SENATE COMMITTEE ON JUDICIARY
May 31, 2005 Hearing Room 343
1:00 P.M. Tapes 150 - 151
MEMBERS PRESENT: Sen. Ginny Burdick, Chair
Sen. Charles Starr, Vice-Chair
Sen. Roger Beyer
Sen. Floyd Prozanski
Sen. Doug Whitsett
MEMBERS EXCUSED: Sen. Charlie Ringo
Sen. Vicki Walker
STAFF PRESENT: William E. Taylor, Counsel
Joe O'Leary, Counsel
Heidi Moawad, Counsel
Sam Sears, Counsel
Dale Penn, Committee Assistant
MEASURES/ISSUES HEARD:
SB 1047 – Public Hearing and Work Session
HB 2568 – Public Hearing and Work Session
SB 1025 – Work Session
SB 392 – Work Session
HB 2634 – Work Session
HB 2305A – Public Hearing and Work Session
HB 2306A – Public Hearing
These minutes are in compliance with Senate and House Rules. Only text enclosed in quotation marks reports a speaker’s exact words. For complete contents, please refer to the tapes.
|
TAPE/# |
Speaker |
Comments |
|
TAPE 150, A |
||
|
002 |
Chair Burdick |
Calls the meeting to order at 1:18 p.m. and opens a public hearing on SB 1047. |
|
SB 1047 – PUBLIC HEARING |
||
|
007 |
Joe O’Leary |
Counsel. Describes SB 1047 relating to creating an authority for fatality review teams to review records related to domestic violence fatalities for the purpose of preventing future fatalities. Introduces and discusses the -1 amendment (EXHIBITA). |
|
038 |
Rep. Kim Thatcher |
House District 25. Testifies in support of SB 1047. |
|
059 |
Sen. Starr |
Inquires if she is testifying in support of the -1 amendment. |
|
056 |
Rep. Thatcher |
Responds that she has not seen the amendment, but from what she understands, she supports them. |
|
068 |
Hans Bernard |
Legislative Aide, Sen. Brown. Testifies in support of SB 1047. |
|
085 |
Honorable Dale Koch |
Presiding Judge, Multnomah County Circuit Court. Testifies in support of SB 1047. |
|
128 |
Sen. Beyer |
Asks if there is a current prohibition from doing what the bill seeks to accomplish. |
|
131 |
Judge Koch |
Replies that there is not, and explains the need for this bill. |
|
151 |
Sybil Hebb |
Oregon Law Center. Submits written testimony from Nancy Glass, Co-Director of the Center for Health Disparities Research at Oregon Health & Science University, Judy Shiprack, Executive Director of the Multnomah County Local Public Safety Coordinating Council, and Denis Washington, the Executive Director of the Oregon Coalition Against Domestic & Sexual Violence and testifies in support of SB 1047 (EXHIBITS B-D). |
|
190 |
Hebb |
Talks about a statewide response team that would deal with instances of domestic abuse and violence. |
|
223 |
Connie Gallagher |
Administrator, Crime Victims’ Assistance Section, Oregon Department of Justice. Submits testimony and testifies in support of SB 1047 (EXHIBIT E). |
|
257 |
Terrie Quinteros |
Program Director, Crime Survivors for Community Safety. Submits testimony and testifies in support of SB 1047 (EXHIBIT F). |
|
281 |
LeAnn Mederios |
Intimate Partner Violence Data Collection Program Manager, Oregon Department of Human Services. Submits testimony and testifies in support of SB 1047 (EXHIBIT G). |
|
319 |
Chair Burdick |
Closes the public hearing and opens a work session on SB 1047. |
|
SB 1047 – WORK SESSION |
||
|
526 |
Sen. Starr |
MOTION: Moves to ADOPT SB 1047-1 amendments dated 5/11/05. |
|
331 |
Sen. Beyer |
Asks why the vote count requirement was changed from a majority to a 2/3 vote. |
|
339 |
Sybil Hebb |
Oregon Law Center. Addresses the reasoning behind the -1 amendment. |
|
368 |
Sen. Beyer |
Inquires about the original bill from the house committees that incorporated the amendment. |
|
375 |
Hebb |
Replies that the bill in front of the committee, SB 1047, incorporates the amendment that did not go into the original house bill. |
|
383 |
Sen. Whitsett |
Wonders about the definition of “child” in SB 1047. |
|
388 |
Hebb |
Talks about the definition of a “child,” and how the bill would be interpreted. |
|
372 |
Sen. Whitsett |
Inquires if the bill would apply to an unborn fetus. |
|
403 |
Hebb |
Replies it would not. |
|
407 |
Sen. Beyer |
Desires a hand-engrossed copy of SB 1047 with the -1 amendment. |
|
433 |
Sen. Starr |
MOTION: Moves to WITHDRAW the MOTION to ADOPT SB 1047-1 amendments dated 5/11/05. |
|
|
|
VOTE: 5-0-2 EXCUSED: 2 - Ringo, Walker |
|
435 |
Chair Burdick |
Hearing no objection, declares the motion CARRIED. |
|
441 |
Chair Burdick |
Closes the work session on SB 1047 and opens a public hearing on HB 2568. |
|
HB 2568 – PUBLIC HEARING |
