Loading
The Oregon Administrative Rules contain OARs filed through June 15, 2016
 
QUESTIONS ABOUT THE CONTENT OR MEANING OF THIS AGENCY'S RULES?
CLICK HERE TO ACCESS RULES COORDINATOR CONTACT INFORMATION

 

DEPARTMENT OF LAND CONSERVATION AND DEVELOPMENT

 

DIVISION 24

URBAN GROWTH BOUNDARIES

660-024-0000

Purpose and Applicability

(1) The rules in this division clarify procedures and requirements of Goal 14 regarding a local government adoption or amendment of an urban growth boundary (UGB). The rules in this division do not apply to the simplified UGB process under OAR chapter 660, division 38.

(2) The rules in this division interpret Goal 14 as amended by the Land Conservation and Development Commission (LCDC or commission) on or after April 28, 2005, and are not applicable to plan amendments or land use decisions governed by previous versions of Goal 14 still in effect.

(3) The rules in this division adopted on October 5, 2006, are effective April 5, 2007. The rules in this division amended on March 20, 2008, are effective April 18, 2008. The rules in this division adopted March 13, 2009, and amendments to rules in this division adopted on that date, are effective April 16, 2009, except as follows:

(a) A local government may choose to not apply this division to a plan amendment concerning the evaluation or amendment of a UGB, regardless of the date of that amendment, if the local government initiated the evaluation or amendment of the UGB prior to April 5, 2007;

(b) For purposes of this rule, "initiated" means that the local government either:

(A) Issued the public notice specified in OAR 660-018-0020 for the proposed plan amendment concerning the evaluation or amendment of the UGB; or

(B) Received LCDC approval of a periodic review work program that includes a work task to evaluate the UGB land supply or amend the UGB;

(c) A local government choice whether to apply this division must include the entire division and may not differ with respect to individual rules in the division.

(4) The rules in this division adopted on December 4, 2015, are effective January 1, 2016, except that a local government may choose to not apply the amendments to rules in this division adopted December 4, 2015 to a plan amendment concerning the amendment of a UGB, regardless of the date of that amendment, if the local government initiated the amendment of the UGB prior to January 1, 2016.

Stat. Auth.: ORS 197.040, Statewide Planning Goal 14
Stats. Implemented: ORS 195.036, 197.015, 197.295 - 197.314, 197.610 - 197.650, 197.764
Hist.: LCDD 8-2006, f. 10-19-06, cert. ef. 4-5-07; LCDD 2-2009, f. 4-8-09, cert. ef. 4-16-09; LCDD 6-2015, f. 12-29-15, cert. ef. 1-1-16

660-024-0010

Definitions

In this division, the definitions in the statewide goals and the following definitions apply:

(1) “Buildable Land” is a term applying to residential land only, and has the same meaning as provided in OAR 660-008-0005(2).

(2) "EOA" means an economic opportunities analysis carried out under OAR 660-009-0015.

(3) "Housing need" or “housing need analysis” refers to a local determination as to the needed amount, types and densities of housing that will be:

(a) Commensurate with the financial capabilities of present and future area residents of all income levels during the 20-year planning period;

(b) Consistent with any adopted regional housing standards, state statutes regarding housing need and with Goal 10 and rules interpreting that goal; and

(c) Consistent with Goal 14 requirements.

(4) "Local government" means a city or county, or a metropolitan service district described in ORS 197.015(13).

(5) "Metro boundary" means the boundary of a metropolitan service district defined in ORS 197.015(13).

(6) “Net Buildable Acre” consists of 43,560 square feet of residentially designated buildable land after excluding future rights-of-way for streets and roads.

(7) "Safe harbor" means an optional course of action that a local government may use to satisfy a requirement of Goal 14. Use of a safe harbor prescribed in this division will satisfy the requirement for which it is prescribed. A safe harbor is not the only way or necessarily the preferred way to comply with a requirement and it is not intended to interpret the requirement for any purpose other than applying a safe harbor within this division.

(8) “Suitable vacant and developed land” describes land for employment opportunities, and has the same meaning as provided in OAR 660-009-0005 section (1) for “developed land,” section (12) for “suitable,” and section (14) for “vacant land.”

(9) "UGB" means "urban growth boundary."

(10) "Urban area" means the land within a UGB.

Stat. Auth.: ORS 197.040, Statewide Planning Goal 14
Stats. Implemented: ORS 195.036, 197.015, 197.295 - 197.314, 197.610 - 197.650, 197.764
Hist.: LCDD 8-2006, f. 10-19-06, cert. ef. 4-5-07; LCDD 2-2009, f. 4-8-09, cert. ef. 4-16-09

660-024-0020

Adoption or Amendment of a UGB

(1) All statewide goals and related administrative rules are applicable when establishing or amending a UGB, except as follows:

(a) The exceptions process in Goal 2 and OAR chapter 660, division 4, is not applicable unless a local government chooses to take an exception to a particular goal requirement, for example, as provided in OAR 660-004-0010(1);

(b) Goals 3 and 4 are not applicable;

(c) Goal 5 and related rules under OAR chapter 660, division 23, apply only in areas added to the UGB, except as required under OAR 660-023-0070 and 660-023-0250;

(d) The transportation planning rule requirements under OAR 660-012-0060 need not be applied to a UGB amendment if the land added to the UGB is zoned as urbanizable land, either by retaining the zoning that was assigned prior to inclusion in the boundary or by assigning interim zoning that does not allow development that would generate more vehicle trips than development allowed by the zoning assigned prior to inclusion in the boundary;

(e) Goal 15 is not applicable to land added to the UGB unless the land is within the Willamette River Greenway Boundary;

(f) Goals 16 to 18 are not applicable to land added to the UGB unless the land is within a coastal shorelands boundary;

(g) Goal 19 is not applicable to a UGB amendment.

(2) The UGB and amendments to the UGB must be shown on the city and county plan and zone maps at a scale sufficient to determine which particular lots or parcels are included in the UGB. Where a UGB does not follow lot or parcel lines, the map must provide sufficient information to determine the precise UGB location.

Stat. Auth.: ORS 197.040, Statewide Planning Goal 14
Stats. Implemented: ORS 195.036, 197.015, 197.295 - 197.314, 197.610 - 197.650, 197.764
Hist.: LCDD 8-2006, f. 10-19-06, cert. ef. 4-5-07; LCDD 2-2009, f. 4-8-09, cert. ef. 4-16-09

660-024-0040

Land Need

(1) The UGB must be based on the appropriate 20-year population forecast for the urban area as determined under Rules in OAR 660, div 32, and must provide for needed housing, employment and other urban uses such as public facilities, streets and roads, schools, parks and open space over the 20-year planning period consistent with the land need requirements of Goal 14 and this rule. The 20-year need determinations are estimates which, although based on the best available information and methodologies, should not be held to an unreasonably high level of precision. Local governments in Crook, Deschutes or Jefferson Counties may determine the need for Regional Large-Lot Industrial Land by following the provisions of OAR 660-024-0045 for areas subject to that rule.

