|
|
INFORMATIONAL MEETING PUBLIC HEARING, SB 11 |
|
|
TAPES 15-16 A-B |
JANUARY 27, 2005 9:00 AM STATE CAPITOL BUILDING
Members Present: Senator Ryan Deckert, Chair
Senator Charles Starr, Vice Chair
Senator Gary George
Senator Floyd Prozanski
Members Excused: Senator Rick Metsger
Witnesses Present: Senator David Nelson, District 29
Catherine Britain, Oregon Telecommunications Coordinating
Council
Bill Penhollow, Association of Oregon Counties
Christopher Tamarin, Oregon Economic & Community
Development Department
Staff Present: Paul Warner, Legislative Revenue Officer
Lizbeth Martin-Mahar, Economist
Barbara Guardino, Committee Assistant
TAPE 15, SIDE A
|
004 |
Chair Deckert |
Calls meeting to order at 9:07 a.m.
|
|
PUBLIC HEARING, SENATE BILL 11 |
||
|
016 |
Paul Warner |
Introduces Senate Bill 11. Proposes modification of SB 622. Increases the annual cap on costs of telecommunications facilities.
|
|
020 |
Sen. David Nelson |
Testifies in support of SB 11. Begins with history of bill beginning with SB 622. Explains Oregon schematic of Oregon’s original telecommunication infrastructure (EXHIBIT 1). Brings high-speed broadband telecommunications access throughout Oregon. Adds carry-forward provisions to complete the process.
|
|
066 |
Sen. Nelson |
Notes, SB 11 is one of a series of bills drafted during interim session. Oregon Telecommunications Coordinating Council consumer group was created to deal with this issue and created this bill and several other bills.
|
|
098 |
Sen. George |
Asks if this bill is part of the governor’s “connect Oregon” infrastructure?
|
|
104 |
Sen. Nelson |
Responds, high-speed telecom is a major part of the infrastructure.
|
|
125 |
Chair Deckert |
Asks, what has been your experience been in outlying areas with SB 622?
|
|
130 |
Sen. Nelson |
Responds, this has been a success story for the state.
|
|
143 |
Sen. Nelson |
Discusses connectivity with Public Utilities Commission. |
|
185 |
Catherine Britain |
Testifies in support of SB 11. See written testimony (EXHIBIT 2). This bill allows for a company to receive a tax credit for investment of up to $50 million in a telecom facility. It is a one-time credit. Also, if the investing company has this investment in a long-term plan, it cannot request the tax credit. Finally, it can only be used by providers who meet minimum requirements.
|
|
241 |
Britain |
Gives an example of why this tax credit is important.
|
|
280 |
Bill Penhollow |
Testifies in support of SB 11. See written testimony, verbatim (EXHIBIT 3).
|
|
340 |
Penhollow |
Explains that broadband is important to business and government, including health care, public safety and consumer information.
|
|
387 |
Christopher Tamarin |
Testifies in support of bill. See written testimony, verbatim (EXHIBIT 4). Highlights telecom policy framework built over the past few years. Discusses current advanced telecommunications infrastructure tax credit program.
|
TAPE 16, SIDE A
|
020 |
Tamarin |
Continues verbatim testimony. Discusses intent of the bill, major impacts and fiscal impacts.
|
|
058 |
Sen. Prozanski |
Asks for clarification on Tamarin’s statement that no one has actually applied or used any of the tax credits to date. Follow-up questions.
|
|
065 |
Tamarin |
Responds, that is correct.
|
|
103 |
Sen. Prozanski |
Requests a list of all tax credit bills that will come through the committee this session.
|
|
108 |
Chair Deckert |
Committee will attempt to hear all of the credit and incentive bills at once.
|
|
118 |
Sen. George |
Question Mr. Tamarin on the fiscal impact statement portion of his testimony.
|
|
136 |
Tamarin |
Agrees, telecom infrastructure is important in attracting business.
|
|
149 |
Sen. George |
Legislature has moral obligation to provide this kind of service to outlying communities that have lost jobs.
|
|
159 |
Chair Deckert |
Are telecom providers across the state aware of the current program? Follow-up questions.
|
|
173 |
Tamarin |
Yes.
|
|
177 |
Britain |
Notes, one thing the council wants this money to be used for is things that are not currently be provided, things companies would normally turn away from.
|
|
198 |
Chair Deckert |
Asks providers in audience if they are aware of the program. They nod “yes.”
|
|
208 |
Sen. Prozanski |
Asks who determines whether a company was planning on working a project as compared to one that will do it only because of the tax credit.
|
|
213 |
Tamarin |
Explains application process.
|
|
249 |
Sen. George |
Asks, is the state encouraging rapid deployment of broadband communications?
|
|
255 |
Tamarin |
State has made tremendous strides in providing broadband over the past three years. No carrier is excluded from applying for the tax credit.
|
|
290 |
Britain |
Will supply any additional information that the committee might require.
