SENATE COMMITTEE ON GENERAL GOVERNMENT
March 15, 2005 Hearing Room B
3:10 P.M. Tapes 37 - 38
MEMBERS PRESENT: Sen. Frank Shields, Chair
Sen. Bruce Starr
Sen. Joanne Verger
Sen. Vicki Walker
STAFF PRESENT: Judith Callens, Committee Administrator
Linda K. Gatto, Committee Assistant
MEASURES/ISSUES HEARD:
SB 402 – Public Hearing
SB 856 – Public Hearing and Work Session
SB 67 – Public Hearing and Work Session
SB 316 – Public Hearing and Work Session
SB 563 – Public Hearing
SB 577 – Public Hearing and Work Session
SB 589 – Public Hearing
SB 807 – Public Hearing
These minutes are in compliance with Senate and House Rules. Only text enclosed in quotation marks reports a speaker’s exact words. For complete contents, please refer to the tapes.
|
TAPE/# |
Speaker |
Comments |
|
TAPE 37, A |
||
|
003 |
Chair Shields |
Calls the meeting to order at 3:12 p.m. and opens a public hearing on SB 402. |
|
SB 402 – PUBLIC HEARING |
||
|
014 |
Sen. Ben Westlund |
Senate District 27. Testifies in support of SB 402 and anticipates the amendments will make this an implemental and practical bill. |
|
028 |
Chair Shields |
Confirms that the amendments relate to helping the counties. |
|
029 |
Sen. Westlund |
Clarifies there needs to be an appropriate way of covering costs. |
|
038 |
Chair Shields |
Closes the public hearing on SB 402 and opens the public hearing on SB 856. |
|
SB 856 – PUBLIC HEARING |
||
|
045 |
Judith Callens |
Committee Administrator. Reviews what SB 856 does and states there are no fiscal or revenue impact statements. |
|
051 |
Carol Suzuki |
Salem resident, serving on the Oregon Commission of Asian Affairs since 2001. Provides information on what the commission does. Explains that SB 856 will bring the Oregon Commission of Asian Affairs into alignment with sister commissions; Black Affairs, Hispanic Affairs and the Commission for Women. |
|
066 |
Chair Shields |
Closes the public hearing on SB 856 and opens the work session on SB 856. |
|
SB 856 – WORK SESSION |
||
|
074 |
Sen. George |
MOTION: Moves SB 856 to the floor with a DO PASS recommendation. |
|
077 |
|
VOTE: 4-0-1 EXCUSED: 1 – Walker (*see Tape 38, B #128) |
|
|
Chair Shields |
Hearing no objection, declares the motion CARRIED. SEN. BROWN will lead discussion on the floor. |
|
087 |
Chair Shields |
Closes the work session on SB 856 and opens the public hearing on SB 67. |
|
SB 67 – PUBLIC HEARING |
||
|
089 |
Judith Callens |
Committee Administrator. Explains what SB 67 does and the purpose of the -1 amendments (EXHIBIT A). Adds there are no fiscal or revenue impact statements. |
|
111 |
Irene Zenev |
President, Oregon Museums Association. Submits and reads prepared testimony in support of SB 67 (EXHIBIT B). |
|
168 |
Chair Shields |
Inquires if Ms. Zenev has any comments about the -1 amendments. |
|
169 |
Zenev |
Respond favorably to the amendment. |
|
172 |
Sen. George |
Refers to line four in the -1 amendments and asks if any of the tourism tax flows into these efforts. |
|
180 |
Zenev |
Responds that heritage related tourism is always promoted as an integral part of their business. |
|
187 |
Sen. George |
Asks if this is associated with the statewide tourism effort. |
|
190 |
Zenev |
Responds the brochures are distributed through information centers. |
|
197 |
Sen. Verger |
Asks if there are any public funds in the grants. |
|
202 |
Zenev |
Responds she is not sure. |
|
194 |
James Hamrick |
Deputy State Historic Preservation Officer, Parks and Recreation Department. Responds that the museum grant aid program is funded with lottery funds that go to the Parks and Recreation department. |
|
214 |
Sen. Verger |
Inquires if there is an appeal process if someone is turned down for a grant. |
|
219 |
Hamrick |
Responds that current administrative rules do not have a case before them. Adds that there is a committee that reviews the criteria that has to be met. |
|
235 |
Chair Shields |
Closes the public hearing on SB 67 and opens the work session on SB 67. |
|
SB 67 – WORK SESSION |
||
|
237 |
Sen. George |
MOTION: Moves to ADOPT SB 67-1 amendments dated 2/14/05. |
|
|
|
VOTE: 4-0-1 EXCUSED: 1 – Walker |
|
|
Chair Shields |
Hearing no objection, declares the motion CARRIED. |
|
243 |
Sen. George |
MOTION: Moves SB 67 to the floor with a DO PASS AS AMENDED recommendation. |
|
246 |
Sen. Verger |
