SENATE COMMITTEE ON ENVIRONMENT & LAND USE
March 14, 2005 Hearing Room B
3:00 P.M. Tapes 41 - 42
MEMBERS PRESENT: Sen. Charlie Ringo, Chair
Sen. Jason Atkinson, Vice-Chair
Sen. Roger Beyer
Sen. Ginny Burdick
Sen. Frank Shields
STAFF PRESENT: Matt Shields, Committee Administrator
Katie Lowry, Committee Assistant
MEASURES/ISSUES HEARD:
SB 886 – Public Hearing
SB 887 – Public Hearing
SB 888 – Public Hearing
SB 380 – Public Hearing
SB 732 – Public Hearing
SB 699 – Public Hearing
These minutes are in compliance with Senate and House Rules. Only text enclosed in quotation marks reports a speaker’s exact words. For complete contents, please refer to the tapes.
|
TAPE/# |
Speaker |
Comments |
|
TAPE 41, A |
||
|
005 |
Chair Ringo |
Calls meeting to order at 3:10 p.m. Announces SB 537 will not be heard today because the -1 amendments have not been received yet. Announces that none of the other bills on the agenda will be moved out of committee today. |
|
017 |
Chair Ringo |
Opens public hearings on SB 886, SB 887, SB 888, SB 380, SB 732, and SB 699. |
|
SB 886, SB 887, SB 888, SB 380, SB 732 AND SB 699 – PUBLIC HEARINGS |
||
|
022 |
Sen. Ben Westlund |
Represents Senate District 27. Testifies in support of SB 380. |
|
052 |
Chair Ringo |
Wonders if there will be testimony saying that the ability to annex is necessary. Asks witness to comment. |
|
055 |
Sen. Westlund |
Responds. |
|
070 |
Doug Riggs |
Central Oregon Cities Organization. Submits written testimony and an article titled “Economic future looks very bright in Redmond” (EXHIBIT A). Highlights written testimony. |
|
140 |
Robb Corbett |
City Manager, City of Prineville. Discusses expansion of urban growth boundary (UGB). Discusses necessity of growth for a city. Points out that the ability for a city to annex is necessary for growth. |
|
180 |
Chair Ringo |
States that a lot of people see problems with the annexation process all over the state. Asks what harm would be done if a two year moratorium was put on forcible annexations. |
|
190 |
Corbett |
Discusses rapid growth. States that the moratorium would allow one landowner to stand in the way of economic development. |
|
195 |
Chair Ringo |
States that the landowner would need to be convinced that it is in their best interest to be annexed. Asks why the annexation needs to be forced. |
|
198 |
Corbett |
States that one landowner who is opposed to certain development could hold up the entire community. Discusses provision of services and infrastructure. |
|
210 |
Chair Ringo |
Asks what annexation plans the witness has over the next two years. |
|
211 |
Corbett |
Gives details. |
|
215 |
Chair Ringo |
Remarks that if there was a two year moratorium on forcible annexation of residential property, then it wouldn’t affect witness’ annexation plans. |
|
216 |
Corbett |
Believes he would still be risking the ability to provide services to that area. |
|
223 |
Chair Ringo |
States uncertainty about witness’ comment. Asks for clarification. |
|
224 |
Corbett |
Explains. |
|
237 |
Chair Ringo |
Discusses motivation for annexation. |
|
240 |
Corbett |
Comments on hampering growth. |
|
243 |
Chair Ringo |
Responds. |
|
245 |
Riggs |
Explains concern with the two year moratorium. |
|
270 |
Riggs |
Submits written testimony on behalf of Mike Morgan, City Administrator of the City of Madras (EXHIBIT B). |
|
295 |
Jack Hoffman |
Member, Lake Oswego City Council. Submits written testimony in opposition to SB 380 and SB 888 (EXHIBIT C). Submits written testimony in opposition to SB 887, SB 888 and SB 380 (EXHIBIT D). Submits excerpt from the General Laws of Oregon (EXHIBIT E). Discusses annexation. Explains visual aid, which is a series of maps. |
|
440 |
Chair Ringo |
