SENATE COMMITTEE ON TRANSPORTATION
January 24, 2005 Hearing Room C
3:00 PM Tapes 3 - 4
Corrected 10/28/05
MEMBERS PRESENT: Sen. Joanne Verger, Chair
Sen. Doug Whitsett, Vice-Chair
Sen. Rick Metsger
Sen. Floyd Prozanski
Sen. Bruce Starr
STAFF PRESENT: Judith Callens, Committee Administrator
James Goulding, Committee Assistant
ISSUES HEARD & WITNESSES:
Introduction of Committee Members - Organizational Meeting
Adoption of Committee Rules – Organizational Meeting
Airport System Overview - Informational Meeting
Michael Burrill, State Aviation Board
Charles Riordan, Oregon Department of Aviation
Oregon Department of Transportation Bridge Update- Informational Meeting
Bruce Warner, Oregon Department of Transportation
Paul Mather, Oregon Department of Transportation
These minutes are in compliance with Senate and House Rules. Only text enclosed in quotation marks reports a speaker’s exact words. For complete contents, please refer to the tapes.
|
TAPE/# |
Speaker |
Comments |
|
TAPE 3, A |
||
|
003 |
Chair Verger |
Opens the meeting at 3:04 p.m. Asks the members to introduce themselves. |
|
INTRODUCTION OF COMMITTEE MEMBERS - ORGANIZATIONAL MEETING |
||
|
015 |
Sen. Bruce Starr |
Introduces himself to the audience and expresses his interests and concerns regarding issues in transportation. |
|
024 |
Sen. Metsger |
Introduces himself and outlines his district and areas of interest. |
|
040 |
Sen. Whitsett |
Introduces himself and summarizes his background. |
|
047 |
Chair Verger |
Introduces herself and her history with transportation-related issues. Outlines the committee’s initial goals. Submits rules to the committee (EXHIBIT A). Asks the committee to adopt the proposed rules. |
|
ADOPTION OF COMMITTEE RULES - ORGANIZATIONAL MEETING |
||
|
053 |
|
MOTION: Moves to ADOPT the proposed Committee Rules dated 1/25/05. |
|
|
|
VOTE: 4-0-1 EXCUSED: 1 - Prozanski |
|
054 |
Chair Verger |
Hearing no objection, declares the motion CARRIED. |
|
058 |
Chair Verger |
Closes the organizational meeting, and opens an informational meeting. |
|
AIRPORT SYSTEM OVERVIEW - INFORMATIONAL MEETING |
||
|
071 |
Michael Burrill |
Chair, State Aviation Board. Makes opening comments in regard to the current state of the Oregon Department of Aviation (ODA). |
|
092 |
Chair Verger |
Asks for an overview of the future. |
|
094 |
Burrill |
Responds that transportation is important to any real estate development in Oregon. Notes the need for a strong relationship between the ODA and the Oregon Department of Transportation (ODOT). |
|
120 |
Charlie Riordan |
Acting Director, ODA. Presents EXHIBIT B (written testimony) and begins PowerPoint presentation (EXHIBIT C). Walks through the presentation providing information on aviation and the airport system. Outlines the National Plan of Integrated Airport Systems (NPIAS). |
|
185 |
Sen. Prozanski |
Wonders how an airport becomes a NPIAS airport. |
|
190 |
Riordan |
States it is decided by geographic importance, activity and size. Continues with presentation outlining the department’s responsibilities. |
|
235 |
Riordan |
Talks about funding and airport improvement projects. Outlines current issues for 2005, to include air cargo, which is the fastest growing segment of the aviation industry. |
|
285 |
Chair Verger |
Asks for clarification regarding economic impact studies. |
|
290 |
Riordan |
Clarifies the purpose and methodology for the economic impact studies. |
|
295 |
Chair Verger |
Asks about growing airports like Medford and Redmond and their economic impact on the community. |
|
300 |
Riordan |
Replies that they will study each airport in turn, looking at them “as a snapshot in time,” and finding out what trends are in the community. |
|
325 |
Chair Verger |
Asks if the economic studies will also be done on the seven airports that have commercial airline service. |
|
330 |
Riordan |
Replies that the studies will be done at those airports. |
|
345 |
Chair Verger |
Asks if the economic studies will be done at all the “public” airports. |
|
350 |
Riordan |
Responds that they will. Reviews activity at the seven airports that have commercial air service. Notes that Klamath Falls, Pendleton and North Bend are all in jeopardy of losing some of their services. |
|
390 |
Chair Verger |
Comments on North Bend airport being down to three flights a day at a time when passenger demand has increased. Wonders why airlines would not address growing demand. |
|
400 |
Riordan |
Replies that it is an economic decision. |
|
TAPE 4, A |
||
|
005 |
Riordan |
Explains that flight route decisions are based on where the airlines can realize the greatest yield. |
|
025 |
Chair Verger |
States her concern over rural Oregon’s ability to obtain investments without having infrastructure in transportation. |
|
040 |
Riordan |
Continues with his presentation on commercial airline service. |
