SENATE COMMITTEE ON TRANSPORTATION
Apirl 1, 2005 Dundee City Hall
1:30 P.M. Council Chambers
620 SW 5th Street
Dundee, OR
Tapes 42 - 45
MEMBERS PRESENT: Sen. Joanne Verger, Chair
Sen. Doug Whitsett, Vice-Chair
Sen. Floyd Prozanski
Sen. Bruce Starr
GUEST MEMBERS: Sen. Gary George
Rep. Donna Nelson
Rep. Kim Thatcher
MEMBER EXCUSED: Sen. Rick Metsger
STAFF PRESENT: Judith Callens, Committee Administrator
James Goulding, Committee Assistant
MEASURES/ISSUES HEARD:
SB 865 – Public Hearing
SB 2115 – Public Hearing and Work Session
SB 2116 – Public Hearing
Informational Meeting – Dundee/Newberg Bypass Project Update
These minutes are in compliance with Senate and House Rules. Only text enclosed in quotation marks reports a speaker’s exact words. For complete contents, please refer to the tapes.
|
TAPE/# |
Speaker |
Comments |
|
TAPE 42, A |
||
|
003 |
Chair Verger |
Calls the meeting to order at 1:31 p.m. Makes opening remarks about meeting in Dundee. Opens a public hearing on SB 865. |
|
SB 865 – PUBLIC HEARING |
||
|
030 |
Judith Callens |
Committee Administrator. Describes the provisions of SB 865. Defers to Senator Bruce Starr to explain his proposed amendments. |
|
037 |
Sen. B. Starr |
Explains the proposed -1 amendments to SB 865 (EXHIBIT A). Presents written testimony of Charlie Tindall in support of SB 865 (EXHIBIT B) and a traffic planning map (EXHIBIT C). |
|
100 |
Sen. B. Starr |
Continues to testify in regards to SB 865 and its amendments. |
|
135 |
Chair Verger |
Asks if he has invited transportation personnel to speak on this subject. |
|
140 |
Sen. B. Starr |
Observes some individuals who are present to testify. |
|
143 |
Chair Verger |
Notes the presence of Rep. Donna Nelson and Rep. Kim Thatcher. |
|
153 |
Bruce Warner |
Director, Oregon Department of Transportation (ODOT). Presents written testimony in favor of SB 865 (EXHIBIT D). |
|
200 |
Warner |
Notes he hasn’t had much time to consider the -1 amendments but observes they add some additional clarity to the legislation. |
|
221 |
Chair Verger |
Considers that he check for duplication of services by ODOT. |
|
230 |
Sen. Whitsett |
Observes that they need to learn from lessons in the past and not repeat mistakes. |
|
240 |
Warner |
Concurs. Discusses the need of focusing on the future using prior knowledge. |
|
269 |
Bob Russell |
Oregon Trucking Association. Submits written testimony in favor of SB 865 (EXHIBIT E). |
|
285 |
Sorin Garber |
Sorin Garber Consulting Group. Presents written testimony in support of SB 865 with some recommendations (EXHIBIT F). |
|
320 |
Garber |
Discusses logistics of shipping in the modern marketplace. |
|
350 |
Garber |
Talks about the relationship between investing in transportation infrastructure and economic growth. |
|
380 |
Chair Verger |
Considers the points Mr. Garber is making. |
|
387 |
Tom Potiowsky |
State Economist, Office of Economic Analysis. Testifies in regards to the Highway Cost Allocation Study, conducted by the office. |
|
403 |
Chair Verger |
Remarks that they just received their report. |
|
TAPE 43, A |
||
|
005 |
Potiowsky |
Informs that they are working on a fiscal impact statement for the study. |
|
009 |
Chair Verger |
Comments on the proposed estimates. |
|
010 |
Potiowsky |
Provides additional details of the study. |
|
015 |
Sen. B. Starr |
Regards the helpful nature of the independent data provided. |
|
027 |
Ann Gardner |
Schnitzer Investment Corp. Testifies in support of SB 865. Offers that an outside third party study would be valuable. |
|
057 |
Chair Verger |
Discusses the value of “Connect Oregon” program. |
|
065 |
Donald Alexander |
Citizen of Newberg. Testifies in support of SB 865. |
|
075 |
Allen Holstein |
Granville Winery. Notes he is present for the informational hearing. Voices his support for the Newberg/Dundee bypass. |
|
080 |
Chair Verger |
Closes public hearing on SB 865. Opens a public hearing on HB 2115. |
|
HB 2115 – PUBLIC HEARING |
||
|
085 |
Callens |
Explains the provisions of HB 2115 and the proposed -A2 amendment (EXHIBIT G). |
|
110 |
Chair Verger |
Comments on the measure. |
|
115 |
John Jackley |