Asks what the witness’ annexation plans are for the next two years. |
|
442 |
Hoffman |
Points out annexation plans on visual aid. Urges committee not to pass two year moratorium against forcible annexation. |
|
TAPE 42, A |
||
|
010 |
Chair Ringo |
Brings up issue of island annexation. Asks if witness understands how that process has been abused in Washington County. |
|
012 |
Hoffman |
Responds. |
|
018 |
Chair Ringo |
Discusses island annexation in Senate District 17. |
|
023 |
Hoffman |
States that he cannot address this issue because he doesn’t know the specifics of Beaverton. Discusses neighborhood associations in Lake Oswego. |
|
030 |
Chair Ringo |
Comments that he is not convinced a two year moratorium would hurt the witness’ annexation plans. Asks witness to quantify what would be lost by a two year moratorium. |
|
035 |
Hoffman |
Gives examples of natural resources lost using visual aid. |
|
042 |
Sen. Atkinson |
Asks if witness used the phrase “control the natural resources.” |
|
043 |
Hoffman |
Confirms this. |
|
044 |
Sen. Atkinson |
Asks why the city government should control natural resources. |
|
045 |
Hoffman |
Asks for clarification of question. |
|
046 |
Sen. Atkinson |
Asks why the city government should control someone’s ability to cut down a tree. |
|
047 |
Hoffman |
Replies because of a tree code. |
|
048 |
Sen. Atkinson |
Asks if there is a tree code in Lake Oswego. |
|
049 |
Hoffman |
Replies yes. |
|
050 |
Chair Ringo |
Points out that Lake Oswego is the tree capital of the country. |
|
051 |
Sen. Atkinson |
Points out that the people mentioned by witness are not inside the city. Gives example of a citizen in southern Oregon. |
|
060 |
Hoffman |
Discusses legislation and control. Talks about regulating resources. Mentions Land Use Planning Goals. |
|
070 |
Alan Tresidder |
Nike. Introduces Julia Brim-Edwards. States they are here to testify on SB 732 and specifically how it relates to proposed annexation of the Nike campus. |
|
077 |
Julia Brim-Edwards |
Deputy Director for State Public Affairs, Nike. Submits written testimony in support of SB 732 (EXHIBIT F). Submits -1 amendments to SB 732 (EXHIBIT G). Testifies in support of SB 732. |
|
090 |
Alan Tresidder |
Explains the -1 amendments (EXHIBIT G). |
|
095 |
Julia Brim-Edwards |
Gives background on Nike. Discusses island annexation in Beaverton mentioned earlier by Chair Ringo. |
|
120 |
Chair Ringo |
Asks witness to explain history of Beaverton in regards to the annexation of the streets directly adjacent to the Nike campus. |
|
124 |
Brim-Edwards |
Explains the process Beaverton used. |
|
160 |
Brim-Edwards |
Discusses property taxes to schools and explains that SB 732 would not change the amount paid. |
|
180 |
Sen. Atkinson |
Gives a scenario of being completely surrounded by the city and wanting to be annexed. Asks if witness believes the system works. |
|
185 |
Tressider |
Asks for clarification. |
|
186 |
Sen. Atkinson |
Asks if one person could stand in the way of a property being annexed. |
|
187 |
Tressider |
Discusses complexity of annexation process. |
|
188 |
Sen. Atkinson |
Asks if the process is unnecessarily complex. |
|
189 |
Tressider |
States that it is complex. States that he does not know if one person can block an annexation. Discusses island annexation. |
|
200 |
Sen. Atkinson |
States that he has had experiences where the city annexed all around a piece of property, but would not annex the property itself. States that this devalues property. |
|
210 |
Mayor Janet Taylor |