(2) If the UGB analysis or amendment is conducted as part of a periodic review work program, the 20-year planning period must commence on the date initially scheduled for completion of the appropriate work task. If the UGB analysis or amendment is conducted as a post-acknowledgement plan amendment under ORS 197.610 to 197.625, the 20-year planning period must commence either:

(a) On the date initially scheduled for final adoption of the amendment specified by the local government in the initial notice of the amendment required by OAR 660-018-0020; or

(b) If more recent than the date determined in subsection (a), at the beginning of the 20-year period specified in the appropriate coordinated population forecast for the urban area as determined under Rules in OAR 660, div 32, unless ORS 197.296 requires a different date for local governments subject to that statute.

(3) A local government may review and amend the UGB in consideration of one category of land need (for example, housing need) without a simultaneous review and amendment in consideration of other categories of land need (for example, employment need).

(4) The determination of 20-year residential land needs for an urban area must be consistent with the appropriate 20-year coordinated population forecast for the urban area determined under Rules in OAR 660, div 32, and with the requirements for determining housing needs in Goals 10 and 14, OAR chapter 660, division 7 or 8, and applicable provisions of ORS 197.295 to 197.314 and 197.475 to 197.490.

(5) Except for a metropolitan service district described in ORS 197.015(13), the determination of 20-year employment land need for an urban area must comply with applicable requirements of Goal 9 and OAR chapter 660, division 9, and must include a determination of the need for a short-term supply of land for employment uses consistent with 660-009-0025. Employment land need may be based on an estimate of job growth over the planning period; local government must provide a reasonable justification for the job growth estimate but Goal 14 does not require that job growth estimates necessarily be proportional to population growth. Local governments in Crook, Deschutes or Jefferson Counties may determine the need for Regional Large-Lot Industrial Land by following the provisions of 660-024-0045 for areas subject to that rule.

(6) Cities and counties may jointly conduct a coordinated regional EOA for more than one city in the county or for a defined region within one or more counties, in conformance with Goal 9, OAR chapter 660, division 9, and applicable provisions of ORS 195.025. A defined region may include incorporated and unincorporated areas of one or more counties.

(7) The determination of 20-year land needs for transportation and public facilities for an urban area must comply with applicable requirements of Goals 11 and 12, rules in OAR chapter 660, divisions 11 and 12, and public facilities requirements in ORS 197.712 and 197.768. The determination of school facility needs must also comply with 195.110 and 197.296 for local governments specified in those statutes.

(8) The following safe harbors may be applied by a local government to determine housing need under this division:

(a) A local government may estimate persons per household for the 20-year planning period using the persons per household for the urban area indicated in the most current data for the urban area published by the U.S. Census Bureau.

(b) If a local government does not regulate government-assisted housing differently than other housing types, it is not required to estimate the need for government-assisted housing as a separate housing type.

(c) If a local government allows manufactured homes on individual lots as a permitted use in all residential zones that allow 10 or fewer dwelling units per net buildable acre, it is not necessary to provide an estimate of the need for manufactured dwellings on individual lots.

(d) If a local government allows manufactured dwelling parks required by ORS 197.475 to 197.490 in all areas planned and zoned for a residential density of six to 12 units per acre, a separate estimate of the need for manufactured dwelling parks is not required.

(e) A local government outside of the Metro boundary may estimate its housing vacancy rate for the 20-year planning period using the vacancy rate in the most current data published by the U.S. Census Bureau for that urban area that includes the local government.

(f) A local government outside of the Metro boundary may determine housing needs for purposes of a UGB amendment using the combined Housing Density and Housing Mix safe harbors described in this subsection and in Table 1, or in combination with the Alternative Density safe harbor described under subsection (g) of this section and in Table 2. To meet the Housing Density safe harbor in this subsection, the local government may Assume For UGB Analysis that all buildable land in the urban area, including land added to the UGB, will develop at the applicable average overall density specified in column B of Table 1. Buildable land in the UGB, including land added to the UGB, must also be Zoned to Allow at least the average overall maximum density specified as Zone To Allow in column B of Table 1. Finally, the local government must adopt zoning that ensures buildable land in the urban area, including land added to the UGB, cannot develop at an average overall density less than the applicable Required Overall Minimum density specified in column B of Table 1. To meet the Housing Mix safe harbor in this subsection, the local government must Zone to Allow the applicable percentages of low, medium and high density residential specified in column C of Table 1.

(g) When using the safe harbor in subsection (f), a local government may choose to also use the applicable Alternative Density safe harbors for Small Exception Parcels and High Value Farm Land specified in Table 2. If a local government chooses to use the Alternative Density safe harbors described in Table 2, it must

(A) Apply the applicable Small Exception Parcel density assumption and the High Value Farm Land density assumption measures specified in the table to all buildable land that is within these categories, and

(B) Apply the Housing Density and Mix safe harbors specified in subsection (f) of this section and specified in Table 1 to all buildable land in the urban area that does not consist of Small Exception Parcels or High Value Farm Land.

(h) As an alternative to the density safe harbors in subsection (f) and, if applicable, subsection (g), of this section, a local government outside of the Metro boundary may assume that the average overall density of buildable residential land in the urban area for the 20-year planning period will increase by 25 percent over the average overall density of developed residential land in the urban area at the time the local government initiated the evaluation or amendment of the UGB. If a local government uses this Incremental Housing Density safe harbor, it must also meet the applicable Zoned to Allow density and Required Overall Minimum density requirements in Column B of Table 1 and, if applicable, Table 2, and must use the Housing Mix safe harbor in Column C of Table 1.

(i) As an alternative to the Housing Mix safe harbor required in subsection (f) of this section and in Column C of Table 1, a local government outside the Metro boundary that uses the housing density safe harbor in either subsection (f), (g) or (h) of this section may estimate housing mix using the Incremental Housing Mix safe harbor described in paragraphs (A) to (C) of this subsection, as illustrated in Table 3:

(A) Determine the existing percentages of low density, medium density, and high density housing on developed land (not “buildable land”) in the urban area at the time the local government initiated the evaluation or amendment of the UGB;

(B) Increase the percentage of medium density housing estimated in paragraph (A) of this subsection by 10 percent, increase the percentage of high density housing estimated in paragraph (A) of this subsection by five percent, as illustrated in Table 3, and decrease the percentage of low density single family housing by a proportionate amount so that the overall mix total is 100 percent, and

(C) Zone to Allow the resultant housing mix determined under subparagraphs (A) and (B) of this subsection.

