|
|
INFORMATIONAL MEETING |
|
|
TAPES 7 A-B, 8 A |
JANUARY 20, 2005 9:00 AM STATE CAPITOL BUILDING
Members Present: Senator Ryan Deckert, Chair
Senator Charles Starr, Vice Chair
Senator Gary George
Senator Rick Metsger
Members Excused: Senator Floyd Prozanski
Witness Present: John Phillips, Legislative Liaison, Oregon Department of Revenue
Staff Present: Paul Warner, Legislative Revenue Officer
Mary Ayala, Economist
Barbara Guardino, Committee Assistant
TAPE 7, SIDE A
|
004 |
Vice Chair Charles Starr |
Calls meeting to order at 9:00 a.m. Committee will continue with informational hearings.
|
|
INFORMATIONAL MEETING |
||
|
019 |
Paul Warner |
Gives overview of updated Withholding Payments chart (EXHIBIT 1).
|
|
045 |
Mary Ayala |
Begins slide presentation on Oregon Property Taxes (EXHIBIT 2) slide 1. Part 1: Historical Overview of Property Tax Collections.
|
|
84 |
Ayala |
Discusses Property Values and Tax Rates, slide 3, assessed value and market rate.
|
|
102 |
Ayala |
Reviews Oregon Property Tax: Per Capita and as % of Income, slide 4. Property tax as % of income; property tax per capita. Discussion on effects of Measure 5 and Measure 50.
|
|
162 |
Ayala |
Discusses Property Tax per Capita and % of Income State Ranking, slide 5. Compares Oregon’s tax burden with other states.
|
|
179 |
Ayala |
Discusses County Ranking of Total Assessed Value, slide 6. Total of 46% of assessed value could be accounted for by three counties, Multnomah, Washington and Clackamas.
|
|
209 |
Ayala |
Discusses FY03-04 Property Tax Rates, slide 7.
|
|
293 |
Ayala |
Reviews Part 1: Summary – Historical Overview of Oregon’s Property Tax Collections, slides 8-9.
|
|
258 |
Ayala |
Begins Part II of presentation, Oregon’s Current Property Tax Structure, slide 11.
|
|
273 |
Ayala |
Discusses What Property is Taxed? Real property and personal property are taxed, slide 12.
|
|
282 |
Ayala |
Explains pie chart concerning real market values, slide 13. More detailed table is available in Table A-4 in DOR report (EXHIBIT 3).
|
|
307 |
Ayala |
Explains pie chart, slide 14, FY 03-04 Assessed Value. Compares with previous slide.
|
|
328 |
Ayala |
Discusses Real Market Value and Assessed Value, by Property Type, slide 15.
|
|
350 |
Ayala |
Continues discussion with The Property Tax Structure, slide16, and Major Components of Property Taxes, slide 17.
|
|
365 |
Ayala |
Discusses Characteristics of Permanent Rates, slide 18.
|
|
380 |
Ayala |
Discusses General Obligation Bonded Debt, slide 19.
|
|
389 |
Ayala |
Discusses Three Other Components of the Property Tax Structure, slide 20.
|
|
398 |
Ayala |
Discusses Characteristics of Local Option, slide 21.
|
|
417 |
Ayala |
Discusses School Local Option, slide 22.
|
|
429 |
John Phillips |
Continues discussion with An Overview of Measures 5 and 50, slide 23. Notes, measures have ongoing effects on taxing districts’ ability to raise additional revenue and the legislature’s ability to assist. Measure 50 creates certainty for taxpayers and provides relative stability of property tax.
|
|
450 |
Phillips |
Discusses Measure 5 Limit, Key Elements, slide 24.
|
|
475 |
Phillips |
Discusses Measure 5 Limit Key Elements, School limit, slide 25.
|
TAPE 8, SIDE A
|
040 |
Phillips |
Continues presentation with discussion on Measures 5 and 50. Discusses Measure 50 Principles, slide 26.
|
|
065 |
Phillips |
Discusses The Roll Back – Maximum Assessed Value (MAV), slide 27. Discusses ratio comparing real market value to maximum assessed value.
