SENATE COMMITTEE ON JUDICIARY
April 20, 2005 Hearing Room 343
1:00 P.M. Tapes 114 - 115
Corrected 10/26/05
MEMBERS PRESENT: Sen. Ginny Burdick, Chair
Sen. Charles Starr, Vice-Chair
Sen. Roger Beyer
Sen. Floyd Prozanski
Sen. Charlie Ringo
Sen. Vicki Walker
Sen. Doug Whitsett
STAFF PRESENT: William E. Taylor
Joe O'Leary, Counsel
Dale Penn, Committee Assistant
MEASURES/ISSUES HEARD:
SB 965 – Work Session
SB 216 – Work Session
SB 1011 – Work Session
SB 333 – Work Session
SB 492 – Work Session
SB 127 – Public Hearing
SB 128 – Public Hearing and Work Session
SB 581 – Public Hearing
These minutes are in compliance with Senate and House Rules. Only text enclosed in quotation marks reports a speaker’s exact words. For complete contents, please refer to the tapes.
|
TAPE/# |
Speaker |
Comments |
|
TAPE 114, A |
||
|
003 |
Chair Burdick |
Calls the meeting to order at 1:32 p.m. and opens a work session on SB 965. |
|
SB 965 – WORK SESSION |
||
|
010 |
Joe O’Leary |
Counsel. Describes SB 965 relating to creating a cause of action for invasion of personal privacy. Introduces the -5 amendment (EXHIBIT A). |
|
027 |
Chair Burdick |
Talks about the -5 amendment and the sunset clause. |
|
033 |
Sen. Beyer |
Inquires about blanks on line 21 and line 22 in the -5 amendment. |
|
040 |
O’Leary |
States that the lines are left blank to be filled in by the amount of liquidated damages. |
|
051 |
Chair Burdick |
Calls the meeting to ease to discuss the bill further. |
|
068 |
Chair Burdick |
Closes the work session on SB 965 and opens a work session on SB 216. |
|
SB 216 – WORK SESSION |
||
|
071 |
Joe O’Leary |
Counsel. Describes SB 216 relating to allowing the Attorney General to intervene in class action lawsuits to assert a claim on behalf of the class members who fail to submit statements required for the award of damages. Discusses the -1 and -2 amendments (EXHIBITS B & C). |
|
091 |
Sen. Whitsett |
Asks about the consumer protection and education revolving account. |
|
095 |
Chair Burdick |
Replies with information on the consumer protection and education revolving account in the Attorney General’s office. |
|
104 |
Sen. Prozanski |
MOTION: Moves to ADOPT SB 216-1 amendments dated 4/1/05. |
|
|
Chair Burdick |
VOTE: 6-1-0 AYE: 6 - Prozanski, Ringo, Starr C., Walker, Whitsett, Burdick NAY: 1 - Beyer |
|
111 |
Chair Burdick |
The motion CARRIES. |
|
113 |
Sen. Prozanski |
MOTION: Moves SB 216 to the floor with a DO PASS AS AMENDED recommendation. |
|
117 |
Sen. Beyer |
States his opposition to SB 216. |
|
123 |
Sen. Walker |
Explains that the money returns to the defendant sued if this doesn’t pass. |
|
120 |
Chair Burdick |
VOTE: 4-3-0 AYE: 4 - Prozanski, Ringo, Walker, Burdick NAY: 3 - Beyer, Starr C., Whitsett |
|
137 |
Chair Burdick |
The motion CARRIES. SEN. BURDICK will lead discussion on the floor. |
|
139 |
Chair Burdick |
Closes the work session on SB 216 and opens a work session on SB 1011. |
|
SB 1011 – WORK SESSION |
||
|
142 |
Joe O’Leary |
Counsel. Describes SB 1011 relating to providing a statute of limitations for injuries or death resulting from the use of medications that are intended to inhibit the enzyme known as cyclooxygenase-2. |
|
151 |
Sen. Prozanski |
MOTION: Moves SB 1011 to the floor with a DO PASS recommendation. |
|
155 |
Sen. Ringo |
Affirms that this is an excellent bill and explains the need for its passage. |
|
177 |
Chair Burdick |
Acknowledges the need for the bill. |
|
184 |
Sen. Whitsett |
Offers his opposition to changing a statute of limitation retroactively. |
|
|
Chair Burdick |
VOTE: 4-3-0 AYE: 4 - Prozanski, Ringo, Walker, Burdick NAY: 3 - Beyer, Starr C., Whitsett |
|
197 |
Chair Burdick |
The motion CARRIES. SEN. RINGO will lead discussion on the floor. |
|
200 |
Chair Burdick |
Closes the work session on SB 1011 and opens a work session on SB 333. |
|
SB 333 – WORK SESSION |
||
|
201 |
Joe O’Leary |
Counsel. Describes SB 333 relating to increasing the maximum amount a plaintiff may claim in certain tort actions for which the court must award attorney fees if the plaintiff prevails. Discusses the -1 amendment (EXHIBIT D). |
|
222 |
Sen. Ringo |
Explains the need for the bill, but states that it should not be moved today due to a possible amendment. |
|
234 |
Chair Burdick |
Closes the work session on SB 333 and moves SB 333, SB 913, and SB 965 to Monday, April 25, 2005. Opens a work session on SB 492. |
|
SB 492 – WORK SESSION |
||
|
245 |
William E. Taylor |
