Oregon Bulletin
Rule
Caption: Immediate rule updates necessary
to implement SB 342 and administer ongoing grant programs.
Adm.
Order No.: OWEB 1-2011
Filed with Sec. of
State: 10-18-2011
Certified to be
Effective: 10-18-11
Notice Publication
Date: 8-1-2011
Rules Amended: 695-010-0030, 695-010-0060, 695-015-0030,
695-030-0060, 695-035-0010, 695-035-0050, 695-035-0060
Subject: The administrative rule amendments adopted by the
Oregon Watershed Enhancement Board update administrative rules directly
affected by the passage of Ballot Measure 76 (November 2010) and its ongoing
legislation, Senate Bill 342 (2011). These immediate updates were necessary to
ensure a smooth transition for ongoing programs for the 2011–2013
biennium. OWEB changed the name of the Watershed Improvement Grant Fund in five
rules to the Watershed Conservation Grant Fund. OWEB also amended two Small
Grant Program rules containing a deleted statutory reference and updated a
Restoration Grant Program rule to math the amended statutory language.
Rules Coordinator: Melissa Leoni—(503) 986-0179
695-010-0030
Watershed Restoration Priorities
For grant applications to be funded by the Watershed
Conservation Grant Fund, the following preferences will apply:
(1) Projects that address altered watershed functions
affecting water quality, water flow volume and duration, and the production
capacity for fish over projects that address site-specific land use problems
where the greatest benefit is to a private resource or land.
(2) Projects that include removal or remediation of
human-caused alterations (roads, culverts, channelization, etc.) to improve
water quality and/or fish habitat over projects that enhance naturally
functioning systems.
(3) Projects that change land management practices to
address the causes of chronic disturbances to the watershed over projects that
address only symptoms of disturbance.
(4) Projects with direct evidence of collaboration
between stakeholders and agencies over single-party projects.
(5) Projects focusing on upslope and upstream
treatments over projects focusing on downslope and downstream treatments,
unless the project addresses tidal-driven systems or addresses other specific
issues (e.g. historic losses) that encompass whole watershed conditions.
Stat. Auth.: ORS 541.396
Stats. Implemented: ORS 541.351 -
541.401
Hist.: OWEB 4-2004, f. 11-2-04,
cert. ef. 2-1-05; OWEB 1-2011, f. & cert. ef. 10-18-11
695-010-0060
Evaluation Criteria
(1) Project applications will be reviewed for
compliance with the items in OAR 695-005-0030 and 695-010-0050.
(2) Watershed restoration projects funded from the
Watershed Conservation Grant Fund must provide a public benefit by supporting
improved:
(a) Water quality;
(b) Native fish or wildlife habitat; or
(c) Watershed or ecosystem function.
(3) Watershed restoration project proposals must meet
the following criteria to be considered for funding by the Board:
(a) The project demonstrates sound principles of
watershed management;
(b) The project uses methods adapted to the project
locale;
(c) The project complies with state land use planning goals
and is compatible with acknowledged comprehensive plans as required under ORS
197.180; and
(d) The project meets the requirements in the Oregon
Aquatic Habitat Restoration and Enhancement Guide.
(4) Watershed restoration projects meeting the criteria
established by subsection (1) above will be further evaluated on the basis of
the extent to which the project:
(a) Is based on a watershed assessment or other
analytical tool that identifies specific watershed health problems;
(b) Is part of a watershed action plan or other
strategic plan that prioritizes subwatersheds or project types within subwatersheds;
(c) Clearly defines and addresses a watershed health
problem or known limiting factors;
(d) Has clearly stated objectives and is likely to meet
these;
(e) Will be implemented using a clearly defined method
to address the problem;
(f) Provides educational opportunities or promotes
public awareness of watershed enhancement benefits;
(g) Fits within the context of past and planned future
restoration efforts in the watershed;
(h) Improves watershed function;
(i) Treats the causes of the identified problems,
rather than treating symptoms;
(j) Encourages the use of non
structural methods to enhance riparian areas and associated uplands;
(k) Includes funds or in-kind services from non-Board
sources;
(l) Is proposed in the context of fish and wildlife
species life stages, upland conditions and year-round watershed functions;
(m) Takes into consideration the quality of the
watershed above and below the project area;
(n) Takes into consideration known potential future
events that may affect the success of the project;
(o) Takes into consideration potential impacts to other
properties and streams in the area;
(p) Is ready to be implemented; and
(q) Identifies and evaluates alternatives to address
the identified problem.
