SENATE COMMITTEE ON JUDICIARY
April 19, 2005 Hearing Room 343
1:00 P.M. Tapes 112 - 113
MEMBERS PRESENT: Sen. Ginny Burdick, Chair
Sen. Charles Starr, Vice-Chair
Sen. Roger Beyer
Sen. Floyd Prozanski
Sen. Vicki Walker
Sen. Doug Whitsett
MEMBER EXCUSED: Sen. Charlie Ringo
STAFF PRESENT: William E. Taylor, Counsel
Dale Penn, Committee Assistant
MEASURES/ISSUES HEARD:
SB 208 – Work Session
SB 548 – Work Session
SB 844 – Work Session
SB 234 – Work Session
SB 229 – Work Session
SB 965 – Work Session
SB 304 – Work Session
These minutes are in compliance with Senate and House Rules. Only text enclosed in quotation marks reports a speaker’s exact words. For complete contents, please refer to the tapes.
|
TAPE/# |
Speaker |
Comments |
|
TAPE 112, A |
||
|
003 |
Chair Burdick |
Calls the meeting to order at 1:20 p.m. and opens a work session on SB 208. |
|
SB 208 – WORK SESSION |
||
|
006 |
William E. Taylor |
Counsel. Describes SB 208 relating to expanding the state no call program and the regulation of unlawful telephone solicitations to include all telephone customers of telecommunications companies. Introduces the -2 and the -7 amendments (EXHIBITS A & B). |
|
022 |
Kevin Neely |
Executive Assistant, Attorney General Hardy Myers, Department of Justice. Discusses the -7 amendments in relation to the -2 amendment. |
|
036 |
Chair Burdick |
Inquires if this provides the Attorney General with the ability to enforce this law as opposed to the federal government. |
|
041 |
Neely |
Replies yes, and offers information on the exemption to the jurisdiction of the Attorney General after this bill. |
|
044 |
Sen. Walker |
Asks about a private right of action being still available. |
|
047 |
Neely |
Responds that he isn’t sure. |
|
052 |
Sen. Walker |
Expresses her belief that consumers are hurt by the federal law, and hesitates to support any state bill that might injure them further. |
|
056 |
Chair Burdick |
Wonders about private rights of action pursued under Oregon law. |
|
059 |
Neely |
Answers that he is not sure about that issue and clarifies the jurisdiction of the bill. |
|
071 |
Sen. Whitsett |
Asks if any portions of the fines resulting from these litigations are retained by the Attorney General. |
|
075 |
Neely |
Explains the jurisdiction of the federal and state government in relation to fines. |
|
093 |
Sen. Whitsett |
Inquires about the current opinions of the individuals who were against the bill before the amendments. |
|
096 |
Neely |
States that he hasn’t approached the opposition to this bill and talks about the proponents of the bill. |
|
101 |
Chair Burdick |
Expresses that nobody has come to her with opposition. |
|
108 |
Sen. Starr |
MOTION: Moves to ADOPT SB 208-7 amendments dated 4/11/05. |
|
|
|
VOTE: 6-0-1 EXCUSED: 1 - Ringo |
|
111 |
Chair Burdick |
Hearing no objection, declares the motion CARRIED. |
|
114 |
Sen. Starr |
MOTION: Moves SB 208 to the floor with a DO PASS AS AMENDED recommendation. |
|
|
|
VOTE: 4-2-1 AYE: 4 - Prozanski, Starr C., Walker, Burdick NAY: 2 - Beyer, Whitsett EXCUSED: 1 - Ringo |
|
126 |
Chair Burdick |
The motion CARRIES. SEN. BURDICK will lead discussion on the floor. |
|
136 |
Chair Burdick |
Closes the work session on SB 208 and opens a work session on SB 548. |
|
SB 548 – WORK SESSION |
||
|
125 |
