SENATE COMMITTEE ON GENERAL GOVERNMENT
March 22, 2005 Hearing Room B
3:10 P.M. Tapes 41 - 45
MEMBERS PRESENT: Sen. Frank Shields, Chair
Sen. Bruce Starr
Sen. Joanne Verger
Sen. Vicki Walker
MEMBER EXCUSED: Sen. Gary George, Vice-Chair
STAFF PRESENT: Judith Callens, Committee Administrator
Linda K. Gatto, Committee Assistant
MEASURES/ISSUES HEARD:
SB 156 – Work Session
SB 706 – Work Session – Invited Testimony
SB 835 – Public Hearing and Work Session
SB 889 – Public Hearing
SB 929 – Public Hearing
These minutes are in compliance with Senate and House Rules. Only text enclosed in quotation marks reports a speaker’s exact words. For complete contents, please refer to the tapes.
|
TAPE/# |
Speaker |
Comments |
|
TAPE 41, A |
||
|
005 |
Chair Shields |
Calls the meeting to order at 3:15 p.m. Announces that SB 964 has been moved to Thursday’s meeting and SB 590 has been removed. Opens a work session on SB 156. |
|
SB 156 – WORK SESSION |
||
|
028 |
Catherine Pollino |
Secretary of State Audits Division. Explains that SB 156 provides a funding mechanism and clarifies that all funding sources that go to school districts can be audited. Explains that the -1 amendments (EXHIBIT A) clarify that these are performance audits and not financial statement opinion audits. Adds that the amendments establish an advisement committee and has a sunset provision. |
|
058 |
Sen. Walker |
Asks if there are objections to the -1 amendments. |
|
065 |
Pollino |
Responds that the amendments address the concerns they felt could be addressed. |
|
072 |
Sen. Walker |
Asks how much does the audit cost and how is it paid. |
|
073 |
Pollino |
Responds that SB 156 does not require a certain level of audit work and does not have a fiscal impact. Explains there is a program option package which would provide additional resources to the work or the current resources could be used but using current resources would take away from another agency audits. |
|
079 |
Chair Shields |
Comments that this is more of a funding issue. |
|
105 |
Sen. B. Starr |
Reiterates there is not a fiscal impact. |
|
101 |
Judith Callens |
Committee Administrator. Summarizes the Legislative Fiscal and Revenue impact statements (EXHIBIT B). |
|
114 |
Sen. B. Starr |
Asks if the measure has a referral to the Committee on Ways and Means. |
|
115 |
Chair Shields |
Responds no it does not. Explains that this measure attempts to create a system where no local school district gets caught with an audit. |
|
128 |
Sen. B. Starr |
Asks if there has been consideration given to marring the bill to a policy option package. |
|
130 |
Pollino |
Explains the reason for keeping them separate. |
|
137 |
Chair Shields |
Clarifies that this is like assessments in other departments but this system has not been in the public school system. |
|
151 |
Pollino |
Answers affirmatively. |
|
154 |
Sen. B. Starr |
Comments that one way or the other the money will be coming from limited resources and suggests that the Committee on Ways and Means consider the bill. |
|
162 |
Sen. Walker |
Inquires if school districts have been billed in past audits. |
|
178 |
Pollino |
Responds this happened in Klamath Falls many years ago and created a large problem as an audit cost was not anticipated. |
|
192 |
Sen. Walker |
Asks do ESDs have local CPAs doing the financial audits. |
|
199 |
Pollino |
Answers yes. |
|
200 |
Sen. Verger |
Wonders if the focus should be to help the schools and have the legislature become more efficient. |
|
207 |
Pollino |
Responds that performance audits encompass a wide variety of topics that would allow for looking at best practices. |
|
220 |
Sen. Walker |
MOTION: Moves to ADOPT SB 156-1 amendments dated 3/16/05. |
|
222 |
|
VOTE: 4-0-1 EXCUSED: 1 - George |
|
|
Chair Shields |
Hearing no objection, declares the motion CARRIED. |
|
224 |
Sen. Walker |
MOTION: Moves B 156 be sent to the floor with a BE ADOPTED AS AMENDED recommendation. |
|
231 |
Sen. B. Starr |
States that he will be a no vote based on the fiscal and revenue impact statements and believes the bill should be referred to the Committee on Ways and Means. |
