SENATE COMMITTEE ON ENVIRONMENT & LAND USE
May 24, 2005 Hearing Room 343
8:00 A.M. Tapes 97 - 99
Corrected 10/18/05
MEMBERS PRESENT: Sen. Charlie Ringo, Chair
Sen. Jason Atkinson, Vice-Chair
Sen. Roger Beyer
Sen. Frank Shields
MEMBER EXCUSED: Sen. Ginny Burdick
MEMBER VISITING: Sen. Peter Courtney
STAFF PRESENT: Matt Shields, Committee Administrator
Katie Lowry, Committee Assistant
MEASURES/ISSUES HEARD:
SB 245 – Work Session
SB 570 – Work Session
HB 2881 – Public Hearing
HJM 5 A – Public Hearing
HB 2356 A – Public Hearing and Work Session
HB 2755 A – Public Hearing
HB 2198 – Public Hearing and Work Session
HB 2577 A – Public Hearing and Work Session
SB 1061 – Public Hearing
HB 2729 A – Public Hearing
HB 3349 – Public Hearing
These minutes are in compliance with Senate and House Rules. Only text enclosed in quotation marks reports a speaker’s exact words. For complete contents, please refer to the tapes.
|
TAPE/# |
Speaker |
Comments |
|
TAPE 97, A |
||
|
005 |
Chair Ringo |
Calls meeting to order at 8:01 a.m. States that SB 699 and SB 532 will not be heard today. Opens work session on SB 245. |
|
SB 245 – WORK SESSION |
||
|
015 |
Matt Shields |
Submits and explains the -3 amendments to SB 245 (EXHIBIT A). |
|
020 |
Chair Ringo |
Discusses the -3 amendments. |
|
023 |
Chair Ringo |
MOTION: Moves to ADOPT SB 245-3 amendments dated 05/18/05. |
|
025 |
|
VOTE: 3-1-2 AYE: 3 - President Courtney, Shields, Ringo NAY: 1 - Beyer EXCUSED: 2 - Atkinson, Burdick |
|
|
Chair Ringo |
The motion CARRIES. |
|
030 |
Chair Ringo |
MOTION: Moves SB 245 to the floor with a DO PASS AS AMENDED recommendation. |
|
031 |
|
VOTE: 3-1-2 AYE: 3 - President Courtney, Shields, Ringo NAY: 1 - Beyer EXCUSED: 2 - Atkinson, Burdick |
|
|
Chair Ringo |
The motion CARRIES. SEN. RINGO will lead discussion on the floor. |
|
034 |
Chair Ringo |
Closes work session on SB 245 and opens work session on SB 570. |
|
SB 570 – WORK SESSION |
||
|
036 |
Matt Shields |
Committee Administrator. Submits and explains the -2 amendments to SB 570 (EXHIBIT B). |
|
039 |
Chair Ringo |
Asks witness to explain the -2 amendments. |
|
040 |
Rick North |
Oregon Physicians for Social Responsibility. Explains the -2 amendments. |
|
049 |
Chair Ringo |
Verifies that witness is referring to the -2 amendments when he says the second amendments. |
|
051 |
Shields |
Confirms witness is referring to the -2 amendments. |
|
052 |
North |
Confirms that he is referring to the -2 amendments. Continues explaining the -2 amendments. |
|
055 |
Chair Ringo |
Verifies that the committee does not need to adopt the -1 amendments. |
|
056 |
North |
Confirms yes. |
|
060 |
Chair Ringo |
MOTION: Moves to ADOPT SB 570-2 amendments dated 04/29/05. |
|
063 |
|
VOTE: 5-0-1 AYE: 5 - Atkinson, Beyer, President Courtney, Shields, Ringo EXCUSED: 1 - Burdick |
|
|
Chair Ringo |
The motion CARRIES. |
|
070 |
Chair Ringo |
MOTION: Moves SB 570 to the floor with a DO PASS AS AMENDED recommendation. |
|
071 |
|
VOTE: 3-2-1 AYE: 3 – President Courtney, Shields, Ringo NAY: 2 - Atkinson, Beyer EXCUSED: 1 - Burdick |
|
|
Chair Ringo |
The motion CARRIES. SEN. SHIELDS will lead discussion on the floor. |
|
104 |
Chair Ringo |
Closes work session on SB 570 and opens public hearing on HB 2881 and HJM 5 A. |
|
HB 2881 & HJM 5 A – PUBLIC HEARING |
||
|
|
Matt Shields |
Committee Administrator. Submits the -2 amendments to HB 2881 for the record (EXHIBIT C). |
|
120 |
Roy Elicker |