(j) Tables 1, 2 and 3 are adopted as part of this rule, and the following definitions apply to terms used in the tables:

(A) “Assume For UGB Analysis” means the local government may assume that the UGB will develop over the 20-year planning period at the applicable overall density specified in Column B of Tables 1 and 2.

(B) “Attached housing” means housing where each unit shares a common wall, ceiling or floor with at least one other unit. “Attached housing” includes, but is not limited to, apartments, condominiums, and common-wall dwellings or row houses where each dwelling unit occupies a separate lot.

(C) “Average Overall Density” means the average density of all buildable land in the UGB, including buildable land already inside the UGB and buildable land added to the UGB, including land zoned for residential use that is presumed to be needed for schools, parks and other institutional uses.

(D) “Coordinated 20-year Population Forecast” and “20-year Population Forecast” under Column A of the Tables refers to the appropriate population forecast for the urban area determined under rules in OAR 660, div 32.

(E) “Density” means the number of dwelling units per net buildable acre.

(F) “High Value Farm Land” has the same meaning as the term defined in ORS 195.300(10).

(G) “Required Overall Minimum” means a minimum allowed overall average density, or a “density floor,” that must be ensured in the applicable residential zones with respect to the overall supply of buildable land for that zone in the urban area for the 20-year planning period.

(H) “Single Family Detached Housing” means a housing unit that is free standing and separate from other housing units, including mobile homes and manufactured dwellings under ORS 197.475 to 197.492.

(I) “Small Exception Parcel” means a residentially zoned parcel five acres or less with a house on it, located on land that is outside a UGB prior to a proposed UGB expansion, subject to an acknowledged exception to Goal 3 or 4 or both.

(J) “Zone To Allow” or “Zoned to Allow” means that the comprehensive plan and implementing zoning shall allow the specified housing types and densities under clear and objective standards and other requirements specified in ORS 197.307(3)(b) and (6).

(9) The following safe harbors may be applied by a local government to determine its employment needs for purposes of a UGB amendment under this rule, Goal 9, OAR chapter 660, division 9, Goal 14 and, if applicable, ORS 197.296.

(a) A local government may estimate that the current number of jobs in the urban area will grow during the 20-year planning period at a rate equal to either:

(A) The county or regional job growth rate provided in the most recent forecast published by the Oregon Employment Department; or

(B) The population growth rate for the urban area in the appropriate 20-year coordinated population forecast determined under Rules in OAR 660, div 32.

(b) A local government with a population of 10,000 or less may assume that retail and service commercial land needs will grow in direct proportion to the forecasted urban area population growth over the 20-year planning period. This safe harbor may not be used to determine employment land needs for sectors other than retail and service commercial.

(10) As a safe harbor during periodic review or other legislative review of the UGB, a local government may estimate that the 20-year land needs for streets and roads, parks and school facilities will together require an additional amount of land equal to 25 percent of the net buildable acres determined for residential land needs under section (4) of this rule, and in conformance with the definition of “Net Buildable Acre” as defined in OAR 660-024-0010(6).

Stat. Auth.: ORS 197.040, Statewide Planning Goal 14; ORS 195.033(10)
Stats. Implemented: ORS 195.036, 197.015, 197.295 - 197.314, 197.610 - 197.650, 197.764, 195.033,195.036 & OL 2013 Ch. 574, Sec. 3
Hist.: LCDD 8-2006, f. 10-19-06, cert. ef. 4-5-07; LCDD 2-2009, f. 4-8-09, cert. ef. 4-16-09; LCDD 9-2012, f. 11-26-12, cert. ef. 12-10-12; LCDD 1-2015, f. & cert. ef. 3-25-15

660-024-0045

Regional Large Lot Industrial Land

(1) Local governments in Crook, Deschutes or Jefferson Counties may determine a need for large lot industrial land in the region and provide sites to meet that need in accordance with this rule.

(2) In addition to the definitions in OAR 660-024-0010, the following definitions apply to this rule:

(a) “Analysis” means the document that determines the regional large lot industrial land need within Crook, Deschutes, or Jefferson County that is not met by the participating local governments’ comprehensive plans at the time the analysis is adopted. The analysis shall also identify necessary site characteristics of needed land.

(b) “COIC” means the Central Oregon Intergovernmental Council.

(c) “Intergovernmental Agreement (IGA)” means the document adopted by the three counties and any participating city to implement the provisions of the analysis.

(d) “Participating city” means a city within Crook, Deschutes, or Jefferson County that has adopted the analysis and entered into the intergovernmental agreement to implement the provisions of the analysis.

(e) “Participating local government” means Crook, Deschutes, and Jefferson Counties, and participating cities.

(f) “Regional large lot industrial land need” means the need for a specific type of 20-year employment land need, as described in OAR 660-024-0040(1) and (5), that is determined based upon the analysis.

(g) “Site” means land in the region that:

(A) Provides the site characteristics necessary for traded sector uses as set forth in the analysis;

(B) Is 50 acres or larger as provided in section (3) of this rule; and

(C) Is determined to be "available," as that term is defined in OAR 660-009-0025(7), for regional large-lot industrial users and for purposes identified by the analysis.

(h) “Site characteristics” has the meaning given that term in OAR 660-009-0005(1).

(i) “Traded Sector use” has the meaning given that term in ORS 285B.280.

(3) For purposes of subsection (2)(g) of this rule, a large lot is at least 50 acres if it is:

(a) A single lot, parcel that is at least 50 acres,

(b) An aggregation of existing lots or parcels under the same ownership that comprises at least 50 acres, or

(c) An aggregation of existing lots or parcels not in the same ownership created and maintained as a unit of land comprising at least 50 acres through a binding agreement among the owners.

(4) Participating local governments may adopt the analysis and implement its provisions. The analysis may demonstrate a need for six vacant, suitable and available sites in the region, and up to three additional sites that may be designated in order to replace one of the original six sites that is developed or committed to development as provided in section (12) of this rule. The original six sites must include two sites of at least 100 acres and not more than 200 acres, and one site more than 200 acres.

(5) If a participating city adopts the analysis, it is deemed to provide an adequate factual basis for the determination of regional large lot industrial land need for that city provided:

(a) The city and other participating local governments have entered into an intergovernmental agreement with the COIC, and

(b) The analysis is adopted by Crook, Deschutes and Jefferson Counties.

