Oregon State Archives

Oregon Bulletin

February 1, 2011

Department of Transportation
Chapter 731

Rule Caption: Application process for economic development projects unable to meet TPR requirements related to state highways.

Adm. Order No.: DOT 3-2010

Filed with Sec. of State: 12-22-2010

Certified to be Effective: 12-22-10

Notice Publication Date: 11-1-2010

Rules Adopted: 731-017-0005, 731-017-0010, 731-017-0015, 731-017-0020, 731-017-0025, 731-017-0030, 731-017-0035, 731-017-0040, 731-017-0045, 731-017-0050, 731-017-0055

Subject: ODOT adopted these rules to carry out the state policy established in ORS 367.850. This statute requires the Oregon Transportation Commission to adopt rules to facilitate projects that support local economic development and job creation but cannot meet the funding or timing requirements of the Land Conservation and Development Commission’s Transportation Planning Rule (TPR) related to state highways. These rules are not intended to supersede any requirements of the TPR; rather, they are intended to encourage innovation and flexibility in the application of traffic performance measures, timing and funding requirements adopted pursuant to the TPR associated with amendments to comprehensive plans and land use regulations, including zone changes.

Rules Coordinator: Lauri Kunze—(503) 986-3171

731-017-0005

Purpose

This division is intended to carry out the state policy outlined in ORS 367.850 to facilitate projects that support local economic development and job creation but cannot meet the funding or timing requirements of the Land Conservation and Development Commission’s Transportation Planning Rule related to state highways. This division is not intended to supersede any requirements of the Transportation Planning Rule; rather, it is intended to encourage innovation and flexibility in the application of traffic performance measures, timing and funding requirements adopted pursuant to the Transportation Planning Rule associated with amendments to comprehensive plans and land use regulations, including zone changes. This innovation and flexibility extends beyond that already permitted under OAR 660-012-0060(2) and through existing applications of Oregon Highway Plan alternate mobility standard processes.

Statutory Auth: ORS 184.616, 184.619, 367.850

Stats. Implemented: ORS 367.850

Hist.: DOT 3-2010, f. & cert. ef. 12-22-10

731-017-0010

Definitions

For the purposes of this division, the following definitions shall apply:

(1) “Amendment” means a proposed amendment to a comprehensive plan, transportation system plan or land use regulation.

(2) “Commission” means the Oregon Transportation Commission.

(3) “Director” means the Director of the Oregon Department of Transportation or the designee thereof.

(4) “Economic development projects” means those projects that demonstrate the direct benefits in terms of “primary” jobs created or retained by the development opportunity. Primary jobs are those in such areas as manufacturing, production, warehousing, distribution, or others that create new wealth for the Oregon economy.

(5) “Funding requirements” means the requirements set out in the Transportation Planning Rule that require a funding plan for transportation facilities or improvements needed to avoid a significant effect on existing or planned transportation facilities (OAR 660-012-0060(2)(b)); a written statement from ODOT that the proposed funding and timing for identified mitigation improvements or measures are, at a minimum, sufficient to avoid further degradation to the performance of an affected state highway (660-012-0060(3)(c)); a written statement from ODOT that improvements to state highways that are included as planned improvements in a regional or local transportation system plan or comprehensive plan are reasonably likely to be provided by the end of the planning period (660-012-0060(4)(b)); or a written statement from ODOT that the proposed funding and timing of mitigation measures are sufficient to avoid a significant adverse impact on the Interstate Highway system (660-012-0060(4)(c)).

(6) “Interim period” means the period, not to exceed 20 years, between when construction of an economic development project begins and construction of the project ends.

(7) “Local government” means any city, county or metropolitan service district formed under ORS Chapter 268, or an association of local governments performing land use planning functions under ORS 195.025.

(8) “Long-term economic benefits” means the net economic benefits anticipated to occur from an economic development project following completion of construction.

(9) “ODOT” means the Oregon Department of Transportation.

(10) “ODOT Region” refers to the five regions operated by ODOT. For the purposes of this division the ODOT Regions are defined as follows: Region One consists of Clackamas, Columbia, Hood River, Multnomah and Washington Counties. Region Two consists of Benton, Clatsop, Lane, Lincoln, Linn, Marion, Polk, Tillamook and Yamhill Counties. Region Three consists of Coos, Curry, Douglas, Jackson and Josephine Counties. Region Four consists of Crook, Deschutes, Gilliam, Jefferson, Klamath, Lake, Sherman, Wasco and Wheeler Counties. Region Five consists of Baker, Grant, Harney, Malheur, Morrow, Umatilla, Union and Wallowa Counties.

