions that need to be taken. Explains that they are the same precautions one would take when farming next to a stream. |
|
195 |
Sen. Burdick |
Asks if the fish are raised to maturity for the market or if they are sent somewhere else to reach maturity. |
|
200 |
Bentz |
Describes what generally is done. Explains that it depends on what the customers want. |
|
210 |
Chair Ringo |
Asks about specific language of –1 amendments. |
|
220 |
Sen. Beyer |
Explains specific language. |
|
260 |
Jim Johnson |
Land Use and Water Quality Specialist, Oregon Department of Agriculture (ODA). Explains that ODA had specific concerns with SB 346 but those have been addressed in the -1 amendments. States that the ODA has no issues with SB 346 if the -1 amendments are adopted. |
|
270 |
Roy Elicker |
Deputy Director of Fish and Wildlife Programs, Oregon Department of Fish and Wildlife (ODFW). Supports aquaculture industry in Oregon, however is unsure about SB 346. Explains potential concerns. |
|
300 |
Chair Ringo |
Addresses purpose of SB 346. |
|
302 |
Elicker |
Explains thatthe ODFW does not have any problems with the aquaculture industry wanting more flexibility in operations. |
|
304 |
Chair Ringo |
Asks witness to get back to the committee in a week. Explains that he wants to move SB 346 soon. |
|
305 |
Elicker |
Agrees. |
|
310 |
Sen. Shields |
Wants it to get done quickly. |
|
315 |
Elicker |
States that if he can arrange this meeting tomorrow, he will. |
|
320 |
Bob Horning |
Horning’s Hide Out. Expresses support for SB 346. Explains reasons for support. |
|
340 |
Chair Ringo |
Asks about permits. |
|
342 |
Horning |
Explains. |
|
343 |
Chair Ringo |
Asks witness to tell about his operation. |
|
345 |
Horning |
Explains operation. Says that he supports SB 346 because it would help hatcheries out a lot. Explains that cleaning up the language in statutes would be helpful to a lot of people. |
|
370 |
Art Schlack |
Association of Oregon Counties (AOC). Explains that he just received these amendments. States that he sent out a request to the counties to see if there is any problem with the changes. Discusses conditional use permit. States that a permit would still need to be obtained from ODFW before operation began. |
|
405 |
Chair Ringo |
Asks if he believes a permit from the ODFW would not be necessary if the conditional use permit was changed to an outright permit. |
|
410 |
Schlack |
Replies no. Explains concern with outright permitted use. |
|
412 |
Chair Ringo |
Asks if witness can get position of the AOC on SB 346 with proposed amendments to the committee within one week. |
|
413 |
Schlack |
Replies yes. |
|
415 |
Don Shellenberg |
Oregon Farm Bureau (OFB). Discusses purpose of conditional use permit. Discusses aquaculture. Explains that the OFB does not have a problem with the -1 amendments. |
|
450 |
Sen. Shields |
Asks if aquaculture presents an opportunity for diversification for a farmer. |
|
TAPE 24, A |
||
|
015 |
Shellenberg |
Explains that diversification decisions are routinely made in agriculture. States that a conditional use permit is necessary to do this, but believes that it should not be necessary. |
|
025 |
Sen. Shields |
Points out that it seems like this would benefit farmers. |
|
The following prepared testimony is submitted for the record without public testimony: |
||
|
|
Ken Dunder |
Submits written testimony in support of SB 346 (EXHIBIT CC). |
|
027 |
Chair Ringo |
States that committee will look at SB 346 based on information received later. Closes public hearing on SB 346 and opens public hearing on SB 351. |
|
SB 351 – PUBLIC HEARING |
||
|
030 |
Joe Rohleder |
Government Affairs Representative, Oregon Aquaculture Association (OAA). Submits written testimony in support of SB 351 (EXHIBIT Z). Submits and refers to fact sheets on sturgeon (EXHIBIT DD). Explains SB 351. |
|
070 |
Chair Ringo |
Asks about pounds of fish referred to. |
|
075 |
Rohleder |
Clarifies number of pounds of fish and what those fish are used for. Continues explaining SB 351. |
|
120 |
Sen. Atkinson |
Asks about tonnage in Idaho and California and asks if there is a marketable caviar industry. |
|
123 |
Rohleder |
Discusses production of eggs. Discusses caviar industry in Idaho and California. |
|
140 |
Sen. Atkinson |