(6) Participating cities may adopt the analysis and enter into the intergovernmental agreement without amending the Economic Opportunities Analysis adopted by the city prior to the adoption of the analysis.

(7) The intergovernmental agreement shall describe the process by which the COIC shall coordinate with participating local governments in:

(a) The determination of a qualifying site that a participating city may designate in order to satisfy the regional large lot industrial land need; and

(b) The allocation of the qualifying sites among the participating cities in accordance with section (4) of this rule.

(8) A participating city may amend its comprehensive plan and land use regulations, including urban growth boundaries (UGB), in order to designate a site in accordance with the requirements of this rule, other applicable laws and the intergovernmental agreement, as follows:

(a) A participating city must show whether a suitable and available site is located within its existing UGB. If a participating city determines that a suitable site already exists within the city’s urban growth boundary, that site must be designated to meet the regional industrial land need. Cities shall not be required to evaluate lands within their UGB designated to meet local industrial land needs.

(b) If a site is not designated per subsection(a), then a participating city may evaluate land outside the UGB to determine if any suitable sites exist. If candidate sites are found, the city may amend its UGB in accordance with Goal 14, other applicable laws and the intergovernmental agreement.

(9) A participating city that designates a site shall apply a regional large-lot industrial zone or overlay zone to the site in order to protect and maintain the site for regional large lot purposes. The zone or overlay zone must:

(a) Include development agreements and other provisions that prevent redesignation of the site for other uses for at least 10 years from the time the site is added to the city’s comprehensive plan to meet regional large lot industrial land needs;

(b) Prohibit division or separation of lots or parcels within the site to new lots or parcels less than the minimum size of the site need until the site is developed with a primary traded sector use requiring a large lot; and

(c) Limit allowed uses on the site to the traded sector uses, except as provided in section (10) of this rule.

(10) The zone or overlay zone established under section (9) may allow:

(a) Subordinate industrial uses that rely upon and support the primary traded sector use when a site is occupied by a primary traded sector use; and

(b) Non-industrial uses serving primarily the needs of employees of industrial uses developed on the site provided the zone includes measures that limit the type, size and location of new buildings so as to ensure such non-industrial uses are intended primarily for the needs of such employees;

(11) If a participating city adds a site to its plan pursuant to this rule, it must consider the site in any subsequent urban growth boundary evaluation conducted to determine local industrial land needs and the adequacy of land available to meet local industrial land needs.

(12) A site may be considered developed or committed to industrial development if a large-lot traded sector user demonstrates a commitment to develop the site by obtaining land use approvals such as site plan review or conditional use permits, and

(a) Obtaining building permits; or

(b) Providing other evidence that demonstrates at least an equivalent commitment to industrial development of the site as is demonstrated by a building permit.

(13) The participating local governments shall review the analysis after the regional supply of six sites has either been replenished by three additional sites or after ten years, whichever comes first.

Stat. Auth.: ORS 197.040, Statewide Planning Goal 14
Stats. Implemented: ORS 195.036, 197.015, 197.295 - 197.314, 197.610 - 197.650, 197.764
Hist.: LCDD 9-2012, f. 11-26-12, cert. ef. 12-10-12

660-024-0050

Land Inventory and Response to Deficiency

(1) When evaluating or amending a UGB, a local government must inventory land inside the UGB to determine whether there is adequate development capacity to accommodate 20-year needs determined in OAR 660-024-0040. For residential land, the buildable land inventory must include vacant and redevelopable land, and be conducted in accordance with OAR 660-007-0045 or 660-008-0010, whichever is applicable, and ORS 197.296 for local governments subject to that statute. For employment land, the inventory must include suitable vacant and developed land designated for industrial or other employment use, and must be conducted in accordance with OAR 660-009-0015.

(2) As safe harbors, a local government, except a city with a population over 25,000 or a metropolitan service district described in ORS 197.015(13), may use the following assumptions to inventory the capacity of buildable lands to accommodate housing needs:

(a) The infill potential of developed residential lots or parcels of one-half acre or more may be determined by subtracting one-quarter acre (10,890 square feet) for the existing dwelling and assuming that the remainder is buildable land;

(b) Existing lots of less than one-half acre that are currently occupied by a residence may be assumed to be fully developed.

(3) As safe harbors when inventorying land to accommodate industrial and other employment needs, a local government may assume that a lot or parcel is vacant if it is:

(a) Equal to or larger than one-half acre, if the lot or parcel does not contain a permanent building; or

(b) Equal to or larger than five acres, if less than one-half acre of the lot or parcel is occupied by a permanent building.

(4) If the inventory demonstrates that the development capacity of land inside the UGB is inadequate to accommodate the estimated 20-year needs determined under OAR 660-024-0040, the local government must amend the plan to satisfy the need deficiency, either by increasing the development capacity of land already inside the city or by expanding the UGB, or both, and in accordance with ORS 197.296 where applicable. Prior to expanding the UGB, a local government must demonstrate that the estimated needs cannot reasonably be accommodated on land already inside the UGB. If the local government determines there is a need to expand the UGB, changes to the UGB must be determined by evaluating alternative boundary locations consistent with Goal 14 and applicable rules at OAR 660-024-0060 or 660-024-0065 and 660-024-0067.

(5) In evaluating an amendment of a UGB submitted under ORS 197.626, the director or the commission may determine that a difference between the estimated 20-year needs determined under OAR 660-024-0040 and the amount of land and development capacity added to the UGB by the submitted amendment is unlikely to significantly affect land supply or resource land protection, and as a result, may determine that the proposed amendment complies with section (4) of this rule.

(6) When land is added to the UGB, the local government must assign appropriate urban plan designations to the added land, consistent with the need determination and the requirements of section (7) of this rule, if applicable. The local government must also apply appropriate zoning to the added land consistent with the plan designation or may maintain the land as urbanizable land until the land is rezoned for the planned urban uses, either by retaining the zoning that was assigned prior to inclusion in the boundary or by applying other interim zoning that maintains the land's potential for planned urban development. The requirements of ORS 197.296 regarding planning and zoning also apply when local governments specified in that statute add land to the UGB.

(7) Lands included within a UGB pursuant to OAR 660-024-0065(3) to provide for a particular industrial use, or a particular public facility, must be planned and zoned for the intended use and must remain planned and zoned for that use unless the city removes the land from the UGB.