(11) “Oregon Highway Plan (OHP)” means the 1999 Oregon Highway Plan, as adopted and amended by the Oregon Transportation Commission, which serves as ODOT’s modal system plan for highways as set forth in OAR chapter 731, division 15, consistent with OAR 660-012-0015(1).

(12) “Planning period” means the planning horizon identified in an adopted local or regional transportation system plan.

(13) “Reasonably likely” means a determination by ODOT pursuant to OAR 660-012-0060 that funding to construct a planned improvement to a state highway included in a regional or local transportation system plan or comprehensive plan is likely to be available by the end of the planning period.

(14) “Significantly affect” is as defined in OAR 660-012-0060(1).

(15) “State Agency Coordination Agreement (or Program) (SAC)” means the agreement adopted by the Commission in September 1990 as part of the Unified Transportation Plan required by ORS 184.618 and certified by the Land Conservation and Development Commission in December 1990 as being in compliance with ORS 197.180 and OAR chapter 660, divisions 30 and 31. The SAC describes what ODOT will do to meet its obligation under ORS 197.180 to carry out its programs affecting land use in compliance with the statewide planning goals and in a manner compatible with acknowledged comprehensive plans.

(16) “State highways” means highways under the jurisdiction and/or control and management of ODOT, including interstate highways within the State of Oregon.

(17) “Traffic performance measures” means the minimum acceptable standards of performance for highway facilities identified in an adopted state, regional or local transportation system plan or comprehensive plan. For state highways, traffic performance is measured by volume to capacity (“v/c”) ratios as defined in the Oregon Highway Plan. Modifications to traffic performance measures for state highways require amendments to the OHP.

(18) “Transportation Planning Rule” means the Land Conservation and Development Commission’s administrative rule governing transportation planning, set out at OAR chapter 660, division 12.

(19) “Transportation System Plan” means a plan for one or more transportation facilities adopted in accordance with the Transportation Planning Rule that are planned, developed, operated and maintained in a coordinated manner to supply continuity of movement between modes, and within and between geographic and jurisdictional areas.

(20) “Volume to capacity ratio” is a measure of roadway congestion, calculated by dividing the number of vehicles passing through a section of highway during the peak hour by the capacity of the section as described and defined in the Oregon Highway Plan.

Statutory Auth: ORS 184.616, 184.619, 367.850

Stats. Implemented: ORS 367.850

Hist.: DOT 3-2010, f. & cert. ef. 12-22-10

731-017-0015

Applications for Time Extensions, Alternative Funding Plans, or Adjustments or Alternatives to Traffic Performance Measures

(1) When a local government amendment needed to authorize an economic development project cannot meet the funding requirements of the Transportation Planning Rule as they relate to state highways, the local government may apply for:

(a) An extension of time to meet the requirements of OAR 660-012-0060(2)(b), 660-012-0060(4)(b)(D) or 660-012-0060(4)(c)(A);

(b) Approval of a plan proposing alternative methods of funding that meets the provisions in this division;

(c) An adjustment to existing traffic performance measures or allowance to use an alternative traffic performance measure other than a volume to capacity ratio with a proposed acceptable level of performance during an interim period prior to completion of construction of an economic development project for a period of no more than 20 years; or

(d) An adjustment to existing traffic performance measures or allowance to use an alternative traffic performance measure other than a volume to capacity ratio with a proposed acceptable level of performance that address the specific traffic impacts of an economic development project.

(2) Applications under subsection (1) of this Section shall be filed with ODOT for Commission review and approval. The Commission may approve up to four applications in each ODOT Region in a calendar year.

(3) The provisions of this rule do not apply to Commission approval of alternate mobility standards authorized and processed pursuant to OHP Policy 1F Action 1F.3 in system or facility planning processes.

Statutory Auth: ORS 184.616, 184.619, 367.850

Stats. Implemented: ORS 367.850

Hist.: DOT 3-2010, f. & cert. ef. 12-22-10

731-017-0020

Application Submittal Requirements

(1) An application submitted pursuant to section 0015 of this division shall be filed with the Region Manager or designee of the ODOT Region within which the economic development project would be located.