(5) Watershed restoration projects shall also be
evaluated based on the following administrative and fiscal criteria:
(a) The amount of the administrative costs relative to
the project’s fiscal management complexity;
(b) The applicant’s past grant record with regard to
timely project completeness, accounting and reporting as well as whether past
projects were completed as proposed, using information provided by Board staff;
(c) The extent to which the personnel costs reflect the
tasks involved in implementing the project;
(d) Whether the direct costs and match values reflect
local market rates; and
(e) Whether the overall budget reflects the expected
watershed health benefit.
Stat. Auth.: ORS 541.396
Stats. Implemented: ORS 541.351 -
541.401
Hist.: OWEB 4-2004, f. 11-2-04,
cert. ef. 2-1-05; OWEB 1-2011, f. & cert. ef. 10-18-11
695-015-0030
Education and Outreach Priorities
For grant applications to be funded by the Watershed
Conservation Grant Fund, the following preference shall apply: Watershed and
riparian education projects that provide education and awareness about
watershed processes for landowners over projects that create curriculum
materials.
Stat. Auth.: ORS 541.396
Stats. Implemented: ORS 541.351 -
541.401
Hist.: OWEB 4-2004, f. 11-2-04,
cert. ef. 2-1-05; OWEB 1-2011, f. & cert. ef. 10-18-11
695-030-0060
Assessment and Action Plan
Priorities
For grant applications to be funded by the Watershed
Conservation Grant Fund, the following preferences will apply:
(1) Watershed assessment projects that address whole
basin conditions to focus restoration needs over single-function research
projects; and
(2) Projects developed from a watershed-level
assessment and analysis of conditions that includes an action plan for
restoration or enhancement of watershed functions.
Stat. Auth.: ORS 541.396
Stats. Implemented: ORS 541.351 -
541.401
Hist.: OWEB 4-2004, f. 11-2-04,
cert. ef. 2-1-05; OWEB 1-2011, f. & cert. ef. 10-18-11
695-035-0010
Small Grant Program
(1) The Oregon Watershed Enhancement Board (OWEB) may
provide funding for a locally administered Small Grant Program from its
Watershed Conservation Grant Fund. Funds may be allocated for the Small Grant
Program in amounts and at times decided by the Board.
(2) The goals of the Small Grant Program are to:
(a) Support implementation of the Oregon Plan for
Salmon and Watersheds.
(b) Support projects designed to improve water quality,
water quantity, and fish and wildlife habitat. Such projects include, but are
not limited to, those developed to address Total Maximum Daily Loads (TMDLs),
Agricultural Water Quality Management Area Plans, urban nonpoint source
pollution management plans, and the Board of Forestry’s Forestry Program for
Oregon.
(c) Make funds available to local Small Grant Teams to
address local priority resource concerns, habitat values, and watershed
functions.
(d) Encourage landowner participation in watershed
improvement by making funds available more quickly than is possible through
OWEB’s Regular Grant Program.
(e) Treat the source of watershed health problems
through technically sound projects that use proven techniques from one of the
approved sources listed in OAR 695-035-0030(3), and that demonstrate benefits
to aquatic species, wildlife, or watershed health across all land uses.
(f) Encourage partnerships among watershed councils,
soil and water conservation districts (SWCDs), and tribes.
Stat. Auth.: ORS 541.396
Stats. Implemented: ORS 541.351 -
541.401
Hist.: OWEB 4-2004, f. 11-2-04,
cert. ef. 2-1-05; OWEB 3-2005, f. & cert. ef. 6-8-05; OWEB 1-2011, f. & cert. ef. 10-18-11
695-035-0050
Eligible Small Grant Projects
(1) The Small Grant Program will fund only those
projects that:
(a) Demonstrate in the Small Grant Project application
a clear watershed benefit to aquatic species, wildlife, or watershed health.
(b) Are consistent with the local Small Grant Team’s
priority watershed concerns, as identified in their program grant agreements
with OWEB.
(c) Adhere to OWEB administrative rules, OAR 695-005-0010–695-005-0060 and
695-050-0010–695-050-0050.
(d) Implement a project to restore, enhance, or protect
native fish or wildlife habitat, watershed or ecosystem functions, or water
quality.
(e) Are implemented in a manner consistent with the
Oregon Aquatic Habitat Restoration and Enhancement Guide.
(f) Use and clearly identify in the small grant
application technical guidance from at least one of the approved sources in OAR
695-035-0030(3), and cite in the application the practice code(s), or the page
number and paragraph, for the technical guidance source listed.