|
245 |
Chair Shields |
Agrees that money will come from either point A as an assessment or point B as a local school district budget. |
|
253 |
Sen. Walker |
Acknowledges Sen. B. Starr’s concerns and states that transparent and accountable government is a common goal. Supports the bill. |
|
256 |
|
VOTE: 3-1-1 AYE: 3 - Verger, Walker, Shields NAY: 1 - Starr B. EXCUSED: 1 – George |
|
262 |
Chair Shields |
The motion CARRIES. SEN. SHIELDS will lead discussion on the floor. |
|
263 |
Chair Shields |
Closes the work session on SB 156 and opens the work session on SB 706 and invites testimony from Senator Carter and Representative Hansen. |
|
SB 706 – WORK SESSION – INVITED TESTIMONY |
||
|
269 |
Judith Callens |
Committee Administrator. Explains what SB 706 does. States that the -1 and -2 amendments (EXHIBIT C) were worked out Housing and Urban Development (HUD). |
|
287 |
Sen. Margaret Carter |
Senate District 22. States that last session this concept was voted unanimously in the Senate. Submits and reads prepared testimony in support of SB 706 (EXHIBIT D). |
|
361 |
Chair Shields |
Asks if there has been any substantial change that would influence the vote outcome of the previous session. |
|
363 |
Sen. Carter |
Responds there was an issue of this bill being a vehicle for other legislation. Expresses that the current administration has looked at this issue very seriously and Oregonians are human rights oriented. |
|
388 |
Sen. Walker |
Inquires if SB 706 is identical to the bill last session. |
|
389 |
Sen. Carter |
Responds that the realtors’ wanted an amendment regarding tax credits. |
|
412 |
Mark Kirchmeier |
Testifies on behalf of Representative Gary Hansen in support of enforcing antidiscrimination laws in housing. |
|
431 |
Dan Gardner |
Commissioner, Bureau of Labor and Industries. Submits prepared testimony in support of SB 706 (EXHIBIT E) plus a copy of the hand engrossed bill (EXHIBIT F). |
|
TAPE 42, A |
||
|
010 |
Gardner |
States there were three elements to the bill last session: substantially equivalent, a City of Portland tax credit, and facially neutral policies. |
|
030 |
Annette Talbott |
Deputy Labor Commissioner, Bureau of Labor and Industries (BOLI). States that the -2 amendments include the -1 amendments and is included in the hand engrossed version (EXHIBIT F). Talks about the technical amendment. Refers to the technical amendments on page 11. Reviews the bracketed sections that refer to facially neutral policies. |
|
058 |
Sen. B. Starr |
Asks why is the enforcement on BOLI and not Oregon Housing and Community Services. |
|
064 |
Gardner |
Responds bill is sponsored by Senator Carter, Representatives Hansen and Shields at the request of Housing and Community Services. States that BOLI has the experience and expertise to do discrimination investigations. |
|
071 |
Amy Klare |
Administrator Civil Rights Division. States there will be testimony regarding fair housing being a three legged stool: BOLI in regard to enforcement, Fair Housing in regard to outreach and investigations and the State Housing Council regarding statewide housing plans. |
|
087 |
Matt Farmer |
General Counsel Oregon Association of Realtors. States their interest is in only the provisions explained by BOLI that could be removed without changing the bill making Oregon law consistent with federal law. |
|
126 |
Farmer |
Explains how the evidentiary issue can be a problem. |
|
137 |
Pegge McGuire |
Executive Director, Fair Housing Council of Oregon. Tells of recent instances of discrimination. Submits a brochure and reads prepared testimony in support of SB 706 (EXHIBIT G). |
|
219 |
Sen. Verger |
Comments illegality of discrimination. |
|
238 |
Jeanne Arana |
Community Resources Administrator, Oregon Housing and Community Services (OHCS). Submits and reads prepared testimony in support of SB 706 (EXHIBIT H). |
|
295 |
Chair Shields |
