|
|
PUBLIC HEARING: SB 899 WORK SESSION: SB 32, SB 840 |
|
|
TAPES 67, 68 A |
MARCH 15, 2005 8:30 AM STATE CAPITOL BUILDING
Members Present: Senator Ryan Deckert, Chair
Senator Gary George
Senator Rick Metsger
Senator Floyd Prozanski
Senator Charles Starr, Vice Chair
Witnesses Present: Dennis Mulvihill Washington County
Tom Linhares, Multnomah County Tax Supervising and
Conservation Commission
Marge Kafoury, City of Portland
Gerald Kubiak, Washington County public affairs staff
Ross Schultz, City of Sherwood
Staff Present: Paul Warner, Legislative Revenue Officer
Mary Ayala, Economist
Lizbeth Martin-Mahar, Economist
Mazen Malik, Economist
Barbara Guardino, Committee Assistant
TAPE 67, SIDE A
|
005 |
Chair Deckert |
Calls meeting to order at 8:40 a.m. Opens work session on SB 32, the companion bill to the compliance and amnesty bill that allows the Dept. of Revenue to waive tax penalties.
|
|
WORK SESSION, SB 32 |
||
|
010 |
Sen. George |
MOTION: MOVES SB 32 TO THE SENATE FLOOR WITH A DO PASS RECOMMENDATION.
|
|
012 |
Chair Deckert |
ORDER: THERE BEING NO OBJECTION THE CHAIR SO ORDERS. VOTE: 4-0-1 MEMBERS VOTING AYE: GEORGE, PROZANSKI, C. STARR, CHAIR DECKERT MEMBERS EXCUSED: METSGER
|
WORK SESSION, SB 840
|
026 |
Mazen Malik |
Provides overview of SB 840. Allows wine manufacturers who did not owe privilege tax the past year and don’t expect to owe one for the coming to year to file annual reports instead of monthly.
|
|
043 |
Malik |
Explains SB 840-1 amendments (EXHIBIT 1). Changes fiscal year to calendar year.
|
|
068 |
Vice Chair C. Starr |
MOTION: MOVES ADOPTION OF 840-1.
|
|
070 |
Chair Deckert |
ORDER: THERE BEING NO OBJECTION THE CHAIR SO ORDERS VOTE: 5-0-0 MEMBERS VOTING AYE: GEORGE, METSGER, PROZANSKI, C. STARR, CHAIR DECKERT
|
|
074 |
Vice Chair C. Starr |
MOTION: MOVES SB 840 AS AMENDED TO THE SENATE FLOOR WITH A DO PASS RECOMMENDATION
|
|
076 |
Chair Deckert |
ORDER: THERE BEING NO OBJECTION THE CHAIR SO ORDERS VOTE: 5-0-0
|
PUBLIC HEARING, SB 899
|
080 |
Mary Ayala |
Gives overview of SB 899. See Staff Measure Summary (EXHIBIT 2). Expands from 500,000 to 600,000 the population level above which a county must create a Tax Supervising and Conservation Commission (TSCC) if it does not have a county clerk. Gives background.
|
|
099 |
Chair Deckert |
Asks why it is necessary to have a commission.
|
|
108 |
Dennis Mulvihill |
Responds, because it is the law. Testifies in favor of SB 899. See written testimony: Request for Support, a letter from Tom Brian, chairman of Washington County Board of Commissioners (EXHIBIT 3), amendments (EXHIBIT 4) and letters from various jurisdictions in support of amended bill (EXHIBITS 5, 6 and 7).
|
|
125 |
Sen. Prozanski |
Asks for clarification in regard to counties that already have the requirement. Will they be allowed reconsideration?
|
|
132 |
Mulvihill |
Multnomah County would be required to have a supervising commission. Any county that reaches 500,000 after July 1, 2005 would not be required to have one unless it wanted one.
|
|
142 |
Sen. Prozanski |
Asks why set up a double standard?
|
|
149 |
Mulvihill |
Multnomah County has not yet decided to change the bill, although Washington County would welcome it. SB 899 as written corrects an oversight in Oregon’s budget law.
|
|
173 |
Mulvihill |
Gives history of Multnomah County’s TSCC. Commission was created 86 years ago. Contends the law is “archaic and contrary to the public’s expectations of efficient government.”
|
|
205 |
Mulvihill |
Concludes, there’s no problem, and it seems arbitrary to create this commission just because a jurisdiction reaches 500,000 people. |
|
|
|
|
|
214 |
Chair Deckert |
Agrees with Sen. Prozanski. Would move this amendment, but is curious why Multnomah County needs this commission. Would entertain an amendment to undo the whole program.