Asks if it is marketable in international waters. |
|
145 |
Rohleder |
Explains. |
|
155 |
Sen. Atkinson |
Explains that a sturgeon would outlast everyone in the room. Asks what size is transportable. |
|
163 |
Rohleder |
Responds up to about six or seven feet. Mentions Newport Aquarium. |
|
175 |
Chair Ringo |
Asks witness to explain the need for transportation. |
|
180 |
Clint Bentz |
Manager, Blue Den Ranch and President, OAA. Introduces himself. Submits written testimony in support of SB 351 (EXHIBIT AA). Discusses transportation permits. |
|
185 |
Chair Ringo |
Asks why the fish are being transported. |
|
186 |
Bentz |
Explains difference between transport and release. Gives examples. |
|
200 |
Bentz |
Discusses sections of SB 351. Discusses advisory committee. |
|
230 |
Chair Ringo |
Refers to advisory committee. States that it comes with a fiscal impact. Asks if section three of SB 351 should be removed if the money is not there for the advisory committee. |
|
235 |
Bentz |
Believes the fiscal impact is not real because a staff person would not be necessary. |
|
260 |
Roy Elicker |
Deputy Director of Fish and Wildlife Programs, Oregon Department of Fish and Wildlife (ODFW). Submits and reads written testimony (EXHIBIT EE). |
|
315 |
Chair Ringo |
Asks if the issue of transportation is different if they are not transporting the fish to the wild. Asks what the state’s interest is in regulating transport from one private pond to another private pond. |
|
320 |
Elicker |
States that he was told that the goal was to be able to get a reoccurring permit to transport fish to farmer’s markets. States that under the current rules, the ODFW is able to issue those permits. |
|
330 |
Chair Ringo |
Remarks that that was not one of the reasons the OAA said they wanted these permits. Points out that the OAA is nodding yes. |
|
335 |
Elicker |
Explains further details. Remarks that the ODFW is unsure why the statutes need to be changed if the permits necessary are already available. |
|
350 |
Vice-Chair Atkinson |
Remarks on steelhead brought to the Capital building four years ago. Asks if the ODFW got a permit to transport those fish. |
|
355 |
Elicker |
Offers to return information to the committee. |
|
360 |
John Thorpe |
Fish Propagation Program Manager, ODFW. Introduces himself. Addresses question. States that the ODFW does not issue themselves permits for the transport of fish. Explains. |
|
375 |
Vice-Chair Atkinson |
Urges the ODFW to bring the fish back to the Capitol. States that it seems inconsistent to ask the public to do something the government is not willing to do. |
|
385 |
Elicker |
Continues reading testimony (EXHIBIT EE). Discusses advisory committee. |
|
395 |
Sen. Beyer |
Asks why the ODFW is opposed to putting the advisory committee in statute if the ODFW plans on working with the OAA anyway. |
|
400 |
Elicker |
Explains hesitancy to have a permanent advisory committees. Gives examples of advisory committees. |
|
415 |
Sen. Beyer |
Asks if a sunset clause would alleviate the ODFW’s concerns. |
|
418 |
Elicker |
Replies yes. |
|
420 |
Sen. Beyer |
Asks about fiscal impact. |
|
TAPE 23, B |
||
|
020 |
Elicker |
Discusses fiscal impact. |
|
030 |
Sen. Beyer |
Thanks witness for clarification because the fiscal impact statement does not accurately reflect the fiscal impact. |
|
035 |
Elicker |
Offers to file an amended fiscal impact statement to accurately reflect reason for fiscal impact. |
|
037 |
Sen. Beyer |
Asks about taking brood stock out of the Columbia River. |
|
040 |
Elicker |
Discusses taking brood stock out of the Columbia River. |
|
045 |
Sen. Beyer |
Verifies that right now a permit is needed to get the fish eggs and then the eggs can only be used for education and research. |
|
047 |
Elicker |
Confirms this. |
|
048 |
Sen. Beyer |
Remarks that SB 351 does not mandate the commission to do anything. Verifies that the fiscal impact for the sturgeon is at the discretion of the ODFW. |
|
054 |
Elicker |
Explains staff time that would be necessary. |
|
065 |
Sen. Beyer |
Clarifies that a person who wants to grow sturgeon, even if not taken from the wild, would need to get a permit from the ODFW. |
|
070 |
Elicker |
Confirms this. |
|
071 |
Sen. Burdick |
Asks if genetic quality of the sturgeons is a factor in this issue. |