States that SB 706 needs to be finalized. Closes the invited testimony and closes the work session on SB 706. Opens the public hearing on SB 835. |
|
|
The following material is submitted for record without public testimony (EXHIBIT I) City of Portland Bureau of Housing and Community Development, William L. White, Director. |
|
|
SB 835 – PUBLIC HEARING |
||
|
298 |
Judith Callens |
Committee Administrator. Reviews the provisions of SB 835. |
|
316 |
Xochitl Esparza |
Service Employees International Union, Local 503. Submits and reads prepared testimony in support of SB 835 and a copy of the Department of Revenue’s information on personal income tax in Spanish (EXHIBIT J). |
|
351 |
Chair Shields |
Confirms that the caucus is spread over many governmental departments. |
|
378 |
Esparza |
Responds affirmatively. |
|
373 |
Juliana Avila |
(Esparza translates) Describes a situation where she had to resolve tax issues and no one spoke Spanish. |
|
405 |
Maria Barba |
Resident of Independence. Submits and reads prepared testimony in support of SB 835 (EXHIBIT K) and notes that she is representing herself. |
|
TAPE 41, B |
||
|
023 |
Sen. Walker |
Confirms that the forms are not easy and citizens are being deprived of filing their own tax returns because these documents are not in their own language. |
|
030 |
Barba |
Responds affirmatively. |
|
050 |
Susan Browning |
Deputy Director, Department of Revenue. Submits (EXHIBIT L) which is an example of what is currently available on the Department of Revenue web site. Expresses concerns and states there is more involved than simply translating the language. |
|
084 |
Browning |
Notes there are other populations that are not Spanish speaking. Notes the implementation of SB 835, in the timeline noted in the bill, is a resource issue. |
|
118 |
Chair Shields |
Asks why would the request to a return and demand to file a return forms be translated before a 40S form. |
|
120 |
Browning |
Responds the intention is to translate the forms as well as the booklet and notices in Spanish. |
|
140 |
Chair Shields |
States it seems backward that there is a demand to file a return but a Spanish speaking person can not access a form in Spanish. |
|
156 |
Browning |
Responds that the multilingual committee suggested that these forms be done first based on where the demand and issues are. |
|
162 |
Chair Shields |
Asks for a response to Ms. Avila’s testimony regarding no one being available who could speak Spanish. Asks if the 11 Spanish speaking people in the office all agents. |
|
183 |
Browning |
Answers no, some are tax auditors, tax payer assistance and collections of delinquent tax dept. |
|
186 |
Chair Shields |
Asks how many of the 11 would be out front to assist those customers who cannot speak English. |
|
189 |
Browning |
Answers there are two in the Salem office, one in Medford and one in Portland. |
|
195 |
Sen. B. Starr |
Asks if they have the authority to this without this bill. |
|
210 |
Browning |
Responds affirmatively. |
|
213 |
Sen. B. Starr |
Asks does the department have a plan to develop these forms in Spanish. |
|
220 |
Browning |
Responds affirmatively. |
|
231 |
Sen. B. Starr |
Asks if the department employs people to speak to other second language speakers. |
|
234 |
Browning |
Responds there is a list of employees that are fluent in other languages. Other languages include Russian, Vietnamese, Laotian, Korean, and Chinese. |
|
241 |
Chair Shields |
Asks of these languages which is the largest population and how does it compare with the Latino population. |
|
245 |
Browning |
Responds Russian although smaller than the Hispanic population is centralized in certain parts of the state. |
|
252 |
Browning |
Responds it has been estimated that the expected number of returns filed by Latino Oregonians ages 15 – 64 speaking Spanish as a primary language is 115,000. |
|
256 |
Chair Shields |
Comments that 9% of Oregonians are Latino. |
|
258 |
Sen. Walker |
Comments that the Latino population is the fastest growing population in Oregon. |
|
266 |
Chair Shields |
