SENATE COMMITTEE ON TRANSPORTATION
April 4, 2005 Hearing Room C
3:10 PM Tapes 46 - 47
MEMBERS PRESENT: Sen. Doug Whitsett, Vice-Chair
Sen. Rick Metsger
Sen. Floyd Prozanski
Sen. Bruce Starr
MEMBER EXCUSED: Sen. Joanne Verger, Chair
STAFF PRESENT: Judith Callens, Committee Administrator
James Goulding, Committee Assistant
MEASURES/ISSUES HEARD:
SB 70 – Work Session
SB 998 – Public Hearing and Work Session
SB 1007 – Public Hearing
These minutes are in compliance with Senate and House Rules. Only text enclosed in quotation marks reports a speaker’s exact words. For complete contents, please refer to the tapes.
|
TAPE/# |
Speaker |
Comments |
|
TAPE 46, A |
||
|
003 |
Sen. Whitsett |
Calls the committee to order at 3:17 p.m. Opens a work session on SB 70. |
|
SB 70 – WORK SESSION |
||
|
010 |
Judith Callens |
Committee Administrator. Explains the provisions of the measure. |
|
020 |
Sen. B. Starr |
MOTION: Moves SB 70 to the floor with a DO PASS recommendation. |
|
023 |
|
VOTE: 4-0-1 AYE: In a roll call vote, all members present vote Aye. EXCUSED: 1 – Verger |
|
|
Sen. Whitsett |
The motion CARRIES. SEN. PROZANSKI will lead discussion on the floor. |
|
025 |
Sen. Whitsett |
Closes work session on SB 70. Opens a public hearing on SB 998. |
|
SB 998 – PUBLIC HEARING |
||
|
027 |
Callens |
Offers an overview of the measure. Observes there are proposed -1 amendments (EXHIBIT A) to the measure. |
|
045 |
Darrell Fuller |
Oregon Auto Dealers Association (OADA). Presents his written testimony in favor of SB 998 with the -1 amendments (EXHIBIT B). |
|
063 |
Daniel Fuller |
Student, Englewood Elementary School in Salem. Reads his written testimony in favor of SB 998 to the committee (EXHIBIT C). |
|
072 |
Sen. Metsger |
Jokes if Daniel Fuller is a registered lobbyist yet. |
|
074 |
Daniel Fuller |
Replies. |
|
077 |
Sen. Prozanski |
Wonder what size trucks Daniel Fuller gets to play with. |
|
079 |
Daniel Fuller |
Responds that he only gets to play with remote control cars. |
|
081 |
Sen. Prozanski |
Commends Daniel Fuller on his testimony. |
|
085 |
Sen. Whitsett |
Closes the public hearing on SB 998. Opens a work session on SB 998. |
|
SB 998 – WORK SESSION |
||
|
090 |
Sen. Prozanski |
MOTION: Moves to ADOPT SB 998-1 amendments dated 3/30/05. |
|
095 |
|
VOTE: 4-0-1 AYE: In a roll call vote, all members present vote Aye. EXCUSED: 1 – Verger |
|
|
Sen. Whitsett |
The motion CARRIES. |
|
100 |
Sen. Prozanski |
MOTION: Moves SB 998 to the floor with a DO PASS AS AMENDED recommendation. |
|
104 |
|
VOTE: 4-0-1 AYE: In a roll call vote, all members present vote Aye. EXCUSED: 1 – Verger |
|
|
Sen. Whitsett |
The motion CARRIES. SEN. B. STARR will lead discussion on the floor. |
|
110 |
Sen. Whitsett |
Closes work session on SB 998. Opens a public hearing on SB 1007. |
|
SB 1007 – PUBLIC HEARING |
||
|
112 |
Callens |
Explains the provisions of the measure. |
|
130 |
Lynn Lehrbach |
Joint Counsel of Teamsters No. 37. Presents his written testimony in favor of SB 1007 (EXHIBIT D). |
|
190 |
Lehrbach |
Talks about the color coded tagging system to indicate chassis condition. |
|
250 |
Lehrbach |
Discusses the lack of inspection of chassis when they leave the container terminal |
|
300 |
Lehrbach |
Relates the workings of the proposed legislation in increasing enforcement of proper chassis inspection. |
|
340 |
Lehrbach |
States that if the federal laws won’t address this situation, the state of Oregon should. |
|
360 |
Sen. Whitsett |
Asks who owns the chassis. |
|
361 |
Lehrbach |
Replies that the shipping lines own them. |
|
363 |
Sen. Whitsett |
Questions how they would enforce this, when a chassis comes in from another state. |
|
375 |
Lehrbach |
Defers the question to Mr. Zander. |
|
387 |
Scott Zander |
International Longshore & Warehouse Union, Local 8. Replies. Observes that they receive chassis from all over. |
|
397 |
Michael Gardner |
Portland Longshoreman. Presents the written testimony of Leal Sundet (EXHIBIT E) who could not attend the committee. |
|
TAPE 47, A |
||
|
005 |
Gardner |
Continues to present testimony in favor of SB 1007. |
|
035 |
Gardner |
Details the proposed inspection process changes. |
|
040 |
Sen. Metsger |
Points out an alternative approach would be to make chassis owners more responsible by enforcing a strict penalty on them. |
|
055 |
Lehrbach |
Offers previous attempts to address this problem from that angle. |
|
069 |
Sen. Metsger |
Relates that businesses would not take a chance if there was the threat of a significant financial penalty. |
|
085 |
Lehrbach |
Feels the port is not at fault, but that they are not being adequately reimbursed for inspections. |
|
087 |
Sen. Metsger |
