SENATE COMMITTEE ON JUDICIARY
June 15, 2005 Hearing Room 343
1:00 P.M. Tapes 169 - 170
MEMBERS PRESENT: Sen. Ginny Burdick, Chair
Sen. Roger Beyer
Sen. Floyd Prozanski
Sen. Charlie Ringo
Sen. Vicki Walker
Sen. Doug Whitsett
MEMBER EXCUSED: Sen. Charles Starr, Vice-Chair
STAFF PRESENT: Heidi Moawad, Counsel
Dale Penn, Committee Assistant
MEASURES/ISSUES HEARD:
HB 2361A – Work Session
HB 2297 – Work Session
HB 2299 – Work Session
HB 2144 – Work Session
HB 2312A – Work Session
HB 2142A – Work Session
HB 2224A – Work Session
These minutes are in compliance with Senate and House Rules. Only text enclosed in quotation marks reports a speaker’s exact words. For complete contents, please refer to the tapes.
|
TAPE/# |
Speaker |
Comments |
|
TAPE 169, A |
||
|
003 |
Chair Burdick |
Calls the meeting to order at 1:27 p.m. and opens a work session on HB 2361A. |
|
HB 2361A – WORK SESSION |
||
|
006 |
Heidi Moawad |
Counsel. Describes HB 2361A relating to requiring the revocation of driving privileges of persons convicted of a misdemeanor while driving under the influence of intoxicants for a third or subsequent time. |
|
020 |
Sen. Walker |
MOTION: Moves HB 2361A to the floor with a DO PASS recommendation. |
|
|
|
VOTE: 5-0-2 EXCUSED: 2 - Ringo, Starr |
|
023 |
Chair Burdick |
Hearing no objection, declares the motion CARRIED. SEN. PROZANSKI will lead discussion on the floor. |
|
026 |
Chair Burdick |
Closes the work session on HB 2361A and opens a work session on HB 2297. |
|
HB 2297 – WORK SESSION |
||
|
028 |
Heidi Moawad |
Counsel. Describes HB 2297 relating to expanding the circumstances under which public indecency is a felony. Introduces a fiscal analysis of HB 2297 (EXHIBIT D). |
|
038 |
Sen. Walker |
MOTION: Moves HB 2297 to the floor with a DO PASS recommendation. |
|
|
|
VOTE: 5-0-2 EXCUSED: 2 - Ringo, Starr |
|
040 |
Chair Burdick |
Hearing no objection, declares the motion CARRIED. SEN. WHITSETT will lead discussion on the floor. |
|
042 |
Chair Burdick |
Closes the work session on HB 2297 and opens a work session on HB 2299. |
|
HB 2299 – WORK SESSION |
||
|
043 |
Heidi Moawad |
Counsel. Describes HB 2299 relating to requiring a person relieved of the duty to report as a sex offender to provide to the Department of State Police a copy of the court order relieving the person of duty. Introduces and describes the -1 amendment (EXHIBIT A). |
|
056 |
Sen. Prozanski |
Asks if the community colleges and universities would be covered under this bill. |
|
060 |
Moawad |
States that she followed up on that point with representatives from the community colleges. |
|
065 |
Sen. Walker |
MOTION: Moves to ADOPT HB 2299-1 amendments dated 5/12/05. |
|
|
|
VOTE: 5-0-2 EXCUSED: 2 - Ringo, Starr |
|
068 |
Chair Burdick |
Hearing no objection, declares the motion CARRIED. |
|
071 |
Sen. Walker |
MOTION: Moves HB 2299 to the floor with a DO PASS AS AMENDED recommendation. |
|
|
|
VOTE: 5-0-2 EXCUSED: 2 - Ringo, Starr |
|
073 |
Chair Burdick |
Hearing no objection, declares the motion CARRIED. SEN. WALKER will lead discussion on the floor. |
|
075 |
Chair Burdick |
Closes the work session on HB 2299 and opens a work session on HB 2144. |
|
HB 2144 – WORK SESSION |
||
|
077 |
Heidi Moawad |
Counsel. Describes HB 2144 relating to modifying the conditions of probation for persons previously convicted of a sex offense. Introduces and describes the -1 and -2 amendments (EXHIBITS B & C). |
|
095 |
Chair Burdick |
Asks if they need to adopt the -1 amendment. |
|
110 |
Scott Taylor |
Chief of Community Corrections, Oregon Department of Corrections. Describes the reasoning behind the drafting of the bill. |
|
132 |
Pat Schreiner |
Marion County Sheriff’s Office, Parole and Probation Division. Testifies in support of HB 2144. Talks about SB 267 in the 2003 Legislative session dealing with evidence based practices. |
|
156 |
Kelly Skye |
Oregon Criminal Defense Lawyers Association. Testifies in opposition to the juvenile adjudication issue within the bill. |