Oregon Department of Fish and Wildlife (ODFW). Explains HB 2881. Submits written testimony (EXHIBIT D). |
|
145 |
Ron Anglin |
Wildlife Division Administrator, ODFW. States that he is available to answer questions. |
|
148 |
Sen. Beyer |
Asks if the commission has the authority to remove species from the endangered species list. |
|
150 |
Anglin |
Replies yes. States the ODFW attempted to remove the Aleutian goose from the state endangered species list, but was unable to do so. Explains why. |
|
157 |
Sen. Beyer |
Points out that the problems with the process of adding or removing species from the list should be fixed, rather than only removing one specific species. |
|
160 |
Elicker |
Discusses previous legislation on this issue (2003). Explains there are immediate issues with the Aleutian goose. |
|
170 |
Sen. Beyer |
Asks if there is a bill this session to fix the problems with the process of adding or removing species from the list. |
|
172 |
Elicker |
Explains that the ODFW did not bring a bill forward this session. |
|
180 |
Sen. Atkinson |
Verifies that the subset of the Aleutian goose is in Summer Lake. |
|
182 |
Elicker |
Clarifies in the Tillamook area. |
|
187 |
Sen. Atkinson |
Asks what bird species is in Summer Lake. |
|
188 |
Elicker |
Asks if Sen. Atkinson is referring to a Canada goose species or snow geese. |
|
189 |
Sen. Atkinson |
Replies Aleutian geese. |
|
190 |
Elicker |
Discusses snow geese in Summer Lake. |
|
192 |
Sen. Atkinson |
Verifies that it is not the Aleutian geese that fly to Summer Lake. |
|
193 |
Elicker |
Confirms this. |
|
194 |
Sen. Atkinson |
Asks about the health of the Lake County geese. |
|
195 |
Anglin |
Replies they are very healthy. Believes that the sub species that Sen. Atkinson is referring to is the Tule goose. |
|
198 |
Sen. Atkinson |
Asks if the ODFW believes that Summer Lake is healthy. |
|
200 |
Elicker |
Replies yes. Remarks on Mr. Anglin’s comments. Discusses the Tule goose. |
|
207 |
Sen. Atkinson |
Verifies that the ODFW believes that Summer Lake is healthy even though it is drying up. |
|
208 |
Elicker |
Responds. |
|
214 |
Sen. Atkinson |
Asks if the Pacific Flyway Council think that the flyways in Lake and Klamath Counties are healthy. |
|
218 |
Elicker |
Replies yes. |
|
220 |
Sen. Atkinson |
States that he is referring to water fowl in general. |
|
225 |
Chair Ringo |
Asks for there to be quiet in the audience so that Sen. Atkinson can hear this testimony. |
|
228 |
Elicker |
Asks Sen. Atkinson to repeat his question. |
|
230 |
Sen. Atkinson |
Asks if the ODFW believes that the flyways in Warners, Klamath, and Tule Lake are healthy. |
|
234 |
Elicker |
Replies yes. Explains in detail. |
|
247 |
Sen. Atkinson |
Asks if the ODFW is worried that in low water years some of those birds might not be impregnated. |
|
253 |
Elicker |
Responds. |
|
267 |
Chair Ringo |
Asks if witness has seen the proposed amendments. |
|
271 |
Elicker |
Discusses the -2 amendments. |
|
274 |
Chair Ringo |
Believes that it is a matter of process. States SB 2881 as drafted would remove the Aleutian goose from the endangered species list. Points out that the complaint of the ODFW is that they do not have the authority to remove the Aleutian goose from the list and the -2 amendments would give the ODFW that authority. |
|
282 |
Elicker |
Explains the ODFW is seeking to remove the Aleutian goose from the list as quickly as possible. |
|
288 |
Chair Ringo |