Mayor, City of Salem. Testifies in opposition to SB 380, SB 699, SB 886 and SB 887. Submits written testimony (EXHIBIT H). Refers to and discusses visual aids which are large maps of Salem. Points out areas on map that are not inside Salem’s city limits. Explains that Salem provides the water and sewer service to those areas. Explains that Salem bought and maintains their systems, but they are not within Salem city limits. |
|
264 |
Chair Ringo |
Asks if those referred to are paying for those systems. |
|
266 |
Taylor |
Explains that they pay for the water and sewer only. Discusses these areas and states that it would be good to make these areas a part of Salem. |
|
275 |
Chair Ringo |
Verifies that witness wants to bring these areas in as an island annexation. |
|
276 |
Taylor |
Confirms this. |
|
277 |
Chair Ringo |
Verifies that the island annexation could be done without a public hearing. |
|
278 |
Taylor |
States that in some cases the annexation can be done without a public hearing. Explains blue areas on map. |
|
285 |
Sen. Burdick |
Verifies that it is not close to an island because it is exclusive farm use (EFU) zoned outside the UGB. |
|
287 |
Taylor |
Confirms this. Discusses intergovernmental agreements and overlapping of efforts. Gives an example of a fire department located at Chemeketa Community College. Discusses city limits along Lancaster Drive in Salem. Points out that it is heavily developed commercial property that is in the county but it is inside Salem’s urban growth boundary. |
|
315 |
Sen. Shields |
Verifies that it is not in the city. |
|
316 |
Taylor |
Confirms this. |
|
320 |
Sen. Atkinson |
Asks where Cordon Road is. |
|
324 |
Mitch Rohse |
Interim Urban Planning Administrator. Points out Cordon Road on map. |
|
327 |
Chair Ringo |
Asks if witness has any plans within the next two years to annex mentioned parcels. |
|
328 |
Taylor |
Replies absolutely. |
|
329 |
Chair Ringo |
Verifies that witness plans to do that through island annexation. |
|
330 |
Taylor |
Confirms this. |
|
331 |
Chair Ringo |
Verifies that witness can annex these areas without getting the consent of the people who live there. |
|
332 |
Taylor |
Confirms this. |
|
333 |
Chair Ringo |
Asks if witness sees any problem with that method. |
|
334 |
Taylor |
Replies no. Explains that they have received a lot of requests to be annexed but cannot do so because the parcels are not contiguous to the city limits. States that the people who live in these areas want more services. |
|
338 |
Chair Ringo |
Verifies that witness is talking about the blue areas on the map. |
|
339 |
Taylor |
Replies no. Explains that she is also talking about people in the gray areas on the map. |
|
345 |
Taylor |
Concludes testimony. Urges committee not to pass any annexation bills. |
|
360 |
Chair Ringo |
States that he has a hard time believing that a two year moratorium would shut down Salem’s economy. |
|
362 |
Sen. Atkinson |
Refers to discomfort he mentioned earlier. Points to spot on map and states that all of those houses are outside of the city limits. Asks how hard it would be for them to come into the city. |
|
368 |
Taylor |
Verifies that they are outside of the UGB. |
|
375 |
Sen. Atkinson |
Confirms this. Discusses services used and roads surrounding them. Asks how hard it is for them to come into the city. |
|
383 |
Taylor |
Replies that they cannot come into the city if they are outside the UGB. Explains that they are on septic tanks and wells. |
|
387 |
Sen. Atkinson |
States that it is tough luck if you are outside the city. |
|
388 |
Taylor |
Clarifies that it is only outside the UGB. Discusses pollution and septic tanks. |
|
405 |
Sen. Burdick |
Asks if the city taxpayers subsidize the people that are in the gray areas on the map. |
|
407 |
Taylor |
Replies absolutely and explains. |
|
412 |
Sen. Shields |
Verifies that they only pay for sewer and water. |