||
|
442 |
Heidi Moawad |
Counsel. Describes HB 2568 relating to requiring the circuit court in Gresham to transfer the proceedings to a court facility in Portland if the accused is in custody of the county sheriff or the Department of Corrections or if the circuit court issues an arrest warrant for the accused in the pending criminal action. |
|
TAPE 151, A |
||
|
018 |
Honorable Dale Koch |
Presiding Judge, Multnomah County Circuit Court. Testifies in support of HB 2568. |
|
063 |
Chair Burdick |
Closes the public hearing and opens a work session on HB 2568. |
|
HB 2568 – WORK SESSION |
||
|
065 |
Sen. Starr |
MOTION: Moves HB 2568 to the floor with a DO PASS recommendation. |
|
|
|
VOTE: 4-0-3 EXCUSED: 3 - Prozanski, Ringo, Walker |
|
068 |
Chair Burdick |
Hearing no objection, declares the motion CARRIED. SEN. BURDICK will lead discussion on the floor. |
|
070 |
Chair Burdick |
Closes the work session on HB 2568 and opens a work session on SB 1025. |
|
SB 1025 – WORK SESSION |
||
|
081 |
William E. Taylor |
Counsel. Introduces and describes the -3 amendment, which effectively replaces the bill (EXHIBIT H). |
|
094 |
Gwen Dayton |
Co-Chair, Advisory Committee on Genetic Privacy and Research. Testifies in support of SB 1025. Discusses the creation of the -3 amendment. |
|
137 |
Dayton |
Talks about a typical situation involving the use of genetic information and DNA samples. |
|
158 |
Chair Burdick |
Asks about patients who gained genetic/DNA information before current privacy standards could have their information accessed. |
|
164 |
Dayton |
Replies that the information gained before current privacy standards (Health Insurance Portability and Accountability Act of 1996) could not be accessed under the bill. |
|
178 |
Dave Fidanque |
Executive Director, American Civil Liberties Union of Oregon. Addresses current law on this issue, and how it has never been adequately implemented. Testifies in support of the -3 amendment. |
|
215 |
Fidanque |
States that the -3 amendment allows health care providers to implement the Health Insurance Portability and Accountability Act of 1996 (HIPAA) notification several different ways. |
|
244 |
Bruce Bishop |
Oregon Association of Hospitals and Health Systems. Testifies in support of SB 1025 and the -3 amendment. |
|
262 |
Chair Burdick |
Inquires about the ‘opting-out’ option, and if it will be a widely used method. |
|
271 |
Bishop |
Replies that he believes a very small amount will utilize this aspect of the bill. |
|
277 |
Fidanque |
Stresses that the largest problem facing the industry is the lack of warning and notification of the patient relating to the use of their biological specimen or information. |
|
307 |
Fidanque |
States that there is a large concern among the populace relating to genetic research. |
|
324 |
Taylor |
Addresses the definition of “covered entity” and asks what is not a “covered entity.” |
|
333 |
Dayton |
Discusses the definition of “covered entities” according to the law. |
|
360 |
Chair Burdick |
Inquires if those specimens would be allowed to be researched. |
|
363 |
Dayton |
Conveys that, because there was not an opportunity for the patient to ‘opt-out,’ their information could not be used. |
|
373 |
Fidanque |
States that less than 5% of all health care providers would face this problem. |
|
399 |
Dayton |
Talks about non-covered providers referring a patient to a covered lab, that lab would then be responsible in providing a notification to the patient. States that certain labs are not covered by HIPAA standards. |
|
429 |
Taylor |
Discusses if there is any way for the sample to be used after a patient says ‘no.’ |
|
441 |
Dayton |
States that you can only use someone’s DNA or genetic sample only if someone was notified and did not ‘opt-out.’ |
|
456 |
Ted Falk |
Testifies in support of SB 1025 with the -3 amendment. |
|
TAPE 150, B |
||
|
026 |
Chair Burdick |
Commends the panel for working on a difficult issue. |
|
034 |
Dr. Gary Kyoto |
Director, Oregon Health & Science University Research Integrity Office. Testifies in support of SB 1025 and the -3 amendment. |
|
063 |
Sen. Starr |
MOTION: Moves to ADOPT SB 1025-3 amendments dated 5/31/05. |
|
|
|
VOTE: 5-0-2 EXCUSED: 2 - Ringo, Walker |
|
067 |
Chair Burdick |
Hearing no objection, declares the motion CARRIED. |
|
067 |
Sen. Starr |
MOTION: Moves SB 1025 to the floor with a DO PASS AS AMENDED recommendation. |
|
|
|