Verifies that it would lead to the same result. |
|
289 |
Elicker |
Replies yes. |
|
290 |
Chair Ringo |
Asks witnesses to comment on HJM 5 A. |
|
292 |
Anglin |
Explains HJM 5 A. Submits written testimony (EXHIBIT E). |
|
320 |
Sen. Beyer |
Refers to page 2, subsection 8 of HB 2881. Asks why the commission is not able to remove a species from the list with that language. |
|
330 |
Anglin |
Explains process of delisting. |
|
362 |
Sen. Shields |
Verifies that the -2 amendments would solve the mentioned problem. |
|
363 |
Elicker |
Answers the -2 amendments would not solve the problem Sen. Beyer pointed out, but would allow the commission to remove the Aleutian goose from the state list. |
|
370 |
Stephen Kafoury |
Wildlife Society. Discusses concerns with HB 2881 as originally drafted. Discusses the -2 amendments. |
|
TAPE 98, A |
||
|
008 |
Sen. Beyer |
Discusses concerns. |
|
014 |
Kafoury |
Responds to Sen. Beyer’s concerns. |
|
025 |
Sen. Beyer |
Points out that ODFW said they would work to remove the Aleutian goose from the list as soon as possible, but they did not say they could get it done. Explains there is still a process the ODFW will have to go through. |
|
033 |
Kafoury |
States that there is no one that he knows of that disagrees with the intent of HB 2881. Explains in detail. |
|
047 |
Chair Ringo |
Makes comments. |
|
050 |
Tim Bernasek |
General Counsel, Oregon Farm Bureau. Testifies in support of HJM 5 A. Submits written testimony (EXHIBIT F). |
|
078 |
Sen. Shields |
Asks for clarification on testimony. |
|
081 |
Bernasek |
Provides clarification. |
|
099 |
Chair Ringo |
Closes public hearing on HB 2881 and HJM 5 A. Makes comments. Opens public hearing on HB 2356 A. |
|
HB 2356 A – PUBLIC HEARING |
||
|
|
Matt Shields |
Committee Administrator. Submits the –A4 amendments to HB 2356 A for the record (EXHIBIT G). |
|
108 |
Art Schlack |
Association of Oregon Counties. Testifies in support of HB 2356 A with the –A4 amendments. Explains HB 2356 A. Explains the –A4 amendments. |
|
149 |
Chair Ringo |
Asks if witness is referring to the -A4 amendments. |
|
150 |
Schlack |
Replies yes. Continues explaining the –A4 amendments. States that the Association of Oregon Counties, League of Oregon Cities, Clackamas County, Oregon Home Builders Association, Oregon Realtors Association, Professional Land Surveyors of Oregon, and the Oregon Association of County Engineers and Surveyors all support HB 2356 A with the –A4 amendments. |
|
178 |
Chair Ringo |
Closes public hearing on HB 2356 A and opens work session on HB 2356 A. |
|
HB 2356 A – WORK SESSION |
||
|
180 |
Hal Colven |
Bank of Salem. States support for HB 2356 A. Submits written testimony (EXHIBIT H). |
|
190 |
Sen. Atkinson |
MOTION: Moves to ADOPT HB 2356 A-4 amendments dated 04/26/05. |
|
192 |
|
VOTE: 4-0-1 EXCUSED: 1 - Burdick |
|
|
Chair Ringo |
Hearing no objection, declares the motion CARRIED. |
|
193 |
Sen. Atkinson |
MOTION: Moves HB 2356 A to the floor with a DO PASS AS AMENDED recommendation. |
|
195 |
|
VOTE: 4-0-1 EXCUSED: 1 - Burdick |
|
|
Chair Ringo |
Hearing no objection, declares the motion CARRIED. SEN. BEYER will lead discussion on the floor. |
|
198 |
Chair Ringo |
Closes work session on HB 2356 A and opens public hearing on HB 2755 A. |
|
HB 2755 A – PUBLIC HEARING |
||
|
200 |
Tom Gallagher |
Professional Land Surveyors. Introduces Charles Pearson. |
|
207 |
Charles Pearson |