|
413 |
Taylor |
Confirms this. |
|
414 |
Sen. Shields |
Asks if they are getting free police protection. |
|
418 |
Taylor |
States that is provided by the county sheriff. |
|
419 |
Sen. Shields |
Gives hypothetical example and asks if that is correct. |
|
420 |
Taylor |
Replies absolutely. |
|
421 |
Sen. Shields |
States that it seems pretty inefficient. |
|
420 |
Taylor |
Agrees. Gives examples involving the Lancaster mall area. |
|
TAPE 41, B |
||
|
005 |
Chair Ringo |
Remarks that it happens all over the state. Clarifies that the services the witness believes are being subsidized are libraries and parks. |
|
006 |
Taylor |
Verifies libraries and parks. Adds code enforcement. |
|
007 |
Chair Ringo |
Asks if there is anything else. |
|
008 |
Taylor |
Adds police and fire. |
|
009 |
Chair Ringo |
Says that he thought witness said that the county sheriff covered the areas. |
|
010 |
Taylor |
Confirms this. States that fire is not subsidized but the residents are asking the City of Salem for increased services. |
|
011 |
Chair Ringo |
Clarifies that the services being subsidized are libraries, parks and code enforcement. |
|
012 |
Taylor |
Confirms this. |
|
013 |
Chair Ringo |
States that if libraries were a big concern then the city could issue library cards. |
|
014 |
Taylor |
States that the city already does this. Explains. |
|
016 |
Chair Ringo |
Asks if there are any studies on the amount of subsidy that occurs annually. |
|
017 |
Taylor |
States that she does not know of any. |
|
018 |
Chair Ringo |
States that the issue of subsidizing comes up often in Washington County. Gives example. States that there are a lot of theories about subsidization, but there are no studies. |
|
019 |
Taylor |
Agrees. |
|
020 |
Chair Ringo |
States that he takes the theories with a grain of salt because there are no studies. |
|
021 |
Larry Glassock |
Director, Strategic Economic Development Corporation (SEDCOR). States opposition to a moratorium. |
|
030 |
Taylor |
Discusses PictSweet Mushroom Plant and development of area where it shut down. |
|
038 |
Chair Ringo |
Verifies that the owners of the property want to develop. |
|
040 |
Taylor |
Confirms this. |
|
041 |
Chair Ringo |
Emphasizes that the moratorium would be against forced annexation only. |
|
042 |
Taylor |
Responds. |
|
045 |
Jerry Ritter |
Secretary, Oregon Communities For A Voice In Annexations. Testifies in support of SB 380. Submits written testimony (EXHIIBT I). Submits written testimony in support of SB 887 (EXHIBIT J). |
|
095 |
Chair Ringo |
Asks how witness responds to questions raised about those inside the city subsidizing those outside the city limits. |
|
098 |
Ritter |
States that he is outside the city limits. |
|
099 |
Chair Ringo |
Asks where the witness lives. |
|
100 |
Ritter |
States that he lives in the Springfield UGB. Discusses services received. Agrees that the cities have not made a case for this argument. |
|
110 |
Chair Ringo |
Responds. |
|
113 |
Ritter |
Submits written testimony on SB 699 (EXHIBIT K). |
|
115 |
Chair Ringo |
Verifies that it is the Nike bill. |
|
116 |
Ritter |
Replies no. |
|
117 |
Chair Ringo |
Replies okay. Asks witness to continue. |
|
118 |
Ritter |
Discusses SB 699. Asks that SB 699 be amended to extend it to all Oregonians. Discusses granting protections from annexation to businesses but not extending those privileges to other residents. |
|
125 |
Ritter |
Testifies in support of SB 887. States that the abuse of the island annexation process has occurred in places other than Beaverton. |
|
130 |
Chair Ringo |
Asks where else the island annexation problem has happened. |
|
131 |
Ritter |
Explains. |
|
132 |
Chair Ringo |
Asks witness for details. |