Presents written testimony in favor of HB 2115 (EXHIBIT H). Favors the -A2 amendments, noting the correction made to the language in the bill. |
|
155 |
Chair Verger |
Discusses the Coos Bay meeting and the facility they visited. |
|
160 |
Jackley |
States they are conforming with state requirements. |
|
165 |
Sen. B. Starr |
Asks about the decision making process. |
|
167 |
Jackley |
Replies that the commission approves the decisions. |
|
169 |
Sen. B. Starr |
Observes it doesn’t affect ODOT’s ongoing budget. |
|
171 |
Jackley |
States they are not allowed to take a loss on the project. |
|
173 |
Sen. Whitsett |
Considers the trading of property. |
|
177 |
Jackley |
Replies the additional money would go back into the highway fund. |
|
180 |
Chair Verger |
Closes public hearing on HB 2115. Opens a work session on HB 2115. |
|
HB 2115 – WORK SESSION |
||
|
185 |
Sen. Whitsett |
MOTION: Moves to ADOPT HB 2115-A2 amendments dated 3/31/05. |
|
187 |
|
VOTE: 4-0-1 EXCUSED: 1 – Metsger |
|
|
Chair Verger |
Hearing no objection, declares the motion CARRIED. |
|
191 |
Sen. Whitsett |
MOTION: Moves HB 2115 to the floor with a DO PASS AS AMENDED recommendation. |
|
195 |
|
VOTE: 4-0-1 EXCUSED: 1 – Metsger |
|
|
Chair Verger |
Hearing no objection, declares the motion CARRIED. SEN. WHITSETT will lead discussion on the floor. |
|
205 |
Chair Verger |
Closes work session on HB 2115. Opens a public hearing on HB 2116. |
|
HB 2116 – PUBLIC HEARING |
||
|
210 |
Callens |
Explains the provisions of HB 2116. |
|
221 |
Jackley |
Submits written testimony in favor of HB 2116 (EXHIBIT I). Offers further explanation of the measure. |
|
249 |
Chair Verger |
Notes her initial confusion on why this bill was needed. Appreciates the explanation. |
|
257 |
Jackley |
Mentions the unintended consequences of HB 2661 from the previous legislative session. Notes how HB 2116 would clear up the problem. |
|
275 |
Chair Verger |
Closes public hearing on HB 2116. Opens an informational hearing on the Dundee/Newberg Bypass Project Update. |
|
INFORMATIONAL HEARING – DUNDEE/NEWBERG BYPASS PROJECT UPDATE |
||
|
290 |
Diane Ragsdale |
Mayor of Dundee. Greets the committee. |
|
295 |
Chair Verger |
Introduces the mayor. |
|
310 |
Ragsdale |
Notes that many individuals wish to comment on the bypass. Gives a handout on the bypass vision (EXHIBIT J). |
|
337 |
Ragsdale |
Introduces the Dundee city officials present. Defers to local representatives who are present to testify, introducing them. |
|
375 |
Jeff Dyck |
Cascade Steel Rolling Mills, McMinnville. Testifies on the operations of his company. Comments on the road and rail infrastructure he relies upon. |
|
407 |
Chair Verger |
Notes the goal is to improve the economy. |
|
417 |
Brent Adams |
Chair, McMinnville Chamber of Commerce. Supports the bypass. Feels it crucial to the development of McMinnville. |
|
TAPE 42, B |
||
|
010 |
Adams |
Comments on the varying travel time it takes to reach Portland for the medical treatment he needs. |
|
017 |
Jeff Palmer |
President, Chehalem Valley Chamber of Commerce and Rex Hill Vineyards. Discusses his reasons for moving to Oregon and all it has to offer. Adds his support for the need for a traffic bypass. |
|
045 |
Chair Verger |
Comments on the presence of Paul Warner of ODOT. Relates she is glad he is here to listen to the testimony. |
|
053 |
Rollin Soles |
Argyle Winery. Introduces himself. |
|
055 |
Sen. Prozanski |
Notes the acclaim of Mr. Soles' winery. |
|
061 |
Soles |
Comments on the high quality of life in his county. Notes how easy it is to travel into and out of Portland, but the difficulty of getting people to visit wine country. |
|
090 |
Soles |
Discusses the need for a balance between business and residential. Talks about the terrible traffic problems that limit freight options. Points out that very few businesses could make it as things stand now. |
|
120 |
Nancy Ponzi |
Dundee Bistro, Owner. Relates her experiences in the wine business and the growth of Dundee. |
|
125 |
Sen. Prozanski |
Relates the factors that draw businesses to Oregon. |
|
130 |
Ponzi |
Outlines the shift in their business focus to Dundee despite the difficulties. Notes the reluctance to invest money in Dundee businesses due to the traffic situation. |