Oregon Association of County Engineers and Surveyors, and Professional Land Surveyors of Oregon. Explains HB 2755 A. Expresses support for the -2 amendments. Submits written testimony in support of HB 2755 A (EXHIBIT I). |
|
224 |
Sen. Beyer |
States that he has the –A4 amendments, not the -2 amendments. |
|
225 |
Chair Ringo |
States he also has the –A4 amendments. |
|
227 |
Matt Shields |
Clarifies that the –A4 amendments are the amendments being referred to. Submits the –A4 amendments for the record (EXHIBIT J). |
|
230 |
Pearson |
Confirms that he was speaking about the –A4 amendments. Explains the –A4 amendments. |
|
232 |
Chair Ringo |
States that HB 2755 A cannot be moved because a conflict amendment is necessary. |
|
235 |
Gallagher |
Believes all of those concerned with HB 2356 A should look closely at HB 2755 A to avoid potential problems because both bills affect the same sections of statute. |
|
245 |
Chair Ringo |
Closes public hearing on HB 2755 A and opens public hearing on HB 2198. |
|
HB 2198 – PUBLIC HEARING |
||
|
260 |
Mark Simmons |
Government Relations Director, Oregon Association of Nurseries. Testifies in support of HB 2198. |
|
270 |
Chair Ringo |
Closes public hearing on HB 2198 and opens work session on HB 2198. |
|
HB 2198 – WORK SESSION |
||
|
273 |
Sen. Atkinson |
MOTION: Moves HB 2198 to the floor with a DO PASS recommendation. |
|
274 |
Sen. Beyer |
Declares a potential conflict of interest because he is a licensed Christmas tree grower subject to this provision. |
|
278 |
|
VOTE: 4-0-1 EXCUSED: 1 - Burdick |
|
|
Chair Ringo |
Hearing no objection, declares the motion CARRIED. SEN. ATKINSON will lead discussion on the floor. |
|
281 |
Chair Ringo |
Closes public hearing on HB 2198 and opens public hearing on HB 2577 A. |
|
HB 2577 A – PUBLIC HEARING |
||
|
284 |
Dan Hilburn |
Administrator, Plant Division, Oregon Department of Agriculture (ODA). States support for HB 2577 A. Discusses section 1 of HB 2577 A. |
|
311 |
Sen. Atkinson |
Ask what a weed control district is. |
|
312 |
Hilburn |
Explains weed control district. |
|
322 |
Sen. Atkinson |
Verifies that there are weed control districts in the state. |
|
323 |
Hilburn |
Replies yes, and explains the ODA is expecting more to form over time. |
|
324 |
Sen. Atkinson |
Asks if Administrative Rules are necessary to govern the weed control districts. |
|
329 |
Hilburn |
Believes the existing rules are sufficient. |
|
333 |
Sen. Atkinson |
Asks why this issue isn’t being coordinated with the Oregon Department of Fish and Wildlife (ODFW). |
|
340 |
Hilburn |
Replies the ODA works closely with the ODFW on state lands and federal lands. States that the weed experts are primarily in the ODA. |
|
353 |
Sen. Beyer |
Asks if Scotch Broom is on the list. |
|
354 |
Hilburn |
Replies yes. Gives exceptions. |
|
358 |
Sen. Beyer |
Asks what is being done to control it. |
|
359 |
Hilburn |
Discusses controls used for different noxious weeds. |
|
375 |
Sen. Beyer |
Makes comment on Scotch Broom. |
|
378 |
Hilburn |
Comments. |
|
382 |
Sen. Atkinson |
Remarks that the committee passed out SB 570 today and the ODA is using biological agents to control weeds. Asks if this is because they don’t want to spray. |
|
389 |
Hilburn |
Believes them to be different issues. Explains in detail. |
|
400 |
Chair Ringo |
Points out that HB 2577 A requires the ODA to report to the next legislature. Asks if there is a fiscal impact associated with that. |