Recesses the public hearing on SB 835. Opens the public hearing on SB 889 and SB 929. |
|
SB 889 PUBLIC HEARING |
||
|
291 |
Rep. Jackie Dingfelder |
House District 45. Submits and reads written testimony in support of SB 889 (EXHIBIT M). |
|
317 |
Chair Shields |
Closes the public hearing on SB 889 and reopens the public hearing on SB 835. |
|
SB 835 – PUBLIC HEARING |
||
|
354 |
Gabriel Silva |
Citizen. Comments on the translation services he has provided in various jobs and personal circumstances. Supports SB 835 as a first step in assisting a better understanding of laws and requirements. |
|
375 |
Sen. Verger |
Asks should every document printed in English be printed in Spanish. |
|
384 |
Silva |
Responds no, but believes critical documents should be. |
|
301 |
Sen. Verger |
Asks is it more of an educational process rather than just a translation of the forms. |
|
405 |
Silva |
Answers critical documents would provide basic information that would generate questions. |
|
446 |
Chair Shields |
Asks is this a pilot project. |
|
456 |
Browning |
Responds that this has already been happening in various state agencies. |
|
458 |
Chair Shields |
Asks if the Department of Revenue is performing as well as other state agencies. |
|
461 |
Browning |
Responds that there is a lot more that can be done. |
|
TAPE 42, B |
||
|
021 |
Sen. Walker |
Asks are these efforts that other state agencies are doing mandated by federal or state government. |
|
026 |
Silva |
Answers there are federal laws that require it if federal funds are being received. |
|
056 |
Sen. Walker |
Comments on the availability of language translation in the courts. |
|
062 |
Joe Schaeffer |
Service Employees International Union Local 503 (SEIU). Points out that this is also a work load issue. Supports SB 835. |
|
080 |
Sen. Walker |
Asks if it is the same individuals that are affected by the workload also the community volunteers. |
|
083 |
Schaeffer |
Responds affirmatively. |
|
087 |
Sen. Walker |
States the Latino population wants to be good citizens but are limited by the ability to read the documents. |
|
100 |
Chair Shields |
Closes the public hearing on SB 835 and opens the work session on SB 835. |
|
SB 835 – WORK SESSION |
||
|
111 |
Sen. Walker |
MOTION: Moves SB 835 to the floor with a DO PASS recommendation and BE REFERRED to the committee on Ways and Means by prior reference. |
|
102 |
Sen. Verger |
Expresses that there are many multicultural dialects and comments on other ways that community groups help others. |
|
134 |
Sen. Starr |
Concurs with Sen. Verger that there is a lot of diversity in Oregon. Asks if this is done for one shouldn’t it be done for all. |
|
145 |
|
VOTE: 4-0-1 EXCUSED: 1 - Sen. George |
|
|
Chair Shields |
Hearing no objection, declares the motion CARRIED. |
|
149 |
Chair Shields |
Requests that the Department of Revenue contact him to discuss these issues. |
|
151 |
Sen. Walker |
Suggest having discussions with the Attorney General to see what are the responsibilities of the various departments to provide documents to the Spanish speaking population. |
|
159 |
Chair Shields |
Closes the work session on SB 835 and opens the public hearing on SB 889 and SB 929. |
|
SB 889 AND SB 929 PUBLIC HEARING |
||
|
188 |
Carolyn Reeves |
Submits and reads prepared testimony in opposition to SB 889 describing the greyhound adoption process (EXHIBIT N). |
|
266 |
Jeffery Yen |
Law Student and employee of the Humane Society. States that a ban on greyhound racing is unreasonable. Provides information on the welfare of greyhounds in Oregon. Refers to correspondence from Dr. Hultine Oregon Racing Commission Staff Veterinarian to Lisa Schaffer MGP Track Superintendent (EXHIBIT KK). |
|
|
Prepared testimony in support submitted for the record without public testimony by Kelly Peterson (EXHIBIT LL). |
|
|
323 |
Dr. Linda Blythe |
Corvallis. Submits prepared testimony in opposition to SB 889 (EXHIBIT O) and passes around text books. Summarizes that her work has been in education and research to promote the breed. |
|
464 |
Sen. Verger |