|
|
230 |
Tom Linhares |
Testifies in favor of bill. Explains function of the Multnomah County Tax Supervising and Conservation Commission and the reasoning behind its creation in 1919. There’s a lot of interconnectedness in budgetary issues. TSCC reviews budgets of the 37 taxing districts and if levies are in excess of the law, it orders them to reduce it. They hold public hearings on proposed taxing levies.
|
|
275 |
Linhares |
TSCC acts as the eyes of the citizens in tax levies. Commission has 5 volunteer positions and 3 staff people including himself, the director. The law says the county has to fund the commission up to a maximum of $280,000.
|
|
311 |
Sen. Metsger |
Asks what is TSCC’s budget.
|
|
315 |
Linhares |
Anticipates, TSCC will spend $250,000 this year.
|
|
319 |
Sen. Metsger |
Asks Mr. Mulvihill how Washington County meets its responsibility to its citizens in relation to its taxing districts.
|
|
332 |
Mulvihill |
Explains, Washington County follows Oregon budget law and has an auditor and a citizens’ budget committee.
|
|
360 |
Sen. Metsger |
Asks questions concerning whether the two county commissions duplicate each other.
|
|
381 |
Linhares |
Responds, Washington County auditor audits Washington and Multnomah counties’ functions. TSCC looks at all taxing districts.
|
|
415 |
Marge Kafoury |
City of Portland has an elected auditor. His budget is about $1 million per year. Can get the exact figure.
|
|
444 |
Sen. Prozanski |
Asks, how many taxing districts are in Washington County.
|
|
451 |
Gerald Kubiak |
Responds, there are 25-30 taxing districts in Washington County.
|
|
474 |
Sen. Prozanski |
It appears this is backwards. Commissions should be in place for smaller counties, not the larger ones. Does not buy the argument that there’s more need for oversight in a larger community. Suggests giving Multnomah County the option of rethinking whether it needs this overlay. Is not comfortable setting up a dual system.
|
TAPE 68, SIDE A
|
033 |
Sen. George |
Refers to City of Tigard letter (EXHIBIT 6) from Mayor Craig E. Dirksen, paragraph 5. Are the commission’s meetings open to the public?
|
|
044 |
Linhares |
Responds, they are all open to the public.
|
|
054 |
Vice Chair. C. Starr |
Does not favor setting up a dual standard. Taxing districts are an open process and their work is audited. Multnomah County needs to decide if it wants to continue this process and free up other counties to do likewise.
|
|
065 |
Chair Deckert |
Concurs with Vice Chair Starr. Requests an amendment to undo the entire state law. Would like to talk to someone from Multnomah County whether there is a need for this commission with all the existing auditing staff.
|
|
079 |
Sen. George |
Would like to eliminate a governor appointee.
|
|
089 |
Linhares |
The reason for gubernatorial appointees is independence.
|
|
103 |
Chair Deckert |
Senses committee is leaning toward getting rid of the law altogether.
|
|
115 |
Kafoury |
Makes correction to earlier response. City of Portland has a $7.5 million budget and 66 auditors.
|
|
125 |
Ross Schultz |
Testifies in support of SB 899. Favors disbanding TSCC requirement. During several years of attending TSCC public meetings not one citizen ever attended. The TSCC funded at $280,000 will review over 150 funds, try to understand them and help those municipalities, all in a two-month period. Staff doesn’t need another set of rules. TSCC does not add value to the local citizens.
|
|
180 |
Schultz |
Concludes, the TSCC law was written in 1919, and the technology has changed.
|
|
195 |
Chair Deckert |
Expresses support of SB 899. Asks for an amendment to disband the TSCC. Closes public hearing at 8:23 a.m. |
Tape Log Submitted by,
Barbara Guardino, Committee Assistant
Exhibit Summary:
1. SB 840, Proposed -1 amendments, 3/9/05, Malik, 1 pp.
2. SB 899, Staff Measure Summary, 3/15/05, Ayala, 1 pp.
3. SB 899, letter of testimony from Tom Brian, Washington County, RE: Request for Support, 3/15/05, Mulvihill, 2 pp.
4. SB 899, Washington County Amendments Senate Bill 899, 3/15/05, Mulvihill, 1 pp.
5. SB 899, letter of testimony from BJ Smith, Clackamas County, RE: Request for Support, 3/15/05, 2 pp.
6. SB 899, letter of testimony from Craig E. Dirksen, City of Tigard, RE: Request for Support, 1 pp.
7. SB 899, letter of testimony from Tom Hughes, City of Hillsboro, 1 pp.