William E. Taylor |
Counsel. Describes SB 548 relating to modifying the crime of interfering with a peace officer. Introduces the -1 and -2 amendments (EXHIBITS C & D). |
|
151 |
Sen. Prozanski |
Describes the -1 and -2 amendments. |
|
178 |
Sen. Starr |
MOTION: Moves to ADOPT SB 548-1 amendments dated 3/9/05. |
|
|
|
VOTE: 6-0-1 EXCUSED: 1 - Ringo |
|
180 |
Chair Burdick |
Hearing no objection, declares the motion CARRIED. |
|
181 |
Sen. Starr |
MOTION: Moves to ADOPT SB 548-2 amendments dated 3/10/05. |
|
|
|
VOTE: 6-0-1 EXCUSED: 1 - Ringo |
|
183 |
Chair Burdick |
Hearing no objection, declares the motion CARRIED. |
|
186 |
Sen. Starr |
MOTION: Moves SB 548 to the floor with a DO PASS AS AMENDED recommendation. |
|
|
|
VOTE: 6-0-1 EXCUSED: 1 - Ringo |
|
188 |
Chair Burdick |
Hearing no objection, declares the motion CARRIED. SEN. PROZANSKI will lead discussion on the floor. |
|
194 |
Chair Burdick |
Closes the work session on SB 548 and opens a work session on SB 844. |
|
SB 844 – WORK SESSION |
||
|
198 |
William E. Taylor |
Counsel. Describes SB 844 relating to increasing the penalty for a dog keeper who maintains a public nuisance by keeping a dog that bites a person. Discusses the -2 amendment (EXHIBIT E). |
|
219 |
Suzanne Funkhouser |
Legislative Aide, Sen. Deckert. Talks about the -2 amendment. |
|
229 |
Sen. Ryan Deckert |
Senate District 14. Talks about the -2 amendment. |
|
241 |
Chuck Taylor |
Deputy Legislative Counsel. Discusses section 1 of the -2 amendment relating to civil liability. |
|
300 |
Sen. Starr |
MOTION: Moves to ADOPT SB 844-2 amendments dated 4/7/05. |
|
305 |
Sen. Beyer |
Asks about current law relating to the authority of the state to take action against a potentially dangerous dog. |
|
312 |
C. Taylor |
Replies with information on current Oregon statute. |
|
356 |
Sen. Prozanski |
Clarifies the term “knowingly” versus “criminally negligible” current law on this issue. |
|
365 |
C. Taylor |
Talks about county ordinances dealing with the issue of dog attacks. |
|
373 |
Sen. Whitsett |
Discusses page 2 line 10 relating to the dog attack being on the property of the owner. |
|
396 |
Funkhouser |
Addresses the issue of trespassing in relation to this issue. |
|
410 |
Sen. Whitsett |
Asks why is there an exemption to an owner prohibiting individuals from coming onto his property. |
|
423 |
C. Taylor |
Comments on section 7 of the amendment dealing with injuries relating to dog attacks while on the owner’s property. |
|
447 |
Sen. Deckert |
Talks about the work group that came up with this amendment. |
|
TAPE 113, A |
||
|
021 |
Sen. Starr |
VOTE: 4-2-1 AYE: 4 - Prozanski, Starr C., Walker, Burdick NAY: 2 - Beyer, Whitsett EXCUSED: 1 - Ringo |
|
030 |
Chair Burdick |
The motion CARRIES. |
|
033 |
Sen. Starr |
MOTION: Moves SB 844 to the floor with a DO PASS AS AMENDED recommendation. |
|
037 |
Chair Burdick |
VOTE: 4-2-1 AYE: 4 - Prozanski, Starr C., Walker, Burdick NAY: 2 - Beyer, Whitsett EXCUSED: 1 - Ringo |
|
038 |
Chair Burdick |
The motion CARRIES. SEN. DECKERT will lead discussion on the floor. |
|
045 |
Chair Burdick |
Closes the work session on SB 844 and opens a work session on SB 234. |
|
SB 234 – WORK SESSION |
||
|
059 |
William E. Taylor |
Counsel. Introduces the -2, -3, -4, and -6 amendments (EXHIBITS F – I). |