(8) As a safe harbor regarding requirements concerning “efficiency,” a local government that chooses to use the density and mix safe harbors in OAR 660-024-0040(8) is deemed to have met the Goal 14 efficiency requirements under:

(a) Sections (1) and (4) of this rule regarding evaluation of the development capacity of residential land inside the UGB to accommodate the estimated 20-year needs; and

(b) Goal 14 regarding a demonstration that residential needs cannot be reasonably accommodated on residential land already inside the UGB, but not with respect to:

(A) A demonstration that residential needs cannot be reasonably accommodated by rezoning non-residential land, and

(B) Compliance with Goal 14 Boundary Location factors.

Stat. Auth.: ORS 197.040, 197A.305, 197A.320 & 197.235, Statewide Planning Goal 14
Stats. Implemented: ORS 195.036, 197.015, 197.295 – 197.314, 197.610 – 197.650, 197.764, 197A.300 - 197A.325
Hist.: LCDD 8-2006, f. 10-19-06, cert. ef. 4-5-07; LCDD 2-2009, f. 4-8-09, cert. ef. 4-16-09; LCDD 6-2015, f. 12-29-15, cert. ef. 1-1-16

660-024-0060

Metro Boundary Location Alternatives Analysis

(1) When considering a Metro UGB amendment, Metro must determine which land to add by evaluating alternative urban growth boundary locations. For Metro, this determination must be consistent with the priority of land specified in ORS 197.298 and the boundary location factors of Goal 14, as follows:

(a) Beginning with the highest priority of land available, Metro must determine which land in that priority is suitable to accommodate the need deficiency determined under OAR 660-024-0050.

(b) If the amount of suitable land in the first priority category exceeds the amount necessary to satisfy the need deficiency, Metro must apply the location factors of Goal 14 to choose which land in that priority to include in the Metro UGB.

(c) If the amount of suitable land in the first priority category is not adequate to satisfy the identified need deficiency, Metro must determine which land in the next priority is suitable to accommodate the remaining need, and proceed using the same method specified in subsections (a) and (b) of this section until the land need is accommodated.

(d) Notwithstanding subsection (a) to (c) of this section, Metro may consider land of lower priority as specified in ORS 197.298(3).

(e) For purposes of this section, the determination of suitable land to accommodate land needs must include consideration of any suitability characteristics specified under section (5) of this rule, as well as other provisions of law applicable in determining whether land is buildable or suitable.

(2) Notwithstanding OAR 660-024-0050(4) and subsection (1)(c) of this rule, except during a legislative review of the Metro UGB, Metro may approve an application under ORS 197.610 to 197.625 for a Metro UGB amendment proposing to add an amount of land less than necessary to satisfy the land need deficiency determined under OAR 660-024-0050(4), provided the amendment complies with all other applicable requirements.

(3) The boundary location factors of Goal 14 are not independent criteria. When the factors are applied to compare alternative boundary locations and to determine the Metro UGB location, Metro must show that all the factors were considered and balanced.

(4) In determining alternative land for evaluation under ORS 197.298, "land adjacent to the UGB" is not limited to those lots or parcels that abut the UGB, but also includes land in the vicinity of the UGB that has a reasonable potential to satisfy the identified need deficiency.

(5) If Metro has specified characteristics such as parcel size, topography, or proximity that are necessary for land to be suitable for an identified need, Metro may limit its consideration to land that has the specified characteristics when it conducts the boundary location alternatives analysis and applies ORS 197.298.

(6) The adopted findings for a Metro UGB adoption or amendment must describe or map all of the alternative areas evaluated in the boundary location alternatives analysis. If the analysis involves more than one parcel or area within a particular priority category in ORS 197.298 for which circumstances are the same, these parcels or areas may be considered and evaluated as a single group.

(7) For purposes of Goal 14 Boundary Location Factor 2, "public facilities and services" means water, sanitary sewer, storm water management, and transportation facilities.

(8) The Goal 14 boundary location determination requires evaluation and comparison of the relative costs, advantages and disadvantages of alternative Metro UGB expansion areas with respect to the provision of public facilities and services needed to urbanize alternative boundary locations. This evaluation and comparison must be conducted in coordination with service providers, including the Oregon Department of Transportation (ODOT) with regard to impacts on the state transportation system. "Coordination" includes timely notice to service providers and the consideration of evaluation methodologies recommended by service providers. The evaluation and comparison must include:

(a) The impacts to existing water, sanitary sewer, storm water and transportation facilities that serve nearby areas already inside the Metro UGB;

(b) The capacity of existing public facilities and services to serve areas already inside the UGB as well as areas proposed for addition to the Metro UGB; and

(c) The need for new transportation facilities, such as highways and other roadways, interchanges, arterials and collectors, additional travel lanes, other major improvements on existing roadways and, for urban areas of 25,000 or more, the provision of public transit service.

Stat. Auth.: ORS 197.040, 197A.305, 197A.320 & 197.235, Statewide Planning Goal 14
Stats. Implemented: ORS 195.036, 197.015, 197.295 – 197.314, 197.610 – 197.650, 197.764, 197A.300 - 197A.325
Hist.: LCDD 8-2006, f. 10-19-06, cert. ef. 4-5-07; LCDD 2-2009, f. 4-8-09, cert. ef. 4-16-09; LCDD 6-2015, f. 12-29-15, cert. ef. 1-1-16

660-024-0065

Establishment of Study Area to Evaluate Land for Inclusion in the UGB

(1) When considering a UGB amendment to accommodate a need deficit identified in OAR 660-024-0050(4), a city outside of Metro must determine which land to add to the UGB by evaluating alternative locations within a “study area” established pursuant to this rule. To establish the study area, the city must first identify a “preliminary study area” which shall not include land within a different UGB or the corporate limits of a city within a different UGB. The preliminary study area shall include:

(a) All lands in the city’s acknowledged urban reserve, if any;

(b) All lands that are within the following distance from the acknowledged UGB:

(A) For cities with a UGB population less than 10,000: one-half mile;

(B) For cities with a UGB population equal to or greater than 10,000: one mile;

(c) All exception areas contiguous to an exception area that includes land within the distance specified in subsection (b) and that are within the following distance from the acknowledged UGB:

(A) For cities with a UGB population less than 10,000: one mile;

(B) For cities with a UGB population equal to or greater than 10,000: one and one-half miles;

(d) At the discretion of the city, the preliminary study area may include land that is beyond the distance specified in subsections (b) and (c).

(2) A city that initiated the evaluation or amendment of its UGB prior to January 1, 2016, may choose to identify a preliminary study area applying the standard in this section rather than section (1). For such cities, the preliminary study area shall consist of:

(a) All land adjacent to the acknowledged UGB, including all land in the vicinity of the UGB that has a reasonable potential to satisfy the identified need deficiency, and

(b) All land in the city’s acknowledged urban reserve established under OAR chapter 660, division 21, if applicable.