|
|
082 |
Phillips |
Explains RMV/MAV ratio, Limited Growth in Taxable Value, slide 29.
|
|
093 |
Phillips |
Continues explanation of Limited Growth in Taxable Value, slide 30.
|
|
122 |
Phillips |
Continues Limited Growth in Taxable Value discussion, slide 31. References exceptions to the tax limits.
|
|
130 |
Phillips |
Limited Growth discussion, slide 32, includes minor construction.
|
|
158 |
Phillips |
Directs members’ attention to examples of exceptions including new construction. Explains ratio of assessed value to real market value. Slide 33.
|
|
165 |
Phillips |
Discusses Consolidated Levy Authority, slide 34.
|
|
170 |
Phillips |
Discusses Measure 50 Tax Calculation, slide 35.
|
|
185 |
Phillips |
Reviews, Part II: Summary of the Current Property Tax Structure, slides 36, 37 and 38.
|
|
209 |
Ayala |
Begins Part III: Local Taxes by Taxing District, slide 39.
|
|
215 |
Ayala |
Discusses Who Levies Taxes on Property? Slide 40.
|
|
222 |
Ayala |
Begins discussion on Who Levies Taxes on Property? Slide 40. Directs members’ attention to table D-2 in Oregon Property Tax Statistics, exhibit 3.
|
|
251 |
Ayala |
Continues discussion on chart: 2003-04 Property Taxes Imposed by District and Structure, slide 41.
|
|
161 |
Ayala |
Discusses Shares of Imposed Taxes, by Major Taxing District, slide 42.
|
|
269 |
Ayala |
Summarizes Components of the Tax Statement, slide 43. Identifiers, property values and tax amounts for each district.
|
|
298 |
Ayala |
Discusses Property Tax Bill, slide 44.
|
|
325 |
Ayala |
Explains Example A: Compression – When It Is NOT Needed, slide 45.
|
|
341 |
Ayala |
Explains Measure 5 – Tax Compression, slide 46. How compression value is applied to each tax statement.
|
|
361 |
Ayala |
Explains Example B: Compression of Governmental Limit – How Compression is Applied to Each Account, slides 47 and 48.
|
|
419 |
Sen. George |
Asks if this compression was a result of Measures 47 and 50.
|
|
421 |
Phillips |
Responds, most taxing districts will levy a permanent rate. If they levy local option tax that could throw all districts into compression except that in Measure 50 the local option is prioritized.
|
TAPE 7, SIDE B
|
022 |
Ayala |
Continues explanation of local options that are levied. Compression has taken its toll over the years. Refers to Example D: Compression, When Tax Rate Increases and a Local Option Levy Exceeds Measure 5 Limits, slide 50. |
|
040 |
Ayala |
Discusses M5 Compression Losses ($millions), chart, slide 51.
|
|
057 |
Ayala |
Reviews section, Part III: Summary Local Revenues by Taxing District, slide 52.
|
|
058 |
Sen. George |
Asks for clarification on the effects of the use of a local option, compression, permanent rate.
|
|
053 |
Phillips |
Responds, most districts will impose full permanent rate. In regard to local option, there are many factors involved.
|
|
085 |
Warner |
Most of the discussion and questions coming to LRO is on the issue of schools district local options. It’s difficult for schools to calculate how much money they will bring in. Seventeen school districts have passed a local option in the last five years.
|
|
103 |
Chair Deckert |
Requests inclusion of the local options in the School Finance Report next week.
|
|
123 |
All |
Questions and discussion pertaining to compression and how educated school districts are on this matter.
|
|
163 |
Chair Deckert |
Previews next week’s topics of discussion. Adjourns meeting at 10:10 a.m. |
Tape Log Submitted by,
Barbara Guardino, Committee Assistant Reviewed by Kim Taylor James
Exhibit Summary:
1. Withholding Payments, Ayala, 1 pp.
2. Oregon Property Taxes, Ayala, 26 pp.
3. Oregon Property Tax Statistics, Fiscal Year 2003-04, Ayala, 175 pp.