|
402 |
Hilburn |
Believes it is not significant. Explains the ODA makes an annual report and will include the legislature with a copy of that report. |
|
405 |
Chair Ringo |
Verifies that the ODA does this report anyway and HB 2577 A would not require the ODA to do a new report. |
|
406 |
Hilburn |
States that the report to the legislature will be new, but that the ODA does the report anyway. Believes there to be no significant fiscal impact associated with it. |
|
411 |
Chair Ringo |
Wonders if the ODA will be creating a new product because of HB 2577 A or if HB 2577 A will just require the ODA to make more copies of a report that is already done. |
|
416 |
Hilburn |
States that the ODA will change the cover of the report and put the legislature’s name on it. |
|
420 |
Chair Ringo |
Closes public hearing on HB 2577 A and opens work session on HB 2577 A. |
|
HB 2577 A – WORK SESSION |
||
|
425 |
Sen. Atkinson |
MOTION: Moves HB 2577 A to the floor with a DO PASS recommendation. |
|
430 |
|
VOTE: 4-0-1 EXCUSED: 1 - Burdick |
|
|
Chair Ringo |
Hearing no objection, declares the motion CARRIED. SEN. SHIELDS will lead discussion on the floor. |
|
TAPE 97, B |
||
|
014 |
Chair Ringo |
Closes work session on HB 2577 A and opens public hearing on SB 1061 and HB 2729 A. |
|
SB 1061 AND HB 2729 A – PUBLIC HEARING |
||
|
030 |
Marvin Brown |
Director, Department of Forestry. Submits written testimony on SB 1061 and HB 2729 A, and white paper entitled “Maintaining Working Forestlands with State Forestland Investments for Public Education” (EXHIBIT K). Testifies in support of HB 2729 A. |
|
079 |
Sen. Ben Westlund |
Represents Senate District 27. Testifies in support of HB 2729 A. |
|
116 |
Rep. Gene Whisnett |
Represents House District 53. Testifies in support of HB 2729 A. |
|
133 |
Rep. Chuck Burley |
Represents House District 54. Testifies in support of HB 2729 A. |
|
181 |
Chair Ringo |
Believes this is an interesting concept. Discusses bringing land under public ownership. Asks why witness believes HB 2729 A does not bring land under public ownership. |
|
197 |
Rep. Burley |
Responds. |
|
221 |
Sen. Shields |
Asks how large of a block the witness was referring to. |
|
224 |
Rep. Burley |
Replies. |
|
226 |
Sen. Shields |
Asks if there is a Community Forest Authority like this in any other state. |
|
230 |
Rep. Burley |
Believes California and Washington both have these Community Forest Authorities. Gives example regarding Weyerhaeuser. |
|
239 |
Sen. Shields |
Believes the mentioned attempt by Weyerhaeuser didn’t work. Asks why. |
|
242 |
Rep. Burley |
Explains. |
|
257 |
Sen. Beyer |
Says he has some questions. |
|
258 |
Chair Ringo |
Informs Sen. Beyer that there will be witnesses who will be able to testify on the technical details. |
|
265 |
Sen. Beyer |
Refers to page one of SB 1061. Asks about the return on the investment of the Elliot State Forest to the Common School Fund (CSF). |
|
269 |
Brown |
Discusses recently completed cost benefit study done by Mason, Bruce and Girard on the potential results of the sale of the Elliot State Forest. |
|
279 |
Sen. Beyer |
Appreciates the potential future information. Asks about the current return on the investment of the Elliot State Forest. |
|
280 |
Brown |
Replies approximately 2-2.5 percent. Explains the new plan increases harvest. |
|
284 |
Sen. Beyer |
Believes that number is a little high. Refers to language in section two of SB 1061. Asks if the language includes condemnation. |