(2) Prior to filing an application with ODOT pursuant to this division, the local government shall seek input from the public and affected local governments and agencies regarding the proposed application. Informal coordination with ODOT is encouraged at the earliest point possible to streamline the application process.

(3) Prior to filing an application, a pre-application meeting shall be held between the local government, the applicant for the amendment and the ODOT Region Manager or designee to determine the nature of the application and identify the applicable submittal requirements and review criteria. ODOT shall notify and provide opportunity for representatives from Business Oregon and/or the Department of Land Conservation and Development to submit comments and attend the meeting.

(4) All applications shall:

(a) Be accompanied by any appropriate forms provided by ODOT;

(b) Indicate the nature of the application request;

(c) Provide a narrative that:

(A) Identifies the economic development project for which an amendment to a comprehensive plan or land use regulation is being proposed;

(B) Identifies the state highways that would be significantly affected by the proposed amendment, their functional classifications and traffic performance measures, and the extent of non-compliance with the traffic performance measures;

(C) Identifies the basis for the determination that improvements to state highways are not reasonably likely to be provided by the end of the planning period or that the funding or timing for mitigation measures are insufficient to avoid adverse impacts;

(D) Demonstrates the net long-term economic development benefits of the proposed economic development project, including:

(i) An estimate of the number of net new primary jobs the amendment is likely to create within the community and their associated average salary.

(ii) A statement of reasons why the proposal merits approval by the Commission under this division.

(E) Addresses how the application meets the specific criteria in sections 0025 through 0035 of this division, as appropriate, and the review criteria in section 0040 of this division.

(F) Explains why compliance with OAR 660-012-0060(1) cannot otherwise reasonably be accomplished through one or a combination of the measures in 660-012-0060(2), including the phasing of development over time, access management measures, or the use of trip caps.

(G) Addresses how the project will impact traffic safety along the state highway corridor.

(H) Addresses how the project will impact the movement of freight along an affected state highway that is a freight route.

(I) Identifies the public involvement and local government coordination opportunities that have been provided with respect to the application.

(d) Be accompanied by attachments that provide background information supporting the application and proposed amendment, such as a copy of the amendment application filed with the local government, a description of the proposed economic development project, a map showing the affected area and the location of affected state highways, any transportation analyses and studies submitted with the amendment application, a copy of any reasonably likely determination provided by ODOT, and other relevant information.

(5) Applications affecting lands within one-half mile of an interstate interchange area as defined in OAR 660-012-0060(4)(d)(C) also shall address how the application is consistent with the following:

(a) An adopted Interchange Area Management Plan, if one exists.

(b) The function of the interchange.

(c) ODOT access management requirements for the interchange.

(6) Within 14 days following receipt of an application, the Region Manager or designee shall notify a local government whether the application is complete. If notified that the application is incomplete, the local government may choose to provide the missing information or to present it as written. If presented as written, the extent of incompleteness shall be noted in the Director’s report prepared pursuant to section 0040 of this division. Where incomplete information impedes the Director’s review for compliance with criteria, the Director shall so note in the Director’s report and may recommend denial of the application.

(7) A local government shall not have more than one application approved by the Commission pursuant to this division within a calendar year.

(8) Where a local government application filed pursuant to this division has been approved by the Commission within the previous three calendar years, the same local government shall not file any additional applications pursuant to this division for property located within the identified traffic impact area of the economic development project that was the subject of the previously approved application.

Statutory Auth: ORS 184.616, 184.619, 367.850

Stats. Implemented: ORS 367.850

Hist.: DOT 3-2010, f. & cert. ef. 12-22-10

731-017-0025

Additional Requirements for Time Extensions to Meet Funding Requirements

(1) In addition to the requirements of section 0020 of this division, an application requesting an extension of time to meet the requirements of OAR 660-012-0060(4)(b)(D) or 660-012-0060(4)(c)(A) shall include the following additional information:

(a) The additional time period being requested from the OTC, up to a maximum of 20 years from the date of application.

(b) If applying for an extension of the time requirement in OAR 660-012-0060(4)(c)(A), the identified mitigation improvements or measures for which a time extension is needed to avoid a significant adverse impact on the Interstate Highway system.

(c) An explanation why OTC approval of a time extension is reasonable and necessary.