Asks if there is a possibility that a track could be provided and recover racing for dogs. |
|
470 |
Blythe |
Responds that there is an interested party and believes it could be economical. |
|
TAPE 43, A |
||
|
054 |
Connie Theil |
Submits prepared testimony in support of SB 889 and a copy of correspondence from The American Society for the Prevention of Cruelty to Animals (ASPCA). Explains that greyhound racing is a web, a profit-driven industry and believes that dog racing should be banned (EXHIBIT P). |
|
124 |
Suzzette Vedder |
Submits prepared testimony in support of SB 889 (EXHIBIT Q). |
|
152 |
Matt Rossell |
In Defense of Animals. Submits prepared testimony in support of SB 889 narrating headlines documenting violations and scandals in the greyhound industry (EXHIBIT R). |
|
208 |
Chair Shields |
Asks have Oregonians voted with their wallet because of cruelty to the dogs or because of the diversity of gambling opportunities. Asks for what reasons has greyhound racing been outlawed in other states. |
|
223 |
Rossell |
Responds that he believes there is a growing concern in the community and an awareness of the abuses. |
|
225 |
Theil |
Concurs that people are learning about dog racing. |
|
240 |
Sen. B. Starr |
Asks if In Defense of Animals objects to horse racing and dog sled racing. |
|
243 |
Rossell |
Answers affirmatively. |
|
244 |
Sen. B. Starr |
Asks what about dogs trained for hunting. |
|
245 |
Rossell |
Responds that officially there is not a campaign against individual hunters nor against dog sled racing. . |
|
275 |
Connie B. Durkee |
Submits and reads prepared testimony in support of SB 889 (EXHIBIT S). |
|
291 |
Shelby Knife |
North Portland resident. Submits prepared testimony in support of SB 889 narrating the reasons why racing greyhounds are not bred to be pets (EXHIBIT T). |
|
331 |
Nancy Sussman Fugit |
Submits prepared testimony in support of SB 889 narrating the cruelty of the sport (EXHBIT U). |
|
363 |
Chair Shields |
Asks where did the information on Ronald Rhodes killing 3,000 dogs come from. |
|
364 |
Sussman-Fugit |
Answers that it came from Oregon Defenders of Greyhounds (ORDOG) and was also well published. |
|
362 |
Cheryl K. Lund |
Submits and reads written testimony in support of SB 889 narrating the cruelty of breeding dogs for racing (EXHIBIT V). |
|
418 |
Brian Lee |
Submits prepared testimony in opposition to SB 889 narrating the merits of greyhound racing and how it differs from other forms of gambling (EXHIBIT W). |
|
TAPE 44, A |
||
|
070 |
Eileen Marr |
West Linn resident. Submits and summarizes prepared testimony in support of SB 889 narrating pet overpopulation and inhumane treatment (EXHIBIT X). |
|
115 |
Chelsea Chilcoat |
Portland resident. Submits and reads prepared testimony in support of SB 889 narrating the low quality of food that is fed to racing dogs (EXHIBIT Y). |
|
146 |
Heather Hines |
Indigo Rescue. Submits prepared testimony and news articles narrating information on the Ronald Floyd incident (EXHIBIT Z). |
|
180 |
Steve Herrington |
Portland resident. Submits prepared testimony in support of SB 889 and emphasizes the mistreatment of greyhounds (EXHIBIT AA). |
|
200 |
Diane Kippes |
Submits prepared testimony and injury documentation. Urges support to ban greyhound racing (EXHIBIT BB). |
|
210 |
Penny Troolin |
Lake Oswego resident. Summarizes prepared testimony in support of SB 889 and notes the inclusion of the history of greyhound racing in Oregon (EXHIBIT CC). |
|
274 |
Sen. B. Starr |
Asks if she feels the same way about horse racing. |
|
256 |
Troolin |
Responds that her knowledge is in dog racing and does not have an opinion on horse racing. |
|
268 |
Sydney Most |
Submits prepared testimony in support of SB 889 (EXHIBIT DD). |
|
308 |
Paul Romain |
Attorney in Portland representing the Oregon Greyhound Association. States preference to hear the amended version of SB 929. |
|
341 |
Dave Nelson |
Magna Entertainment Corp. Submits and reviews page one of prepared testimony on SB 929 (EXHBIT EE). |