|
070 |
Ronelle Shankle |
Department of Justice. Discusses the amendments for SB 234. |
|
085 |
Chair Burdick |
Asks whether they need to adopt all of the amendments. |
|
092 |
Shankle |
Explains the different acceptable amendment combinations. |
|
105 |
Wendy Johnson |
Deputy Director, Oregon Law Commission (OLC). Talks about the OLC’s approval of the -2 amendment for the bill, and takes a neutral stance on the -3, -4 and -6 amendment as they have yet to see these newer changes. |
|
117 |
Chair Burdick |
Inquires about a two-year sunset clause on the -6 amendment. |
|
119 |
Shankle |
Replies that there is a sunset clause as a compromise during the workgroup. |
|
124 |
Chair Burdick |
Clarifies the need for the different amendments. |
|
126 |
Johnson |
Explains that the OLC has a comparative bill dealing with this issue, and what the commission will do during the 2007 session after the sunset clause has expired on the -6 amendment. |
|
142 |
Chair Burdick |
Assures the committee that the House Judiciary Committee will support this bill. |
|
157 |
Shankle |
Declares that the -3 and -4 amendments have yet to be discussed among the House Judiciary Committee members. |
|
172 |
Sen. Prozanski |
Desires clarification on the effects of the -3 and -4 amendments. |
|
175 |
Shani Fuller |
Oregon Child Support Program, Department of Justice. Talks about the different effects of the -3 and -4 amendments. |
|
190 |
Chair Burdick |
Inquires about the differences between the -3 and -4 amendments |
|
199 |
Fuller |
Responds with information on paternity establishment services through the Oregon Child Support Programs and how the -4 amendment addresses this issue. |
|
209 |
Johnson |
States that the courts support the amendments. |
|
261 |
Starr |
Inquires if the -3 and -4 are repetitive in several sections. |
|
268 |
Johnson |
Replies that they are, but different in certain areas, and explains where. |
|
289 |
Taylor |
Describes the process resulting from passing the amendments. |
|
300 |
Sen. Beyer |
Brings up the issue that a -7 is needed to reconcile the 3 amendments together. |
|
322 |
Taylor |
Explains the situation with the different amendments, and how Legislative Counsel would draft a new amendment in order to reconcile all the similar areas in each draft. |
|
351 |
Sen. Starr |
MOTION: Moves to ADOPT SB 234-3 amendments dated 4/14/05. |
|
|
|
VOTE: 5-0-2 EXCUSED: 2 - Ringo, Walker |
|
354 |
Chair Burdick |
Hearing no objection, declares the motion CARRIED. |
|
357 |
Sen. Starr |
MOTION: Moves to ADOPT SB 234-4 amendments dated 4/14/05. |
|
|
|
VOTE: 5-0-2 EXCUSED: 2 - Ringo, Walker |
|
359 |
Chair Burdick |
Hearing no objection, declares the motion CARRIED. |
|
362 |
Sen. Starr |
MOTION: Moves to ADOPT SB 234-6 amendments dated 4/19/05. |
|
|
|
VOTE: 5-0-2 EXCUSED: 2 - Ringo, Walker |
|
363 |
Chair Burdick |
Hearing no objection, declares the motion CARRIED. |
|
366 |
Sen. Starr |
MOTION: Moves SB 234 to the floor with a DO PASS AS AMENDED recommendation. |
|
370 |
Sen. Whitsett |
States that he will support the bill but may change his mind on the Senate floor. |
|
|
|
VOTE: 5-0-2 EXCUSED: 2 - Ringo, Walker |
|
379 |
Chair Burdick |
Hearing no objection, declares the motion CARRIED. SEN. WALKER will lead discussion on the floor. |
|
395 |
Chair Burdick |