(d) An explanation of what will be accomplished during the additional time period that makes compliance with OAR 660-012-0060(1) likely by its conclusion.

(e) A discussion of whether and how an extension of time might adversely impact other existing uses in the community or along a corridor.

(2) Applications for time extensions beyond what is authorized in the OHP require OHP amendments and must be approved by the Commission. Pursuant to ODOT’s State Agency Coordination Agreement, any such amendment must comply with the coordination procedures in OAR 731-015-0065.

Statutory Auth: ORS 184.616, 184.619, 367.850

Stats. Implemented: ORS 367.850

Hist.: DOT 3-2010, f. & cert. ef. 12-22-10

731-017-0030

Additional Requirements for Alternative Funding Plans

(1) In addition to the requirements of section 0020 of this division, an application requesting approval of an alternative funding plan shall include the following additional information:

(a) An estimate of the additional funds required to construct needed state highway facilities or improvements or provide identified mitigation improvements or measures.

(b) A description of the proposed alternative funding method and an explanation how it would be adequate to alleviate the funding shortfall.

(c) An explanation why implementation of the proposed alternative funding method is feasible and likely to occur.

(d) If the proposed alternative method requires participation by other public or private entities, such as contributions from employers or other parties directly benefitting from an economic development project, a demonstration of commitment by such other entities to participate in the funding method.

(2) Applications for alternative funding plans must be approved by the Commission.

Statutory Auth: ORS 184.616, 184.619, 367.850

Stats. Implemented: ORS 367.850

Hist.: DOT 3-2010, f. & cert. ef. 12-22-10

731-017-0035

Additional Requirements for Adjustments or Alternatives to ODOT Traffic Performance Measures

(1) In addition to the requirements of section 0020 of this division, an application to adjust traffic performance measures or to allow use of alternative traffic performance measures including measures other than a volume to capacity ratio shall include the following additional information:

(a) Identification of the existing traffic performance measures and a description of the adjusted or alternative traffic performance measures being requested to accommodate the economic development project, including the geographic boundaries of the requested adjustment or alternative measures.

(b) An explanation how the proposed adjusted or alternative traffic performance measures protect the function of affected state highway facilities.

(c) Methodologies and procedures for applying the adjusted or alternative traffic performance measures, including the level of performance being sought under the new measure.

(d) If the proposal is to adjust existing traffic performance measures or allow use of alternative traffic performance measures during an interim period prior to completion of construction of the development:

(A) The proposed length of the interim period and what will be achieved during that interim period.

(B) An explanation of what will need to occur for the significantly affected transportation facility to be brought up to the current traffic performance measure by the end of the interim period.

(e) An explanation how Commission approval of the requested adjustment or use of alternative traffic performance measures would impact affected state highway corridors and the local government’s ability to implement its adopted transportation system plan or comprehensive plan.

(2) Applications to adjust or allow alternative traffic performance measures for state highways require OHP amendments and must be approved by the Commission. Pursuant to ODOT’s State Agency Coordination Agreement, any such modification must comply with the coordination procedures in OAR 731-015-0065.

Statutory Auth: ORS 184.616, 184.619, 367.850

Stats. Implemented: ORS 367.850

Hist.: DOT 3-2010, f. & cert. ef. 12-22-10

731-017-0040

ODOT Review and Report to Commission

(1) Within 30 days following receipt of a complete application or an incomplete application presented as written, the Director shall submit to the Commission a report and recommendation on the application.

(2) The Director’s report shall:

(a) Identify the applicant and the nature of the application.

(b) Identify the ODOT Region from which the application originated and the number of applications within that Region that have already been approved under this division during the current calendar year.

(c) Address consistency with the applicable submittal criteria in section 0020 of this division and with the review criteria in this section.

(d) Include ODOT’s recommendation on the application and the reasons for that recommendation.

(3) In evaluating applications submitted pursuant to this division, the Director shall consider the following:

(a) Whether the economic development project for which amendments are needed can reasonably comply with the requirements in OAR 660-012-0060 without having to apply for a time extension or alternative funding plan or a proposal to adjust or allow use of alternative traffic performance measures under this division.

(b) Based on consultation with Business Oregon, the net long-term primary job creation benefits of the proposed economic development project. Any written materials from Business Oregon will be attached to the ODOT Director’s report.

