SENATE COMMITTEE ON TRANSPORTATION
February 28, 2005 Hearing Room C
3:10 P.M. Tapes 25 - 26
MEMBERS PRESENT: Sen. Joanne Verger, Chair
Sen. Doug Whitsett, Vice-Chair
Sen. Rick Metsger
Sen. Floyd Prozanski
Sen. Bruce Starr
STAFF PRESENT: Judith Callens, Committee Administrator
Gary Roulier, Committee Assistant
MEMBERS PRESENT: Rep. Terry Beyer
MEASURES/ISSUES HEARD:
HB 2067 – Public Hearing and Work Session
SB 71 – Public Hearing
These minutes are in compliance with Senate and House Rules. Only text enclosed in quotation marks reports a speaker’s exact words. For complete contents, please refer to the tapes.
|
TAPE/# |
Speaker |
Comments |
|
TAPE 25, A |
||
|
003 |
Chair Verger |
Opens the meeting at 3:19 p.m. and opens a public hearing on HB 2067. |
|
HB 2067 – PUBLIC HEARING |
||
|
010 |
Bob Hidley |
Director, Oregon Department of Aviation. States that the bill will stagger the terms of the members of the Aviation Board. |
|
025 |
Chair Verger |
Closes the pubic hearing and opens a work session on HB 2067. |
|
HB 2067 – WORK SESSION |
||
|
031 |
Judith Callens |
Administrator. Reviews the fiscal and revenue impact statements. |
|
037 |
Sen. Whitsett |
MOTION: Moves HB 2067 to the floor with a DO PASS recommendation. |
|
|
|
VOTE: 4-0-1 AYE: In a roll call vote, all members present vote Aye. EXCUSED: 1 - Metsger |
|
|
Chair Verger |
The motion CARRIES. SEN. WHITSETT will lead discussion on the floor. |
|
045 |
Chair Verger |
Closes the work session and opens a public hearing on SB 71. |
|
SB 71 – PUBLIC HEARING |
||
|
053 |
Hidley |
Testifies in support of SB 71. |
|
081 |
Hidley |
Reviews some of the federal matching funds that will become available with the passage of SB 71. |
|
106 |
Chair Verger |
Expresses how disappointing it is when we have to return federal funds. Asks if the witness supports the fact that the Oregon Transportation Commission will decide what projects will be funded. |
|
118 |
Hidley |
Responds that they support how the projects will be selected. |
|
125 |
Sen. B. Starr |
Asks if they have identified projects to be funded and adds he would like to see a list of projects. |
|
131 |
Hidley |
Responds that they have projects identified and will forward the list. |
|
137 |
Sen. Whitsett |
Asks if the projects identified are ready to go. |
|
141 |
Hidley |
Answers that some are engineered and some are not. |
|
152 |
Scott Witt |
Director of Corporate Transportation, Oregon Steel Mills. Testifies in support of SB 71. |
|
183 |
Delmer Hanson |
United Transportation Union. Presents written testimony (EXHIBIT A) and testifies in support of SB 71. |
|
216 |
Hanson |
Notes that there are capacity constraints within the rail system in Oregon. |
|
231 |
Sen. B. Starr |
Asks if the labor shortage problem within the rail industry is improving. |
|
241 |
Hanson |
Responds that the labor shortage situation is improving and summarizes hiring within the rail industry. |
|
261 |
Terry Cleaver |
Traffic Manager, Columbia Grain International. Presents written testimony (EXHIBIT B) and testifies in support of SB 71. |
|
293 |
Sen. Metsger |
Asks what criteria he would utilize to make sure that the investments are maximized. |
|
304 |
Cleaver |
Recommends that the bottlenecks be addressed as they affect the entire transportation system. Also emphasizes they look for matching federal dollars. |
|
318 |
Sen. Whitsett |
Asks what specific bottlenecks should be addressed. |
|
323 |
Cleaver |
Reviews some of the areas that would require attention. Summarizes the problems associated with getting railcars in and out of the yards that serve their company. |
|
349 |
Patti Iverson-Summer |
Global Trading Resources. Testifies in support of SB 71. |
|
388 |
Iverson-Summer |
Outlines the increase in international trade on the west coast, and points out the problems created by shortcomings in the Portland infrastructure. |