Counsel. Describes SB 492 relating to revising the laws regarding driver duties to certain pedestrians. Introduces the -2 amendment (EXHIBIT E). |
|
256 |
Sen. Prozanski |
Talks about the -2 amendment. |
|
288 |
Chair Burdick |
Asks if SB 591 is incorporated into this bill. |
|
289 |
Sen. Prozanski |
Replies that it is incorporated into the -2 amendments to SB 492. |
|
291 |
Mark Landauer |
Office of Government Relations, Portland. Testifies in support of the -2 amendment. |
|
296 |
Mark Lear |
Manager, Traffic Investigation Group, Portland. Addresses the -2 amendment. |
|
320 |
Sen. Beyer |
Inquires about clarification on the definition of a bicycle lane in relation to a car lane, goes on to ask about pedestrians. |
|
325 |
Sen. Prozanski |
Clarifies the issue of bicycle lanes compared to regular traffic lanes and pedestrian walkways. |
|
375 |
Chair Burdick |
Talks about the issue of pedestrian and bicycle lanes. |
|
387 |
Sen. Starr |
MOTION: Moves to ADOPT SB 492-2 amendments dated 4/20/05. |
|
392 |
Sen. Ringo |
Points out that he has issues with the bill due to his district’s current traffic problems. |
|
407 |
Landauer |
Addresses the problems Sen. Ringo has with the current law being too restrictive and how this bill fixes those issues. |
|
435 |
Sen. Ringo |
Talks about the new traffic violation created by this bill. |
|
441 |
Landauer |
States that this violation is already a Class C traffic violation. |
|
455 |
Sen. Beyer |
Expresses his opposition to the bill. |
|
460 |
Chair Burdick |
Explains the traffic accidents that this bill seeks to stop. |
|
|
Chair Burdick |
VOTE: 5-1-1 AYE: 5 - Prozanski, Ringo, Starr C., Whitsett, Burdick NAY: 1 - Beyer EXCUSED: 1 - Walker |
|
|
Chair Burdick |
The motion CARRIES. |
|
TAPE 115, A |
||
|
001 |
Sen. Starr |
MOTION: Moves SB 492 to the floor with a DO PASS AS AMENDED recommendation. |
|
004 |
Sen. Beyer |
Declares that he might support the bill later. |
|
|
Chair Burdick |
VOTE: 5-1-1 AYE: 5 - Prozanski, Ringo, Starr C., Whitsett, Burdick NAY: 1 - Beyer EXCUSED: 1 - Walker |
|
011 |
Chair Burdick |
The motion CARRIES. SEN. BURDICK will lead discussion on the floor. |
|
016 |
Chair Burdick |
Closes the work session on SB 492 and opens a public hearing on SB 127. |
|
SB 127 – PUBLIC HEARING |
||
|
017 |
William E. Taylor |
Counsel. Describes SB 127 relating to expanding the definition of “sex crime” for the purpose of sex offender registration to include the crimes of other jurisdictions requiring registration as a sex offender under federal law. |
|
027 |
Dan Malin |
Oregon State Police (OSP). Submits testimony and testifies in support of SB 127 (EXHIBIT F). |
|
065 |
Malin |
Talks about the sex offender registration forms used by the federal government. |
|
087 |
Chair Burdick |
Asks about the Wetterling Act. Inquires about the timeline since the bill was passed |
|
089 |
Malin |
Replies that the Wetterling Act was passed by Congress in 1994 and deals with the registration of sex offenders. Explains the difference between state and federal laws on this issue. |
|
118 |
Sen. Prozanski |
Inquires about a possible retroactive clause being implemented with the Wetterling Act in 1994. |
|
129 |
Malin |
States that they should use the federal deadline of 1994 as the statute of limitations cut-off. |
|
143 |
Taylor |
Explains the retroactive law being okay because, according to expo facto law, this was not a punishment. |
|
150 |
Sen. Prozanski |
Desires some more research on the constitutionality of this issue before passing this out of committee. |
|
155 |
Malin |
Points out that the law was not considered punishment, so expo facto did not apply. |
|
169 |
Chair Burdick |
Closes the public hearing on SB 127 and opens a public hearing on SB 128. |
|
SB 128 – PUBLIC HEARING |
||
|
174 |
William E. Taylor |
Counsel. Describes SB 128 relating to allowing the grand jury to receive in evidence an affidavit of a representative of the Oregon State Police concerning completeness of certain records of sex offenders. |
|
185 |
Dan Malin |
Oregon State Police. Submits testimony and testifies in support of SB 128 (EXHIBIT G). |
|
219 |
Sen. Prozanski |
Goes on the record and summarizes the effects of the bill. |
|
238 |
Malin |
States that the earlier summarization is complete, and discusses the types of documents allowed to be submitted to the grand jury under SB 128. |
|
249 |
Taylor |
Asks how much money this bill would save the state police. |
|
251 |
Malin |
Replies with data on the estimated expenditures related to sending a representative to testify at the grand jury. |