|
167 |
Wayne Stocks |
City Council Member, McMinnville. Concurs with previous comments. |
|
200 |
Stocks |
Discusses the comments from his community over the gridlock they are suffering as a result of traffic. |
|
243 |
Chair Verger |
Wonders when the major problems with gridlock started to occur. |
|
247 |
Stocks |
Observes that it first started about 10 years ago, but has become especially bad in the last 4 to 5 years. |
|
272 |
Chair Verger |
Notes that aside from the traffic issues McMinnville is a great community. |
|
285 |
Ragsdale |
Outlines the next part of their presentation. Introduces Mr. Worrall. |
|
320 |
Roger Worrall |
Former mayor of Dundee. Presents his written testimony in favor of the bypass (EXHIBIT K). |
|
370 |
Worrall |
Provides a history of the Dundee bypass proposal. |
|
TAPE 43, B |
||
|
005 |
Worrall |
Continues his presentation. |
|
011 |
Chair Verger |
Regards the efforts in Coos Bay to build a bypass and the protests involved. Describes ODOT’s challenge of working with the unique wishes of each community. |
|
023 |
Worrall |
Offers that the bottom line is they want to get their town back. |
|
033 |
Chair Verger |
Asks about the origins of the name Dundee. |
|
037 |
Worrall |
Comments that the founder of Dundee came from Scotland. |
|
039 |
Sen. Whitsett |
Asks about the date of the meeting that drew 400 people. |
|
043 |
Worrall |
Replies that it was in March or April of 2001. |
|
050 |
Ken Austin |
Owner, Austin Dental Equipment Company, former Newberg city council member. Begins offering a comprehensive history of the development of Dundee and Newberg. |
|
090 |
Austin |
Talks about the history of the bypass problem. |
|
126 |
David Haugeberg |
Chair, Yamhill County Parkway Committee. Offers additional testimony on the prior history and discussion of a bypass. Notes Newberg and Dundee are drowning in traffic. |
|
160 |
Haugeberg |
Describes the formation and history of the parkway committee and the traffic design proposals. |
|
193 |
Chair Verger |
Observes that sometimes the discussion of the common good is lost. |
|
198 |
Haugeberg |
Continues discussing the process. Details the Policy Oversight Steering Team (POST). |
|
230 |
Haugeberg |
Discusses the fund raising that helped start the project in motion. |
|
260 |
Sen. Whitsett |
Observes that this process started 33 years ago. Wonders what is holding the process up. |
|
270 |
Austin |
States traffic design considerations have been proposed for over 50 years. |
|
300 |
Austin |
Notes the very strong conservative nature of Newberg and the reluctance to expand the city. Talks about the barriers they faced when setting up their business. Feels that opinions have changed recently. |
|
340 |
Chair Verger |
Appreciates the efforts of the Austin family. |
|
350 |
Ragsdale |
Introduces the next segment of testimony and Ms. Lewis |
|
379 |
Leslie Lewis |
Yamhill County Commissioner. Details the reasons why the bypass project hasn’t moved forward. Welcomes Senator Gary George, who has just arrived. |
|
TAPE 44, A |
||
|
010 |
Lewis |
Continues to testify in relation to previous legislative actions. |
|
040 |
Lewis |
Describes the attempts to fund the project with tolls. |
|
070 |
Lewis |
Talks about not receiving the needed funds from the Oregon Transportation Investment Act (OTIA). |
|
087 |
Chair Verger |
Wonders if they thought the toll would be enough to pay for the project. |
|
089 |
Lewis |
Relates that their estimates were conservative and that they knew they would need both public and private funds. |
|
107 |
Mike Sherwood |
Chair, Dundee Planning Commission. Details the development of their vision statement for the city. Provides an overview of transportation studies they have held and a planning map they have developed. |
|
157 |
Bob Stewart |
Mayor, City of Newberg. Endorses the phasing of the program. Relays the concerns of the community. Talks about the impact of large volumes of vehicles passing through the city. |
|
185 |
Sen. B. Starr |
References a similar situation with large trucks passing through Redmond, Oregon. |
|
195 |
Stewart |