(3) When the primary purpose for expansion of the UGB is to accommodate a particular industrial use that requires specific site characteristics, or to accommodate a public facility that requires specific site characteristics, and the site characteristics may be found in only a small number of locations, the preliminary study area may be limited to those locations within the distance described in section (1) or (2), whichever is appropriate, that have or could be improved to provide the required site characteristics. For purposes of this section:

(a) The definition of “site characteristics” in OAR 660-009-0005(11) applies for purposes of identifying a particular industrial use.

(b) A “public facility” may include a facility necessary for public sewer, water, storm water, transportation, parks, schools, or fire protection. Site characteristics may include but are not limited to size, topography and proximity.

(4) The city may exclude land from the preliminary study area if it determines that:

(a) Based on the standards in section (7) of this rule, it is impracticable to provide necessary public facilities or services to the land;

(b) The land is subject to significant development hazards, due to a risk of:

(A) Landslides: The land consists of a landslide deposit or scarp flank that is described and mapped on the Statewide Landslide Information Database for Oregon (SLIDO) Release 3.2 Geodatabase published by the Oregon Department of Geology and Mineral Industries (DOGAMI) December 2014, provided that the deposit or scarp flank in the data source is mapped at a scale of 1:40,000 or finer. If the owner of a lot or parcel provides the city with a site-specific analysis by a certified engineering geologist demonstrating that development of the property would not be subject to significant landslide risk, the city may not exclude the lot or parcel under this paragraph;

(B) Flooding, including inundation during storm surges: the land is within the Special Flood Hazard Area (SFHA) identified on the applicable Flood Insurance Rate Map (FIRM);

(C) Tsunamis: the land is within a tsunami inundation zone established pursuant to ORS 455.446;

(c) The land consists of a significant scenic, natural, cultural or recreational resource described in this subsection:

(A) Land that is designated in an acknowledged comprehensive plan prior to initiation of the UGB amendment, or that is mapped on a published state or federal inventory at a scale sufficient to determine its location for purposes of this rule, as:

(i) Critical or essential habitat for a species listed by a state or federal agency as threatened or endangered;

(ii) Core habitat for Greater Sage Grouse; or

(iii) Big game migration corridors or winter range, except where located on lands designated as urban reserves or exception areas;

(B) Federal Wild and Scenic Rivers and State Scenic Waterways, including Related Adjacent Lands described by ORS 390.805, as mapped by the applicable state or federal agency responsible for the scenic program;

(C) Designated Natural Areas on the Oregon State Register of Natural Heritage Resources;

(D) Wellhead protection areas described under OAR 660-023-0140 and delineated on a local comprehensive plan;

(E) Aquatic areas subject to Statewide Planning Goal 16 that are in a Natural or Conservation management unit designated in an acknowledged comprehensive plan;

(F) Lands subject to acknowledged comprehensive plan or land use regulations that implement Statewide Planning Goal 17, Coastal Shoreland, Use Requirement 1;

(G) Lands subject to acknowledged comprehensive plan or land use regulations that implement Statewide Planning Goal 18, Implementation Requirement 2;

(d) The land is owned by the federal government and managed primarily for rural uses.

(5) After excluding land from the preliminary study area under section (4), the city must adjust the area, if necessary, so that it includes an amount of land that is at least twice the amount of land needed for the deficiency determined under OAR 660-024-0050(4) or, if applicable, twice the particular land need described in section (3). Such adjustment shall be made by expanding the distance specified under the applicable section (1) or (2) and applying section (4) to the expanded area.

(6) For purposes of evaluating the priority of land under OAR 660-024-0067, the “study area” shall consist of all land that remains in the preliminary study area described in section (1), (2) or (3) of this rule after adjustments to the area based on sections (4) and (5), provided that when a purpose of the UGB expansion is to accommodate a public park need, the city must also consider whether land excluded under subsection (4)(a) through (c) of this rule can reasonably accommodate the park use.

(7) For purposes of subsection (4)(a), the city may consider it impracticable to provide necessary public facilities or services to the following lands:

(a) Contiguous areas of at least five acres where 75 percent or more of the land has a slope of 25 percent or greater, provided that contiguous areas 20 acres or more that are less than 25 percent slope may not be excluded under this subsection. Slope shall be measured as the increase in elevation divided by the horizontal distance at maximum ten-foot contour intervals;

(b) Land that is isolated from existing service networks by physical, topographic, or other impediments to service provision such that it is impracticable to provide necessary facilities or services to the land within the planning period. The city’s determination shall be based on an evaluation of:

(A) The likely amount of development that could occur on the land within the planning period;

(B) The likely cost of facilities and services; and,

(C) Any substantial evidence collected by or presented to the city regarding how similarly situated land in the region has, or has not, developed over time.

(c) As used in this section, “impediments to service provision” may include but are not limited to:

(A) Major rivers or other water bodies that would require new bridge crossings to serve planned urban development;

(B) Topographic features such as canyons or ridges with slopes exceeding 40 percent and vertical relief of greater than 80 feet;

(C) Freeways, rail lines, or other restricted access corridors that would require new grade separated crossings to serve planned urban development;

(D) Significant scenic, natural, cultural or recreational resources on an acknowledged plan inventory and subject to protection measures under the plan or implementing regulations, or on a published state or federal inventory, that would prohibit or substantially impede the placement or construction of necessary public facilities and services.

(8) Land may not be excluded from the preliminary study area based on a finding of impracticability that is primarily a result of existing development patterns. However, a city may forecast development capacity for such land as provided in OAR 660-024-0067(1)(d).

(9) Notwithstanding OAR 660-024-0050(4) and section (1) of this rule, except during periodic review or other legislative review of the UGB, the city may approve an application under ORS 197.610 to 197.625 for a UGB amendment to add an amount of land less than necessary to satisfy the land need deficiency determined under OAR 660-024-0050(4), provided the amendment complies with all other applicable requirements.

Stat. Auth.: ORS 197.040, 197A.305, 197A.320 & 197.235, Statewide Planning Goal 14
Stats. Implemented: ORS 195.036, 197.015, 197.295 – 197.314, 197.610 – 197.650, 197.764, 197A.300 - 197A.325
Hist.: LCDD 6-2015, f. 12-29-15, cert. ef. 1-1-16

660-024-0067

Evaluation of Land in the Study Area for Inclusion in the UGB; Priorities

(1) A city considering a UGB amendment must decide which land to add to the UGB by evaluating all land in the study area determined under OAR 660-024-0065, as follows

(a) Beginning with the highest priority category of land described in section (2), the city must apply section (5) to determine which land in that priority category is suitable to satisfy the need deficiency determined under OAR 660-024-0050 and select for inclusion in the UGB as much of the land as necessary to satisfy the need.