|
172 |
Sen. Prozanski |
Asks if she is supportive of the -1 amendment, which would remove the juvenile issue she has a conflict with. |
|
174 |
Skye |
Replies affirmatively. Continues discussion on juvenile offenses having a larger than intended impact on an individuals’ future record. |
|
192 |
Sen. Whitsett |
Comments on the issue of statutory rape (perhaps consensual between two age-varied individuals) falling under the effects of this bill. |
|
200 |
Skye |
Talks about the statutory rape issue being classified as a sex offense which would fall under this broadly encompassing bill. |
|
218 |
Sen. Whitsett |
Wonders about the numbers of individuals who have been convicted of sex crimes who develop behavior as a teenager who might repeat later in life. |
|
222 |
Schreiner |
Stresses that the most heinous sex offenders tend to start young. |
|
234 |
Sen. Ringo |
Talks about a drafting conflict on line 9 of the -1 amendment. |
|
251 |
Sen. Walker |
Discusses her stance on the bill. States that there are currently over 3000 sex offenders in the Oregon Department of Corrections. |
|
288 |
Sen. Ringo |
Declares his support for the -1 amendment. |
|
291 |
Sen. Prozanski |
Comments on the methods used in other states. Talks about the broad nature of the bill. |
|
316 |
Sen. Walker |
Brings up the issue of static-99: a tool used to determine the threat level of sex offenders. |
|
331 |
Taylor |
Discusses the static-99 assessment method tool that analyzes sex offender danger levels. |
|
355 |
Chair Burdick |
Wonders about the circumstances that would call for such screenings. |
|
363 |
Schreiner |
Stresses that these individuals are not the type who go thirty years without a repeat offense; generally the offenders are young (early 20s) with juvenile issues before repeat offending. |
|
398 |
Sen. Prozanski |
Inquires about the assessment process used by the parole officers (static-99). |
|
416 |
Schreiner |
Discusses why this bill was brought before the committee: several officers requested sex offender treatment for individuals under their care who were not given the treatment they needed. |
|
443 |
Sen. Whitsett |
Declares his hesitance to support the bill; the letter of the statute may be too broad. |
|
TAPE 170, A |
||
|
022 |
Sen. Walker |
MOTION: Moves to ADOPT HB 2144-1 amendments dated 5/31/05. |
|
|
|
VOTE: 6-0-1 EXCUSED: 1 - Starr |
|
025 |
Chair Burdick |
Hearing no objection, declares the motion CARRIED. |
|
026 |
Sen. Beyer |
Discusses the -2 amendment dealing with certain sex offender information available on specific websites. |
|
042 |
Sen. Prozanski |
Stresses that a fiscal may be needed for this amendment (which has another bill as the body of the amendment). |
|
058 |
Sen. Walker |
Talks about a sex offender internet program started across the United States by the federal government. |
|
065 |
Sen. Beyer |
Addresses section 3 of the -2 amendment dealing with government websites. |
|
084 |
Sen. Ringo |
States that he is new to the issue and needs to be caught up. |
|
086 |
Sen. Prozanski |
Brings up the issue of this amendment possibly becoming an unfunded mandate for smaller counties and areas that cannot afford such responsibility. |
|
117 |
Schreiner |
Comments on the problems they have with the -2 amendment. Talks about the lack of consistency, statewide, with sex offender notifications (website, etc.). |
|
158 |
Sen. Walker |
MOTION: Moves HB 2144 to the floor with a DO PASS AS AMENDED recommendation. |
|
|
|
VOTE: 6-0-1 EXCUSED: 1 - Starr |
|
161 |
Chair Burdick |
Hearing no objection, declares the motion CARRIED. SEN. BURDICK will lead discussion on the floor. |
|
162 |
Chair Burdick |
Closes the work session on HB 2144 and calls the meeting to recess at 2:07 p.m. |
|
166 |
Chair Burdick |
Calls the meeting to order at 2:35 p.m. and opens a work session on HB 2312A. |
|
HB 2312A – WORK SESSION |
||
|
174 |
Heidi Moawad |