Closes the work session on SB 234 and opens a work session on SB 229. |
|
SB 229 – WORK SESSION |
||
|
396 |
William E. Taylor |
Counsel. Describes SB 229 relating to requiring that in a dependency proceeding in juvenile court, the court gives preference in placement of the child or ward to a person with caregiver relationship with the child or ward. Introduces the -4 amendment (EXHIBITJ). |
|
427 |
Wendy Johnson |
Deputy Director, Oregon Law Commission (OLC). Testifies on the -4 amendment. |
|
443 |
Ingrid Swenson |
Office of Public Defense Services. Submits testimony and testifies in support of SB 229 (EXHIBIT K). |
|
476 |
Chair Burdick |
Asks if the OLC is neutral on this issue. |
|
478 |
Swenson |
Replies yes. |
|
489 |
Sen. Starr |
MOTION: Moves to ADOPT SB 229-4 amendments dated 3/28/05. |
|
|
|
VOTE: 5-0-2 EXCUSED: 2 - Ringo, Walker |
|
491 |
Chair Burdick |
Hearing no objection, declares the motion CARRIED. |
|
494 |
Sen. Starr |
MOTION: Moves SB 229 to the floor with a DO PASS AS AMENDED recommendation. |
|
|
|
VOTE: 5-0-2 EXCUSED: 2 - Ringo, Walker |
|
497 |
Chair Burdick |
Hearing no objection, declares the motion CARRIED. SEN. WALKER will lead discussion on the floor. |
|
509 |
Chair Burdick |
Closes the work session on SB 229 and opens a work session on SB 965. |
|
SB 965 – WORK SESSION |
||
|
TAPE 112, B |
||
|
031 |
William E. Taylor |
Counsel. Describes SB 965 relating to creating a cause of action for personal privacy. Discusses a possible -4 amendment. |
|
043 |
Sen. Prozanski |
Brings up an issue with the retroactivity of the bill compromising expo facto laws. |
|
046 |
Taylor |
Acknowledges that there might be issues with the bill and advises moving the bill over to another date until Legislative Counsel can address the issues. |
|
078 |
Chair Burdick |
Closes the work session on SB 965 and puts SB 216, SB 333, SB 913, and SB 965 to Wednesday, April 20, 2005. Opens a work session on SB 304. |
|
SB 304 – WORK SESSION |
||
|
092 |
William E. Taylor |
Counsel. Describes SB 304 relating to reviving certain product liability civil actions for damages resulting from asbestos-related disease claims that are barred solely because the statute of limitations for these claims has expired. Introduces the -1 and -2 amendments (EXHIBITS L & M). |
|
116 |
Ann Samuelson |
Plumbing contractor, author of the bill. Testifies in support of the bill and the revisions in the amendments. |
|
137 |
Sen. Starr |
Asks about the different amendments. |
|
144 |
Taylor |
Talks about the language in the -1 and -2 amendments. |
|
154 |
Sen. Prozanski |
Discusses the amendments and a possible drafting conflict during their creation. |
|
187 |
Sen. Starr |
MOTION: Moves to ADOPT SB 304-2 amendments dated 4/18/05. |
|
|
|
VOTE: 6-0-1 EXCUSED: 1 - Ringo |
|
189 |
Chair Burdick |
Hearing no objection, declares the motion CARRIED. |
|
195 |
Sen. Starr |
MOTION: Moves SB 304 to the floor with a DO PASS AS AMENDED recommendation. |
|
182 |
Sen. Beyer |
VOTE: 4-2-1 AYE: 4 - Prozanski, Starr C., Walker, Burdick NAY: 2 - Beyer, Whitsett EXCUSED: 1 - Ringo |
|
210 |
Chair Burdick |
The motion CARRIES. SEN. RINGO will lead discussion on the floor. |
|
208 |
Chair Burdick |
Closes the work session on SB 304 and adjourns the meeting at 2:30. |
|
|
|
|
EXHIBIT SUMMARY