Discusses the use of alternative roads in an attempt to get around Dundee causing high traffic loads in unintended areas. |
|
240 |
Stewart |
Talks about their city transportation plans. |
|
281 |
Chair Verger |
Asks if the city plans are connected to the bypass plans. |
|
287 |
Stewart |
Affirms they are connected. Further details their cooperation. |
|
315 |
Chair Verger |
Observes the bypass is not just moving traffic, but economic development as well. |
|
323 |
Sen. B. Starr |
Asks if they have the resources for such an ambitious project. |
|
325 |
Stewart |
Replies it is a 20 year project and that they will need partnerships to accomplish it. |
|
352 |
Rep. Nelson |
Notes she has to depart shortly. Discusses 2001 legislative efforts to finance transportation improvements. |
|
361 |
Sen. B. Starr |
Details the funding made available. |
|
364 |
Rep. Nelson |
Comments on the legislative intent of their proposals. Grapples with her frustration in moving this project forward. |
|
390 |
Sen. B. Starr |
Points out the passage of OTIA III to address bridges and highways. |
|
393 |
Rep. Nelson |
Considers the division and distribution of the funds. |
|
TAPE 45, A |
||
|
003 |
Rep. Nelson |
Expounds upon the need to move freight and allowing access to the state’s top tourist attractions. |
|
015 |
Chair Verger |
Hopes to find out why it is being held up. |
|
023 |
Rep. Nelson |
Reiterates the efforts that have gone into this project. |
|
027 |
Mike Ragsdale |
Chair, Citizen Task Force. Details the plans for future development of Dundee. |
|
097 |
Chair Verger |
Appreciates his efforts. Recalls her experiences as mayor of Coos Bay. Feels that ODOT’s primary mission is to move traffic. |
|
107 |
Mike Ragsdale |
Replies that with the bypass in place, reduced traffic will make 99W a true “main street” for Dundee. |
|
119 |
Chair Verger |
Asks for clarification on the change to 99W. |
|
123 |
Mike Ragsdale |
Recognizes that with the bypass in place they may change the designation of 99W from a highway to a main street. |
|
125 |
Chair Verger |
Offers that they have made similar changes before with great success. |
|
130 |
Mike Ragsdale |
Compliments the recent cooperation with ODOT. |
|
143 |
Bruce Warner |
Director, ODOT. States the department is trying to move this project forward. Details that the design of this project should begin this summer. |
|
159 |
Chair Verger |
Asks about financing possibilities. |
|
161 |
Warner |
Notes financing and the approach to the project. Comments on OTIA I and II phases. Discusses the OTIA III bridge studies and the use of funds that could be moved to the bypass project. Notes they are only one year into the eight year bridge program. |
|
195 |
Chair Verger |
Elaborates on the statewide impact of this project. |
|
197 |
Warner |
Restates the need for funding on bridges, but replies it will be up to the legislature. |
|
211 |
Chair Verger |
Feels there should be come criteria for determining the most needed traffic projects. |
|
233 |
Sen. B. Starr |
Praises the consistency of Mr. Warner’s work. Comments on the spending of excess revenues. |
|
257 |
Chair Verger |
Observes the importance of legislative members visiting various regions of Oregon firsthand. |
|
261 |
Rep. Nelson |
Thanks Mr. Warner for his assistance. Notes her appreciation for the committee’s work. |
|
275 |
Sen. B. Starr |
Asks Mr. Warner about a proposal to use federal funds. |
|
296 |
Warner |
Answers that he is correct. Refers to congressional efforts making additional resources available. |
|
315 |
Chair Verger |
Wonders about the potential use of tolls. |
|
317 |
Warner |
States they are still being considered. |
|
327 |
Lewis |
Begins a conclusion of their presentation with the public and private funding options. |
|
370 |
Lewis |
Talks about the projects available for private sector investment. Discusses the number of finance proposals regarding the Newberg/Dundee bypass. |
|
TAPE 44, B |
||
|
005 |
Lewis |
Continues discussing the design phase of the project. |
|
006 |
Chair Verger |
Asks who is preparing the Environmental Impact Statement (EIS). |
|
007 |
Lewis |