|
133 |
Ritter |
Gives details. |
|
135 |
Chair Ringo |
Asks for explanation of phrase “cherry stemming.” |
|
136 |
Ritter |
Explains phrase. |
|
145 |
Sen. Ryan Deckert |
Represents Senate District 14. Discusses mediation process. Offers to bring the committee an amendment. |
|
180 |
Burdick |
Discusses the City of Corvallis. Asks if witness is saying that the legislature will decide any contested annexation. |
|
185 |
Sen. Deckert |
Discusses process. Gives an example. |
|
190 |
Burdick |
Asks if that example is in her district. |
|
191 |
Sen. Deckert |
Replies no. Gives further examples. Discusses mediation process. |
|
205 |
Chair Ringo |
Believes that the mediation process makes sense in Washington County, but is unsure how witness connects the mediation process with legislative action. |
|
210 |
Sen. Deckert |
Discusses mentioned amendments. Offers to bring amendments at committee’s request. |
|
213 |
Steve Bryant |
City Manager, Albany. Submits and reads written testimony (EXHIBIT L). |
|
255 |
Chair Ringo |
States that witness is assuming that subsidization is occurring. |
|
256 |
Bryant |
Confirms this. Explains using an example. |
|
270 |
Chair Ringo |
States that the witness could have some services agreement where the people in rural areas pay for those services. |
|
271 |
Bryant |
Replies that they do. |
|
272 |
Chair Ringo |
Remarks that would remove the subsidization argument. |
|
273 |
Bryant |
Responds. |
|
276 |
Chair Ringo |
States that there is very little evidence to support the subsidization argument. |
|
280 |
Bryant |
States that it would take some economic study to demonstrate the subsidization argument. |
|
290 |
Chair Ringo |
States that in Washington County, the sheriff’s office is providing security in the jail and there are a lot of prisoners in there from the city. |
|
293 |
Bryant |
Responds. |
|
300 |
Bryant |
Continues reading testimony (EXHIBIT L). |
|
370 |
Bryant |
Discusses -1 amendments for SB 732 submitted by Brim-Edwards. |
|
380 |
Chair Ringo |
States that these amendments are not being considered at the moment. |
|
385 |
Patricia Daniels |
League of Oregon Cities and City Council, City of Corvallis. Discusses annexation. |
|
413 |
Chair Ringo |
Asks if there are forced annexations in Corvallis. |
|
414 |
Daniels |
Replies no. |
|
415 |
Chair Ringo |
Wonders if the witness would have a problem with limiting forced annexation while the problem is studied for two years. |
|
416 |
Daniels |
States that she has a suggestion for the committee. Continues discussing annexation. |
|
TAPE 42, B |
||
|
025 |
Daniels |
Suggests the issues discussed not be addressed for all towns by a group of bills. Suggests that the committee create an interim task force. |
|
030 |
Chair Ringo |
Believes that a task force is necessary. Explains. |
|
040 |
Marshall Cova |
Boise Cascade. Testifies in support of SB 699. |
|
050 |
Mike Hicks |
Northwest Oregon Area Logging Manager, Boise Cascade. Submits and reads written testimony in support of SB 699 (EXHIBIT M). |
|
135 |
Lisa Hamilton-Trike |
Resident, Unincorporated Bull Mountain. Discusses annexation attempt by the city of Tigard. Urges committee to let citizens be involved in task forces if they are made. |
|
230 |
Randy Tucker |
Legislative Affairs Manager, Metro. Discusses responsibility of the Metro Council with respect to growth management in the Portland Metropolitan area. |
|
260 |
Chair Ringo |
Asks about two year moratorium. |
|
261 |
Tucker |
Responds. |
|
275 |
Linda Ludwig |
League of Oregon Cities (LOC). Submits informational packet on SB 380, SB 732, SB 886, SB 887, SB 888 (EXHIBIT N). Discusses annexation law. Suggests that an interim committee be created to look at annexation. Talks about methods of annexations. |