|
268 |
Sen. Prozanski |
Brings up the issue of whether this is a fair and reasonable tradeoff or not. |
|
291 |
Chair Burdick |
Closes the public hearing and opens a work session on SB 128. |
|
SB 128 – WORK SESSION |
||
|
295 |
Sen. Starr |
MOTION: Moves SB 128 to the floor with a DO PASS AS AMENDED recommendation. |
|
|
|
VOTE: 5-0-2 EXCUSED: 2 - Ringo, Walker |
|
297 |
Chair Burdick |
Hearing no objection, declares the motion CARRIED. SEN. STARR will lead discussion on the floor. |
|
302 |
Chair Burdick |
Closes the work session on SB 128 and opens a public hearing on SB 581. |
|
SB 581 – PUBLIC HEARING |
||
|
304 |
William E. Taylor |
Counsel. Describes SB 581 relating to modifying the distribution of fines collected in traffic offense cases. |
|
313 |
Sen. Prozanski |
Submits written testimony from Chief of Police Terry Wright from the Tillamook Police Department (EXHIBIT H). Talks about the history of this bill and discusses the need for the passage of SB 581. |
|
361 |
Carl Myers |
Municipal Court Judge, City of Keizer. Testifies in support of SB 581. |
|
412 |
Myers |
Discusses the Class B violation in this bill and the maximum amount he is able or required to charge. Talks about the citing of “California Stops,” and how he would rather educate than fine. |
|
Note: Tape 114 B is not complete due to equipment malfunction (see Tape 115, B) |
||
|
TAPE 115, B |
||
|
026 |
Myers |
Details the current law on this issue. |
|
055 |
Myers |
Stresses the need for the local judges to address this issue with greater authority. |
|
074 |
Chair Burdick |
Inquires about the fiscal impact of this bill. |
|
076 |
Myers |
Replies that the courts should be in the justice business, not the money-making business. Reads an ORS relating to the fines and penalties resulting from breaking the law. |
|
123 |
Sen. Beyer |
Inquires about the price for a unitary assessment in a traffic violation. |
|
125 |
Myers |
Responds that the amount retained by the state and counties through the unitary assessment is only $37.00. |
|
150 |
Sen. Starr |
Asks about the base fine for these violations. |
|
153 |
Myers |
Stresses that the bill merely needs to refer to the fine itself, not the base. |
|
168 |
Bradd Swank |
Oregon Judicial Department. Submits a summary on the minimum base fine amounts for violation offenses in Oregon and testifies in a neutral stance on SB 581 (EXHIBIT I). Discusses the base fines that have been established for the different violations. |
|
215 |
Swank |
Talks about possible amendments to the bill that would assuage certain problems with the unitary county assessment fee being removed as well as the base fine being altered. |
|
256 |
Sen. Prozanski |
Inquires about the proposed amendments from Mr. Swank. |
|
260 |
Swank |
Talks about the different proposed amendments he recommends relating to the exclusion of the term ‘traffic” and the lack of standard, or guidelines, for the judges to follow when assigning fines. |
|
294 |
Swank |
Discusses the average fines posted by the courts in relation to the legislatures recommended fine during a time of discretionary fines. |
|
281 |
Mark Landauer |
Office of Government Relations, Portland. Testifies in opposition to SB 581. |
|
292 |
Mark Lear |
Manager, Traffic Investigation Group, Portland. Submits testimony and testifies in opposition to SB 581 (EXHIBIT J). Comments on traffic accidents in the city of Portland over the past decade. |
|
350 |
Lear |
Addresses the misconception that some police officers don’t write tickets in a residential zone until the driver is going 36 miles. Cites accident information relating to this scenario. |
|
398 |
Sen. Whitsett |
Inquires about the stopping distance in the above scenario in a residential zone. |
|
405 |
Lear |
Replies with information on breaking time and perception reaction time included in those 100 feet of stopping distance. |
|
423 |
Sen. Prozanski |
Wonders about the possibility of increasing fines to decrease accidents. |
|
435 |
Lear |
Stresses the need to find a balance so police officers do not hesitate to write tickets for violations. |
|
464 |
Chair Burdick |
Inquires about police officers not ticketing certain violations in Portland. |
|
470 |
Lear |
Replies with information on upcoming enforcement actions being taken by the City of Portland to address these issues. |
|
500 |
Chair Burdick |
Closes the public hearing on SB 581. Moves SB 333, and SB 913, and SB 965 to Monday’s agenda. Adjourns the meeting at 2:58 p.m. |
EXHIBIT SUMMARY