(g) Where applicable, have been approved for technical
sufficiency by the appropriate state agency, or by the appropriate tribal
government for projects on Tribal Trust Lands.
(2) Small Grant Projects to be completed in phases on
the same property are eligible for Small Grant Project funding, provided only
one phase is submitted for funding consideration per OWEB fiscal year, and
provided all phases occur at different locations on the property. In general,
OWEB encourages multi-phased project applications to be submitted through the
OWEB Regular Grant Program.
(3) Teams must select from the following list when
identifying priority watershed concerns for their Small Grant Area:
(a) Instream Process and Function;
(b) Fish Passage;
(c) Urban Impact Reduction;
(d) Riparian Process and Function;
(e) Wetland Process and Function;
(f) Upland Process and Function;
(g) Water Quantity and Quality/Irrigation Efficiency;
(h) Road Impact Reduction.
(4) The following project types are eligible for
funding. Teams are encouraged to be strategic in identifying eligible project
types in an effort to better support salmon recovery objectives and
Agricultural Water Quality Management Area Plans. Teams may petition OWEB to
allow project types not appearing on the list, as described in OAR
695-035-0020(9)(c).
(a) Instream Process and Function.
(A) Improve Instream Habitat: place large wood,
boulders, or salmon carcasses;
(B) Manage Erosion: bioengineer stream banks, slope
stream banks, or develop water gaps, streambank barbs;
(C) Eradicate or Control Exotic Aquatic Species.
(b) Fish Passage.
(A) Remove Irrigation or Push-Up Dams: install
alternatives (e.g., infiltration galleries, point-of-diversion transfers) or
convert from gravity diversion to pumps;
(B) Remove and/or Replace Culverts (as a condition of
funding, such projects require ODFW or ODF technical review and approval, or
tribal government review and approval for projects on Tribal Trust Lands, using
a standard OWEB form; and for culverts under state roads, a 50 percent ODOT
match);
(C) Remove or Replace Stream Crossings (as a condition
of funding, such projects require ODFW or ODF technical review and approval, or
tribal government review and approval for projects on Tribal Trust Lands, using
a standard OWEB form).
(c) Urban Impact Reduction.
(A) Install Stormwater Runoff Treatments (e.g., create
bioswales, pervious surfaces, native plant buffers, green roofs);
(B) Create Off-Channel Flood Storage;
(C) Employ Integrated Pest Management.
(d) Riparian Process and Function.
(A) Manage Nutrient and Sediment Inputs through managed
grazing (e.g., fencing and developing off-channel watering) and plantings;
(B) Manage Vegetation: plant or seed native riparian
species, propagate native riparian plants, or control weeds in conjunction with
a restoration project;
(C) Employ Integrated Pest Management.
(e) Wetland Process and Function.
(A) Manage Nutrient and Sediment Inputs: fence out
livestock or develop alternative watering sites;
(B) Manage Vegetation: control weeds (in conjunction
with a restoration project), or plant native wetland species;
(C) Restore Wetlands: excavate or remove fill, or
eliminate drainage structures;
(D) Employ Integrated Pest Management.
(f) Upland Process and Function.
(A) Manage Erosion on Agricultural Lands: terrace land;
employ laser leveling; create windbreaks; install water and sediment control
basins (WASCBs); develop filter strips/grassed waterways; manage mud (e.g.,
gravel high-use areas, develop paddocks); seed bare areas (OWEB may require a
grazing management plan, if appropriate, prior to release of funds. For
post-fire areas, seed only where natural regeneration is unlikely — e.g.,
on slopes of 30 percent or more — or where it can be demonstrated that
seeding would retard or prevent the spread of noxious weeds); or reduce
tillage.
(B) Manage Nutrient and Sediment Inputs to Streams
through the management of grazing, vegetation cover, animal waste, or
irrigation runoff.
(C) Manage Vegetation: prescribed burning, except when
conducted as part of a commercial harvest; non-commercial thinning;
control/remove juniper (except late-seral/old growth); plant or seed (native
upland species or native beneficial mixes preferred); or control weeds (in
conjunction with a restoration project). Projects for prescribed burning to
reduce fuel loads require ODF technical review and approval, or tribal
government review and approval for projects on Tribal Trust Lands, using a
standard OWEB form.
(D) Manage Wildlife: install water guzzlers.
(E) Employ Integrated Pest Management.
(g) Water Quantity and Quality/Irrigation Efficiency.
