SENATE COMMITTEE ON REVENUE
January 18, 2005 Hearing Room A
9:00 AM Tapes 3 - 4
MEMBERS PRESENT: Sen. Ryan Deckert, Chair
Sen. Gary George
Sen. Rick Metsger
Sen. Floyd Prozanski
MEMBERS EXCUSED: Sen. Bruce Starr, Vice-Chair
VISITING MEMBER: Sen. Charles Starr
STAFF PRESENT: Paul Warner, Legislative Revenue Staff
Lizbeth Martin-Mahar, Legislative Revenue Staff
James Goulding, Committee Assistant
ISSUES HEARD: Informational Meeting
Orientation: Personal Income Tax
These minutes are in compliance with Senate and House Rules. Only text enclosed in quotation marks reports a speaker’s exact words. For complete contents, please refer to the tapes.
|
TAPE/# |
Speaker |
Comments |
|
TAPE 3, SIDE A |
||
|
003 |
Chair Deckert |
Calls the meeting to order at 9:06 AM. Makes opening remarks to the committee. Notes Senator Charles Starr will be taking the place of Senator Bruce Starr on the committee. |
|
Informational Meeting |
||
|
Orientation: Personal Income Tax |
||
|
020 |
Lizbeth Martin-Mahar |
Makes opening remarks on tax documents available for committee members. Begins making PowerPoint presentation on Oregon Income Taxes (EXHIBIT A). Presents committee with a research report on Impact of 1997 Legislation (EXHIBIT B), and Oregon Personal Income Tax Statistics (EXHIBIT C). |
|
046 |
Martin-Mahar |
Begins slide presentation with Oregon Income and Property Tax collections, slide 2. |
|
060 |
Chair Deckert |
Wonders if as corporate taxes rise, personal income tax revenues will increase. |
|
070 |
Martin-Maher |
Replies there is a correlation and that taxpayers would expect to see that happen. Continues with presentation, elaborates on personal incomes taxes and withholding of payments. Discusses General Fund Revenues, slide 3. |
|
108 |
Martin-Maher |
Explains Number of Tax Returns: Tax Withheld, Estimated Payments & Refunds – 2002, slide 4. Explains Tax Withheld, Estimated Payments & Refunds – 2002, slide 5. |
|
150 |
Sen. Prozanski |
Asks about graph indications on the Withholding Payments slide 6. |
|
170 |
Martin-Mahar |
Clarifies what the graph indications are referring to. Continues presentation with a breakdown of industry and month of tax withholdings index for 1999-2004, slide 7. |
|
200 |
Martin-Mahar |
Discusses industry sectors with a decline in withholdings between July 2001 and October 2002, compared to data from October 2004, slides 8 and 9. |
|
234 |
Martin-Mahar |
Begins second segment of slide show, Oregon Income Taxes, Details on the Personal Income Tax system. Discusses Oregon’s tie to federal tax system, page 6. |
|
245 |
Chair Deckert |
Wonders about the implications of disconnecting from the federal tax system, and federal laws that would require Oregon to reconnect. |
|
250 |
Martin-Mahar |
Explains Oregon’s disconnect, and how some federal changes will not be implemented in Oregon. Legislature will start a rolling reconnect. |
|
348 |
Martin-Mahar |
Discusses Oregon subtractions, federal income taxes but Oregon does not. This includes Social Security. Explains standard deductions vs. itemized deductions. |
|
360 |
Martin-Mahar |
Discusses trends in Oregon’s largest subtractions, page 6. Changes made by U.S. Congress affect Oregon taxes. |
|
380 |
Chair Deckert |
Asks if Oregon is the only state with a special tax deduction for the elderly. |
|
390 |
Martin-Mahar |
Replies that he is correct. Discusses top five Oregon tax subtractions. |
|
450 |
Martin-Maher |
Discusses number of itemized and standard tax returns. |
|
TAPE 4, SLIDE A |
||
|
005 |
Martin-Mahar |
Continues discussion of itemized and standard tax returns, page 7. |
|
020 |
Martin-Mahar |
Discusses trends in largest federal itemized deductions, page 8. |
|
040 |
Martin-Mahar |
Continues discussion on top five federal itemized deductions. Top deductions are home mortgage interest and property taxes. |
|
045 |
Martin-Mahar |
Begins discussion on Oregon’s personal income tax. Oregon’s tax rates are significantly lower than federal tax brackets. Brackets are indexed to inflation. |
|