Considers that increased liability would make the port more inclined to address this problem. |
|
095 |
Scott Zander |
Presents his written testimony in favor of SB 1007 (EXHIBIT F). |
|
125 |
Zander |
Relates the problems with drivers being able to take any chassis that is available, regardless of their condition. |
|
150 |
Kevin Clark |
International Longshore and Warehouse Union, Local 40. Presents written testimony to the committee in favor of SB 1007 (EXHIBIT G). |
|
200 |
Rick Christensen |
International Longshore and Warehouse Union, Local 40. Testifies in support of SB 1007. Discusses inspection process and wonders how some chassis pass. Feels this is an essential public safety issue. |
|
225 |
Sen. Metsger |
References Mr. Clark’s written testimony. Wonders why the Port of Portland objects to the inspections. |
|
230 |
Clark |
Replies he doesn’t know why the port objects. |
|
243 |
Sen. Metsger |
Notes he would like to hear from the port on this issue. |
|
245 |
Sen. Prozanski |
Questions the process of tightening down the brakes on a chassis. |
|
250 |
Christensen |
Outlines the process. |
|
265 |
Sen. Prozanski |
Notes his unfamiliarity with the chassis brake system. |
|
267 |
Christensen |
Provides additional details on how the brakes can be adjusted. |
|
275 |
Pat Egan |
Port of Portland. Presents summary of federal legislation HR 3, which has passed the U.S. House of Representatives, that addresses chassis rule-making (EXHIBIT H). Testifies in opposition to SB 1007. Discusses the problem with the proposed legislation, and advocates the authority should remain with the federal government. |
|
320 |
Egan |
Voices concern that the measure would almost exclusively apply to the Port of Portland and a few other Oregon ports. |
|
355 |
Egan |
Observes shortcomings with SB 1007. Feels inspection law must apply to all sectors of interstate commerce and not just one sector. |
|
380 |
Ken Armstrong |
Oregon Ports Group. Testifies against SB 1007 and echoes Mr. Egan’s comments. Discusses his concerns that state regulations would interfere with federal regulations. |
|
397 |
Robin Freeman |
Oregon Department of Transportation (ODOT). Presents the written testimony of Gregg Dal Ponte (EXHIBIT I), who was unable to attend. |
|
TAPE 46, B |
||
|
005 |
Freeman |
Testifies in regards to her concerns with a specific problem within the proposed statute changes. Points out the chassis owners are shippers and not motor carriers. |
|
030 |
Sen. Metsger |
Expresses his concern that there is little safety consideration in their testimony. Feels that their testimony does not acknowledge the existence of the problem. |
|
045 |
Egan |
Offers they care a great deal about safety. Talks about the number of inspections performed at the Port of Portland. Reiterates the need for uniform standards, to prevent other ports from gaining an advantage. |
|
063 |
Sen. Metsger |
Asks Mr. Egan to comment on Mr. Clark’s statement that they were asked to stop their inspection service. |
|
067 |
Egan |
Replies he does not know specifically but will get that information back to him. |
|
071 |
Sen. B. Starr |
Questions who would bear the financial liability for an accident. |
|
080 |
Egan |
Considers it would be a case by case basis. Assumes the owner of the chassis would carry the majority of the liability. |
|
090 |
Sen. B. Starr |
Feels there needs to be someone who carries the responsibility. |
|
100 |
Sen. Prozanski |
Notes that it would create a lawsuit situation. Wonders that if the federal government doesn’t move forward on HR 3, Oregon should take some action. |
|
119 |
Egan |
Describes the liability situation with SB 1007, and advocates the need for a federal standard. |
|
137 |
Sen. Prozanski |
States his surprise that they can’t suspend the licenses on some of the trucks. Assumes ODOT can cite vehicles for safety violations. |
|
145 |
Freeman |
Replies he is correct. Notes ODOT has the ability to issue safety citations. |
|
150 |
Sen. Whitsett |
Considers the scope of this problem. Wonders how often problems occur. |
|
153 |
Freeman |
Replies she does not know, but will provide that information to him. |
|
160 |
Sen. Whitsett |
Asks Mr. Egan for a comparison of current inspection practices with those that are proposed in SB 1007. |
|
162 |
Egan |
Observes that the primary difference would be adding a mandatory brake inspection to the usual visual inspection. Relates he does not know the estimated cost from additional inspections proposed under SB 1007. |
|
185 |
Sen. Whitsett |
Requests that Mr. Egan submit additional information. Closes public hearing on SB 1007. Adjourns committee at 4:26 p.m. |
EXHIBIT SUMMARY