Replies. Discusses the EIS process. Talks about all the projects competing for funding. |
|
050 |
Chair Verger |
Feels the process is wonderful in coming up with ideas that ultimately don’t have any funding. |
|
056 |
Lewis |
Comments on the difficulty in moving this forward and the critical infrastructure needs. |
|
069 |
Chair Verger |
Notes the difficulty of relying on state income tax for funding. |
|
073 |
Lewis |
Concludes her testimony. |
|
075 |
Sen. B. Starr |
Thanks her for the testimony. Points out the need for local advocacy to make sure if additional funding comes from congress that they highlight the need for modernization. |
|
099 |
Lewis |
Relays her commitment to move this forward. |
|
115 |
Chair Verger |
Discusses the efficiency of placing legislative members engaged in policy into the ways and means process. |
|
121 |
Haugeberg |
Summarizes the presentation. Showcases support of the numerous people in favor of this project. Presents the committee with jars of “Traffic Jam”. |
|
155 |
Ragsdale |
Thanks them for their visit. |
|
165 |
Chair Verger |
Thanks Mayor Ragsdale. Voices her appreciation for being able to bring the process to the people. |
|
193 |
Chair Verger |
Observes the need to prioritize the state’s problems. |
|
207 |
Lewis |
Notes the legislative support from Sen. George and Rep. Thatcher. |
|
219 |
Rep. Thatcher |
Emphasizes that changes have to be made to take advantage of the assets available in this region of Oregon. Asks if they had the money, is there anything else that would be a barrier to this project. |
|
252 |
Lewis |
Notes the Land Use System could be a risk to this project. |
|
289 |
Haugeberg |
Makes additional comments. |
|
313 |
Sen. Gary George |
Senate District 12. Notes the need for a more efficient tax structure. Talks about infrastructure development he observed in Alaska. |
|
345 |
Sen. Whitsett |
Comments on his rural background and the importance of hearing from small communities like Dundee. |
|
The following material is submitted for the record without public testimony: |
||
|
|
Jim Morrison |
Submits written testimony for the record (EXHIBIT L). |
|
|
Donnald Alexander |
Submits written testimony for the record (EXHIBIT M). |
|
|
Merilyn Reeves |
Submits written testimony for the record (EXHIBIT N). |
|
377 |
Chair Verger |
Voices her hope for policies that support the beauty of their environment. Thanks them all. Closes the informational meeting, and reopens the public hearing on SB 865 to allow one more person to testify. |
|
SB 865 – PUBLIC HEARING |
||
|
TAPE 45, B |
||
|
007 |
Rod Park |
Councilor, Portland Metro. Voices his concerns with SB 865 as written. |
|
045 |
Park |
Talks about examining previous transportation related decision making. |
|
095 |
Park |
Offers that the private sector is realizing the opportunity of investing in transportation related projects. |
|
112 |
Chair Verger |
Asks that he send them copies of his testimony. Wonders about his position on the width of bill. |
|
120 |
Park |
Clarifies his thoughts. |
|
131 |
Sen. B. Starr |
Inquires about the 60% figure. |
|
135 |
Park |
Replies it refers to the federal and state funds going into transportation. |
|
137 |
Sen. B. Starr |
Appreciates the figures he has provided. Wonder about the percentages of federal “flexible” funds. |
|
147 |
Park |
Reiterates the 60% figure. |
|
161 |
Sen. B. Starr |
Points out that they don’t have a huge say on transportation projects funded through the State Transportation Improvement Program (STIP). |
|
165 |
Park |
Notes there is mutual approval of projects. |
|
173 |
Sen. B. Starr |
Appreciates his testimony and his perspective on this issue. Suggests that they need to look back and well and looking forward in the planning process. |
|
199 |
Sen. Whitsett |
Concurs with Sen. Starr’s comments. Wonders how much the movement of freight and people coincide with the 60% investment as opposed to the 40%. |
|
210 |
Park |
Responds. |
|
240 |
Chair Verger |
Voices her concerns of duplicating processes. |
|
245 |
Park |
Replies it is purely an economic study. |
|
260 |
Chair Verger |
Closes public hearing on SB 865. Adjourns the committee at 5:01 p.m. |
EXHIBIT SUMMARY