|
|
301 |
Tamarin |
Concludes, though the state has made significant progress, all infrastructure is a work in progress. This bill encourages additional development.
|
|
323 |
Chair Deckert |
Closes public hearing on SB 11. Opens informational meeting on corporate income taxes. |
|
|
|
|
INFORMATIONAL MEETING
|
346 |
Lizbeth Martin-Mahar |
Begins slide presentation, Oregon Income Taxes, Corporate Excise Tax (EXHIBIT 5). Introduces Oregon Corporate Excise and Income Tax booklet (EXHIBIT 6). Slide 2: Corporate Income and Excise Tax Payments. Industries that are struggling include manufacturing and information. Retail trade is doing well.
|
|
449 |
Sen. Prozanski |
Asks for an example of management of companies.
|
|
459 |
Martin-Mahar |
Responds, those are holding companies.
|
TAPE 15, SIDE B
|
030 |
Martin-Mahar |
Continues slide presentation on corporate income taxes. Slide 3: Business Income Tax Returns
|
|
066 |
Martin-Mahar |
Slide 4: Business Income By Business Type 1990 and 2002
|
|
090 |
Martin-Mahar |
Slide 5: Business Income Statement – Gross Receipts
|
|
120 |
Martin-Mahar |
Slide 6: Business Income Statement – Federal Taxable Income
|
|
189 |
Martin-Mahar |
Slide 7: States Corporate Top Tax Rates (%) – Tax Year 2004
|
|
208 |
Martin-Mahar |
Slide 8: Trends in Oregon Corporate Credits Used and the Corporate Base Tax Amount – 1990-2002
|
|
249 |
Martin-Mahar |
Slide 9: Trends in C Corporations Utilization of Major Tax Credits – 1998-2002
|
|
259 |
Chair Deckert |
Asks about an agreement reached on pollution control tax credit in 2001 legislation.
|
|
265 |
Martin-Mahar |
Responds, maximum amount is 35% of cost of the investment. Credit sunsets in 2008.
|
|
306 |
Martin-Mahar |
Slide 10: Corporate Tax Credits Used
|
|
336 |
Martin-Mahar |
Slide 11: Trends in C Corporations’ Unused Tax Credits ($millions) 2000-2002. There are twice as many unused credits as used.
|
|
388 |
Warner |
Comments, one of the provisions for the telecommunications credit is it may not be carried forward. SB 11 would change this.
|
|
416 |
Sen. George |
Would it be possible or legal to remove the carry-overs from some of the recipients who have not used them?
|
|
423 |
Martin-Mahar |
No.
|
|
433 |
Sen. Prozanski |
If a 5-year carry-over expires do they lose it? Follow-up questions.
|
|
440 |
Martin-Mahar |
Yes.
|
|
450 |
Martin-Mahar |
Continues answering questions concerning expiring credits.
|
TAPE 16, SIDE B
|
045 |
Martin-Mahar |
Slide 12: Corporate Excise Tax
|
|
075 |
Chair Deckert |
Asks how many corporations pay minimum excise tax of $10.
|
|
080 |
Martin-Mahar |
Jumps ahead to slide 16 in response.
|
|
090 |
Martin-Mahar |
Slide 15: Top 50 Corporate Taxpayers
|
|
107 |
Martin-Mahar |
Slide 17: Breakdown of C-Corporate Net Tax by Income
|
|
111 |
Martin-Mahar |
Slide 19: Oregon’s Multi-State Corp. Apportionment Formula
|
|
125 |
Martin-Mahar |
Slide 20: Multi-state Income Apportionment
|
|
138 |
Martin-Mahar |
Slide 21: State Apportionment Formulas – 2004
|
|
144 |
Martin-Mahar |
Slide 24: Throwback Sales by Industry Sector – 2002
|
|
159 |
Sen. George |
Asks for clarification on sales factor.
|
|
165 |
Martin-Mahar |
Responds, products had to originate in Oregon. Gives example.
|
|
199 |
Chair Deckert |
Asks for input on whether to continue committee’s start time at 9:00 a.m. or begin at 8:30 a.m. Committee will continue 9:00 a.m. start time at least through next week.
|
|
222 |
Chair Deckert |
Adjourns meeting at 10:45 a.m. |
Tape Log Submitted by,
Barbara Guardino, Committee Assistant Reviewed by Kim Taylor James
Exhibit Summary:
1. SB 11, Qwest SB 622 Rings map, Nelson, 1 pp.
2. SB 11, Oregon Telecommunications Coordinating Council, Britain, 1 pp.
3. SB 11, Testimony in Support of Senate Bill 11, Penhollow, 2 pp.
4. SB 11, Testimony of Mr. Christopher Tamarin, Tamarin, 3 pp.
5. Oregon Income Taxes, Corporate Excise Tax, Martin-Mahar, 12 pp.
6. Oregon Corporate Excise and Income Tax, Martin-Mahar, 41 pp.