Asks since the funds are coming from Parks and Recreation Department funds, would an appeal process be required. |
|
250 |
Hamrick |
Responds that just about every decision is appealable but he is not aware if there is a formal process. Speculates that if the bill passes an appeals process will be set up if it does not already exist in rule. |
|
270 |
|
VOTE: 5-0-0 AYE: In a roll call vote, all members present vote Aye. |
|
|
Chair Shields |
The motion CARRIES. SEN. GEORGE will lead discussion on the floor. |
|
278 |
Chair Shields |
Closes the work session on SB 67 and opens the public hearing on SB 316. |
|
SB 316 – PUBLIC HEARING |
||
|
300 |
Judith Callens |
Reviews what SB 316 and the -1 amendments (EXHIBIT C). States there are no fiscal or revenue statements. |
|
304 |
Sandra Bishop |
Fair Competition Alliance. Requests that contracts that go directly to non-profits not be excluded from the competitive bid process (EXHIBIT D). |
|
356 |
Sen. B. Starr |
Clarifies that there is no fiscal statement on SB 316. Ask how many agencies would have to go through a rule making process with the advocate. |
|
362 |
Callens |
Clarifies there is no fiscal or revenue on the original bill. With the amendments the typical impact will be $5,000 for each agency having to go through the administrative rule process. |
|
376 |
Chair Shields |
Asks if the Department of Administrative Services (DAS) handles the majority. |
|
386 |
Callens |
Responds that the amendments take DAS out of the process. |
|
395 |
Sen. B. Starr |
Suggests referring the bill to the Committee of Ways and Means. |
|
414 |
Chair Shields |
Closes the public hearing on SB 316 (*see Tape 38, A #343). Opens the public hearing on SB 563. |
|
TAPE 38, A |
||
|
SB 563 – PUBLIC HEARING |
||
|
009 |
Judith Callens |
Committee Administrator. Reviews SB 563. States that the cities are opposed to the concept in general. Explains what the cities want in an amendment. |
|
020 |
John Popenuk |
Supervisor, City of Portland, Bureau of Utilities Customer Services. Submits and reads prepared testimony opposing SB 563 as written (EXHIBIT E). |
|
021 |
Chair Shields |
Asks if there are occasions when the previous occupant may still be living in the residence and only the billing information was changed. |
|
028 |
Popenuk |
Responds this is sometimes the case. |
|
048 |
Sen. Verger |
Confirms there is a process when the bill is not paid the water is shut off. |
|
055 |
Popenuk |
Explains that most customers will notify whether or not they are taking responsibility for the bill. Explains there are a significant number ofcustomers that have service restored in a roommate’s name. |
|
090 |
Sen. Verger |
Provides a scenario where a landlord prepares an apartment for a new tenant and has to pay the water bill of the previous tenant. |
|
092 |
Popenuk |
Responds as of today, even with an outstanding bill, the water service would be restored if it was established this is a totally new tenant. |
|
093 |
Sen. George |
Comments on water being an elemental need. Asks what is wrong with the legislature believing that there needs to be a legitimate reason to not supply a new tenant with water. |
|
112 |
Popenuk |
Responds that this occurs in single family rentals. States there are certain properties have a history of people moving in and out, creating an unfair burden on other rate payers. Explains that the city believes the owner should pay the bill before a new tenant can move in. |
|
138 |
Chair Shields |
Recaps for Sen. Beyer that Mr. Popenuk stated he was unaware of what brought this bill forward and updates Sen. Beyer on the testimony. |
|
157 |
Sen. Roger Beyer |
Senate District 9. Responds that the bill was introduced at the request of a constituent in August/September 2003 from rural Clackamas County. |
|
199 |
Sen. Beyer |
Submits prepared testimony from Willie Tiffany (EXHIBIT F). |
|
214 |
Popenuk |
Responds that the Portland Water Bureau has an appeal process in place. Reiterates that in certain cases the landlord should pay the bill before a new tenant occupies the residence. |
|
245 |
Chair Shields |
Asks what is fair about a new tenant, with no ties or knowledge of the previous tenant, moving into a residence and not being able to obtain water. |
|
234 |
Sen. Beyer |
Responds that a new tenant often needs to come up with first, last and a security deposit and then discovers there is no water. |