|
075 |
Elicker |
Defers to Thorpe. |
|
078 |
Thorpe |
Asks Sen. Burdick to repeat the question. |
|
080 |
Sen. Burdick |
Asks if the genetic quality of the stock is an issue. |
|
083 |
Thorpe |
Confirms that is one of the biggest concerns in raising sturgeon. Explains why. |
|
099 |
Sen. Burdick |
Asks how that factor can be controlled. |
|
100 |
Thorpe |
Gives recommendation. |
|
103 |
Sen. Shields |
Asks how these issues were addressed in Idaho and California. |
|
105 |
Thorpe |
Discusses how these issues were addressed in Idaho. |
|
118 |
Sen. Shields |
Asks what the difference is between genetic overpopulation in the wild and at a farm. |
|
125 |
Thorpe |
Explains difference. |
|
140 |
Corey Pelfrey |
Pelfrey Sturgeon Hatchery. Introduces himself. Submits and reads written testimony in opposition to SB 351 (EXHIBIT FF). |
|
240 |
Pelfrey |
Continues reading testimony (EXHIBIT FF). |
|
340 |
Chair Ringo |
Asks where his operation is located. |
|
350 |
Pelfrey |
Gives location. |
|
351 |
Chair Ringo |
Asks how many employees the witness has. |
|
352 |
Pelfrey |
Explains. |
|
355 |
Chair Ringo |
Verifies that this is a for profit operation. |
|
356 |
Pelfrey |
Confirms this. |
|
358 |
Chair Ringo |
Asks if his concern about SB 351 is that the competition would hurt his business. |
|
360 |
Pelfrey |
Replies no. Explains concerns. |
|
380 |
Chair Ringo |
Refers to California’s regulations and remarks that California has more regulations than SB 351 would put into place. |
|
385 |
Pelfrey |
Confirms this. |
|
386 |
Chair Ringo |
Asks if it is done right in California. Asks if it would make the witness more comfortable if more regulations were proposed. |
|
390 |
Pelfrey |
States that he cannot testify as to whether or not it is done right in California. |
|
392 |
Chair Ringo |
Asks if the witness knows of any problems that California has. |
|
394 |
Pelfrey |
Replies yes. |
|
395 |
Chair Ringo |
Asks what the problems are. |
|
396 |
Pelfrey |
Explains problems. |
|
400 |
Sen. Beyer |
Refers to testimony (EXHIBIT FF). Points out that under current statute, witness is the only permit holder and none of the criteria referred to in testimony is required by law. |
|
415 |
Pelfrey |
States that ODFW does require these criteria. |
|
420 |
Sen. Beyer |
Talks about difference between rule and law. |
|
425 |
Pelfrey |
Remarks that he wouldn’t object if criteria were met. Explains. |
|
TAPE 24, B |
||
|
004 |
Sen. Beyer |
States, that clarifies that concern. Addresses another concern raised in testimony regarding advisory committee. |
|
015 |
Pelfrey |
Discusses advisory committee. Asks if something could be included in this law that would require at least one permit holder in the state of Oregon be a criteria for the advisory committee. |
|
020 |
Sen. Beyer |
Explains reason for not including this in the draft. |
|
025 |
Lyle Negus |
Desert Springs Trout Farm. Introduces himself. Gives background information. |
|
040 |
Chair Ringo |
Verifies that he supports the bill. |
|
043 |
Negus |
Confirms this. |
|
050 |
Chair Ringo |
States for the record that Thomas McDonald supports SB 351. |
|
058 |
Bob Horning |
Horning’s Hide Out. Explains purpose of SB 351. Expresses support for SB 351. Discusses issue of special interest. |
|
080 |
Anne Rystrom |
Clear Creek Rainbow Ranch. Introduces herself. Testifies in support of SB 351. Submits written testimony (EXHIBIT BB). |
|
120 |
Chair Ringo |
Invites Roy Elicker and John Thorpe, ODFW, to answer questions. Refers to testimony (EXHIBIT EE) and concerns that have been raised by witnesses. Believes that these concerns can be addressed. Wants to accommodate the concerns raised by witnesses who have testified. |
|
130 |
Elicker |
Clarifies that the ODFW is not saying no. States that there are some concerns. |
|
150 |
Chair Ringo |
States that he doesn’t want to spend more time on this right now, but wants to try and develop a commercial aquaculture business in Oregon. |
|
155 |
Elicker |
Says that he will come by and meet with Chair Ringo on SB 351. |
|
157 |
Sen. Shields |
Hopes that Chair Ringo and Mr. Elicker can work out these issues. Asks how it could benefit Oregon economically if Oregon was in the same place as California. |
|
165 |
Elicker |