(A) Recharge Groundwater: roof water harvesting;
(B) Implement Irrigation Practices (e.g., pipe existing
ditch, install drip or sprinkler systems, install automated soil moisture
sensors where water and electrical savings can be documented, or recover or
eliminate tail water). Such projects must either not adversely impact the
current level of groundwater in a Groundwater Management Area, or must
measurably reduce the diversion of water at the point of diversion. As a
condition of funding, irrigation efficiency projects require local watermaster
technical review and approval, or tribal government review and approval for
projects on Tribal Trust Lands, using a standard OWEB form.
(h) Private Road Impact Reduction.
(A) Decommission Roads;
(B) Improve Surface Drainage: surface road drainage
improvements, gravel surfacing, stream crossings.
Stat. Auth.: ORS 541.396
Stats. Implemented: ORS 541.351 -
541.401
Hist.: OWEB 4-2004, f. 11-2-04,
cert. ef. 2-1-05; OWEB 3-2005, f. & cert. ef. 6-8-05; OWEB 1-2011, f. & cert. ef. 10-18-11
695-035-0060
Ineligible Small Grant Projects
(1) The Small Grant Program will not fund projects
that:
(a) Do not demonstrate a clear watershed benefit to
aquatic species, wildlife, or watershed health.
(b) Are not consistent with the local Small Grant
Team’s priority watershed concerns, as identified in their program grant
agreements with OWEB.
(c) Do not adhere to OWEB administrative rules: OAR
695-005-0010–695-005-0060, 695-035-0010–695-035-0070, and
695-050-0010–695-050-0050.
(d) Do not implement a project to restore, enhance, or
protect native fish or wildlife habitat, watershed or ecosystem functions, or
water quality.
(e) Do not use and clearly identify in the small grant
application technical guidance and standards from one of the approved sources
listed in OAR 695-035-0030(3).
(f) Are at the same location as, and are identical to,
projects that have already been funded, are currently being funded, or are
currently being considered for funding through either the Small Grant Program
or the OWEB Regular Grant Program.
(2) The following project types are ineligible for
funding through the Small Grant Program:
(a) Project planning and design not done in conjunction
with the implementation of funded restoration or enhancement activities.
(b) Routine maintenance.
(c) Trash removal.
(d) Fish screens and trash racks.
(e) Tide gate removal, replacement, or installation.
(f) Constructed stream bank armoring.
(g) Development of off-channel watering systems not
done in conjunction with fencing a riparian area or managing nutrient and
sediment inputs in upland areas.
(h) Pond cleaning and pond creation (does not include
off-channel watering systems and pump-back systems).
(i) Residential landscaping not done in conjunction
with the implementation of funded riparian restoration or enhancement
activities.
(j) Weed control not done in conjunction with the implementation
of funded restoration or enhancement activities.
(k) Projects required as a condition of a local, state,
or federal permit, order, or enforcement action (e.g., mitigation projects,
manure storage and management projects that are required by a permit from ODA).
(l) Irrigation practices that adversely impact the
current level of groundwater in a Groundwater Management Area, or do not
measurably reduce the diversion of water at the point of diversion.
(m) Irrigation water conservation projects that propose
any of the following activities:
(A) Irrigation system maintenance or renovation of
existing pipe.
(B) Restoring a system that has deteriorated due to
lack of maintenance and/or inadequate design.
(C) Portable pipe (does not include gated pipe) or
ditch cleaning.
(D) Electrical costs resulting from conversion to pump
from flood irrigation.
(n) Western juniper management that involves the
removal of late-seral/old growth juniper.
(o) Reforestation or tree planting on lands following a
commercial harvest.
(p) Prescribed burning when conducted as part of a
commercial operation.
(q) Commercial thinning.
Stat. Auth.: ORS 541.396
Stats. Implemented: ORS 541.351 -
541.401
Hist.: OWEB 4-2004, f. 11-2-04,
cert. ef. 2-1-05; OWEB 3-2005, f. & cert. ef. 6-8-05; OWEB 1-2011, f. & cert. ef. 10-18-11
Notes
1.) This online version of the OREGON BULLETIN is provided for convenience of reference and enhanced access. The official, record copy of this publication is contained in the original Administrative Orders and Rulemaking Notices filed with the Secretary of State, Archives Division. Discrepancies, if any, are satisfied in favor of the original versions. Use the OAR Revision Cumulative Index found in the Oregon Bulletin to access a numerical list of rulemaking actions after November 15, 2010.
2.) Copyright 2011 Oregon Secretary of State: Terms and Conditions of Use |