VOTE: 5-0-2 EXCUSED: 2 - Ringo, Walker |
|
070 |
Chair Burdick |
Hearing no objection, declares the motion CARRIED. SEN. BURDICK will lead discussion on the floor. |
|
073 |
Chair Burdick |
Closes the work session on SB 1025 and opens a work session on SB 392. |
|
SB 392 – WORK SESSION |
||
|
074 |
William E. Taylor |
Counsel. Describes SB 392 relating to providing that if a person slays another person, the property that would have passed from the heir or devisee of the descendent to the slayer, whether by interstate succession, by will, or by trust, passes and vests as if the slayer had predeceased the descendent unless the heir or devisee specifically provides otherwise by will or other instrument executed after the death of descendent. |
|
090 |
Sen. Starr |
MOTION: Moves SB 392 to the floor with a DO PASS recommendation. |
|
|
|
VOTE: 5-0-2 EXCUSED: 2 - Ringo, Walker |
|
093 |
Chair Burdick |
Hearing no objection, declares the motion CARRIED. SEN. WESTLUND will lead discussion on the floor. |
|
095 |
Chair Burdick |
Closes the work session on SB 392 and opens a work session on HB 2634. |
|
HB 2634 – WORK SESSION |
||
|
098 |
Sam Sears |
Counsel. Describes HB 2634 relating to establishing a pleading requirement for an action asserting professional negligence against a real estate license. |
|
115 |
Sen. Starr |
MOTION: Moves HB 2634 to the floor with a DO PASS recommendation. |
|
|
|
VOTE: 5-0-2 EXCUSED: 2 - Ringo, Walker |
|
118 |
Chair Burdick |
Hearing no objection, declares the motion CARRIED. SEN. WHITSETT will lead discussion on the floor. |
|
120 |
Chair Burdick |
Closes the work session on HB 2634 and opens a public hearing on HB 2305A. |
|
HB 2305A – PUBLIC HEARING |
||
|
122 |
Sam Sears |
Counsel. Describes HB 2305A relating to allowing a delivery of writ of garnishment to a person designated by the sole proprietor to accept the service. |
|
135 |
Jim Markee |
Oregon Collectors Association. Submits testimony and testifies in support of HB 2305A (EXHIBIT I). |
|
154 |
Chair Burdick |
Closes the public hearing and opens a work session on HB 2305A. |
|
HB 2305A – WORK SESSION |
||
|
157 |
Sen. Starr |
MOTION: Moves HB 2305A to the floor with a DO PASS recommendation. |
|
|
|
VOTE: 5-0-2 EXCUSED: 2 - Ringo, Walker |
|
160 |
Chair Burdick |
Hearing no objection, declares the motion CARRIED. SEN. BEYER will lead discussion on the floor. |
|
163 |
Chair Burdick |
Closes the work session on HB 2305A and opens a public hearing on HB 2306A. |
|
HB 2306A – PUBLIC HEARING |
||
|
164 |
Sam Sears |
Counsel. Describes HB 2306A relating to making unmarried parents of minor children liable for the expenses and education of the child. |
|
177 |
Jim Markee |
Oregon Collectors Association. Submits testimony and testifies in support of HB 2306A (EXHIBIT J). |
|
215 |
Markee |
States that they did not want to extend family debts to spouses unless they related to the benefit of the children. |
|
265 |
Chair Burdick |
Inquires about debts that the child may incur. |
|
268 |
Markee |
States that debts incurred by a minor or child are usually not fully enforceable. Addresses a section in his testimony, ORS 101.112, which states you are no longer a minor when you have a child. Declares that the parents are no longer responsible for the debt she may incur after that child. |
|
318 |
Chair Burdick |
Brings up the issue of a son (minor), as opposed to a daughter, having a child, and if these rules would still apply. |
|
322 |
Markee |
Replies that it is the same, no matter the sex of the child. |
|
349 |
Sen. Prozanski |
Inquires if the parents of a minor who is emancipated would still be obligated until the age of 18. |
|
351 |
Markee |
States that they would not be obligated to a child until the age of 18 if the child is emancipated earlier. |
|
372 |
Sen. Beyer |
Inquires about a married 16 year old child. |
|
382 |
Markee |
Replies that there is another operative statute that would address the issue. |
|
396 |
Sen. Whitsett |
Inquires about the 16 year old unmarried parent and the responsibility of the parents. |
|
409 |
Markee |
Offers clarification on the statutes relating to this issue. |
|
450 |
Sen. Whitsett |
Asks for more clarification on the current law relating to unmarried parents. |
|
460 |
Markee |
Clarifies the current statutes on this issue. |
|
492 |
Chair Burdick |
Closes the work session on HB 2306A and adjourns the meeting at 2:50 p.m. |
|
|
|
|
EXHIBIT SUMMARY