|
434 |
Scott Daruty |
Chief Counsel for Magna Entertainment Corp. Provides an overview of Magna Entertainment Corp. and the reasons Magna chose to enter the Oregon market. States that $21 million has been invested and projections are that losses will continue. |
|
TAPE 43, B |
||
|
074 |
Daruty |
Reviews accomplishments and defines “export handles” which has increased by 275%. States that in the last five years, dollars wagered by people in Oregon dropped off 25% to date. |
|
083 |
Chair Shields |
Asks if this is an indication of competition with other forms of gambling in Oregon. |
|
091 |
Daruty |
Responds there is competition from growth in video lottery and Indian casinos. |
|
124 |
Daruty |
Refers to purse agreement discussions with greyhound owners and the acknowledgment that the race track was losing money and that without a subsidy by the racetrack greyhound racing is economically infeasible. |
|
151 |
Daruty |
Continues, stating that year round simulcasting and year round off-track wagering will maintain the horseracing industry. |
|
203 |
Chair Shields |
Announces that SB 556 will be rescheduled. |
|
220 |
Daruty |
Concludes testimony. |
|
242 |
Gary Martin |
President, Oregon Thoroughbred Owners and Breeders Association. Testifies in support of SB 929. Submits and summarizes prepared testimony of Ursula V. Gibbons in support of SB 929 (EXHIBIT FF). |
|
254 |
Jack Root |
Provides a personal background on experience with the horseracing industry. |
|
324 |
David R. Benson |
President, Oregon Horseman’s Benevolent & Protective Association. Submits prepared testimony in support of SB 929 (EXHIBIT GG) narrating the benefits of horse racing at Portland Meadows. |
|
405 |
John McCulley |
Oregon Fairs Association. Submits prepared testimony in support of SB 929 and the impact that horseracing has on not-for-profit local race meets in Burns, Tillamook, Prineville, Grants Pass and Union (EXHIBIT HH). |
|
456 |
Sen. B. Starr |
Confirms there is a reliance on horseracing in Oregon and not that there is a cash incentive. |
|
462 |
McCulley |
Answers there is cut from the handle at the racing site but not at Portland Meadows. |
|
TAPE 44, B |
||
|
014 |
Sen. B. Starr |
Clarifies that they need the horses and would not be able to draw those owners for the small races. |
|
030 |
Steve Walters |
Chair, Oregon Racing Commission. States that without simulcasting there would be no racing in Oregon. States that even if the simulcasting was divided between the greyhound meet and the horse meet it will not support two significant commercial race meets in Oregon. Expresses concern that if the horse track goes away and someone wants to start a greyhound racing meet in Oregon with the simulcasting rights, SB 889 would prohibit it. |
|
070 |
Walters |
Comments on earlier testimony regarding SB 889 regarding the tracking of greyhounds in Oregon. States that the Oregon Racing Commission has licensed, inspected, and monitor the conditions of the farms regularly. |
|
091 |
Chair Shields |
Asks if there was suitable financing to regulate the industry. |
|
096 |
Walters |
Answers affirmatively. Adds there is a no-kill rule in Oregon. States that all greyhounds whelped on a greyhound farm that is licensed is placed for adoption and they are tracked. Adds that none of the greyhounds in the Alabama case were from Oregon. |
|
114 |
Chair Shields |
Asks if there are interstate agreements in regard to the welfare of these animals. |
|
127 |
Walters |
Answers no. |
|
130 |
Chair Shields |
Asks if there was a penalty in the Alabama case. |
|
130 |
Walters |
Answers that it is his understanding that Mr. Floyd was criminally prosecuted, had his license revoked and is banned from greyhound racing throughout the United States. |
|
130 |
Sen. Verger |
Ask if Mr. Walter has seen or read the -4 amendments (EXHIBIT NN). |
|
143 |
Walters |
Answers no he has not read them. Responds that it would be difficult if the casino is built. |
|
145 |
Sen. Verger |