|
076 |
Riordan |
Summarizes a proposed interstate air service development program. Presents information on air cargo, pointing out it is one of the fastest growing industries. |
|
095 |
Sen. Prozanski |
Wonders about smaller airports “buying service” to their communities. |
|
105 |
Riordan |
Responds that it is a practice called “ticket banking.” Explains that communities commit to purchasing so many seats so an airline is guaranteed revenue. |
|
141 |
Riordan |
Continues with his presentation, discussing trends like the new Airbus 380, and notes that cargo activity will triple in the next ten years. |
|
156 |
Riordan |
Details the general aviation segment. Discusses security issues in aviation. |
|
180 |
Chair Verger |
Asks if the witness is familiar with the project at the North Bend airport, and whether he has been involved in that project. |
|
190 |
Riordan |
Replies he has not worked personally on that project, which is to get a new terminal building at the airport. |
|
200 |
Chair Verger |
Points out the problems being experienced at the airport. Outlines how community involvement can contribute. |
|
215 |
Riordan |
Concurs with her comments and elaborates on means of improving public/private partnerships. |
|
240 |
Sen. Prozanski |
Inquires about the size of the Airbus 380 and whether it compares in size to the C-5A. |
|
245 |
Riordan |
Replies that it is quite a bit larger. |
|
250 |
Chair Verger |
Asks if the Airbus 380 is built by Boeing |
|
|
Riordan |
Replies it is built by Airbus in Europe. |
|
260 |
Sen. Starr |
Wonders what is required to build one’s own airstrip. |
|
265 |
Riordan |
Replies that the aviation department can come out and inspect the location and it can be built. |
|
270 |
Sen. Metsger |
Inquires about problems with private airstrips and “glide slopes” and being placed in risky areas. |
|
280 |
Riordan |
Responds that airstrips are sometimes built and then adjoining property begins building too near the airstrip. Outlines some of the solutions the DOA can provide. |
|
300 |
Chair Verger |
Reviews past efforts to find funding for roads and bridges. Closes the informational meeting on aviation and opens an informational meeting on the ODOT bridge update. |
|
OREGON DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION BRIDGE UPDATE - INFORMATIONAL MEETING |
||
|
336 |
Bruce Warner |
Director, ODOT. Notes that the department has been involved in getting the best information they can regarding the need to repair or replace the bridges in the system. |
|
380 |
Paul Mather |
Region 3 Manager, ODOT. Begins PowerPoint presentation on Oregon State University bridge study (EXHIBIT D). |
|
TAPE 3, B |
||
|
005 |
Mather |
Continues with presentation regarding bridge options and status. |
|
030 |
Sen. Prozanski |
Asks for clarification on the color coding on slide two of the PowerPoint presentation (EXHIBIT D). |
|
040 |
Mather |
Explains the color coding on the map and their meaning in regards to route stages. Continues presentation with discussion of the objectives of an Oregon State University (OSU) study done for ODOT. |
|
105 |
Chair Verger |
Asks if ODOT has illustrated the differences between the OSU study and the national standards. Expresses the need for “transparency” in the process. |
|
115 |
Mather |
Summarizes how ODOT is applying the new criteria to bridges. Reviews the challenges of maintaining momentum for the program. |
|
170 |
Chair Verger |
Expresses her appreciation for the summary. Asks about freight routes and how they were chosen, and feels that it should be addressed at a future date. |
|
190 |
Sen. Starr |
Notes the lack of detail in the presentation. Wants to see if anything has changed since the OSU study, or how many bridges have been moved into other categories (page seven of EXHIBIT D). |
|
220 |
Mather |
Points out this is the same information given to the interim committee in December, and that he had hoped to have additional information. States he has some draft reports that they are working to complete. |
|
230 |
Sen. Starr |
Reiterates his desire to see more information. |
|
240 |
Warner |
Comments that they would be happy to return and provide information on the freight routes, how they were chosen, and the decision-making process. |
|
290 |
Warner |
Talks about the federal bridge standards and that the OSU study has been an essential new tool for determining bridge strength. |
|
300 |
Chair Verger |
Points out the economic problems with closing bridges to freight. Talks about going on the road on February 11, 2005, and upcoming meeting topics. |
|
325 |
Sen. Prozanski |
Asks about the meeting time on February 11. |
|
330 |
Chair Verger |
Replies she would like to make a stop at the Port of Umpqua. Closes the informational meeting and adjourns the meeting at 4:23 PM. |
EXHIBIT SUMMARY