|
TAPE 26, A |
||
|
009 |
Iverson-Summer |
Discusses the importance of investment in reducing congestion on in-bound traffic. |
|
043 |
Iverson-Summer |
Stresses that moving cargo through the port in an efficient manner will bring back container traffic to Portland. |
|
053 |
Chair Verger |
Asks how SB 71 would alleviate some of these capacity problems. |
|
065 |
Iverson-Summer |
Responds that building the infrastructure, particularly rail, would counteract some of our disadvantages. |
|
089 |
Chair Verger |
Asks about the cost of ships waiting for four weeks at some congested ports. |
|
094 |
Iverson-Summer |
Answers that she attempts to route her customers away from the congested ports, but options are limited. |
|
102 |
Sen. Whitsett |
Reviews some of the issues covered, and asks her to further develop some of the economic issues. |
|
114 |
Iverson-Summer |
Reviews some of the costs involved in utilizing the Port of Portland, to include the cost for bar pilots. |
|
148 |
Iverson-Summer |
Stresses the importance of being a “full-service port.” |
|
154 |
Sen. Metsger |
Asks what investments would bring the most benefit to marine traffic. |
|
171 |
Iverson-Summer |
Answers that investments in rail would bring the most benefit. |
|
201 |
Anna Spindler |
Fujimi Corporation. Testifies in support of SB 71. Reviews changes in their shipping methods. |
|
250 |
Chair Verger |
Asks what types of finished goods they import. |
|
255 |
Spindler |
Reviews the products her company imports. |
|
261 |
Sen. Whitsett |
Asks why the container traffic left the Port of Portland. |
|
266 |
Spindler |
Reviews some of the reasons behind the decrease in container traffic. |
|
300 |
Spindler |
Notes that the larger vessels required additional dredging of the Columbia channel. |
|
340 |
Sen. Whitsett |
Asks how long the container companies have had terminals in Tacoma. |
|
349 |
Spindler |
Answer they have been in Tacoma for some time. |
|
353 |
Sen. Metsger |
Opines that the investments in infrastructure would reduce the congestion enough that we would regain some competitive advantages. |
|
383 |
Spindler |
Agrees and notes that the Port of Portland is known for their efficiency. |
|
TAPE 25, B |
||
|
009 |
Mike Burton |
Division Manager, Community Development, Oregon Economic and Community Development Department. Testifies in support of SB 71. |
|
047 |
Burton |
States that the rail service through the Columbia Gorge is a major advantage for Portland as we can utilize the Ports of Morrow and Umatilla to reduce congestion. |
|
083 |
Burton |
Emphasizes the importance of intermodal connections, and stresses that we look at these investments as part of a system. |
|
110 |
Jonathon Schlueter |
Executive Director, Westside Economic Alliance. Testifies in support of SB 71 and notes that his board of directors unanimously supports the concept of ConnectOregon. |
|
154 |
Schlueter |
Stresses that this bill will benefit the entire state. |
|
164 |
Mark Simmons |
Government Relations Director, Oregon Association of Nurseries. Testifies in support of SB 71. Notes that fuel costs are devaluing Oregon nursery exports. |
|
197 |
Chair Verger |
Asks if the association has done a cost analysis of utilizing rail transporation. |
|
206 |
Simmons |
Reviews costs analyses of utilizing intermodal transport options, and adds that he will provide specific numbers to the committee. |
|
215 |
Chair Verger |
Asks how the growth of the nursery industry impacts the employment picture within the state. |
|
223 |
Simmons |
Notes that the industry is labor intensive. |
|
|
Phil Boyer |
Aircraft Owners and Pilots Association. Submits written testimony in support of SB 71 (EXHIBIT C). |
|
227 |
Chair Verger |
Closes the public hearing on SB 71 and adjourns the meeting at 4:33 p.m. |
EXHIBIT SUMMARY