|
315 |
Chair Ringo |
Discusses task force. States that a lot of legislators have concerns about what is going on in their districts. Discusses previous testimony that a two year moratorium against forced annexations would kill economic development. Asks if witness believes that is an exaggerated argument. |
|
325 |
Ludwig |
Replies no and explains the different kinds of annexation methods. |
|
335 |
Chair Ringo |
Agrees. Asks witness to explain the harm that would be done by having a two year moratorium against forced annexations. |
|
336 |
Ludwig |
Explains. |
|
365 |
Ludwig |
States that the LOC does not have opposition to SB 886. Offers to work with the committee for amendments on SB 887. States that the LOC has no position on SB 888. Discusses SB 380. States that the LOC has no position on SB 732. Discusses SB 699. |
|
390 |
Chair Ringo |
Discusses bills. |
|
400 |
Sen. Shields |
States for the record that Gene Grant, Mayor of Happy Valley is in support of annexation. States that he is opposed to SB 380, SB 887, SB 732 and SB 699. |
|
The following prepared testimony is submitted for the record without public testimony: |
||
|
|
Dottie Belknap |
Submits written testimony in support of SB 380 (EXHIBIT O). |
|
|
Barton Brierly |
Submits written testimony in opposition to SB 886, SB 887, SB 888, SB 380, SB 732 and SB 699 (EXHIBIT P). |
|
|
Holly Shumway |
Submits written testimony is support of SB 380 (EXHIBIT Q). |
|
|
Ken Henschel |
Submits written testimony in support of SB 380 (EXHIBIT R). |
|
|
Richard Franzke |
Submits written testimony in support of SB 380 (EXHIBIT S). |
|
|
Richard Reid |
Submits written testimony in opposition to SB 699 (EXHIBIT T). Submits written testimony in opposition to SB 380 (EXHIBIT U). Submits written testimony in support of SB 887 (EXHIBIT V). |
|
|
James Thompson |
Submits written testimony in support of SB 380 (EXHIBIT W). |
|
|
Isador Morgavi |
Submits written testimony on annexation (EXHIBIT X). |
|
412 |
Chair Ringo |
Closes public hearings on SB 886, SB 887, SB 888, SB 380, SB 732, and SB 699. Adjourns meeting at 5:03 p.m. |
EXHIBIT SUMMARY
A. SB 380, SB 699, SB 732, SB 886, SB 887, and SB 888, written testimony, Doug Riggs, 3 pp
B. SB 380, SB 699, SB 732, SB 886, SB 887, and SB 888, written testimony of Mike Morgan, Doug Riggs, 2 pp
C. SB 380 and SB 888, written testimony, Jack Hoffman, 3 pp
D. SB 380, SB 887, and SB 888, written testimony, Jack Hoffman, 8 pp
E. SB 380, SB 699, SB 732, SB 886, SB 887, and SB 888, excerpt, Jack Hoffman, 1 p
F. SB 732, written testimony, Julia Brim-Edwards, 4 pp
G. SB 732, -1 amendments, Julia Brim-Edwards, 3 pp
H. SB 380, SB 699, SB 732, SB 886, and SB 887, written testimony, Janet Taylor, 3 pp
I. SB 380, written testimony, Jerry Ritter, 2 pp
J. SB 887, written testimony, Jerry Ritter, 1 p
K. SB 699, written testimony, Jerry Ritter, 1 p
L. SB 380, SB 699, SB 732, SB 886, SB 887, and SB 888, written testimony, Steve Bryant, 3 pp
M. SB 699, written testimony, Mike Hicks, 4 pp
N. SB 380, SB 732, SB 886, SB 887, and SB 888, informational packet, Linda Ludwig, 16 pp
O. SB 380, written testimony, Dottie Belknap, 1 p
P. SB 380, SB 699, SB 732, SB 886, SB 887, and SB 888, written testimony, Barton Brierly, 1 p
Q. SB 380, written testimony, Holly Shumway, 1 p
R. SB 380, written testimony, Ken Henschel, 4 pp
S. SB 380, written testimony, Richard Franzke, 5 pp
T. SB 699, written testimony, Richard Reid, 1 p
U. SB 380, written testimony, Richard Reid, 1 p
V. SB 887, written testimony, Richard Reid, 1 p
W. SB 380, written testimony, James Thompson, 2 pp
X. SB 380, SB 699, SB 732, SB 886, SB 887, and SB 888, written testimony, Isador Morgavi, 4 pp