075 |
Martin-Mahar |
Begins discussion on trends in Oregon’s largest credits for tax years 1999-2003. Personal exemption is by far the largest credit. |
|
090 |
Chair Deckert |
Wonders what the aggregate cost of a credit. |
|
100 |
Martin-Mahar |
Replies, aggregate is about $15 million, but that number is declining in 2003. |
|
105 |
Sen. Prozanski |
Wonders how many states provide for credit where some income is earned from other states. |
|
110 |
Martin-Mahar |
Does not know. Federal level also provides credit for those who pay taxes in other countries. |
|
115 |
Paul Warner |
Points out that his research shows all states have some method of preventing double taxation across state lines. |
|
120 |
Sen. Charles Starr |
Questions how Oregon can capture the income for taxes for work done in other states. |
|
125 |
Martin-Mahar |
Replies that taxpayers have to report it themselves. It is difficult to do. |
|
130 |
Warner |
Ensuring compliance for this is one of the toughest tasks for Oregon Dept. of Revenue. |
|
140 |
Martin-Mahar |
Continues with presentation on trends in largest Oregon credits. |
|
150 |
Chair Deckert |
Ponders how many other states have a similar law. |
|
155 |
Warner |
Replies he would be surprised if many states have that law. |
|
160 |
Martin-Mahar |
Moves forward with her presentation on income tax credit trends. Outlines key features of Oregon’s earned income and child care credits. Continues discussion on Top Five Oregon Credits – Tax Year 2002. The top five credits total 93% of total credits. Next slide gives same breakdown in pie graph. |
|
196 |
Martin-Mahar |
Discusses key features of Oregon’s earned income and working family child care credits. Brought into effect in 1997. EIC legislation was to help low-income taxpayers. |
|
212 |
Martin-Mahar |
Explains Table B: Historical Utilization of EIC and WFCC & Federal EIC, slide 23. Some families claim both credits. |
|
266 |
Martin-Mahar |
Graph below table shows credits are tailored to help low income taxpayers. As income grows, credits decrease. |
|
300 |
Martin-Mahar |
Explains Distribution of Tax Returns, comparing 2003 returns to 1990. Provides details of the components of adjusted gross income for 1990. |
|
317 |
Martin-Mahar |
Discusses components of adjusted growth income pie chart. Wages comprise 66.3 percent of total. Compares 1990 AGI with 2002 AGI. |
|
364 |
Martin-Mahar |
Discusses change in major components of AGI tax year 2000 and 2002, slide 28. |
|
390 |
Martin-Mahar |
Summarizes distribution of AGI components with discussion of adjusted gross income in 1990 and 2002, slides 29 and 30. Points out slides that details AGI by county. Illustrates disparity among urban and rural counties. |
|
TAPE 3, SIDE B |
||
|
018 |
Martin-Mahar |
Continues slide presentation with discussion of check-off donations on Oregon income tax forms. |
|
020 |
Chair Deckert |
Asks about rotation of tax check-off donations from year to year. |
|
025 |
Martin-Mahar |
Replies that some rotate, others are permanent |
|
030 |
Sen. Prozanski |
Asks about how to specify a donation. |
|
040 |
Martin-Mahar |
Responds. |
|
050 |
Sen. Prozanski |
Wonders about taxation of Vancouver, Washington residents that work in Oregon. |
|
055 |
Martin-Mahar |
Responds, tax compliance can be difficult to enforce. |
|
067 |
Sen. George |
Wonders about percentage of total amount of state taxes are paid by those earning $60,000 and above (refer to page 15). |
|
070 |
Martin-Mahar |
Replies, roughly 61%. |
|
075 |
Chair Deckert |
Asks about Oregon’s disconnect from federal tax cuts, and what might happen if the Bush administration’s tax cuts were to be made permanent. |
|
090 |
Martin-Mahar |
Responds, Oregon would have less federal tax subtraction, and state taxes would raise. |
|
095 |
Warner |
Provides more detail. |
|
102 |
Chair Deckert |
Thanks the staff for the presentation. Adjourns the meeting at 10:09 AM. |
Tape Log Submitted by,
Barbara Guardino, Committee Assistant Reviewed by Kim Taylor James
EXHIBIT SUMMARY