|
287 |
Brown |
Explains that was not the intent. |
|
290 |
Sen. Beyer |
Wants to know if that phrase includes condemnation. |
|
295 |
Sen. Beyer |
Refers to language in section three and section eight of SB 1061. Discusses appropriation of funds. Asks about legislative oversight. |
|
303 |
Brown |
Assumes that it would be the way it is now and explains. |
|
308 |
Sen. Beyer |
Refers to language in section three regarding appropriation of funds to students in the Oregon University System. Wonders why community colleges and private schools were not included. |
|
312 |
Brown |
Offers to make an adjustment to SB 1061. |
|
316 |
Sen. Beyer |
Refers to language in section eight of SB 1061 regarding financing. Asks if these would be considered junk bonds because they have no backing. |
|
320 |
Brown |
States he doesn’t know what the technical term for junk bonds implies. Discusses issuance of bonds. |
|
329 |
Sen. Beyer |
Verifies that, according to the way he reads SB 1061, there is no backing of the bonds by the state of Oregon. |
|
330 |
Brown |
Replies that is possible. |
|
332 |
Sen. Beyer |
Refers to language in section two of HB 2729 A which refers to issuing revenue bonds or other obligations. Asks about the term “other obligations”. |
|
339 |
Rep. Burley |
Explains he is not the correct person to answer that question. |
|
345 |
Chair Ringo |
Asks if Sen. Beyer is looking at SB 1061. |
|
346 |
Sen. Beyer |
Replies that he is now looking at HB 2729 A. |
|
347 |
Sen. Beyer |
Refers to language in section five, line 35 of HB 2729 A regarding the administration of the Community Forest Authority and voting to pass a motion. Asks about number of people required to pass a motion. |
|
352 |
Rep. Burley |
States he would have to take a closer look at the language. Remarks the language says the majority of the directors constitutes a quorum. Points out that there may be no fewer than five and no more than eleven members on the Board of Directors. Comments the actual number of people required to pass a motion would depend on how many people were on the Board of Directors. |
|
363 |
Sen. Beyer |
Explains he is asking about the wording of the language. Comments that the language says a majority of the members present and voting are required to pass a motion. Opines that four members could pass a motion on an eleven member board. |
|
373 |
Rep. Burley |
Replies that may be the case. |
|
375 |
Sen. Beyer |
Asks if that is the intent. |
|
378 |
Rep. Burley |
Replies he cannot speak to the intent. Believes that Mr. Tuchmann can answer that. Reiterates that a majority constitutes a quorum and a majority present can pass a motion. States that if there were five members on a board, then three members present could conduct business. |
|
385 |
Sen. Beyer |
Understands. Asks if all three would have to vote in affirmative, or if two of the three could pass a motion. |
|
397 |
Rep. Burley |
Believes two of the three could pass a motion. |
|
400 |
Sen. Beyer |
Confirms that it was set up so a minority of a board could pass motions on behalf of the entire board. |
|
401 |
Rep. Burley |
Replies that appears to be the way it is written. |
|
399 |
Sen. Beyer |
Wants to know if that was the intent or if it was a drafting error. |
|
403 |
Rep. Burley |
States that he cannot address the intent. |
|
409 |
Sen. Beyer |