(b) If the amount of suitable land in the first priority category is not sufficient to satisfy all the identified need deficiency, the city must apply section (5) to determine which land in the next priority is suitable and select for inclusion in the UGB as much of the suitable land in that priority as necessary to satisfy the need. The city must proceed in this manner until all the land need is satisfied, except as provided in OAR 660-024-0065(9).

(c) If the amount of suitable land in a particular priority category in section (2) exceeds the amount necessary to satisfy the need deficiency, the city must choose which land in that priority to include in the UGB by applying the criteria in section (7) of this rule.

(d) In evaluating the sufficiency of land to satisfy a need under this section, the city may use the factors identified in sections (5) and (6) of this rule to reduce the forecast development capacity of the land to meet the need.

(e) Land that is determined to not be suitable under section (5) of this rule to satisfy the need deficiency determined under OAR 660-024-0050 is not required to be selected for inclusion in the UGB unless its inclusion is necessary to serve other higher priority lands.

(2) Priority of Land for inclusion in a UGB:

(a) First Priority is urban reserve, exception land, and nonresource land. Lands in the study area that meet the description in paragraphs (A) through (C) of this subsection are of equal (first) priority:

(A) Land designated as an urban reserve under OAR chapter 660, division 21, in an acknowledged comprehensive plan;

(B) Land that is subject to an acknowledged exception under ORS 197.732; and

(C) Land that is nonresource land.

(b) Second Priority is marginal land: land within the study area that is designated as marginal land under ORS 197.247 (1991 Edition) in the acknowledged comprehensive plan.

(c) Third Priority is forest or farm land that is not predominantly high-value farm land: land within the study area that is designated for forest or agriculture uses in the acknowledged comprehensive plan and that is not predominantly high-value farmland as defined in ORS 195.300, or that does not consist predominantly of prime or unique soils, as determined by the United States Department of Agriculture Natural Resources Conservation Service (USDA NRCS). In selecting which lands to include to satisfy the need, the city must use the agricultural land capability classification system or the cubic foot site class system, as appropriate for the acknowledged comprehensive plan designation, to select lower capability or cubic foot site class lands first.

(d) Fourth Priority is agricultural land that is predominantly high-value farmland: land within the study area that is designated as agricultural land in an acknowledged comprehensive plan and is predominantly high-value farmland as defined in ORS 195.300. A city may not select land that is predominantly made up of prime or unique farm soils, as defined by the USDA NRCS, unless there is an insufficient amount of other land to satisfy its land need. In selecting which lands to include to satisfy the need, the city must use the agricultural land capability classification system to select lower capability lands first.

(3) Notwithstanding section (2)(c) or (d) of this rule, land that would otherwise be excluded from a UGB may be included if:

(a) The land contains a small amount of third or fourth priority land that is not important to the commercial agricultural enterprise in the area and the land must be included in the UGB to connect a nearby and significantly larger area of land of higher priority for inclusion within the UGB; or

(b) The land contains a small amount of third or fourth priority land that is not predominantly high-value farmland or predominantly made up of prime or unique farm soils and the land is completely surrounded by land of higher priority for inclusion into the UGB.

(4) For purposes of categorizing and evaluating land pursuant tosubsections (2)(c) and (d) and section (3) of this rule,

(a) Areas of land not larger than 100 acres may be grouped together and studied as a single unit of land;

(b) Areas of land larger than 100 acres that are similarly situated and have similar soils may be grouped together provided soils of lower agricultural or forest capability may not be grouped with soils of higher capability in a manner inconsistent with the intent of section (2) of this rule, which requires that higher capability resource lands shall be the last priority for inclusion in a UGB;

(c) Notwithstanding subsection (4)(a), if a city initiated the evaluation or amendment of its UGB prior to January 1, 2016, and if the analysis involves more than one lot or parcel or area within a particular priority category for which circumstances are reasonably similar, these lots, parcels and areas may be considered and evaluated as a single group;

(d) When determining whether the land is predominantly high-value farmland, or predominantly prime or unique, “predominantly” means more than 50 percent.

(5) With respect to section (1), a city must assume that vacant or partially vacant land in a particular priority category is “suitable” to satisfy a need deficiency identified in OAR 660-024-0050(4) unless it demonstrates that the land cannot satisfy the specified need based on one or more of the conditions described in subsections (a) through (g) of this section: Existing parcelization, lot sizes or development patterns of rural residential land make that land unsuitable for an identified employment need; as follows:

(A) Parcelization: the land consists primarily of parcels 2-acres or less in size, or

(B) Existing development patterns: the land cannot be reasonably redeveloped or infilled within the planning period due to the location of existing structures and infrastructure.”

(b) The land would qualify for exclusion from the preliminary study area under the factors in OAR 660-024-0065(4) but the city declined to exclude it pending more detailed analysis.

(c) The land is, or will be upon inclusion in the UGB, subject to natural resources protections under Statewide Planning Goal 5 such that that no development capacity should be forecast on that land to meet the land need deficiency.

(d) With respect to needed industrial uses only, the land is over 10 percent slope, or is an existing lot or parcel that is smaller than 5 acres in size, or both. Slope shall be measured as the increase in elevation divided by the horizontal distance at maximum ten-foot contour intervals.

(e) With respect to a particular industrial use or particular public facility use described in OAR 660-024-0065(3), the land does not have, and cannot be improved to provide, one or more of the required specific site characteristics.

(f) The land is subject to a conservation easement described in ORS 271.715 that prohibits urban development.

(g) The land is committed to a use described in this subsection and the use is unlikely to be discontinued during the planning period:

(A) Public park, church, school, or cemetery, or

(B) Land within the boundary of an airport designated for airport uses, but not including land designated or zoned for residential, commercial or industrial uses in an acknowledged comprehensive plan.

(6) For vacant or partially vacant lands added to the UGB to provide for residential uses:

(a) Existing lots or parcels one acre or less may be assumed to have a development capacity of one dwelling unit per lot or parcel. Existing lots or parcels greater than one acre but less than two acres shall be assumed to have an aggregate development capacity of two dwelling units per acre.

(b) In any subsequent review of a UGB pursuant to this division, the city may use a development assumption for land described in subsection (a) of this section for a period of up to 14 years from the date the lands were added to the UGB.