(c) The adverse impacts approval of the proposed project would have on state transportation facilities, measured in terms of the degree of divergence from existing state highway traffic performance measures, the length of time the divergence would remain in effect, the scale of short and long-term impacts on existing users of the facilities, the safety of users of the facilities, and impacts on neighboring communities.

(d) Local government and private sector commitments to contribute financially to needed state highway and local road improvements that will mitigate state highway impacts.

(e) Local government and private sector commitments to employ interim measures where appropriate, including but not limited to phasing of development or trip caps.

(f) Local government and private sector commitments to employ techniques that reduce vehicle trips on the system as appropriate for the scale and location of the development, including but not limited to transportation demand management, carpooling, transit and land use management methods.

(g) The level of public review and local government coordination associated with an application filed pursuant to this division.

(4) In addition to the conditions of approval required under section 0045 of this division, the Director may recommend conditions of approval for the Commission to attach to a decision approving an application filed pursuant to this division.

Statutory Auth: ORS 184.616, 184.619, 367.850

Stats. Implemented: ORS 367.850

Hist.: DOT 3-2010, f. & cert. ef. 12-22-10

731-017-0045

Commission Review and Decision on Applications

(1) Within 45 days following receipt of the Director’s report, the Commission shall review the Director’s report and issue a written decision approving or denying the application. Commission approval or denial of an application shall be accompanied by findings of fact and a statement of reasons explaining how the decision relates to the applicable review standards. If a public hearing is required on the application, the Commission shall schedule the public hearing and allow for the required public review period. The Commission may approve up to four applications in each ODOT Region in a calendar year. The Commission may attach such conditions to its approval as it deems necessary or appropriate to protect the function or ensure the safe operation of state highways or to protect the state’s substantial financial investment in its state highway system.

(2) Once the Commission has approved four applications within an ODOT Region within a calendar year, it may continue its consideration of one or more applications within that ODOT Region to the following calendar year. Continuation of an application to the following calendar year shall not imply any preference or priority for that application.

(3) A Commission decision to approve an application shall be conditioned to limit the allowed uses on the property that is the subject of the proposed amendment to only those uses specifically identified in the proposed economic development project. A local government may achieve this result through application of a limited use overlay zone, the creation of a new zoning district, or other similar method.

(4) A Commission decision to approve an application to adjust traffic performance measures or allow use of alternative traffic performance measures other than a volume to capacity ratio shall be conditioned to apply only to the facility impact area that is the subject of the proposed local government amendment.

Statutory Auth: ORS 184.616, 184.619, 367.850

Stats. Implemented: ORS 367.850

Hist.: DOT 3-2010, f. & cert. ef. 12-22-10

731-017-0050

Land Use Decisions

(1) Commission determinations made pursuant to this division concerning the financing of transportation facilities and improvements are not considered land use decisions.

(2) Commission actions made pursuant to this division to extend the time beyond the maximum planning horizon established in the OHP and to adjust or allow alternative traffic performance measures are considered land use decisions and require OHP amendments.

Statutory Auth: ORS 184.616, 184.619, 367.850

Stats. Implemented: ORS 367.850

Hist.: DOT 3-2010, f. & cert. ef. 12-22-10

731-017-0055

Review and Update

Beginning two years following the adoption of this division, the Commission shall commence a review to evaluate implementation of and consider possible modifications to this division. This evaluation shall include considerations of the cumulative effects from applications that have been approved.

Statutory Auth: ORS 184.616, 184.619, 367.850

Stats. Implemented: ORS 367.850

Hist.: DOT 3-2010, f. & cert. ef. 12-22-10

Rule Caption: Multimodal Transportation Fund Program.

Adm. Order No.: DOT 4-2010

Filed with Sec. of State: 12-22-2010

Certified to be Effective: 12-22-10

Notice Publication Date: 11-1-2010

Rules Amended: 731-035-0070

Subject: ODOT’s rules did not previously address how earnings on lottery bond proceeds will be used. This amended rule will dedicate those earnings to passenger rail to provide funds for passenger rail projects and enable Oregon to compete for substantial federal capital funding available to states with matching funds for passenger rail programs.

Rules Coordinator: Lauri Kunze—(503) 986-3171

731-035-0070

Grant and Loan Awards and Match

(1) At least five percent of the net proceeds of the lottery bonds will be allocated to Rural Airports.