Asks, as author of HB 2729 A, if that is the way the witness would want HB 2729 A drafted. |
|
TAPE 98, B |
||
|
006 |
Rep. Burley |
Shares that he had no objections to the way it was written. |
|
008 |
Sen. Beyer |
Refers to language in section five regarding interest representation of the Board of Directors. Asks if those terms are defined anywhere. |
|
010 |
Rep. Burley |
Replies no. |
|
012 |
Sen. Beyer |
States that he will defer the rest of his questions until a later time. |
|
021 |
Thomas Tuchmann |
President, US Forest Capital, LLC. Testifies in support of HB 2729 A. Submits written testimony (EXHIBIT L). |
|
066 |
Bill J. Kluting |
Western Council of Industrial Workers. Testifies in support of HB 2729 A. |
|
095 |
Brad Chalfant |
Associate Director, Deschutes Basin Land Trust. Testifies in support of HB 2729 A. |
|
126 |
Chair Ringo |
Asks who owns the Crown Pacific lands mentioned in witness’ testimony. |
|
128 |
Chalfant |
Replies they are held by a holding company composed of the secured creditors of Crown Pacific. |
|
129 |
Chair Ringo |
Wonders about the current development potential of those lands. Asks if there are 360 acres. |
|
133 |
Chalfant |
Replies 240 acres. |
|
134 |
Chair Ringo |
Comments that it can’t be divided down to 10-acre minimums or 5-acre minimums. States that the current status is 240-acre minimums. Asks if it is the witness’ goal to prevent that. |
|
136 |
Chalfant |
Replies yes. |
|
137 |
Chair Ringo |
Verifies that witness believes the 240-acre minimum is too intensive and that will interfere with timber production. |
|
139 |
Chalfant |
Explains that it interferes with the timber production but also the ability to manage the large tracts economically, and the ability to maintain a herd of mule deer. Explains in detail. |
|
161 |
Chair Ringo |
Asks if it is the witness’ intention to pursue acquisition of the Crown Pacific lands if this bill passes. |
|
162 |
Chalfant |
Responds. |
|
167 |
Sen. Beyer |
Notes witness said this was private land and not public land. Asks where in the bill is the prohibition against the Forest Authority issuing bonds and buying the lands. |
|
171 |
Tuchmann |
Discusses amendments adopted in the House committee on HB 2729 A. |
|
177 |
Sen. Beyer |
States that he is looking at the A-engrossed version of HB 2729 and he cannot find any language that refers to assets or portions of the assets owned by the Forest Authority. Wants to know where the specific language is when he has a chance to look at HB 2729 A. |
|
183 |
Tuchmann |
Offers to find the language and explains that was not the intent. |
|
184 |
Sen. Beyer |
Asks if the Forest Authority would have the ability of condemnation. |
|
185 |
Tuchmann |
Replies no. |
|
186 |
Sen. Beyer |
Asks witness to also point out that language. |
|
190 |
Tuchmann |
States that it is not technically in the bill. States that HB 2729 A was drafted on the Hospital Authority’s Act. Explains it is a permissive bill and that the only activity the Authority is allowed to participate in is the issuance of debt. Offers to provide the legal history and rationale for that. |
|
196 |
Sen. Beyer |
Notes the witness said the land has to be managed in order to be a commercial, productive forest. Asks where that language is in the bill. |
|
198 |
Tuchmann |
States that is not in the bill, it is in the financing. Explains these are revenue bonds, not general obligation bonds. Explains in detail. |
|
206 |
Sen. Beyer |