|
256 |
Chair Shields |
States there needs to be a system that works for everyone. |
|
270 |
Popenuk |
States that at the present time if it is determined that a totally different entity is moving into the property, water will be restored. |
|
285 |
Sen. George |
Reiterates the public safety issue of the basic need of water. Asks what the time frame is for when water service is guaranteed. |
|
300 |
Popenuk |
Answers when it is determined that the occupancy is a different person the water is turned on the same day. |
|
336 |
Chair Shields |
Requests that the League of Cities and Portland address the issue with Sen. Beyer and Ms. Callens. Closes the public hearing on SB 563 and opens the work session on SB 316. |
|
SB 316 – WORK SESSION |
||
|
343 |
Judith Callens |
States that Legislative Fiscal Office would like time to investigate the process and provide an estimate. Explains why. |
|
341 |
Chair Shields |
Closes the public hearing on SB 316 and opens the public hearing on SB 577. |
|
SB 577 – PUBLIC HEARING |
||
|
360 |
Judith Callens |
Committee Administrator. Reviews SB 577 and the -2 amendments (EXHIBIT G). |
|
420 |
Keith Adams |
Business Manager, State Library. Submits prepared testimony from Jim Scheppke in support of SB 577 (EXHIBIT H). |
|
443 |
Joe McKeever |
Legal Council, Oregon State Library. States this bill is intended to establish and affirm a formula that has been used since 1995 that allocates costs among state agencies. States that the -2 amendments clarify that the change would apply only to the State Library. |
|
475 |
Joe Stephen |
State Law Library. Supports the -2 amendments stating that the bill as originally written made a change that was not needed; they prefer to maintain the status-quo. |
|
TAPE 37, B |
||
|
034 |
Chair Shields |
Closes the public hearing SB 577 and opens the work session on SB 577. |
|
SB 577 – WORK SESSION |
||
|
037 |
Sen. B. Starr |
MOTION: Moves to ADOPT SB 577-2 amendments dated 3/10/05. |
|
038 |
|
VOTE: 4-0-1 EXCUSED: 1 - George |
|
|
Chair Shields |
Hearing no objection, declares the motion CARRIED. |
|
041 |
Sen. B. Starr |
MOTION: Moves SB 577 to the floor with a DO PASS AS AMENDED recommendation. |
|
039 |
Callens |
States for the record that the fiscal impact would be a minimal impact or no impact with the amendment. |
|
049 |
|
VOTE: 5-0-0 |
|
|
Chair Shields |
Hearing no objection, declares the motion CARRIED. SEN. B. STARR will lead discussion on the floor. |
|
051 |
Chair Shields |
Closes the work session on SB 577 and opens the public hearing on SB 589. |
|
SB 589 – PUBLIC HEARING |
||
|
050 |
Judith Callens |
Committee Administrator. Reviews what SB 589 does and that there is a request from the Legislative Fiscal Office that this be referred to the Committee on Ways and Means. |
|
068 |
Chair Shields |
States that a few years ago this concept did not have a fiscal impact. Request information on why it does now. |
|
070 |
Tom Hughes |
Legislative Fiscal Office. Explains that HB 3740 (2001) and SB 589 both require a clerk training program. The responsible vendor program was enacted in 1999 and the Oregon Liquor Control Commission (OLCC) was still accessing the workload. Reviews the fiscal impact statement (EXHIBIT I). |
|
118 |
Sen. Verger |
States the purpose of the responsible vendor program. Refers to the statement that it would be unlawful to dismiss an employee that had not completed the program. |
|
138 |
Hughes |
Responds this is the information that was received from the Bureau of Labor and Industries (BOLI). |
|
158 |
Marc Zolton |
Legislative Director, BOLI. States that based on their analysis, this would create a new unlawful employment practice that does not exist at this time and would force them to have .45 FTE in the 2005/2007 biennium and .60 FTE in the 2007/2009 biennium. Expects a best estimate of 80 cases a year. |
|
194 |
Sen. Verger |
Refers back to how the sentence reads, wonders if it should read the employee “had” completed the program. |
|
197 |
Jon Stubenvoll |
Responds that SB 589 creates a new piece in statute about workplace employment. The responsible vendor program protects the liquor license holder but there is nothing in current statute that protects the employee who sells the alcohol to the minor. |
|
213 |