Asks if this bill were to pass is there confidence that Portland Meadows will remain the track that it is today. |
|
149 |
Walters |
Answers not with 100% certainty, noting the competition of other forms of gambling. |
|
163 |
Sen. Verger |
Ask if Mr. McCulley has seen or read the -4 amendments (EXHIBIT NN). |
|
164 |
McCulley |
Responds he has not read them. |
|
165 |
Sen. Verger |
Asks how many lines are needed to simulcast. |
|
166 |
McCulley |
Answers he does not know. |
|
163 |
Sen. Verger |
Ask if Mr. Benson has seen or read the -4 amendments (EXHIBIT NN). |
|
167 |
Benson |
Answers he has not. |
|
145 |
Sen. Verger |
Asks if this bill were to pass is there confidence that Portland Meadows will remain the track that it is today. |
|
171 |
Benson |
Responds it is his opinion that the track should have the opportunity. |
|
167 |
Sen. B. Starr |
Asks, assuming there was someone who wanted to bring dog racing to Oregon, why can’t the off track betting do both dog and horse racing year round. Asks why should the government restrict an investor who is willing to make the investment. |
|
204 |
Walters |
Respond it is a matter of how much revenue can be generated. Speculates on allowing the racing commission to grant year round simulcasting rights and not specify for what track. Adds an investment on a track would have to be a substantial investment. |
|
236 |
Walters |
Comments on the -1 amendments (EXHIBIT MM). |
|
257 |
Chair Shields |
Asks Mr. Daruty to respond to the affects of Portland Meadows if a major casino lands in LaCenter. |
|
241 |
Scott Daruty |
Responds if a large scale tribal casino is built in the metro area it will be the end of racing and the state lottery. |
|
313 |
Ronald Weeden |
Oregon Greyhound Breeders’ Association and Oregon Greyhound Owners. Submits prepared testimony in opposition to SB 929 including correspondence from Pioneer Resources (EXHIBIT II). |
|
387 |
Weeden |
Concludes testimony citing the loss of revenue to the state. |
|
390 |
Kirk Schaffer |
Firefighter, City of Portland and President Oregon Greyhound Breeders Association. Submits and reads testimony in opposition to SB 929 (EXHIBIT JJ). |
|
430 |
Schaffer |
Continues with testimony and discusses simulcast aspects |
|
496 |
Paul Romaine |
Attorney in Portland representing the Oregon Greyhound Association. Refers to the Yiddish word “hoodspah” and gives a legal example. |
|
TAPE 45, A |
||
|
038 |
Romaine |
Relates “hoodspah” to SB 929. Explains the essence of the -1 amendments (EXHIBIT MM). States that what is being asked for is to be given an opportunity and discusses Pioneer Resources. |
|
090 |
Sen. Verger |
Asks Mr. Romaine if he has seen the -4 amendments (EXHIBIT NN). |
|
091 |
Romaine |
Answers he has not seen the -4 amendments. |
|
092 |
Sen. Verger |
Ask will Portland Meadows remain the track that it is today. |
|
099 |
Romaine |
Answers no, agrees the LaCenter casino will affect of lot of different things. Adds that they would like to do the greyhound track combined with some other type of entertainment knowing that there may be a large gambling complex north of Portland. States this issues is about simulcasting not racing. |
|
100 |
Chair Shields |
Asks what does he say to those who say it will be a second rate track. |
|
110 |
Romaine |
Responds that a second rate track is not acceptable. |
|
114 |
Chair Shields |
States that Mr. Walters did not sound very optimistic about both horseracing and greyhound racing being able to survive. |
|
125 |
Romaine |
Responds that given the chance, economically greyhound racing is viable, and would like the marketplace to determine the outcome. |
|
144 |
Sen. Verger |
Asks where would the greyhounds race. |
|
145 |
Romaine |
Answers it depends on where the track is built. A marriage between NASCAR and greyhounds is already being done in Daytona. |
|
159 |
Sen. Verger |
Asks what would the investment be f or a track. |
|
160 |
Romaine |
Responds he has no idea. |
|
163 |
Sen. B. Starr |
Asks why can’t there be one screen for horses and one for dogs. |
|
170 |
Romaine |