Refers to language in section eight of HB 2729 A. Asks about the term “other revenue obligations”. States witness does not have to answer that question right now. |
|
212 |
Sen. Beyer |
Refers to language in section eight of HB 2729 A regarding the autonomy of a Forest Authority. |
|
223 |
Tuchmann |
Discusses role of a Forest Authority. Discusses financing. |
|
260 |
Sen. Beyer |
Asks about statement made by witness regarding the high turnover of commercial forest lands and lack of interest of industrial companies. |
|
270 |
Tuchmann |
Responds. |
|
294 |
Sen. Beyer |
Asks if the bill as drafted would be limited to land east of the Cascades. |
|
297 |
Tuchmann |
Replies no. |
|
303 |
Greg Miller |
Government Affairs Manager, Weyerhaeuser. Testifies in support of HB 2729 A. |
|
345 |
Chair Ringo |
Asks if witness has a position on SB 1061. |
|
346 |
Miller |
Replies no. |
|
352 |
Chair Ringo |
Closes public hearing on HB 2729 A and SB 1061. Opens public hearing on HB 3349. |
|
HB 3349 – PUBLIC HEARING |
||
|
|
Matt Shields |
Committee Administrator. Submits the -3 amendments to HB 3349 for the record (EXHIBIT M) |
|
360 |
Dave Hunnicutt |
Oregonians In Action (OIA). Defers to Don Schellenberg. |
|
370 |
Don Schellenberg |
Oregon Farm Bureau (OFB). Testifies in support of HB 3349. Submits written testimony (EXHIBIT N). States that the amendments were drafted incorrectly. |
|
395 |
Sen. Beyer |
Asks if the -3 amendments are the amendments the witness is referring to. |
|
399 |
Schellenberg |
Replies yes. |
|
400 |
Sen. Beyer |
Asks if the amendments are a gut and stuff of HB 3349. |
|
401 |
Chair Ringo |
States that the committee just received the -3 amendments. |
|
402 |
Sen. Beyer |
Insists that the -3 amendments are a gut and stuff of HB 3349. |
|
403 |
Schellenberg |
Discusses the intent of the -3 amendments. |
|
408 |
Hunnicutt |
States that the -3 amendments are a gut and stuff of HB 3349. Believes that is not the intention. Expresses support for HB 3349 as drafted. |
|
TAPE 99, A |
||
|
009 |
Sen. Beyer |
Verifies that the OFB and OIA would both be opposed to the -3 amendments. |
|
010 |
Hunnicutt |
Replies yes. |
|
011 |
Schellenberg |
Replies yes. |
|
012 |
Chair Ringo |
Asks who prepared the -3 amendments. |
|
012 |
Shields |
Confirms that Sen. Westlund requested the -3 amendments and explains they were not drafted to his specifications. |
|
014 |
Chair Ringo |
Closes public hearing on HB 3349. Asks staff to list the bills that will be carried over to the next agenda. |
|
016 |
Shields |
Lists SB 699, SB 532, HJM 5 A, HB 2258, HB 2755 A, HB 2881 and HB 3349. |
|
014 |
Chair Ringo |
States the bills that were listed will be carried over to the next meeting scheduled on Thursday, 05/26/2005 at 8:00 a.m. Adjourns the meeting at 9:52 a.m. |
EXHIBIT SUMMARY
A. SB 245, -3 amendments, staff, 2 pp
B. SB 570, -2 amendments, staff, 1 p
C. HB 2881, -2 amendments, staff, 1 p
D. HB 2881, written testimony, Roy Elicker, 3 pp
E. HJM 5 A, written testimony, Ron Anglin, 2 pp
F. HJM 5 A, written testimony, Tim Bernasek, 2 pp
G. HB 2356 A, -A4 amendments, staff, 4 pp
H. HB 2356 A, written testimony, Hal Colven, 2 pp
I. HB 2755 A, written testimony, Charles Pearson, 2 pp
J. HB 2755 A, -A4 amendments, staff, 1 p
K. SB 1061 and HB 2729 A, written testimony, Marvin Brown, 22 pp
L. HB 2729 A, written testimony, Thomas Tuchmann, 6 pp
M. HB 3349, -3 amendments, staff, 35 pp
N. HB 3349, written testimony, Don Schellenberg, 2 pp