Sen. Verger |
Confirms if the employee goes through the training, they don’t get fired the first time. |
|
232 |
Stubenvoll |
Answers that today there is no such piece in statute; the program is designed to protect the employer from losing the liquor license. |
|
247 |
Chair Shields |
Inquires if the committee wants this bill to go to the Committee on Ways and Means. |
|
260 |
Sen. Verger |
States that the responsible vendor is a good program and she was under the impression there was a benefit to the employee as well as the employer. |
|
270 |
Steve Langley |
AFL-CIO. States that this is a second attempt to pass this bill. Explains the intent is to protect and train grocery clerks to keep alcohol out of the hands of minors. There is no protection for the clerks; if they make a mistake they loose their job. |
|
288 |
Sen. George |
Asks why not say that every employee has an opportunity to participate in the program and if they do they can not be fired on the first offense. |
|
275 |
Langley |
Responds that they are willing to look at options. |
|
300 |
Sen. Walker |
Asks about the other bills addressing this. |
|
306 |
Langley |
Responds there is a bill that will have amendments that decriminalize the first offense making it a violation for the grocery clerk. Adds there is a bill on the House side regarding training for new employees. |
|
311 |
Sen. Walker |
States the goal is to protect the grocery clerks. |
|
337 |
Sen. Verger |
States the responsible vendor program is a good program; clerks should be trained and not fired if they make one mistake. |
|
319 |
Chair Shields |
States there is sensitivity to fiscal expenses. |
|
335 |
Langley |
Comments that this could be amended. |
|
387 |
Sen. Walker |
Refers to March 1 testimony and disagrees with the statement that this would erode “zero tolerance.” Closes the public hearing on SB 589 opens the public hearing on SB 807. |
|
SB 807 – PUBLIC HEARING |
||
|
405 |
Judith Callens |
Committee Administrator. Reviews SB 807. |
|
412 |
Catherine Webber |
Technology Analyst, Department of Administrative Services (DAS). Submits prepared testimony providing background information (EXHIBIT J). Explains the reason DAS is suggesting to delay this bill until next session when the technology and business models have matured. |
|
TAPE 38, B |
||
|
014 |
Sen. George |
Refers to a conversation earlier in the day. |
|
028 |
Weber |
Responds that SB 160 deals with setting up campaign and finance reporting. The text of the bill requires that it be provided free of charge. |
|
038 |
Jim Thompson |
Office of Senator Gary George. States the origin of the bill came from constituent complaints concerning the Secretary of State’s program for reporting campaign expenses and activities and in looking ahead at the agricultural pesticide reporting requirements. Explains the purpose of the legislation. States no objection to delaying this until next session. |
|
074 |
Sen. George |
Concurs in holding this until next session with a commitment to move forward with addressing the issue and making it user friendly. |
|
089 |
Webber |
Clarifies that the state would make every effort possible to ensure that the interfaces and uses are as easy and inexpensive as possible. Suggests that the debate of how and when fees could be charged is two years down the road. |
|
108 |
Sen. George |
Concurs and looks forward to a progress report. |
|
113 |
Sen. Verger |
Comments in opposition to people who use the computer being charged less than those who do not. |
|
125 |
Chair Shields |
Closes the public hearing on SB 807. Opens a work session for the purpose of suspending the rules to allow Sen. Walker to record her vote on SB 856. |
|
*WORK SESSION |
||
|
128 |
Sen. Shields |
MOTION: Moves to SUSPEND the rules for the purpose of allowing Sen. Walker to record a vote on moving SB 856 to the floor with a DO PASS recommendation. |
|
128 |
|
VOTE: 5-0-0 |
|
|
Chair Shields |
Hearing no objection, declares the motion CARRIED. |
|
133 |
|
AYE: Sen. Walker votes Aye. VOTE: 5-0-0 |
|
136 |
Chair Shields |
Closes the work session. Announces that SAIF and Liberty are having discussions and will come before the committee on Thursday. |
|
159 |
Sen. Walker |
Comments on amendments regarding SB 752. |
|
167 |
Chair Shields |
Adjourns the meeting at 5:20 p.m. |
EXHIBIT SUMMARY