(2) Once a project is selected by the Commission under 731-035-0060(11) and (12) the amount of monies identified by the Commission is considered allocated from the Fund to a Recipient. If an Agreement with a Recipient has not been executed within 180 days from such date, the grant is deemed terminated, and the funds may be reassigned by the Commission. The Commission, not withstanding 731-035-0060(12), may select the highest priority Project that is appropriate for the funds available from the Final Recommendation Report, created in 731-035-0060(8) or from the Rural Airport Recommendation Report, created in 731-035-0060(5).

(3) To the extent that proposed Projects meet the qualifications established in OAR 731-035-0050 and 731-035-0060, at least 10 percent of the total net proceeds of the lottery bonds will be allocated to each of the five regions as specified in Chapter 865, OL 2009. The regions consist of the following counties:

(a) Region one consists of Clackamas, Columbia, Hood River, Multnomah and Washington Counties;

(b) Region two consists of Benton, Clatsop, Lane, Lincoln, Linn, Marion, Polk, Tillamook and Yamhill Counties;

(c) Region three consists of Coos, Curry, Douglas, Jackson and Josephine Counties;

(d) Region four consists of Crook, Deschutes, Gilliam, Jefferson, Klamath, Lake, Sherman, Wasco and Wheeler Counties; and

(e) Region five consists of Baker, Grant, Harney, Malheur, Morrow, Umatilla, Union and Wallowa Counties.

(4) Applicants may use a combination of grant and loan funds to finance a Project.

(5) Grants and loans will be awarded only when there are sufficient funds available in the Multimodal Transportation Fund to cover the costs of the loans and grants.

(a) Grants:

(A) Awards must not exceed 80 percent of the total eligible Project costs.

(B) Applicant matching funds must be provided by the Applicant in the form of monetary outlay for elements necessary for implementation of the Project, including land, excavation, permits, engineering, payroll, special equipment purchase or rental, and cover at least 20 percent of the eligible Project costs.

(b) Loans:

(A) Loans may be for any portion of project costs, up to the full amount of the project.

(B) The Department will not charge fees for processing or administering a loan to a Recipient.

(C) Loans from the Multimodal Transportation Fund may be interest free if repaid according to the terms and conditions of the Agreement between the Department and Recipient.

(D) Prior to entering into a loan Agreement, the Department will determine if an application meets reasonable underwriting standards of credit-worthiness, including whether:

(i) The Project is feasible and a reasonable risk from practical and economic standpoints.

(ii) The loan has a reasonable prospect of repayment according to its terms.

(iii) The Applicant’s fiscal, managerial and operational capacity is adequate to assure the successful completion and operation of the Project.

(iv) The Applicant will provide good and sufficient Collateral to mitigate risk to the Multimodal Transportation Fund.

(6) Notwithstanding any other provision of division 35 rules, earnings on moneys in the Multimodal Transportation Fund shall be used for grants or loans for passenger rail projects; including, but not limited to, projects where the Department of Transportation seeks match funds for a federal grant. The Oregon Transportation Commission shall select passenger rail projects for grants or loans of moneys from the earnings of the Multimodal Transportation Fund in accordance with ORS 367.084. Nothing within this rule shall prevent an application by, or consideration of, a passenger rail project for a grant or loan of other moneys within the Multimodal Transportation Fund.

Stat. Auth.: ORS 184.616, 184.619 & 367.082

Stats. Implemented: ORS 367.080 - 367.086

Hist.: DOT 8-2005(Temp), f. 11-17-05, cert. ef. 11-21-05 thru 5-19-06; DOT 3-2006, f. & cert. ef. 1-24-06; DOT 5-2007, f. & cert. ef. 11-15-07; DOT 3-2009, f. & cert. ef. 11-17-09; DOT 2-2010, f. & cert. ef. 7-30-10; DOT 4-2010, f. & cert. ef. 12-22-10

Notes
1.) This online version of the OREGON BULLETIN is provided for convenience of reference and enhanced access. The official, record copy of this publication is contained in the original Administrative Orders and Rulemaking Notices filed with the Secretary of State, Archives Division. Discrepancies, if any, are satisfied in favor of the original versions. Use the OAR Revision Cumulative Index found in the Oregon Bulletin to access a numerical list of rulemaking actions after November 15, 2010.

2.) Copyright 2011 Oregon Secretary of State: Terms and Conditions of Use