(7) Pursuant to subsection (1)(c), if the amount of suitable land in a particular priority category under section (2) exceeds the amount necessary to satisfy the need deficiency, the city must choose which land in that priority to include in the UGB by first applying the boundary location factors of Goal 14 and then applying applicable criteria in the acknowledged comprehensive plan and land use regulations acknowledged prior to initiation of the UGB evaluation or amendment. The city may not apply local comprehensive plan criteria that contradict the requirements of the boundary location factors of Goal 14. The boundary location factors are not independent criteria; when the factors are applied to compare alternative boundary locations and to determine the UGB location the city must show that it considered and balanced all the factors. The criteria in this section may not be used to select lands designated for agriculture or forest use that have higher land capability or cubic foot site class, as applicable, ahead of lands that have lower capability or cubic foot site class.

(8) The city must apply the boundary location factors of Goal 14 in coordination with service providers and state agencies, including the Oregon Department of Transportation (ODOT) with respect to Factor 2 regarding impacts on the state transportation system, and the Oregon Department of Fish and Wildlife (ODFW) and the Department of State Lands (DSL) with respect to Factor 3 regarding environmental consequences. “Coordination” includes timely notice to agencies and service providers and consideration of any recommended evaluation methodologies.

(9) In applying Goal 14 Boundary Location Factor 2 to evaluate alternative locations under section (7), the city must compare relative costs, advantages and disadvantages of alternative UGB expansion areas with respect to the provision of public facilities and services needed to urbanize alternative boundary locations. For purposes of this section, the term “public facilities and services” means water, sanitary sewer, storm water management, and transportation facilities. The evaluation and comparison under Boundary Location Factor 2 must consider:

(a) The impacts to existing water, sanitary sewer, storm water and transportation facilities that serve nearby areas already inside the UGB;

(b) The capacity of existing public facilities and services to serve areas already inside the UGB as well as areas proposed for addition to the UGB; and

(c) The need for new transportation facilities, such as highways and other roadways, interchanges, arterials and collectors, additional travel lanes, other major improvements on existing roadways and, for urban areas of 25,000 or more, the provision of public transit service.

(10) The adopted findings for UGB amendment must describe or map all of the alternative areas evaluated in the boundary location alternatives analysis.

Stat. Auth.: ORS 197.040, 197A.305, 197A.320 & 197.235, Statewide Planning Goal 14
Stats. Implemented: ORS 195.036, 197.015, 197.295 – 197.314, 197.610 – 197.650, 197.764, 197A.300 - 197A.325
Hist.: LCDD 6-2015, f. 12-29-15, cert. ef. 1-1-16

660-024-0070

UGB Adjustments

(1) A local government may adjust the UGB at any time to better achieve the purposes of Goal 14 and this division. Such adjustment may occur by adding or removing land from the UGB, or by exchanging land inside the UGB for land outside the UGB. The requirements of section (2) of this rule apply when removing land from the UGB. The requirements of Goal 14 and this division[and ORS 197.298] apply when land is added to the UGB, including land added in exchange for land removed. The requirements of ORS 197.296 may also apply when land is added to a UGB, as specified in that statute. If a local government exchanges land inside the UGB for land outside the UGB, the applicable local government must adopt appropriate rural zoning designations for the land removed from the UGB prior to or at the time of adoption of the UGB amendment and must apply applicable location and priority provisions of OAR 660-024-0060 through 660-020-0067.

(2) A local government may remove land from a UGB following the procedures and requirements of ORS 197.764. Alternatively, a local government may remove land from the UGB following the procedures and requirements of 197.610 to 197.650, provided it determines:

(a) The removal of land would not violate applicable statewide planning goals and rules;

(b) The UGB would provide a 20-year supply of land for estimated needs after the land is removed, or would provide roughly the same supply of buildable land as prior to the removal, taking into consideration land added to the UGB at the same time;

(c) Public facilities agreements adopted under ORS 195.020 do not intend to provide for urban services on the subject land unless the public facilities provider agrees to removal of the land from the UGB and concurrent modification of the agreement;

(d) Removal of the land does not preclude the efficient provision of urban services to any other buildable land that remains inside the UGB; and

(e) The land removed from the UGB is planned and zoned for rural use consistent with all applicable laws.

(3) Notwithstanding sections (1) and (2) of this rule, a local government considering an exchange of land may rely on the land needs analysis that provided a basis for its current acknowledged plan, rather than adopting a new need analysis, provided:

(a) The amount of buildable land added to the UGB to meet:

(A) A specific type of residential need is substantially equivalent to the amount of buildable residential land removed, or

(B) The amount of employment land added to the UGB to meet an employment need is substantially equivalent to the amount of employment land removed, and

(b) The local government must apply comprehensive plan designations and, if applicable, urban zoning to the land added to the UGB, such that the land added is designated:

(A) For the same residential uses and at the same housing density as the land removed from the UGB, or

(B) For the same employment uses as allowed on the land removed from the UGB, or

(C) If the land exchange is intended to provide for a particular industrial use that requires specific site characteristics, only land zoned for commercial or industrial use may be removed, and the land added must be zoned for the particular industrial use and meet other applicable requirements of ORS 197A.320(6).

Stat. Auth.: ORS 197.040, 197A.305, 197A.320 & 197.235, Statewide Planning Goal 14
Stats. Implemented: ORS 195.036, 197.015, 197.295 – 197.314, 197.610 – 197.650, 197.764, 197A.300 - 197A.325
Hist.: LCDD 8-2006, f. 10-19-06, cert. ef. 4-5-07; LCDD 2-2009, f. 4-8-09, cert. ef. 4-16-09; LCDD 6-2015, f. 12-29-15, cert. ef. 1-1-16

660-024-0080

LCDC Review Required for UGB Amendments

A metropolitan service district that amends its UGB to include more than 100 acres, or a city with a population of 2,500 or more within its UGB that amends the UGB to include more than 50 acres shall submit the amendment to the Commission in the manner provided for periodic review under ORS 197.628 to 197.650 and OAR 660-025-0175.

Stat. Auth.: ORS 197.040, Other Auth. Statewide Planning Goal 14
Stats. Implemented: ORS 197.626
Hist.: LCDD 2-2009, f. 4-8-09, cert. ef. 4-16-09

The official copy of an Oregon Administrative Rule is contained in the Administrative Order filed at the Archives Division, 800 Summer St. NE, Salem, Oregon 97310. Any discrepancies with the published version are satisfied in favor of the Administrative Order. The Oregon Administrative Rules and the Oregon Bulletin are copyrighted by the Oregon Secretary of State. Terms and Conditions of Use