Agrees that it is a substantial industry. Refers to California’s industry. Offers to return information to the committee. |
|
180 |
Sen. Shields |
Asks if California has learned something and if Oregon can learn from it. |
|
183 |
Chair Ringo |
Wants to pass a bill out this session. |
|
185 |
Elicker |
Offers to work with the committee. |
|
190 |
Sen. Beyer |
Offers to facilitate discussion. Speaks specifically about transport issue. Discusses clarity of the statutes. |
|
205 |
Elicker |
Offers to work with Sen. Beyer. |
|
The following prepared testimony is submitted for the record without public testimony. |
||
|
|
Ken Dunder |
Submits written testimony in support of SB 351 (EXHIBIT CC). |
|
210 |
Chair Ringo |
Closes public hearing on SB 351 and opens work session on introduction of committee measures. |
|
INTRODUCTION OF COMMITTEE MEASURES – WORK SESSION |
||
|
215 |
Matt Shields |
Committee Administrator. Introduces Legislative Counsel (LC) draft 2144. Reads summary (EXHIBIT GG). |
|
220 |
Chair Ringo |
MOTION: Moves LC 2144 BE INTRODUCED as a committee bill. |
|
|
|
VOTE: 4-0-1 EXCUSED: 1 - Burdick |
|
|
Chair Ringo |
Hearing no objection, declares the motion CARRIED. NOTE: LC 2144 printed as SB 863 |
|
225 |
Chair Ringo |
Closes work session on introduction of committee measures and opens public hearing on SB 352. |
|
SB 352 – PUBLIC HEARING |
||
|
235 |
Joe Rohleder |
Government Affairs Representative, Oregon Aquaculture Association (OAA). Explains program. Submits written testimony in support of SB 352 (EXHIBIT Z). Submits and refers to informational packet including spreadsheets and letters (EXHIBIT HH). |
|
255 |
Clint Bentz |
President, OAA. Submits written testimony in support of SB 352 (EXHIBIT AA). Explains reasons for SB 352. |
|
285 |
Roy Elicker |
Deputy Director of Fish and Wildlife Programs, Oregon Department of Fish and Wildlife (ODFW). Submits written testimony in opposition to SB 352 (EXHIBIT II). Explains opposition to SB 352. |
|
308 |
Chair Ringo |
Refers to (EXHIBIT HH, Page 1) and asks if these numbers are correct. |
|
310 |
Elicker |
Offers to stop by and discuss mentioned testimony with Chair Ringo. Discusses hatcheries and vendors in the state of Oregon. |
|
335 |
Sen. Beyer |
Discusses purpose of SB 352. |
|
365 |
Chair Ringo |
States that more analysis will be done. |
|
370 |
Anne Rystrom |
Clear Creek Rainbow Ranch. Submits written testimony in support of SB 352 (EXHIBIT BB). States that she met with the ODFW and discusses the meeting. |
|
The following prepared testimony is submitted for the record without public testimony. |
||
|
|
Ken Dunder |
Submits written testimony in support of SB 352 (EXHIBIT CC). |
|
380 |
Chair Ringo |
Closes public hearing on SB 352 and adjourns meeting at 4:56 p.m. |
EXHIBIT SUMMARY
A. SB 346, -1 Amendments, Staff, 37 pp
B. Introductions, LC 1299, Staff, 3 pp
C. Introductions, LC 1300, Staff, 2 pp
D. Introductions, LC 1407, Staff, 7 pp
E. Introductions, LC 1442, Staff, 12 pp
F. Introductions, LC 2174, Staff, 3 pp
G. Introductions, LC 2327, Staff, 3 pp
H. Introductions, LC 2390, Staff, 3 pp
I. Introductions, LC 2391, Staff, 11 pp
J. Introductions, LC 2392, Staff, 13 pp
K. Introductions, LC 2395, Staff, 5 pp
L. Introductions, LC 2452, Staff, 6 pp
M. Introductions, LC 2512, Staff, 2 pp
N. Introductions, LC 2595, Staff, 2 pp
O. Introductions, LC 2625, Staff, 3 pp
P. Introductions, LC 2639, Staff, 2 pp
Q. Introductions, LC 2694, Staff, 2 pp
R. Introductions, LC 2701, Staff, 1 p
S. Introductions, LC 2738, Staff, 1 p
T. Introductions, LC 2741, Staff, 2 pp
U. Introductions, LC 2760, Staff, 1 p
V. Introductions, LC 2793, Staff, 2 pp
W. Introductions, LC 2794, Staff, 2 pp
X. Introductions, LC 2795, Staff, 2 pp
Y. Introductions, LC 2796, Staff, 2 pp
Z. SB 346, SB 351, and SB 352, written testimony, Joe Rohleder, 2 pp
AA. SB 346, SB 351, and SB 352, written testimony, Clint Bentz, 2 pp
BB. SB 346, SB 351, and SB 352, written testimony, Anne Rystrom, 12 pp
CC. SB 346, SB 351, and SB 352, written testimony, Ken Dunder, 2 pp
DD. SB 351, fact sheets, Joe Rohleder, 11 pp
EE. SB 351, written testimony, Roy Elicker, 2 pp
FF. SB 351, written testimony, Corey Pelfrey, 5 pp
GG. Introductions, LC 2144, Staff, 34 pp
HH. SB 352, informational packet, Joe Rohleder, 6 pp
II. SB 352, written testimony, Roy Elicker, 2 pp