Counsel. Describes HB 2312A relating to extending the time that a motion requesting the performance of DNA testing must be filed. Introduces and describes the –A3 amendment (EXHIBIT E). |
|
185 |
Brad Berry |
Yamhill County District Attorney, Oregon District Attorneys Association. Testifies in support of HB 2312A. |
|
207 |
Sen. Walker |
MOTION: Moves to ADOPT HB 2312A-A3 amendments dated 5/12/05. |
|
210 |
Sen. Beyer |
Declares his opposition to this bill. |
|
216 |
Chair Burdick |
Discusses her stance on the issue where sometimes people may feel pressured into pleading guilty even if they are not. |
|
234 |
Sen. Whitsett |
Stresses his hesitant support for the bill with the amendment. |
|
243 |
|
VOTE: 5-1-1 AYE: 5 - Prozanski, Ringo, Walker, Whitsett, Burdick NAY: 1 - Beyer EXCUSED: 1 - Starr C. |
|
249 |
Chair Burdick |
The motion CARRIES. |
|
250 |
Sen. Walker |
MOTION: Moves HB 2312A to the floor with a DO PASS AS AMENDED recommendation. |
|
|
|
VOTE: 5-1-1 AYE: 5 - Prozanski, Ringo, Walker, Whitsett, Burdick NAY: 1 - Beyer EXCUSED: 1 - Starr C. |
|
255 |
Chair Burdick |
The motion CARRIES. SEN. BURDICK will lead discussion on the floor. |
|
261 |
Sen. Beyer |
Asks about a fiscal for the amendment. |
|
262 |
Chair Burdick |
Replies that there is no fiscal. |
|
266 |
Moawad |
Stresses that there is no memo regarding a fiscal that she is aware of: Oregon State Police declared that this bill might create a fiscal but they are not certain. |
|
277 |
Chair Burdick |
Closes the work session on HB 2312A and opens a work session on HB 2142A. |
|
HB 2142A – WORK SESSION |
||
|
279 |
Heidi Moawad |
Counsel. Describes HB 2142A relating to specifying the circumstances under which corrections officers or other officials employed by the Oregon Department of Corrections may and may not use deadly physical force. Introduces and describes the –A2 amendment (EXHIBIT F). |
|
289 |
Chair Burdick |
Declares her support for the bill without the –A2 amendment. |
|
299 |
Sen. Prozanski |
Offers his support for the bill with the –A2 amendment, but states that use of force issues, and the training involved, will be analyzed by experts whenever such action is taken. |
|
305 |
Sen. Prozanski |
Raises another issue with the –A3 amendments. |
|
343 |
Sen. Walker |
MOTION: Moves HB 2142A to the floor with a DO PASS recommendation. |
|
|
|
VOTE: 5-0-2 EXCUSED: 2 - Ringo, Starr |
|
349 |
Chair Burdick |
Hearing no objection, declares the motion CARRIED. SEN. PROZANSKI will lead discussion on the floor. |
|
361 |
Chair Burdick |
Closes the work session on HB 2142A and opens a work session on HB 2224A. |
|
HB 2224A – WORK SESSION |
||
|
364 |
Heidi Moawad |
Counsel. Describes HB 2224A relating to requiring the appellate court, after reversing any count but not all counts on appeal to remand the case to a trial court for resentencing on the remaining count or counts Introduces and describes the –A2 amendment (EXHIBIT G). |
|
389 |
Jonathan Fussner |
Oregon Department of Justice. Testifies in support of HB 2224A and talks about the –A2 amendment. |
|
408 |
Chair Burdick |
Asks about situations where someone has a combination of concurrent and consecutive sentences. |
|
424 |
Fussner |
Talks about the scenario raised by Chair Burdick. |
|
460 |
Fussner |
Stresses that the trial judge has discretion on what to do in these instances of multiple offenses. |
|
TAPE 169, B |
||
|
021 |
Sen. Beyer |
Wonders about upward departures issues with the Blakely decision and the relation with this bill. |
|
031 |
Fussner |
Comments on cases on remand where Blakely was decided during the process. |
|
052 |
Chair Burdick |
Asks what would happen if we don’t pass this bill. |
|
054 |
Fussner |
States that not much would occur if this bill wasn’t passed. Talks about what might happen. |
|
073 |
Chair Burdick |
Places this bill onto the agenda for Thursday, June 17, 2005. Adjourns the meeting at 2: 58 p.m. |
|
|
|
|
EXHIBIT SUMMARY