Responds that would be potentially practical. Adds their legislation would provide the opportunity for both and let the market decide. |
|
180 |
Sen. B. Starr |
Asks if he would be fine with the horseracing six months of the year and the dog-racing six months a year. Opines that this seems to be a compromise and let the market figure it out. |
|
193 |
Walters |
Responds that the difficulty is who gets the revenue and how is it divided. Revenue is not large enough to support two big race meets and survive without killing each other off. |
|
224 |
Romaine |
States a willingness to work with something along those lines. |
|
261 |
Nelson |
Explains that the -4 amendments (EXHIBIT NN) put SB 889 into SB 929. The first 28 pages delete references of authorization for greyhound racing in Oregon and the last 35 pages have sections in land use law that permit kennels in a farm use zone and the final amendment makes it effective January 2009. |
|
286 |
Romaine |
States opposition to the amendments. |
|
292 |
Chair Shields |
States this needs further consideration. Expresses concern with the “restraint of trade.” Expresses that he would like more discussions on whether both races can survive and what a mega complex LaCenter means to Oregon. |
|
326 |
Nelson |
Speculates that investment in a track would be around $30 – $40 million for a first rate track. |
|
351 |
Romaine |
Comments this is all speculation. Reiterates giving free enterprise a chance. States that Portland Meadows has a history of problems regarding viability. |
|
|
The following prepared testimony was submitted for the record without public testimony, (EXHIBIT OO, Jackie Phillips. |
|
|
378 |
Chair Shields |
Closes the public hearing on SB 889 and 929 and adjourns the meeting at 7:24 p.m. |
EXHIBIT SUMMARY
A. SB 156, -1 amendments, staff, 12 pp
B. SB 156, Legislative Fiscal and Revenue Statements, staff, 2 pp
C. SB 706, -1 amendments, Senator Margaret Carter, 7 pp
D. SB 706, prepared testimony, Senator Margaret Carter, 4 pp
E. SB 706, prepared testimony, Dan Gardner, 2 pp
F. SB 706, hand engrossed bill, BOLI staff, 12 pp
G. SB 706, prepared testimony, Pegge McGuire, 5 pp
H. SB 706, prepared testimony, Jeanne Arana, 1 p
I. SB 706, prepared testimony, William White, 2 pp
J. SB 835, prepared testimony, Xochitl Esparza, 2 pp
K. SB 835, prepared testimony, Maria Barba, 1 p
L. SB 835, example of information in Spanish, Susan Browning, 9 pp
M. SB 889, written testimony, Representative Jackie Dingfelder, 2 pp
N. SB 889, prepared testimony, Carolyn Reeves, 3 pp
O. SB 889, prepared testimony, Linda L. Blythe, 2 pp
P. SB 889, prepared testimony and correspondence, Connie Theil, 2 pp
Q. SB 889, prepared testimony, Suzzette Vedder, 1 p
R. SB 889, prepared testimony, Matt Rossell, 1 p
S. SB 889, prepared testimony, Connie B. Durkee, 1 p
T. SB 889, prepared testimony, Shelby Knife, 1 p
U. SB 889, prepared testimony, Nancy Sussman Fugit, 1 p
V. SB 889, prepared testimony, Cheryl K. Lund, 1 p
W. SB 889, prepared testimony and history, Brian Lee, 7 pp
X. SB 889, prepared testimony, Eileen Marr, 2 pp
Y. SB 889, prepared testimony, Chelsea Chilcoat, 1 p
EXHIBIT SUMMARY (Cont’d)
Z. SB 889, prepared testimony and newspaper articles, Heather Hines, 3 p
AA. SB 889, prepared testimony and newspaper article, Steve Herrington, 2 p
BB. SB 889, prepared testimony and injury documentation, Dianne Kippes, 197 pp
CC. SB 889, prepared testimony and history, Penny Trolin, 13 pp
DD. SB 889, prepared testimony, Sydney Most, 1 p
EE. SB 929, prepared testimony, Dave Nelson and Scott Daruty, 19 pp
FF. SB 929, prepared testimony of Ursula V. Gibbons, The Oregon Horse publication of the Oregon Thoroughbred Owners and Breeders Association, Gary Martin, 212 pp
GG. SB 929, prepared testimony, David R. Benson, 2 pp
HH. SB 929, -1 amendments, staff, 2 pp
I I. SB 929, prepared testimony, Ronald Weeden, 6 pp
JJ. SB 929, prepared testimony, Kirk Schaffer, 1 p
KK. SB 889, correspondence, Jeffery Yen, 29 pp
MM. SB 929, -1 amendments, staff, 2 pp
NN. SB 929, -4 amendments, staff, 66 pp